CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01494220Updated Apr 4, 2012

Validation of the Bispectral Index Monitor During Living Donor Liver Transplantation

An observational study in Liver Cirrhosis, sponsored by Mansoura University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-04.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42
Ages
20 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may be influenced with several factors rather than the depth of anesthesia such as bradycardia, hypotension, hypothermia, and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2). The investigators tested the validity and the independent factors which may alter of BIS readings during LDLT.

Up to the investigators best knowledge, the independent predictors for BIS monitoring were not identified yet during the three phases of liver transplantation.

Read the detailed description

Forty two American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class III-IV patients aged 20-50 years with severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C) due to liver cirrhosis undergoing living donor liver transplantation in the Mansoura University Liver Transplantation Program from 2007 to 2010 were included in this prospective, observational study after obtaining approval of the local ethical committee and an informed written consent from all participants. The etiology of liver cirrhosis was hepatitis C, Budd Chiari syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma and autoimmune in all patients.

Anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients. All patients received preoperative intravenous 40 mg of pantoprazole. Patients were monitored with three leads electrocardiography, pulse oximeter, and noninvasive blood pressure. BIS recording electrodes (Aspect Medical Systems. Inc., One Upland Road, Norwood, MA 02062 USA) were applied to the forehead of each patient according to the manufacturer recommendations. The BIS monitor was masked with opaque sheet and BIS data was recorded prior to induction of general anesthesia then continued throughout the procedure. All information obtained from the BIS monitor was continuously downloaded to a computer for offline analysis. The patient's management was not guided by the changes in BIS readings. Before induction of anesthesia, all patients were premedicated with 1-2 mg of intravenous midazolam.

Independent anesthetists, who were not involved in the collection and analysis of the patient's data, provided the perioperative anesthetic management. After preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced with lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg and fentanyl 2µg/kg. Rocuronium 1-1.2 mg/kg was given to suppress the first response on the train-of-four (TOF) stimulations of the ulnar nerve. After tracheal intubation, the lungs were ventilated with an inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) of 0.4 to maintain an arterial carbon dioxide tension at 35-45 mm Hg and monitoring of end-tidal carbon dioxide and sevoflurane concentration, direct arterial pressure monitoring through a radial artery catheter and a tympanic membrane temperature were implemented.

A 7.5 Fr continuous thermodilution fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter (CCO/SvO2) Edwards Life Science, Irvine, CA, USA) was floated through the right internal jugular vein to the right pulmonary artery using waveform and fluoroscopic guidance to measure cardiac output using Angstrom AS5 Monitor (Datex - Ohmeda AS5, Microvitec Display LTD, Bolling Road, Bradford, UK). The final position was confirmed by fluoroscopy and when PAOP less than pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP).

Anesthesia was maintained with 0.5-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane and continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl (1-3 µg/kg/h) titrated to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) within 20% of their baseline values. Rocuronium 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/h was used to maintain suppression of the second twitch in the TOF.

Normothermia was maintained using intravenous infusions of warm fluid and blood products and water-filled thermal mattress according to the authors' protocol. Fluid boluses were given in 250 ml aliquots of either 5% hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 (Voluven® 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Hombourg, Germany) as needed to maintain the CVP and/or PAOP between 5 and 7 mm Hg and the stroke volume (SV) within 20% of its baseline value. Albumin 5% was given as needed to treat hypoalbuminemia. Transfusion of salvaged blood from the cell saver and packed red blood cells was administered as clinically indicated to maintain a hemoglobin level ≥7 g/dL. Intraoperative changes in electrolyte levels and acid-base balance were regularly monitored and treated as appropriate. Hemodynamic control was standardized according to the authors' center protocol. Hypotension (MAP decreased \< 20% from the mean baseline and SVR \< 600 dyne.sec-1.cm-5) was treated with boluses of fluids, ephedrine 5 mg, or epinephrine 5 µg, as needed. Norepinephrine infusion was used for persistent hypotension with low SVR. Dobutamine or epinephrine infusion was administered if the MAP was ≥ 70 mm Hg, CVP and/or PAOP ≥ 7 mm Hg and the cardiac output was \< 4.0 L. min-1. Hypertension (MAP increased > 20% from the mean baseline) was treated with deepening of anesthesia, bolus doses of nitroglycerin 0.05 mg or labetalol 20 mg. Tachycardia (HR > 20% from the baseline values) was treated with boluses of esmolol 20 mg.

All operations were performed by the same surgeons using the piggyback technique. After portal vein clamping, infusion rates of fentanyl and rocuronium were reduced by approximately 50%. Fentanyl and rocuronium infusions were discontinued after peritoneal closure. After completion of skin closure, sevoflurane was discontinued. The patients were transferred to the ICU immediately after surgery, while intubated and postoperative analgesia was achieved with rescue boluses of fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg when needed.

Extubation criteria included cooperative, alertness, train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, spontaneous breathing with tidal volume > 5 mL/kg, respiratory rate > 10 and \< 28 breaths/min, maximum inspiratory pressure ≤ -20 cm H2O, stable hemodynamics, minimal bleeding, core temperature > 35.5°C, urine output > 0.5 mL/Kg/h, arterial carbon dioxide tension ≤ 45 mm Hg, arterial oxygen tension > 100 mm Hg and FiO2 \< 50%.

On the second postoperative day, the patients were asked about perioperative awareness and recall by asking three simple questions using standard interview "What was the last thing you remembered happening before you went to sleep? What is the first thing you remember happening on waking? Did you dream or have any other experiences whilst you were asleep?" Another investigator, who was not involved in the patient's management, collected the saved patients' data. Preoperative MELD score, durations of warm ischemia and anhepatic phase, intraoperative blood loss and fentanyl consumption were collected. Preoperatively (baseline) absolute values and intraoperative average values for BIS, Et-Sevo, heart rate (HR), MAP, CVP, MPAP, CO, PAOP, SVR, PVR, core temperature, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, SaO2 SvO2, and PvO2 were recorded during hepatic dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic phases and during surgical closure. Postoperative total bilirubin, albumin level, liver enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT, and alkaline phosphatase), PT, factors V and VII, time to extubation, ICU and hospital length of stays, neurological complication, encephalopathy and 3 months-mortality were recorded.

Data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for analysis of serial changes in the patients' data at different times. Fisher exact test was used for categorical data. Postulated independent predictors of BIS readings included age, gender, MELD score, durations of surgical phases and warm ischemia, Et-Sevo, average of intraoperative hemodynamic, temperature, oxygenation and acid base variables, intraoperative blood loss and fentanyl consumption, were examined in a stepwise manner into a multiple regression model, with entry and retention set at a significance level of P \< 0.05 and removal set at P ≥ 0.1. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression was done to identify the correlations between BIS values and blood loss, time to tracheal extubation, postoperative liver function and coagulation variables, ICU length of stay, and 3 months-mortality.

To evaluate the accuracy of BIS in predicting survival rate after liver transplantation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to describe the performance characteristics of the BIS readings during different phases of surgery in predicting the survival outcome. An ROC area of 1.0 is characteristic of an ideal model, whereas an area of 0.5 indicates a model of no diagnostic value. Cutoff values for mortality with the best diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were derived from the ROC curve analyses. Unweighted accuracy ((sensitivity + specificity) / 2) was also reported.

The studied patients were further divided according to their outcome variables into survivors (n = 32) and non-survivors (n = 10) subgroups. Independent Student-t- and Mann Whitney tests were used as appropriate. Data were expressed as mean (standard deviation), number (%), or median [range]. A value of P \< 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Cirrhosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bispectral index; anesthesia
  • liver transplantation
  • independent factors
  • outcome
  • Living donor liver transplantation
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,642 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 358 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 151 across 587 observational studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Mansoura University Liver Transplantation Program

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class III-IV
  • aged 20-50 years
  • severe liver dysfunction
  • Child-Pugh Class C
  • liver cirrhosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • preexisting significant neuropsychiatric
  • cardiac diseases
  • pulmonary diseases
  • renal diseases
  • neuromuscular diseases
  • electrolyte disorders
  • body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2
  • pregnancy
  • use of antipsychotics
  • use of antidepressants
  • alcohol abuse
  • drug abuse
  • previous transplantation
  • those with hepatic encephalopathy
  • recent cognitive dysfunction during the past three months
  • fulminant hepatic failure
  • hepato-pulmonary syndrome
  • pulmonary hypertension
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Living donor liver transplantation

    Patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation in the Mansoura University Liver Transplantation Program from 2007 to 2010

    Device: Bispectral index monitoring (BIS)

Interventions

  • DeviceBispectral index monitoring (BIS)

    BIS recording electrodes (Aspect Medical Systems. Inc., One Upland Road, Norwood, MA 02062 USA) were applied to the forehead of each patient according to the manufacturer recommendations. The BIS monitor was masked with opaque sheet and BIS data was recorded prior to induction of general anesthesia then continued throughout the procedure. All information obtained from the BIS monitor was continuously downloaded to a computer for offline analysis. The patient's management was not guided by the changes in BIS readings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: up to 1 hr after surgery

  2. Changes from Baseline in hemodynamic variables

    Hemodynamic changes

    Time frame: 30 min during hepatectomy, 30 min during anhepatic, 30 min during neohepatic phases

  3. Changes from Baseline in Temperature variables

    Temperature

    Time frame: 30 min during hepatectomy, 30 min during anhepatic, 30 min during neohepatic phases

  4. Changes in blood gases variables from baseline

    Blood gases

    Time frame: 30 min during hepatectomy, 30 min during anhepatic, 30 min during neohepatic phases

Secondary outcomes

  1. postoperative liver function tests

    correlation between BIS values and postoperative liver function tests

    Time frame: up to 6 hrs after surgery

  2. postoperative coagulation factors

    correlation between BIS and postoperative coagulation factors

    Time frame: up to 6 hrs after surgery

  3. 3-months mortality

    correlation between BIS values and 3-months mortality

    Time frame: up to 3 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • College of Medicine, Mansoura University
    Mansoura, DK 050, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01494220
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Mohamed R El Tahan (Dr, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2011
Start date
Jun 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Feb 2011
Last update
Apr 4, 2012

Study contacts

Mohamed R El Tahan, MD
study director · Anesthesiology Department, Principal Investigator, Clinical Associate Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion