CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01455519CovidienUpdated Oct 24, 2017Results posted

True Functional Restoration and Analgesia in Non-Radicular Low Back Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Hydromorphone ER and Sugar pill in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-24.

Sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

You are asked to take part in this study because you have chronic, non-radicular low back pain. This study is done to investigate the pain relieving effects of the study drug Exalgo (Hydromorphone ER) for people who experience chronic non-radicular low back pain. The purpose of this research is to look at how the study drug can be used to benefit people who experience this type of pain. This is a phase IV study done to study the safety and effectiveness of the drug. At this point the drug has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and has been studied in more than 2,000 pain patients in clinical trials, including individuals with low back pain. About 36 subjects will take part in this study.

Read the detailed description

As a participant in this study, you will be asked to come to the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC), Center for Pain Studies (446 E Ontario St. Suite 1011, Chicago, IL 60611). Your part in this study will last for 8 weeks and will involve 3 visits to the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and anywhere from weekly phone calls to phone calls every other day.

If you are in this study, you will be placed in one of two study groups: one group will receive the study drug and one will receive a placebo. You will be assigned a study group by chance using a process similar to the flip of a coin. This process is called randomization. Neither you nor the study staff will select the group you will be in. A placebo looks like the study drug but is an inactive substance that has no medication. Researchers use a placebo to see if the study drug works better or is safer than not taking anything. You will have a 66% chance of getting the study drug. You will receive placebo at some point during the study but you will not know whether you are receiving placebo or study drug during the entire study. However, if you have a medical emergency, the investigators can get this information.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Low Back Pain
  • Back Pain
  • Chronic back pain
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meets our criteria for Chronic Non-Radicular Back Pain (CNRBP): non-radiating (below buttocks), no frank weakness or atrophy, no sensory or reflex changes
  • If female, is not pregnant or breast feeding, and not currently attempting to conceive; if of childbearing potential, use of a highly effective method of birth control (as determined by Pl).
  • Able to read and speak English and provide informed consent; ages: 18-90.
  • Able to understand and comply with all data collection methodology.
  • Subjects may continue any non opioid, non acetaminophen stable drug regimen with no changes during the course of study and not use rescue medications 12 hours before testing.
  • Subjects taking opioids must agree to detoxify for the protocol. If they agree they will detox under the direction of the PI before entering the protocol. They may begin the acetaminophen rescue med as per the protocol while in detox.
  • Must have pain greater than or equal to 5 on a 10 point Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at phone screening, or pain greater than or equal to 50 on VAS at visit one.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with hypersensitivity to Opioids, Acetominophen or Exalgo.
  • Subjects with severe or untreated psychiatric disturbance (e.g. mania, depression [esp suicidality], anxiety, substance dependence).
  • Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia or polymyalgia rheumatica.
  • Subjects with severe ongoing or unaddressed medical conditions (e.g. Renal or Hepatic disease [creatinine>1.5 ml/dl; AST or ALT> 3x normal limit], uncontrolled hypertension), pulmonary disease, uncontrolled seizure disorder, gastoparesis or urinary retention.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar pill

    Subjects may receive a pill with no medicine.

    Drug: Sugar pill

  • Active comparator
    Hydromorphone ER

    Subjects received study drug: Hydromorphone ER

    Drug: Hydromorphone ER

Interventions

  • DrugHydromorphone ER

    Total target dose of 32 mg/day. All subjects will have a lead in for 2 weeks; then begin a 'forced' 2-week up-titration schedule as follows: 8mg/d (1 pill, 5 days), 16mg mg/d (2 pills, 5 days), and 24mg/d (3 pills, 5 days) then finally 32 mg/d (4 pills a day) for the 'stable dose' phase of the study, or identical placebo pills. If intolerable side effects occur, the dose may be reduced to last tolerable does, a minimum of 8 mg/day (or one pill a day), at the discretion of the PI. Subjects unable to tolerate 8 mg/day will be discontinued from the study. A 2-week down-titration will be used.

    Also known as: Exalgo(hydromorphone HCl), CII (77605306)

  • DrugSugar pill

    Sugar pill

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form

    The McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (MPQ-SF) is a well-validated pain measure that permits separation of the sensory and affective components of pain, which are added together to compute a total score. The scale ranges from 0-45 (0=no pain, 45=the most pain).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  2. Change in VAS

    Visual Analogue Scale is a self report pain scale on a scale 0(no pain) to 100 (the worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in PASS

    Anxiety scores were collected at least two data points. The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) is a scale from 0 - 100, where 0 = no anxiety and 100 = the most anxiety.

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  2. Change in Pain Disability

    The Pain Disability Index (PDI) is a seven-item, validated instrument that assesses perceived disability in seven key life areas. It provides a total disability score, and is an indirect measure of self efficacy. The Pain Disability Scale is a scale from 0 - 70, where 0 = no Disability and 70 = the most Disability.

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  3. Change in Stair Climb Time

    Time to climb 1 flight of stairs

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  4. Change in Treadmill Distance Walked

    Treadmill distance walked in 6 minutes

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  5. Change in Sit to Stand Repetitions

    Sit to stand repetitions completed in 1 minute

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  6. Change in Distance to Floor

    Distance from fingers to Floor when bending forward. A functional test of flexibility

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  7. Change in Time to Lift Box

    Time to lift 13 pound box to floor and back up to table.

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  8. Change in NRS After Stair Climb

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional stair climb test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  9. Change in NRS After Treadmill Walk

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional treadmill walk test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  10. Change in NRS After Sit to Stand Repetitions

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional sit to stand test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

  11. Change in NRS After Box Lift

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional box lift test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

    Time frame: Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention

07

Results

Posted Jul 13, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Started1223
Completed818
Not completed45

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form

The McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (MPQ-SF) is a well-validated pain measure that permits separation of the sensory and affective components of pain, which are added together to compute a total score. The scale ranges from 0-45 (0=no pain, 45=the most pain).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form
units on a scaleSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form-0.73 ± 2.33-3.78 ± 1.7
PrimaryChange in VAS

Visual Analogue Scale is a self report pain scale on a scale 0(no pain) to 100 (the worst pain imaginable).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in VAS
units on a scaleSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in VAS-10.57 ± 9.54-10.67 ± 6.91
SecondaryChange in PASS

Anxiety scores were collected at least two data points. The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) is a scale from 0 - 100, where 0 = no anxiety and 100 = the most anxiety.

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in PASS
units on a scaleSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in PASS-7.14 ± 2.94-5.85 ± 2.21
SecondaryChange in Pain Disability

The Pain Disability Index (PDI) is a seven-item, validated instrument that assesses perceived disability in seven key life areas. It provides a total disability score, and is an indirect measure of self efficacy. The Pain Disability Scale is a scale from 0 - 70, where 0 = no Disability and 70 = the most Disability.

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Pain Disability
units on a scaleSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Pain Disability-9.84 ± 4.56-9.25 ± 3.36
SecondaryChange in Stair Climb Time

Time to climb 1 flight of stairs

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change in Stair Climb Time
secondsSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Stair Climb Time1.28 ± 1.08-1.25 ± 0.8
SecondaryChange in Treadmill Distance Walked

Treadmill distance walked in 6 minutes

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · miles
Change in Treadmill Distance Walked
milesSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Treadmill Distance Walked0.02 ± 0.020.02 ± 0.01
SecondaryChange in Sit to Stand Repetitions

Sit to stand repetitions completed in 1 minute

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · number of repetitions
Change in Sit to Stand Repetitions
number of repetitionsSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Sit to Stand Repetitions-1.07 ± 1.52.54 ± 1.14
SecondaryChange in Distance to Floor

Distance from fingers to Floor when bending forward. A functional test of flexibility

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Change in Distance to Floor
centimetersSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Distance to Floor-4.61 ± 3.03-4.02 ± 2.26
SecondaryChange in Time to Lift Box

Time to lift 13 pound box to floor and back up to table.

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · seconds per lift
Change in Time to Lift Box
seconds per liftSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in Time to Lift Box-1.45 ± 1.13-1.06 ± 0.8
SecondaryChange in NRS After Stair Climb

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional stair climb test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · NRS pain score
Change in NRS After Stair Climb
NRS pain scoreSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in NRS After Stair Climb0.04 ± 0.23-0.11 ± 0.17
SecondaryChange in NRS After Treadmill Walk

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional treadmill walk test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · NRS pain score
Change in NRS After Treadmill Walk
NRS pain scoreSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in NRS After Treadmill Walk0.1 ± 0.44-0.51 ± 0.32
SecondaryChange in NRS After Sit to Stand Repetitions

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional sit to stand test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · NRS pain score
Change in NRS After Sit to Stand Repetitions
NRS pain scoreSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in NRS After Sit to Stand Repetitions-0.24 ± 0.34-0.57 ± 0.25
SecondaryChange in NRS After Box Lift

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional box lift test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst).

Time frame:
Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · NRS pain score
Change in NRS After Box Lift
NRS pain scoreSugar PillHydromorphone ER
Change in NRS After Box Lift0.39 ± 0.58-0.43 ± 0.36

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugar Pill—0/12 (0%)5/12 (41.7%)
Hydromorphone ER—0/23 (0%)15/23 (65.2%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventSugar PillHydromorphone ER
drowsinessGeneral disorders1/129/23
nauseaGeneral disorders0/126/23
fatigueGeneral disorders0/124/23
itchinessGeneral disorders2/121/23
vomitingGeneral disorders1/122/23
stomach painGastrointestinal disorders1/120/23
trouble sleepingGeneral disorders0/121/23
dizzinessGeneral disorders0/121/23
diarrheaGeneral disorders0/121/23
ear infectionEar and labyrinth disorders0/121/23

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
Mean49.8 ± 10.746.6 ± 9.247.7 ± 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
Female51217
Male71118
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino102333
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American81321
White189
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported224
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m2)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
Mean32.8 ± 10.429.3 ± 8.430.5 ± 9.1
Duration of Pain
Duration of Pain(years)Sugar PillHydromorphone ERTotal
Mean12.6 ± 12.38.7 ± 7.810.0 ± 9.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01455519
Lead sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Collaborators
Mallinckrodt
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Jul 13, 2015
Last update
Oct 24, 2017

Study contacts

Norman Harden, M.D.
principal investigator · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion