CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01467037Updated Apr 19, 2016Results posted

Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1 in a Naïve Population

An observational study in Rotavirus Infections, Gastroenteritis and Diarrhea, sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Completed at 3 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 8 Weeks to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-19.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
374
Ages
8 Weeks to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rotavirus (RV) is the leading cause of severe gastroenteritis (GE) in young children. The cumulative risk of GE hospitalizations and hospital stays of \< 24 hours is 1/25, which would amount to 13,600 Canadian children \< 5 years. The incidence of nosocomial RV infections is an average of 8/10,000 patient-days in children \< 5 years. An immunization program with a live-attenuated monovalent oral RV vaccine (RV1 - Rotarix® from GSK) will be implemented, free of charge, in the Province of Quebec in November 2011. To provide an accurate portrait of the disease and give critical information to the public health agencies as they struggle to control costs, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of surveillance for RV and other diseases with similar characteristics; estimate selection bias in passive laboratory-based surveillance; and estimate the agreement between surveillance time-series created from passive and active surveillance data sources.

Read the detailed description

In November 2011, Quebec implemented a publicly-funded RV1 vaccination program with its routine administration at 2 and 4 months of age. From February 1, 2012 - May 31, 2014, we conducted prospective, active surveillance for acute rotavirus gastroenteritis at The Montreal Children's Hospital and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, located in Montreal, and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, located in Sherbrooke. Active surveillance was approved by Research Ethics Boards at each hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotavirus Infections
  • Gastroenteritis
  • Diarrhea

Keywords

  • Rotavirus
  • Gastroenteritis
  • Vaccination
  • Pediatrics
03

In context

Rotavirus Infections

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotavirus Infections; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 374 is below the median of 885 across 31 observational studies indexed under Rotavirus Infections.

Browse Rotavirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 415 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Weeks to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The Montreal Children's Hospital and the CHU Sainte-Justine are the 2 main pediatric hospitals in Montreal. With these 3 sites, 30% of the Quebec birth cohort will be captured and, given the concentration of children in the Montreal area, the participating hospitals will ensure that the study remains efficient in terms of resources. We elected Sherbrooke as an intermediate area; Montreal will represent an urban population.

Inclusion criteria

  • Child less than 3 years old

Cases:

  • Acute gastroenteritis (within 7 days of hospital visit)
  • able to provide a stool specimen for RV ELISA testing
  • Rotavirus positive

Controls:

  • Visited the ED or admitted for a non-rotavirus gastroenteritis
  • Visited the ED or admitted for acute respiratory infections without gastroenteritis symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Immunocompromised children
  • Prior history of intussusception
  • Admission to NICU between 6 to 15 weeks of life, for >6 weeks
  • Child less than 56 days of life (8 weeks)
  • Child vaccinated with Rotateq (Merck)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
374 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Rotavirus-negative

    Patients with a negative result for rotavirus via enzyme immunoassay (EIA). No intervention done.

    Other: No intervention done

  • Rotavirus-positive

    Patients with a positive result for rotavirus via enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Rotavirus-positives were confirmed via real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR). RT-PCR results were used in the event of discordant EIA results. Rotavirus genotyping was performed. No intervention done.

    Other: No intervention done

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention done

    Not applicable because no intervention was done.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Matched VE Participants

    RV1 vaccine effectiveness (VE) was investigated using a subset of active surveillance participants age-eligible to receive 2-doses of RV1 vaccine, defined as participants (i) \<15 weeks of age as of program implementation (November 1, 2011), and (ii) ≥16 weeks of age at symptom onset. These ages corresponded to the maximum recommended age of administration for the first RV1 dose at program implementation, and the recommended age of second dose administration, respectively. We estimated RV1 VE of 2- versus 0-doses and ≥1- versus 0-doseto prevent rotavirus hospitalization or emergency visits. Only valid RV1 vaccinations administered ≥14 days prior to symptom onset were considered. Children vaccinated with RV5 (private market,minimal penetrance) were excluded.

    Time frame: From February 1, 2012 to May 31, 2014

Other outcomes

  1. Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1

    RV1 vaccine effectiveness (VE) was investigated using a subset of active surveillance participants age-eligible to receive 2-doses of RV1 vaccine, defined as participants (i) \<15 weeks of age as of program implementation (November 1, 2011), and (ii) ≥16 weeks of age at symptom onset. These ages corresponded to the maximum recommended age of administration for the first RV1 dose at program implementation, and the recommended age of second dose administration, respectively. Only valid RV1 vaccinations administered ≥14 days prior to symptom onset were considered. RV1 VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) × 100. Based upon our sampling scheme, the exposure odds ratio from our analyses approximates the rate ratio.

    Time frame: From February 1, 2012 to May 31, 2014

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2016

Participant flow

We conducted prospective, active surveillance for acute rotavirus gastroenteritis at The Montreal Children's Hospital and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, located in Montreal, and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, located in Sherbrooke.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVaccine Effectiveness Study Population
Started374
Completed374
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMatched VE Participants

RV1 vaccine effectiveness (VE) was investigated using a subset of active surveillance participants age-eligible to receive 2-doses of RV1 vaccine, defined as participants (i) \<15 weeks of age as of program implementation (November 1, 2011), and (ii) ≥16 weeks of age at symptom onset. These ages corresponded to the maximum recommended age of administration for the first RV1 dose at program implementation, and the recommended age of second dose administration, respectively. We estimated RV1 VE of 2- versus 0-doses and ≥1- versus 0-doseto prevent rotavirus hospitalization or emergency visits. Only valid RV1 vaccinations administered ≥14 days prior to symptom onset were considered. Children vaccinated with RV5 (private market,minimal penetrance) were excluded.

Time frame:
From February 1, 2012 to May 31, 2014
Reported as:
Number · participants
Matched VE Participants
participantsRotavirus-negativeRotavirus-positive
0-Doses2622
1 Dose161
2 Doses1147
Other pre-specifiedVaccine Effectiveness of RV1

RV1 vaccine effectiveness (VE) was investigated using a subset of active surveillance participants age-eligible to receive 2-doses of RV1 vaccine, defined as participants (i) \<15 weeks of age as of program implementation (November 1, 2011), and (ii) ≥16 weeks of age at symptom onset. These ages corresponded to the maximum recommended age of administration for the first RV1 dose at program implementation, and the recommended age of second dose administration, respectively. Only valid RV1 vaccinations administered ≥14 days prior to symptom onset were considered. RV1 VE was estimated as (1 - exposure odds ratio) × 100. Based upon our sampling scheme, the exposure odds ratio from our analyses approximates the rate ratio.

Time frame:
From February 1, 2012 to May 31, 2014
Reported as:
Number · adjusted VE
Vaccine Effectiveness of RV1
adjusted VE2 Versus 0 Doses≥1 Versus 0 Dose
Vaccine Effectiveness of RV191.2 (61.6 to 98.0)92.5 (69.3 to 98.2)
Statistical analysis
  • 2 Versus 0 Doses · Adjusted or: 0.088 · 95% CI 0.020 to 0.384Conditional logistic regression was used. Adjusted VE = (1 - adjusted OR) \*100
  • ≥1 Versus 0 Dose · Adjusted or: 0.075 · 95% CI 0.018 to 0.307Conditional logistic regression was used. Adjusted VE = (1 - adjusted OR) \*100

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vaccine Effectiveness Study Population———

Baseline characteristics

Among all active surveillance eligible patients, patients were included if parent/legal guardian had provided informed consent, and if an adequate stool specimen was provided within 7 days of hospital presentation. Patients needed to be aged \<15 months at RV1 program implementation (November 1, 2011), AND aged ≥16 weeks at symptom onset.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(months)Rotavirus-negativeRotavirus -PositiveTotal
Mean12.6 ± 6.316.6 ± 6.513 ± 6.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Rotavirus-negativeRotavirus -PositiveTotal
Female15420174
Male18812200
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Rotavirus-negativeRotavirus -PositiveTotal
Canada34232374
Rotavirus vaccination
Rotavirus vaccination(participants)Rotavirus-negativeRotavirus -PositiveTotal
RV-vaccination 0 dose622486
RV-vaccination 1-dose26127
RV-vaccination ≥2 doses2547261
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • The Montreal Children's Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec H3H 1P3, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Doll MK, Buckeridge DL, Morrison KT, Gagneur A, Tapiero B, Charest H, Quach C. Effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccine in a high-income, predominant-use setting. Vaccine. 2015 Dec 16;33(51):7307-7314. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.118. Epub 2015 Nov 3. PubMed 26546262 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01467037
Lead sponsor
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Collaborators
Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec, Ministere de la Sante et des Services Sociaux, GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Caroline Quach-Thanh (MD, MSc, FRCPC, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2011
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Jan 29, 2016
Last update
Apr 19, 2016

Study contacts

Caroline Quach-Thanh, MD, MSc
principal investigator · McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Caroline Quach-Thanh, MD, MSc
study director · McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion