CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01463189Updated Dec 10, 2012

Web-based Support to Manage Arthritis Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of painACTION: Arthritis in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis, sponsored by Inflexxion, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-12-10.

Sponsored by Inflexxion, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
228
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Development of an interactive, online pain self-management program for adults who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, and other arthritic conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) using principles from Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1977). This online health intervention, painACTION: Arthritis, will provide clinically reliable information about diagnosis, treatment, and management of arthritis, written for health consumers in a clear and engaging manner to help increase their skills and confidence to use self-management strategies.

Read the detailed description

One of every five adults in the United States (46.4 million people) is affected by arthritis. Increasing the number of days individuals are free of arthritis pain is one of the Healthy People 2010 objectives. Although there are a variety of medical treatments and medications available, self-management is a critical component in helping arthritis sufferers learn how to identify, avoid, and help manage their pain. Unfortunately, clinicians face significant time pressure, leaving little time for desired patient-provider education and collaboration. This is an important omission as tailored advice (e.g., specific exercises to reduce pain) from health providers could enable behavior change and improve outcomes. Therefore, widely accessible and tailored interventions that address motivational issues are needed to facilitate self-management education among arthritis patients. Because of its reach across demographic groups, the Internet is an excellent vehicle for offering a self-management program to arthritis sufferers. The investigators propose to develop an interactive, online pain self-management program for adults who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, and other arthritic conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) using principles from Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1977). This online health intervention, painACTION: Arthritis, will provide clinically reliable information about diagnosis, treatment, and management of arthritis, written for health consumers in a clear and engaging manner to help increase their skills and confidence to use self-management strategies. Moreover, it will be designed to complement and connect to our other SBIR-supported pain online health interventions (chronic back pain, migraine pain, neuropathic pain) to be a more comprehensive resource for those seeking pain management assistance. The most unique aspect of painACTION: Arthritis is that it includes three technological innovations -- a Web 2.0-enabled platform, a Custom Recommendation Engine, and Dynamic Lessons - to help people self manage their arthritis pain. In Phase I the investigators accomplished two important objectives: 1) established the feasibility of painACTION: Arthritis as an intervention and a technical project and 2) generated preliminary plans for the content, design, and technical development of painACTION: Arthritis. In Phase II the investigators will produce the program and test its efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • Other Arthritic Conditions (e.g., Psoriatic Arthritis)

Keywords

  • arthritis
  • self management
03

In context

Spondylitis

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylitis; 83 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 228 is above the median of 92 across 349 interventional studies indexed under Spondylitis.

Browse Spondylitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Inflexxion, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Be at least 18 years of age;
  2. Be able to provide informed consent
  3. Be able to read and speak English
  4. Have reliable Internet access and e-mail
  5. Have a self-reported doctor diagnosis of arthritis, limited to the following conditions - osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or other arthritis conditions (e.g., psoriatic arthritis)
  6. Have a self-reported pain level of 4 or more in the past week on the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (McCaffery \& Beebe, 1993) because 4 indicates moderate or higher level of pain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in another Inflexxion pain management study.
  2. Participation in an online research study related to arthritis in the past year
  3. Currently in pain from a recent injury
  4. Has been hospitalized for non-medical reasons related to emotional or mental health in the past year
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
228 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    painACTION: Arthritis

    Behavioral: painACTION: Arthritis

  • No intervention
    treatment as usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralpainACTION: Arthritis

    Participants will be asked to complete eight 20-minute sessions on the site over a four-week intervention period (two site visits per week), and complete five 20-minute "booster" sessions (one site visit per month) during the follow up period. Each session will have a minimum set of requirements. Specific details about the requirements for each session will be provided in the session logs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in cognitions from baseline to: post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention

    Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (Lorig et al., 1989) is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's ability to determine self-efficacy. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan et al., 1995) was developed to assess three components of catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The scale consists of 13 items rated from 0-4 (0 = not at all, 4 = all the time). Pain Awareness Questionnaire (Berman et al., 2009) is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's awareness of their current pain.

    Time frame: baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention

  2. Change in self management behaviors from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention

    Exercise Behaviors (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing the total time a patient had participated in various forms of exercise (e.g., stretching). Cognitive Symptom Management (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 6-item questionnaire assessing a patient's ability to manage their symptoms. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always. Communication with Physicians (Lorig et al., 1996) is a 3-item scale assessing a patient's communication with their physicians. This scale is rated on a 0 to 5 scale: 0 = never to 5 = always.

    Time frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

  3. Change in pain and functioning from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention

    Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) (Cleeland, 1991) uses a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale to obtain information on the intensity of pain, the degree to which pain interferes with function, pain relief, pain quality, and the patient's perception of the cause of pain (6 items).

    Time frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention

    The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-2-SF (Guillemin et al., 1997) is a 26-item scale that measures 5-domains of health status (e.g., physical, role, work, and social functioning.) Six additional items from the Ankylosing Spondylitis-AIMS will be added for additional validity of spine and mobility functioning for the participants with AS (Guillemin et al., 1999). Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (Guy, 1976) is an outcome measure of global improvement with treatment and consists of a single-item self-rating.

    Time frame: baseline, post intervention, 3 months post intervention, and 6 months post intervention

  2. Change in affect from baseline to: post intervention post intervention (approximately 1 month post baseline), 3 months post intervention, 6 months post intervention

    Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21, Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995). The DASS is a 21-item questionnaire that distinguishes symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress.

    Time frame: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inflexxion, Inc.
    Newton, Massachusetts 02459, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available. PubMed 847061 ↗
  • Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jan;32(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320107. PubMed 2912463 ↗
  • Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, González V, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
  • Sullivan MJL. The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment 7(4):524-532, 1995.
  • Berman RL, Iris MA, Bode R, Drengenberg C. The effectiveness of an online mind-body intervention for older adults with chronic pain. J Pain. 2009 Jan;10(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 5. PubMed 18774342 ↗
  • Cleeland CS. Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). Pain Research Group. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://prc.coh.org/pdf/BPI%20Short%20Version.pdf, 1991.
  • Guillemin F, Coste J, Pouchot J, Ghezail M, Bregeon C, Sany J. The AIMS2-SF: a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2. French Quality of Life in Rheumatology Group. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Jul;40(7):1267-74. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199707)40:73.0.CO;2-L. PubMed 9214427 ↗
  • Guillemin F, Challier B, Urlacher F, Vancon G, Pourel J. Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Jun;12(3):157-62. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:33.0.co;2-r. PubMed 10513505 ↗
  • Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976.
  • Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. PubMed 7726811 ↗
  • McCaffery M, Beebe A. Pain: Clinical Manual for Nursing Practice. Baltimore: V.V. Mosby Company, 1993.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01463189
Lead sponsor
Inflexxion, Inc.
Responsible party
Kimberlee Trudeau (Research Scientist, Inflexxion, Inc.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2011
Start date
Sep 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Nov 2012
Last update
Dec 10, 2012

Study contacts

Kimberlee J Trudeau, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Inflexxion, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion