CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01459120DoDoPiUpdated Feb 9, 2012

Comparison of Door-to-door Versus Community Gathering to Provide HIV Counseling and Testing Services in Rural Lesotho

An interventional study of Door-to-door and Pitso in HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by SolidarMed. Completed at 2 sites in Lesotho. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-09.

Sponsored by SolidarMed · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,800
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine if door-to-door is more effective than community gathering in providing voluntary HIV counseling and testing (VCT) in communities in rural Lesotho. The voluntary HIV counseling and testing will be proposed as an integrated part of a package of proposed services. The package consists of: Blood-pressure measurement, blood-glucose measurement, Body-mass-index (adults), weight for height (children), catch-up vaccinations, deworming (children) Vitamin A (children \& young women), family planning for eligible women, Tuberculosis screening and HIV counseling and testing.

Read the detailed description

12 health centers (clusters) in rural Lesotho are matched according to their routine performance in VCT and enrollment into chronic HIV/AIDS care (average numbers tested positive and enrolled into HIV/AIDS care per month per facility). After matching, 6 health centers are randomly assigned to perform door-to-door VCT, whereas the others perform the traditional community gathering approach (called "pitso" in Sesotho). Within the catchment area of each health center five campaigns in five different, randomly selected villages, are held (one day VCT campaign per village). Within each cluster another five villages are randomly selected who do not get a particular campaign and serve as a control for each cluster. In each matched cluster-pair, both health centers conduct the five campaigns during the same week (one conducting it as door-to-door, the other one conducting it through "pitsos" (community gathering)).

Both approaches receive the same resources in terms of finances, time spending doing the VCT-campaign and human resources.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Tuberculosis
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Arterial Hypertension

Keywords

  • Home-based HIV-testing
  • Voluntary Counseling and Testing
  • Community based testing
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Lesotho
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Not already known to be HIV-positive
  • Resident in the catchment area of the health center where the campaign is conducted
  • Provision of written informed consent to participate (signed by writing or fingerprint)
  • In case of children: Provision of written informed consent by an adult care-taker
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Door-to-Door

    Health care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT at the peoples' homes.

    Other: Door-to-door

  • Active comparator
    Pitso

    Health care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT through community gatherings ("pitso").

    Other: Pitso

  • No intervention
    control

    Within each cluster (catchment area of a health center), five villages are randomly chosen as comparators on cluster level. These villages get no particular intervention (VCT-campaign). However, routine services continue to be provided. These villages serve as a control for the third primary outcome that assesses the overall numbers newly enrolled into chronic HIV/AIDS care at facility-level.

Interventions

  • OtherDoor-to-door

    Health workers propose the integrated service package including VCT at the peoples' homes (home-based testing).

  • OtherPitso

    Health care workers propose the integrated service package including VCT through community gatherings ("Pitso").

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of newly tested HIV-positive clients over all clients tested for HIV during the campaigns

    Proportion refers to the proportion of newly tested HIV-positive clients among all clients tested for HIV during the voluntary counselling and testing campaigns in each arm.

  2. Proportion of clients newly tested HIV-positive who enrolled into HIV/AIDS care within one month over all clients newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns

    One month after the campaigns, enrollment of clients who newly tested HIV-positive at the campaign is assessed at the facilities based on the clinics' registers.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after tested positive

  3. Overall number newly tested HIV-positive and enrolled into chronic HIV/AIDS-care at each facility

    Between the two study-arms, the overall numbers will be compared in two ways: 1. Total number positively tested and enrolled into care at the facility during the month after the campaign (this refers to the overall number at facility-level. Irrespective if these patients were tested during one of the campaigns or during routine activities at the facility) 2. Total number positively tested and enrolled into care from the 5 villages where campaigns were held as compared to the five villages where no campaigns were held.

    Time frame: 4 weeks after campaign

  4. Absolute number of newly tested HIV-positive clients

    Refers to the overall number newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns in both arms

  5. Absolute number of clients newly tested HIV-positive who enrolled into HIV/AIDS care

    This refers to the absolute number newly tested HIV-positive during the campaigns who enrolled thereafter into chronic HIV/AIDS care within one month

    Time frame: 4 weeks after tested HIV-positive

Secondary outcomes

  1. CD4-count among clients newly tested HIV-positive

    CD4-counts will be measured on site using a Point-of-care machine.

  2. Clinical WHO-stage among clients newly tested HIV-positive

  3. Proportion of clients screened positive for Tuberculosis during the campaigns

    All clients accessing services (irrespective of HIV-status) will be screened for TB by a nurse. Clients with a positive screening are provided sputum bottles and are entered in the Tuberculosis-suspect register.

  4. Proportion of first-time HIV-testers among all clients accessing the testing services

  5. Proportion of clients with positive tuberculosis screening who return 3 sputum-bottles within ≤ 5 days to the facility

    Tuberculosis-suspect registers and tuberculosis registers at the facility are used for verification

    Time frame: 5 days after the campaign was held

  6. Proportion of clients with a positive Tuberculosis-screening who return their sputum-bottles and who have at least one AFB-positive smear.

    Tuberculosis suspect registers and Tuberculosis registers at the facility are used for verification.

    Time frame: 5 days after the campaign was held

  7. Demographic characteristics of clients accessing the voluntary counseling and testing services

  8. Absolute number of clients accessing the services at the campaigns who have a positive screening for Tuberculosis

  9. Absolute number of clients with positive tuberculosis screening who return 3 sputum-bottles within ≤ 5 days to the facility

    Time frame: ≤ 5 days after the campaigns

  10. Absolute number of clients with a positive Tuberculosis-screening who return their sputum-bottles and who have at least one AFB-positive smear.

    Time frame: ≤ 5 days after the campaign

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Seboche Hospital
    Seboche, Botha-Bothe P.O. 304, Lesotho
  • Paray Hospital
    Thaba-Tseka, Lesotho
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Labhardt ND, Motlomelo M, Cerutti B, Pfeiffer K, Kamele M, Hobbins MA, Ehmer J. Home-based versus mobile clinic HIV testing and counseling in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 16;11(12):e1001768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001768. eCollection 2014 Dec. PubMed 25513807 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01459120
Lead sponsor
SolidarMed
Collaborators
Paray Mission Hospital, Thaba-Tseka, Seboche Hospital, Botha-Bothe
Responsible party
Niklaus Labhardt (Project Manager, SolidarMed) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2012
Completion
Feb 2012
Last update
Feb 9, 2012

Study contacts

Motlomelo Masetsibi
principal investigator · SolidarMed
Niklaus Labhardt, MD, MIH
study director · SolidarMed
Karolin Pfeiffer, MD, McommH
study chair · SolidarMed

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion