ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01502878Updated Sep 13, 2016

Nut Allergy Study: Double-blind Challenge and Oral Desensitization

An interventional study of Nut challenge and Nut challenge: Placebo in Nut Allergy, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-13.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
3 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nut sensitization in skin prick tests is common in areas, including Finland, where birch pollen is abundant. However, sensitization to nuts in skin prick test does not predict the possibility of allergic symptoms when nuts are ingested. In this study the investigators launch and perform double-blind placebo-controlled nut challenges and oral desensitization/ protocol to those with serious symptoms in the challenge. The efficacy and safety of the new oral desensitization program is the primary outcome. The effect of oral desensitization on bronchial hyperreactivity, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and quality of life are secondary outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The investigators aim to improve nut allergy diagnosis by launching a new double-blind placebo-controlled nut (peanut, hazel nut, cashew) challenge protocol. The investigators also launch a specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) protocol to nuts in serious nut allergy. This study takes place in the Helsinki University Skin and Allergy Hospital between May 2011 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria: age 6 to 18 years and suspected nut allergy (unclear anaphylaxis possibly caused by nuts, skin prick test to nuts ≥ 10 mm or specific-IgE ≥ 20 kU/L and have never eaten nuts, or avoids nuts and does not dare try nuts at home). Patients having uncontrolled asthma or other lung disease, having cardiovascular disease or other systemic disease, using beta-blockers, and having poor compliance, are excluded. Methods:The investigators perform skin prick tests to peanut, tree nuts and seeds, take a blood sample before the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC), and measure total IgE and specific-IgE to birch, peanut, hazel nut, allergen components Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 8, and Cor a 1 and 8. Then the serum samples are kept frozen for further component and immunologic analyses. The investigators put iv before the challenge. In DBPCFC the patients receive 5 mg, 50 mg, 200mg, and 1000mg nut protein mixt with placebo, or placebo every 30 minutes. The severity of the allergic reaction is estimated using a modified severity scale. The probability of severe/moderate reaction at low (\<0.7 kU/L) and at increased (>0.7 kU/L) Ara h 2 and 8 concentrations is the primary end-point in the DBPCFC. The investigators also correlate the concentrations of Ara h 2 with the severity score. Patients with moderate or severe reaction in the challenge will be offered desensitization therapy "SOTI" using(pea)nut flour mixed with milk-free margarine. The first dose of 0.1 mg nut protein is given at hospital part of the up-dosing is made at home every 2 weeks. The patient takes an antihistamine 1 hour before each daily dose. An epinephrine autoinjector and prednisolone tablets are also prescribed for emergency use. The desensitization protocol takes 28 weeks and is personalized when needed. Exercise is avoided 1 hour following each dose. Before and after the SOTI the investigators measure food related quality of life using standardized questionnaires, and perform metacholine challenge and measure exhaled nitric oxid. After the SOTI the investigators take blood samples and perform DBPCFC again.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nut Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nut allergy
  • Double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) oral nut challenge
  • Nut oral immunotherapy (OIT)
  • Nut oral desensitization
03

In context

Nut Hypersensitivity

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Nut Hypersensitivity; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 47 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Nut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Nut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 311 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • sensitization in skin prick test or in serum nut-specific IgE
  • unknown anaphylaxis suspected caused by nuts
  • never eaten nuts
  • if challenge positive with serious symptoms, OIT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active asthma and low lung function,
  • pregnancy, cardiovascular or other disease that might worsen during the challenge and OIT
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Nut challenge

    Double-blind placebo controlled oral challenge 5-50-200-1000 mg peanut or hazelnut protein, or placebo administered with 30 min intervals and 2 hour-follow-up after the last dose.

    Dietary Supplement: Nut challenge

  • Placebo comparator
    Nut challenge: Placebo

    See intervention

    Dietary Supplement: Nut challenge: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Nut oral desensitization

    Patients who have moderate to severe immediate allergic reaction at peanut challenge and who enter the oral desensitization program receive peanut protein daily, from 0,1 mg to 800 mg peanut protein, maintenance dose 800 mg.

    Dietary Supplement: Nut oral desensitization

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementNut challenge

    Nut powder made from non-roasted nuts and roasted banana mixed with oats yoghurt or chocolate pudding

    Also known as: Super nuts banan chips, Yosa oat yoghurt, Arla cowpower chololate pudding

  • Dietary supplementNut challenge: Placebo

    Dried banana mixed with oat yoghurt or chocolate pudding

    Also known as: Super nuts banan chips, Yosa oat yoghurt, Arla cowpower chololate pudding

  • Dietary supplementNut oral desensitization

    Roasted peanut powder mixed with milk- and soy-free margarine

    Also known as: Old Virginia Byrd Mill Fat-Light roasted peanut, Keiju-margarine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of nut oral desensitization

    Change from baseline in the amount of nut (mg) tolerated in a double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge at 1 month after the 6-month oral desensitization therapy.

    Time frame: 7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of the treatment on quality of life

    Change from baseline in Quality of life questionnaire square before and after the oral desensitization therapy

    Time frame: 7 months

  2. Effect of the treatment on bronchial hyperreactivity and airway inflammation

    Change from baseline in bronchial hyperreactivity in metacholine challenge and in eosinophilic airway inflammation measured by multiple channel exhaled nitric oxid

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Safety of nut oral desensitization therapy

    Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability

    Time frame: 7 months

  4. Effect of the treatment on eosinophilic airway inflammation

    Change from baseline in exhaled nitric oxid concentration

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital, Skin and Allergy Hospital
    Helsinki, 00029, Finland
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital, Skin and Allergy Hospital
    Helsinki, 160, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Uotila R, Kukkonen AK, Greco D, Pelkonen AS, Makela MJ. Peanut oral immunotherapy decreases IgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 but does not enhance sensitization to cross-reactive allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;139(4):1393-1396.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.054. Epub 2016 Dec 1. No abstract available. PubMed 27916627 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01502878
Responsible party
Mika Juhani Mäkelä, MD, PhD (Chief Physician, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 2, 2012
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Mar 2016
Last update
Sep 13, 2016

Study contacts

Mika J Mäkelä, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Helsinki UCH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion