CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01492660Echostim1Updated Apr 23, 2013

Echogenic Versus Stimulating Needle and Catheter for Sciatic Blocks

A Phase 3 interventional study of echogenic needle and catheter and Neurostimulation to position needle and catheter in Osteoarthritis Knee and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-23.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients scheduled for total knee replacements and suitable for sciatic nerve block will be randomized to one of 2 groups.

Group 1 will have the nerve block performed using a standard Pajunk block needle under ultrasound guidance and with electrical nerve stimulation (ENS), and have catheter placement also guided by electrical nerve stimulation. Group 2 will have the block performed using a Sonoplex echogenic block needle and have an echogenic catheter sited, all under ultrasound (US) guidance. Group 2 will have needle location aided by ENS, but ENS will not be used for catheter location.

An observer blinded to the needle type will assess the quality of needle visualisation on a recording of the US image taken during the procedure, along with adequacy of spread of local anesthetic. The primary outcome will be needle visibility, and secondary outcomes will be block success rate, block performance time, complication rate, number of needle passes per block, and adequacy of spread of local anesthetic.

Read the detailed description

A total of 70 patients with ASA physical status 1 to 4, scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty and deemed suitable to receive a sciatic nerve block will be included in the study. They will be randomised to one of two groups prior to the block procedure using a closed envelope system.

Recruitment will take place in the preoperative clinic. All blocks will be performed in the block room using standard monitoring, sterile precautions and titrated intravenous sedation.

Prior to the sciatic nerve block a continuous femoral nerve block will be performed according to standard procedure. Once this is complete the patient will be positioned for the sciatic nerve block.

A preprocedural scan will be done as per standard practice and skin will be infiltrated with 1% lidocaine.

The anaesthetist performing the block will be aware of the study group allocation due to the requirement for physically handling the block needles, and will proceed to position the needle into the required location site to facilitate catheter insertion, with the aid of electrical nerve stimulation via the needle. This will be recorded using the ultrasound machines cineloop facility.

If after 6 passes the operator is unable either to contact the nerve according to the ultrasound image or elicit a twitch response, the procedure will be abandoned and this will be considered a failed block. In this case analgesia will be covered with periarticular infiltration and opioids.

During needle positioning, the observer will record the number of needle redirections required to optimally locate the needle, each redirection being defined as every movement which follows a withdrawal of more than 2cm. The observer will also record the number of skin punctures required and any arterial or venous punctures.

Group E will have the block performed using the echogenic needle, and the echogenic catheter will be placed using ultrasound guidance.

The catheter will be inserted through the needle by a second anesthetist. This process will be continuously recording using the cineloop feature of the ultrasound machine. Once the catheter is deemed to be in an appropriate position, local anaesthetic will be injected by the second anaesthetist while observing the disposition of the local anaesthetic perineurally in short axis. This will be confirmed with a long axis view of the nerve (also recorded).

Group S will have the block performed with a standard needle and catheter, guided by electrical nerve stimulation.

Acceptable muscle twitch response will be plantar- or dorsiflexion, inversion or eversion with an initial nerve current strength of 0.5mA at a frequency of 2Hz. If a satisfactory motor response cannot be elicited, current will be increased in stages to 1.5mA. If a response still cannot be elicited this will be recorded but the catheter will still be used if its position is deemed satisfactory using colour Doppler - a medley of colour adjacent to the nerve with the injection of agitated dextrose 5%. Once the catheter is deemed to be in an appropriate position, local anaesthetic will be injected by the second anaesthetist while observing the disposition of the local anaesthetic perineurally in short axis. This will be confirmed with a long axis view of the nerve (also recorded).

Once the catheter has been sited using the above techniques, a bolus of agitated 5% dextrose will be injected through the catheter and Doppler ultrasound will be used to locate where in the tissues the injected fluid is being deposited. This will also be recorded and subsequently assessed.

An assistant present during the block will time two aspects of the procedure:

  1. Time from first skin contact with needle to first muscle response to nerve stimulation. This will be done only on the day of surgery during the block procedure until the desired muscle twitch is elicited.
  2. Time from first skin contact to completion of catheter insertion (Block time).This is done during the block procedure only on the day of surgery as noted above

Once catheter position has been assessed a total of 20 millilitres of 2% mepivacaine will be injected via the catheter in both groups. Over the subsequent 30 minutes a second blinded observer will take observations every 5 minutes to assess the degree of motor and sensory block.

The video recording of the block procedure will be sent along with the data collection form to two of the co-investigators, who will independently assess the following:

  1. At the time of nerve contact by the needle, assign a rating for visibility of the needle shaft and tip according to the following scale:

    1. not visualised or poorly visualised - needle tip/shaft being isoechoic or only slightly more echogenic than background parenchyma.
    2. tip or shaft visualised with some difficulty - tip/shaft readily identified as being more echogenic than the background parenchyma but not seen in their entirety
    3. excellent visibility shaft and tip strongly echogenic relative to tissue and visualised in their entirety.
  2. Assign the same rating after completion of injection
  3. Judge whether circumferential and longitudinal spread of local anaesthetic is either adequate or inadequate.

Following the operation a standard infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine at 4cc/hr will be commenced via the sciatic catheter. Post operative care will be as per the standard practice at this institution.

One week post operatively the patient will be telephoned at home to check for persisting neurological symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis Knee
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Ultrasonography
  • nerve block
  • catheters
  • needle
  • anesthesia
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,302 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 608 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 70 across 2,731 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients age 18-80 years listed for total knee arthroplasty.
  • ASA I-IV.
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Able to cooperate with study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Standard contraindication to regional anaesthesia/analgesia: local infection, coagulopathy, local anaesthetic allergy, patient refusal, diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, pre-existing nerve injury)
  • Inability to consent
  • Patient refusal
  • Pregnant patients
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Echogenic needle and catheter

    The echogenic needle will be positioned using ultrasonography and neurostimulation with an end point of plantar or dorsiflexion with 0.6mA of current strength. The catheter will be inserted using ultrasonography alone. 20 Ml of 2% mepivacaine will be inserted using the catheter. The distribution of drug will be evaluated using short axis and long axis views. Sensory motor block evaluation every 5 minutes for 30 minutes. Duration of block procedure, number of passes and success will be evaluated

    Device: echogenic needle and catheter

  • Active comparator
    Neurostimulation

    The non echogenic needle will be positioned using ultrasonography and neurostimulation with plantar or dorsiflexion as the end point with 0.6mA current.The catheter will be positioned using neurostimulation with plantar or dorsiflexion with 0.6-1.5mA current.

    Device: Neurostimulation to position needle and catheter

Interventions

  • Deviceechogenic needle and catheter

    Visibility of needle shaft and tip with engraved markers. Ultrasonographic Visibility of catheter tip

    Also known as: Pajunk Stimulong plexus catheter set, Pajunk sonolong sonoset

  • DeviceNeurostimulation to position needle and catheter

    The non echogenic needle will be positioned using ultrasonography and neurostimulation and the catheter will be positioned using neurostimulation with plantar or dorsiflexion with 0.6-1.5mA current. 20mL of 2% mepivacaine will be injected via the catheter. Sensory motor block will be evaluated every 5 minutes for 30 mins

    Also known as: Pajunk Stimulaong Plexus catheter set

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visibility of needle tip and catheter tip

    Needle tip visibility graded by blinded observers Catheter tip visibility graded by blinded observers

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. number of needle passes

    The number of times the needle is withdrawn more than 2 cm and resited

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. success rate of block

    Motor and sensory block will be evaluated on standard grading system every 5 minutes for 30 minutes post injection

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Block procedure time

    Time from needle insertion to the end of catheter insertion

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Immediate complications

    Vascular punctures, venous or arterial

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. delayed complications

    telephone interview to elicit delayed neurologic symptoms

    Time frame: One week after surgery/block

07

Study locations

1 site
  • London Health Sciences Centre University Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brookes J, Sondekoppam R, Armstrong K, Uppal V, Dhir S, Terlecki M, Ganapathy S. Comparative evaluation of the visibility and block characteristics of a stimulating needle and catheter vs an echogenic needle and catheter for sciatic nerve block with a low-frequency ultrasound probe. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):912-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev351. PubMed 26582852 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01492660
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Collaborators
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
Responsible party
Sugantha Ganapathy (Professor, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 15, 2011
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Jan 2013
Last update
Apr 23, 2013

Study contacts

Sugantha Ganapathy
principal investigator · Professor, Director, regional and Pain reseaerch

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion