ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01528072Updated Jan 29, 2020Results posted

Dynesys Spinal System Post Market 522 Study

An interventional study of Dynesys Spinal System in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Pseudoarthrosis, sponsored by Zimmer Biomet. Terminated at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-29.

Sponsored by Zimmer Biomet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Terminated at request of FDA
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
153
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and fusion rates following posterior lateral fusion with the Dynesys Spinal System used as an adjunct to fusion and compare to literature control.

Read the detailed description

Study is meant to assess the safety and fusion rates following posterior lateral fusion with the Dynesys Spinal System.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
  • Pseudoarthrosis

Keywords

  • Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System
  • Spondylolithesis
  • pseudoarthrosis
  • neurologic impairment
  • failed fusion
03

In context

Pseudarthrosis

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudarthrosis; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 153 is above the median of 22 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Pseudarthrosis.

Browse Pseudarthrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Zimmer Biomet is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Skeletally mature between the ages of 20-80
  2. Candidate for posterior lateral fusion between T1-S1 with autograft
  3. Degenerative spondylolisthesis with evidence of neurologic impairment or failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis)
  4. Symptoms of leg and/or back pain
  5. Non-responsive to conservative/non-surgical treatment for at least three (3) months
  6. Must be willing and able to comply with study requirements; including complete necessary study paperwork and return for required follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active systemic or local infection
  2. Obesity
  3. Use of interbody device
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Mental illness
  6. Incarceration
  7. Alcohol or drug abuse
  8. Severe osteoporosis or osteopenia
  9. Use in the cervical spine
  10. Sensitivities/allergy to metals, polymers, polyethylene, polycarbonate urethane and polyethylene terephthalate
  11. Soft tissue deficit not allowing sound closure
  12. Any medical or physical condition that would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery
  13. Congenital abnormalities, tumors or other conditions that would prevent secure component fixation that has the potential to decrease the useful life of the device
  14. Active or other significant medical comorbidities
  15. Any medical or mental condition which would put the patient at high risk due to the severity of surgery
  16. Inadequate pedicles of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral vertebrae
  17. Patient unwilling or unable to follow postoperative instructions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
153 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dynesys System

    All patients will receive the Dynesys System and all patients will be compared to historical literature control. Dynesys Spinal System will be used for all subjects.

    Device: Dynesys Spinal System

Interventions

  • DeviceDynesys Spinal System

    Dynesys Spinal System will be used for all subjects

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fusion Rates

    Fusion was defined by meeting three criteria: * rotation \< 5° between motion segments on flexion-extension radiographs * translation \< 3 mm between motion segments on flexion-extension radiographs * presence of bridging bone. Fusion assessment for each patient was categorized as one of the four defined outcomes: fused, not fused, partial fusion, or UA (unable to assess). Efficacy was confirmed by the achievement of fusion in the experimental group when compared to the rate established in a literature control.

    Time frame: 24 months post surgery date

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Early termination lead to a significant subset of subjects to not make it to the final follow up time interval. This resulted in small numbers of subjects analyzed for fusion and literature control was not used as planned originally in protocol.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDynesys System
Started140
Completed66
Not completed74
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5
Withdrew: Physician decision1
Withdrew: Determined not eligible by aeac1
Withdrew: Missed visit2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Explanted2
Withdrew: Site closure4
Withdrew: Death2
Withdrew: Early termination of study52

Outcome measures

PrimaryFusion Rates

Fusion was defined by meeting three criteria: * rotation \< 5° between motion segments on flexion-extension radiographs * translation \< 3 mm between motion segments on flexion-extension radiographs * presence of bridging bone. Fusion assessment for each patient was categorized as one of the four defined outcomes: fused, not fused, partial fusion, or UA (unable to assess). Efficacy was confirmed by the achievement of fusion in the experimental group when compared to the rate established in a literature control.

Time frame:
24 months post surgery date
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Fusion Rates
ParticipantsDynesys System
Proportion fused33
Proportion not fused19
Proportion with Partial Fusion5
Proportion unable to assess4

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time of surgery through the participants last visit; up to 48months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dynesys System2/139 (1.4%)33/139 (23.7%)71/139 (51.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventDynesys System
RadiculitisNervous system disorders5/139
Other- Adjacent level diseaseMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/139
Other- Spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/139
Intracranial hemorrhageNervous system disorders2/139
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/139
Other- Total hip arthoroplastyMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/139
AcidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/139
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders1/139
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/139
Coronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disorders1/139
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventDynesys System
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders10/139
Intraoperative neurological injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/139
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/139
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/139
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/139
NeuralgiaNervous system disorders5/139
ParesthesiaNervous system disorders4/139
Other- Pain low backNervous system disorders4/139
Buttock painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/139
RadiculitisNervous system disorders3/139

Baseline characteristics

Baseline variables were summarized for all subjects who were eligible, enrolled in the study and underwent a surgical procedure where the Dynesys® Spinal System was implanted.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Dynesys System
Mean63.9 ± 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dynesys System
Female88
Male51
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Dynesys System
Height
Height(inches)Dynesys System
Mean65.7 ± 3.7
Weight
Weight(pounds)Dynesys System
Mean184.6 ± 39.6
BMI
BMI((kg/mg^2))Dynesys System
Mean30 ± 5.4
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Neurological Surgery of Southern Ill
    Belleville, Illinois 62226, United States
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Pine Heights Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21229, United States
  • NYU - Center for Musculoskeletal Care
    New York, New York 10003, United States
  • Riverhills Healthcare, Inc
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, United States
  • Allegheny General Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
  • OrthopaediCare
    Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090, United States
  • Danville Orthopedics and Spine
    Danville, Virginia 24541, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01528072
Lead sponsor
Zimmer Biomet
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2012
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Apr 2017
Completion
Apr 2017
Results posted
Jan 29, 2020
Last update
Jan 29, 2020

Study contacts

Joel Batts
study director · Zimmer Biomet Spine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion