ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01507545Updated May 6, 2022Results posted

Morphotek Investigation in Colorectal Cancer: Research of MORAb-004 (MICRO)

A Phase 2 interventional study of MORAb-004 and Placebo in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Morphotek. Terminated at 67 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-06.

Sponsored by Morphotek (part of Eisai Co., Ltd.) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
By the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 due to futility.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether therapy with MORAb-004 is effective and safe in the treatment of metastatic, colorectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Tumor endothelial marker-1 also referred to as TEM-1 is expressed in the supportive tissue, as well as, on the cells within the tumor. TEM-1, which is a cell surface glycoprotein, and is expressed in the stromal compartment (cells) of nearly all human tumors. In preclinical studies, it has been shown that TEM-1 plays a key role in tumor growth and the vascularization of tumors. There is evidence suggesting an association between the level of TEM-1, 7, 7R, 8 in relation to lymph node involvement and disease progression. MORAb-004 is a humanized immunoglobulin G (IgG1/κ) antibody directed against endosialin/TEM-1. Nonclinical pharmacological studies showed that MORAb-004 has the ability to block specific TEM-1 receptor-ligand interactions. Immunohistochemistry studies of human tumor biopsy samples demonstrate TEM-1 expression and MORAb-004 binding to tumor stromal cells, in particular mural cell compartment of neovessels and cancer-associated fibroblasts. All of which suggests a potential effective treatment. Researchers hypothesize that an antibody therapy that binds to TEM-1 may be efficacious in the treatment of metastatic, colorectal cancer. This clinical study is a proof of concept study to see if an anti-TEM-1 agent is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic, colorectal cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • mCRC
  • chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,734 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 154 is above the median of 77 across 4,222 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Morphotek is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females >18 years old
  • Diagnosis of metastatic, colorectal cancer
  • Significant medical conditions must be well-controlled and stable for at least 30 days prior to the first treatment infusion
  • Be willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No prior treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
  • Other serious systemic diseases (bacterial or fungal)
  • Clinically significant heart disease or an arrhythmia on an ECG within the past 6 months
  • Known allergic reaction to monoclonal antibody therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
154 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    MORAb-004

    Drug: MORAb-004 · Other: Best supportive care

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo · Other: Best supportive care

Interventions

  • MORAb-004 8mg per kg IV once a week

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo - normal saline IV once a week

  • OtherBest supportive care

    Best supportive care to improve quality of life

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 was defined as the time (in weeks) from the date of randomization to the date of the first observation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. If progression or death was not observed for a participant, the PFS time was censored at the date of last tumor assessment without evidence of progression prior to the date of initiation of further antitumor treatment. PFS was summarized for each treatment group using Kaplan-Meier estimation curves.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first observation of PD or death due to any cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause. OS was summarized for each treatment group using Kaplan-Meier estimation curves. In the absence of death confirmation or for participants alive at the time of analysis, the survival time was censored at the last date known to be alive.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects achieving either CR or PR using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of CR or PR (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)

  3. Time to Tumor Response (TTR)

    Time to tumor response was defined for those participants with objective evidence of confirmed CR or PR as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)

  4. Duration of Response (DOR)

    The DOR was defined as the time from first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From the date of first objective response (CR or PR) to objective tumor progression or death regardless of cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)

  5. Biomarkers Based PFS, Within Treatment Group

    The statistical evidence to support the use of the biomarker identified in Stage 1 interim analysis for Stage 2 selection of participants as designed was not adequate to clearly define a biomarker responsive population. The study was terminated by the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 and enrollment of stage 2 did not occur due to futility, hence Stage 2 and biomarker based analysis for PFS was not carried out.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to approximately 1 year 7 months

  6. Biomarkers Based OS, Within Treatment Group

    The statistical evidence to support the use of the biomarker identified in Stage 1 interim analysis for Stage 2 selection of participants as designed was not adequate to clearly define a biomarker responsive population. The study was terminated by the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 and enrollment of stage 2 did not occur due to futility, hence Stage 2 and biomarker based analysis for OS was not carried out.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to approximately 1 year 7 months

07

Results

Posted May 6, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated by the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 due to futility, hence Stage 2 was not carried out.

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at 61 investigative sites in the United States from 27 March 2012 to 20 October 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Started8442
Treated/safety set8240
Completed00
Not completed8442
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject62
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Discontinuation of the study by sponsor119
Withdrew: Progressive disease6027
Withdrew: Other64

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 was defined as the time (in weeks) from the date of randomization to the date of the first observation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. If progression or death was not observed for a participant, the PFS time was censored at the date of last tumor assessment without evidence of progression prior to the date of initiation of further antitumor treatment. PFS was summarized for each treatment group using Kaplan-Meier estimation curves.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the date of the first observation of PD or death due to any cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
weeksMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)8.1 (7.9 to 8.1)8.1 (8.0 to 8.3)
Statistical analysis
  • MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSC vs Placebo + BSC · One-sided log-rank test · p = 0.7335 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.67
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause. OS was summarized for each treatment group using Kaplan-Meier estimation curves. In the absence of death confirmation or for participants alive at the time of analysis, the survival time was censored at the last date known to be alive.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Overall Survival (OS)4.8 (3.7 to 6.2)6.2 (4.7 to 9.7)
Statistical analysis
  • MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSC vs Placebo + BSC · One-sided log-rank test · p = 0.9498 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.43 · 95% CI 0.93 to 2.19
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects achieving either CR or PR using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the first documentation of CR or PR (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Overall Response Rate (ORR)0 (0.000 to 4.296)2.4 (0.060 to 12.566)
Statistical analysis
  • MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSC vs Placebo + BSC · Fisher Exact · p = 0.333 · Difference of arms: -2.4 · 95% CI -6.992 to 2.230
SecondaryTime to Tumor Response (TTR)

Time to tumor response was defined for those participants with objective evidence of confirmed CR or PR as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Tumor Response (TTR)
weeksMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Time to Tumor Response (TTR)—NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

The DOR was defined as the time from first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From the date of first objective response (CR or PR) to objective tumor progression or death regardless of cause (up to approximately 1 year 7 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Duration of Response (DOR)
weeksMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Duration of Response (DOR)—NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryBiomarkers Based PFS, Within Treatment Group

The statistical evidence to support the use of the biomarker identified in Stage 1 interim analysis for Stage 2 selection of participants as designed was not adequate to clearly define a biomarker responsive population. The study was terminated by the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 and enrollment of stage 2 did not occur due to futility, hence Stage 2 and biomarker based analysis for PFS was not carried out.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization up to approximately 1 year 7 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryBiomarkers Based OS, Within Treatment Group

The statistical evidence to support the use of the biomarker identified in Stage 1 interim analysis for Stage 2 selection of participants as designed was not adequate to clearly define a biomarker responsive population. The study was terminated by the sponsor at the end of Stage 1 and enrollment of stage 2 did not occur due to futility, hence Stage 2 and biomarker based analysis for OS was not carried out.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization up to approximately 1 year 7 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over From the date of randomization of the study drug up to 45 days after the last infusion of study drug (approximately up to 1 year 7 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSC13/82 (15.9%)31/82 (37.8%)77/82 (93.9%)
Placebo + BSC4/40 (10%)15/40 (37.5%)40/40 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent serious events
EventMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
Neoplasm MalignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)7/822/40
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders5/822/40
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/822/40
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/820/40
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders3/820/40
Small Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders3/820/40
Hepatic FailureHepatobiliary disorders3/820/40
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/821/40
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/821/40
Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/821/40
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 211
Most frequent other events
EventMORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSC
FatigueGeneral disorders43/8219/40
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders32/8214/40
Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders28/8211/40
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders22/8213/40
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders20/829/40
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders17/829/40
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders12/829/40
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders16/828/40
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations4/828/40
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/828/40

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment assigned by the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) or Interactive Web Response System (IWRS).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSCTotal
Mean61.4 ± 11.7261.8 ± 10.6161.5 ± 11.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSCTotal
Female431659
Male412667
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSCTotal
Hispanic or Latino617
Not Hispanic or Latino7540115
Unknown or Not Reported314
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MORAb-004 8.0 mg/kg + BSCPlacebo + BSCTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native112
Asian426
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American336
White7436110
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported202
08

Study locations

67 sites
  • Central Hem/Onc Medical Group, Inc.
    Alhambra, California 91801, United States
  • Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Providence St. Joseph Medical Center-Disney Family Cancer Center
    Burbank, California 91505, United States
  • St. Jude Heritage Healthcare
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • The Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Cancer Center Northridge Hospital Medical Center
    Northridge, California 91328, United States
  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Sacramento, California, United States
  • Sharp Memorial Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • CPMCRI / Pacific Hematology Oncology Associates
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Central Coast Medical Oncology
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Colorado Cancer Research Program
    Denver, Colorado 80224, United States
  • St. Mary's Hospital Regional Cancer Center
    Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, United States
  • Lutheran Hematology & Oncology
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, United States
  • Christiana Care Health Services
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Georgetown University
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Florida Hematology/Oncology
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Integrated Community Oncology Network / Cancer Specialists of North Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Compass Research, LLC
    Orange City, Florida 32763, United States
  • Hematology Oncology Associates of the Treasure Coast
    Port Saint Lucie, Florida 34952, United States
  • Cancer Care Centers of Brevard
    Rockledge, Florida 32955, United States
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (Moffitt Cancer Center)
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Suburban Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.
    Duluth, Georgia 30096, United States
  • Suburban Hematology-Oncology Assoc., PC
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Suburban Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.
    Snellville, Georgia 30078, United States
  • Medical and Surgical Specialists
    Galesburg, Illinois 61401, United States
  • Ingalls Cancer Research Center
    Harvey, Illinois 60426, United States
  • Oncology Specialists,S.C. Center for Advanced Care
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
  • Illinois CancerCare, P.C.
    Peoria, Illinois 61615, United States
  • Carle Cancer Center
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Medical Oncology & Hematology Associates (Clinic #3)
    Clive, Iowa 50325, United States
  • Iowa Oncology Research Association
    Des Moines, Iowa 50309, United States
  • Medical Oncology & Hematology Associates (Clinic #1)
    Des Moines, Iowa 50309, United States
  • Medical Oncology & Hematology Associates (Clinic #2)
    Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • Siouxland Hematology-Oncology Associates, LLP
    Sioux City, Iowa 51101, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas
    Wichita, Kansas 67208, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Central Baptist Hospital
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • John Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21231-1000, United States
  • Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Lahey Clinic
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, United States
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Grand Rapids Clinical Oncology Program
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Essentia Health Duluth CCOP
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Coborn Cancer Center/ CentraCare Health Plaza
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • Metro Minnesota CCOP
    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • Regions Hospital
    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • St. John's Hospital
    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • CCCN
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    Buffalo, New York 14263, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Presbyterian Hospital Cancer Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Piedmont Hematology Oncology Associates PA
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Medcenter One
    Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, United States
  • TriHealth Oncology Institute/Oncology Partners Network
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45247, United States
  • Hickman Cancer Center at Flower Hospital
    Sylvania, Ohio 43560, United States
  • Mercy Cancer Center
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, United States
  • Pharma Resource
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02915, United States
  • Rhode Island Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • The Miriam Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
  • St. Vincent Hospital / Green Bay Oncology
    Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301, United States
  • St. Mary's Hospital / Green Bay Oncology
    Green Bay, Wisconsin 54303, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01507545
Lead sponsor
Morphotek
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2012
Start date
Mar 27, 2012
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2013
Completion
Oct 20, 2013
Results posted
May 6, 2022
Last update
May 6, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ontuxizumab

Start the discussion