CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01497080Updated Mar 19, 2014

Distal Radius Fracture Prospective Database 50-80 Years Old

An observational study in Radius Fracture Distal, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-19.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
195
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Problem Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common and result in a variable amount of disability. The investigators have completed considerable work in developing tools that measure impairment and disability after DRF . The investigators initial studies indicate that the associated disablement process is multifactorial and variable with only 25% of the resultant disability predicted by baseline patient and injury characteristics. The investigators see DRF as a signal event where some people are at-risk of transitioning from an active lifestyle to inactivity and subsequent health risks. The investigators recent data confirms variable participation following a DRF. The traditional focus in orthopedic/rehabilitative approaches to DRF fracture management has been localized to the wrist, largely ignoring this potential transition and its health impacts. The investigators will initiate a line of investigation that will profile the at-risk older adult who presents with a DRF with the ultimate goal of accurate identification and prevention of adverse activity transitions (active to inactive). In this study the investigators will identify the extent of the problem by quantifying changes in activity/participation and its short-term health impacts. The investigators will also identify the risk factors present at time of injury that predict a loss of mobility/activity/participation. This work has the potential to identify tools and/or clinical prediction rules that identify at-risk individuals at a critical time where early intervention might most easily prevent adverse outcomes associated with inactivity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radius Fracture Distal

Keywords

  • distal radius fracture
  • Condition
  • risk factors
  • adverse activity transitions following DRF
  • optimal assessment approach
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 195 is above the median of 100 across 675 observational studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Participants aged 50-80 years of age who have incurred a wrist fracture

Inclusion criteria

individuals 50-80 years old

  • one month of fracture resulting from a fall from standing height or less will be recruited through our orthopedic surgeon
  • wrist fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

previous history of humeral, hip or vertebral fracture

  • Testing will not be performed on patients with evident postural instability, severe chronic conditions (Parkinson's disease) or other vestibulo-ocular abnormalities.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
195 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • 1
  • activity level
  • no treatment
06

Study locations

1 site
  • HULC, St Joseph's health Care London
    London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Colquhoun HL, Letts LJ, Law MC, MacDermid JC, Missiuna CA. A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation. Can J Occup Ther. 2010 Dec;77(5):270-9. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.5.3. PubMed 21268509 ↗
  • Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Pope J, Chesworth BM. Baseline predictors of pain and disability one year following extra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y). 2007 Sep;2(3):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s11552-007-9030-x. Epub 2007 Mar 23. PubMed 18780068 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01497080
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Responsible party
Joy MacDermid (Professor, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2011
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Last update
Mar 19, 2014

Study contacts

Joy MacDernmid, PhD
principal investigator · St. Joseph's Health Care London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion