ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01523054Updated Feb 1, 2012

Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial Infarction. A PK/PD Study

A Phase 1 interventional study of Metoprolol- Toprol XL and Metoprolol- Lopressor in Acute Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-01.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study was to compare treatment with two different oral formulations of metoprolol, metoprolol immediate release (IR) and metoprolol extended release (CR/XL) in patients with acute myocardial infarction regarding the following:

Pharmacokinetics, peak and trough plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration curve.

Pharmacodynamics, hourly means of Holter recorded heart rate. Tolerability. An open, randomised design with two parallel groups was employed.

Read the detailed description

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study comparing metoprolol IR and metoprolol CR/XL subsequent to initial treatment with intravenous and/or oral metoprolol in patients with suspected acut myocardial infarction

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • metoprolol, acute myocardial infarction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,498 studies on the registry; 269 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients admitted to the CCU with suspected acute myocardial infarction
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Treated with and tolerated the full dose of metoprolol IR 50 mr four times daily or metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg once daily on study day 1
  • Expected to stay in the CCU until the morning of study day 4
  • Sinus rhythm on the day of admission and at randomisation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or childbearing potential without adequate contraception
  • Participation in a clinical study during the last 30 days or previous randomisation in the present study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metoprolol- Toprol XL

    Metoprolol extended release (CR/XL) tablet 200 mg once daily

    Drug: Metoprolol- Toprol XL

  • Active comparator
    Metoprolol- Lopressor

    Metoprolol immediate release (IR) tablet

    Drug: Metoprolol- Lopressor

Interventions

  • DrugMetoprolol- Toprol XL

    Extended release tablet, 200mg once daily for 4 days

  • Immediate release tablet, Day 1 50 mg four times daily, Day 2, 3 and 4 100 mg twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pharmacokinetic profile in terms of Cmax, Cmin, AUC

    Assesment following multiple dosing of metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg once daily, or multiple dosing of metoprolol IR 200 mg daily in divided doses

    Time frame: Treatment duration: 4 days

  2. Pharmacodynamics in terms of Hourly means of heart rate (Holter recorded)

    Assesment following multiple dosing of metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg once daily, or multiple dosing of metoprolol IR 200 mg daily in divided doses

    Time frame: Treatment duration: 4 days

  3. Safety profile in terms of adverse events

    Time frame: Treatment duration: 4 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2000, a primary completion of Apr 2002 and a completion of Apr 2002. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2012
First posted
Feb 1, 2012
Start
Feb 2000
Primary completionActual
Apr 2002
CompletionActual
Apr 2002
Last update
Feb 1, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01523054
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2012
Start date
Feb 2000
Primary completion
Apr 2002
Completion
Apr 2002
Last update
Feb 1, 2012

Study contacts

Dag Elmfeldt, MD, PHD
study director · AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion