ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01459328Updated Oct 25, 2011

Resource-Sparing Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy in Rectal Carcinoma, sponsored by International Atomic Energy Agency. Status unknown at 12 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-10-25.

Sponsored by International Atomic Energy Agency · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2011), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized clinical trial comparing two different neo-adjuvant radiation-based strategies prior to intended surgery for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

This trial may establish the investigational therapy to be superior to, or at least not inferior to conventional treatment.

Read the detailed description

This phase III randomised clinical trial compares the outcome of two different neo-adjuvant radiation based treatments for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. This encompasses patients at risk for a positive circumfrential resection margin (CRM+) on baseline assessment imaging and pateints identified as being with a T-descriptor T4 at baseline assessment.

The arms compared are as follows:

  • The investigational arm: short chemo-radiation course(25Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week) +/- surgery.
  • The conventional arm: protracted chemo-radiation course (50Gy in 25 daily fractions over 5 weeks combined with chemotherapy)+/- surgery.

The outcomes include four domains: overall survival, biological effect, quality of life and health-related economics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Carcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rectal carcinoma
  • long course chemo-radiation
  • short course chemo-rdiation
  • Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is above the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

International Atomic Energy Agency is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Clinical (i.e. surgical determination) and/or diagnostic image findings consistent with c/uT4 or CRM+ (note that CRM+ must be established by MRI), primary rectal Adenocarcinoma (i.e. histology consistent with origin from rectal mucosa); these constitute LARC for the purpose of this protocol
  • Treatment will be directed at the primary cancer, being clinically appropriate and given with an initial intent to cure the patient (this includes accepting up front that radiation and surgery are feasible; for surgery, this means that the patient has been determined fit for major surgery by an anaesthesiologist prior to the request for randomization)
  • Performance status is sufficient to undertake the treatment in either arm (>50%)
  • Patient is accessible for required follow-up and data collection
  • Radiation oncologist expects survival to exceed 6 months from date of diagnosis
  • Patient provides

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent rectal cancer
  • Primary wholly in the sigmoid colon
  • Considered to be arising in the anal canal
  • disease beyond the pelvis (by clinical assessment and/or diagnostic imaging)
  • to protocol RT or to protocol chemotherapy, such as one or more of the following:
  • any prior RT to the pelvis; a solitary pelvic kidney within the intended radiation volume
  • consideration by the most responsible radiation oncologist that the treatment volume is too large, or the amount of small bowel or other critical organs within the treatment volume is too much for safe treatment
  • significantly abnormal laboratory tests such as impaired renal/liver function
  • a that is \< 8.0 (or 80, SI) and the patient is not transfused to exceed 8.0 (or 80, SI)
  • on-going medications that are not compatible with protocol chemotherapy as described in this protocol
  • Significant development issues (such as with age \< 18 yr)
  • Co-morbidity
  • Psychiatric diagnosis
  • Physical impairment
  • Pregnancy or continuing breast-feeding, that precludes administration of protocol treatments, or that precludes data collection (such as likely to preclude follow-up visits or completing questionnaires)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A: Conventional Long Course Chemo-Radiation

    Conventional long course chemo-radiation

    Radiation: Radiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Arm B: Short Course Radiation Followed by Chemotherapy

    Experimental short course radiation followed by chemotherapy.

    Radiation: Radiotherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationRadiotherapy

    Short course radiotherapy: 25Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week Chemotherapy: - Bolus 5 Fluorouracil 450 mg/m2/day * Injected Leucovorin 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days

  • RadiationRadiotherapy

    Conventional long course chemo-radiation: * Radiation 50Gy in 25 daily fractions over 5 weeks * Bolus 5 Fluorouracil 350mg/m2/d for 5 days * Injected Leucovorin 20mg in both the first and last (5th) week of radiation * Oral Capecitabine (CAPE) 825mg/m2 b.i.d. during the entire radiotherapy course over 5 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Time frame: From commencement of radiation (day 1) to death or last follow-up up to 5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biological Effect and Tumour Biology

    Maximum size of the tumor based on imaging and/or up to 3D measures reported by radiologists, comparing baseline and pre-surgical decision inverstigations If definitive surgery is conducted: * Proportion obtaining R0 * Proportion undergoing TME * Status of the neurovascular and neural invasion(s) * Nodal ratio * Tumor sizes CEA results

    Time frame: Prior to surgical decision in weeks 13-15 and 4 weeks after surgery

  2. Quality of Life

    Time frame: From date of randomization till the end of follow-up (5 years)

  3. Health-related Economics

    Number of days in hospital Number of surgical procedures Number of days with stomas Protocol required therapies, as actually administered Adverse events that have significant cost implications (i.e. cost-drivers)

    Time frame: From date of randomization till the end of follow-up (5 years)

07

Study locations

12 of 12 sites recruiting
  • Centre Anti-Cancer, Hopital Franz Fanon
    Blida, 09000, Algeria
    Recruiting
  • Hospital A.C. Camargo, Fundacao Antonio Prudente
    Sao Paulo, 01509-010, Brazil
    Recruiting
    • Maria Leticia Gobo Silva · Contactmlgobo@yahoo.fr · +551132729613
    • Maria Leticia Gobo Silva · Principal investigator
  • Credit Valley Hospital
    Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2N1, Canada
    Recruiting
  • Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Minesterio de Salud
    Bogota D.C., Colombia
    Recruiting
    • Rosalba Ospinp Pena · Contactrospino@cancer.gov.co · 005713341997
    • Rosalba Ospino Pena · Principal investigator
  • Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
    Recruiting
    • Ana Frobe · Contactafrobe@irb.hr · +38513787468
    • Blanka Jaksic · Principal investigator
  • Ministerio de Cienca, Tecnologia y Medio Ambiente (CITMA)
    La Habana, Cuba
    Recruiting
    • Maria Lourdes Pernez Pena · Contactsoconcol@infomed.sld.cu · +5378316040
    • Aixa Ulloa Balmaseda · Principal investigator
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, V.N. Cancer Center, GKNM Hospital
    Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 037, India
    Recruiting
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 012, India
    Recruiting
    • Reena Engineer · Contactreena_engineer@rediffmail.com · +912224177163
    • · Contact+912224177000
    • Shyam Kishore Shrivastava · Principal investigator
  • Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusuma National General Hospital, University of Indonesia
    Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    Recruiting
    • Sri Mutya Sekarutami · Contactsmutya12@yahoo.com · +62213921155
    • Sri Mutya Sekarutami · Principal investigator
  • Instituto di Radiologia, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
    Roma, 00168, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Vincenzo Valentini · Contactvvalentini.it@email.it · +390630154376
    • Vincenzo Valentini · Principal investigator
  • National Cancer Institute
    Bratislava, 833 10, Slovakia
    Recruiting
  • University of Cape Town
    Cape Town, 7701, South Africa
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC; EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060829. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):728. PubMed 16971718 ↗
  • Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, van Krieken JH, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):638-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010580. PubMed 11547717 ↗
  • Radu C, Berglund A, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with delayed surgery in rectal cancer - a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jun;87(3):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 21. PubMed 18093674 ↗
  • Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, Birkemeyer E, Frykholm G, Pahlman L, Wiig JN, Bystrom P, Bujko K, Glimelius B. Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3687-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858. PubMed 18669453 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2009 and a primary completion of Sep 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2011
First posted
Oct 25, 2011
Start
Sep 2009
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2013
Last update
Oct 25, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01459328
Lead sponsor
International Atomic Energy Agency
Collaborators
Centre Anti Cancer Hopital Frantz Fanon, Hospital A.C. Camargo, Credit Valley Hospital, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia, University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice, Minesterio de Cienca, Tecnologia y Medio Ambiente, V.N. Cancer Center GKNM Hospital, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, National Cancer Center, Bratislava, University of Cape Town, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2011
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2013 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 25, 2011

Study contacts

IAEA
Contact
Eduardo Rosenblatt
principal investigator · International Atomic Energy Agency

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion