ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT01450722finnptxUpdated Mar 7, 2024

Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in Long SFA Obstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison With Bypass Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of bypass surgery, stent placement and stent placement in Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia, Peripheral Athero Obstructive Disease and Critical Ischemia, sponsored by Kuopio University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-07.

Sponsored by Kuopio University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic lower limb ischemia due to atherosclerosis causes significant morbidity especially in elderly: the prevalence of asymptomatic obstructive peripheral atherosclerosis among 40-74 old is 4-22%. The prevalence of its milder symptomatic manifestation, intermittent claudication among 40 years old men is about 1% and among 70 years old it is 7%. In about 10% of the patients the ischemia worsens to threat the vitality of the limb. Although intermittent claudication has a benign prognosis and can often treated conservatively, more severe forms with extensive arterial obstructions require revascularization, either open surgical or endovascular. Surgical bypass operations are currently the standard reference for treating long femoral artery obstructions. Surgical bypass operations are accompanied by significant acute complications and late adverse effects, especially in patients with associated cardio-cerebrovascular and pulmonary diseases, and less invasive, safe, and effective endovascular therapies are seeked for. The long term patency rates of infrainguinal balloon angioplasty (PTA) vary largely in different studies but they are mostly poor when long femoral arterial obstructions have been treated. Drug eluting stents have shown great promise in coronary artery interventions. The purpose of this study is to compare Paclitaxel eluting Zilver PTX nitinol stent (Cook INC) with bypass surgery using PTFE graft to proximal popliteal artery in the treatment of long femoral artery obstructions (total length of 10-25 cm) in a prospective, randomized, Finnish multi center trial with consecutive claudicant and chronic critical ischemia patients. The aim is to randomize altogether 400 patients during about two years in five universities and in 2-3 central hospitals. The primary end point is patency at 24 month follow up. Secondary end points are primary success at patient discharge, complications, 30-day mortality, target lesion revascularization, quality of life, and economical analysis.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Chronic lower limb ischemia due to atherosclerosis causes significant morbidity especially in elderly: the prevalence of asymptomatic obstructive peripheral atherosclerosis among 40-74 old is 4-22%. The prevalence of its milder symptomatic manifestation, intermittent claudication among 40 years old men is about 1% and among 70 years old it is 7%. In about 10% of the patients the ischemia worsens to threat the vitality of the limb. Although intermittent claudication has a benign prognosis and can often treated conservatively, more severe forms with extensive arterial obstructions require revascularization, either open surgical or endovascular. Surgical bypass operation is currently the standard reference for treating long SFA obstructions. Up to 81% two-year patency can be appreciated after bypass with a good quality sapheneous vein. If synthetic graft is used the long term patency is somewhat lower, up to 67% according to a systematic review (Klinkert et al 2004).

The long term patency rates of infrainguinal balloon angioplasty (PTA) vary largely in different studies. At 1 year, primary patency rates of 47% to 86%, at three years 27% to 69%, and at six years 23% to 36% are reported in the literature. Highly variable and mostly poor patency rates, between 22 to 64% at 6-12 months have been reported by using subintimal angioplasty for the treatment of femoral and femoropopliteal lesions. (Met et al. 2008) In the femoropopliteal region, highly variable 1-year primary patency rates between 22% and 81% with various stents have been reported (Matsi et al 1994, Sapoval et al 1992, Grimm et al 2001, Lugmayr et al 2002). In three randomised studies, although the primary success rate of stent placement was higher than that after balloon angioplasty alone, the long-term patency was not improved by using stents (Cejna et al 2001, Grimm 2001). A meta-analysis revealed similar patency rates after balloon dilation and stent implantation (34). The authors of the largest randomized multicenter comparison of femoropopliteal PTA and balloon expanded stent placement with 154 treated limbs summarised that the beneficial effect of stents is to rescue PTA failures (54). In one study three year primary patency rate of 76% was obtained after primary stenting of relatively short, less than 6 cm long lesions (Lugmayr et al 2002). However, midterm restenosis after long-segment femoropopliteal stenting remains a problem. In recent single-center observational study in which long segments (median length 16 cm) were covered by nitinol stent after initial failure of PTA, the primary patency was only 54% at one year. Stent in the femoropopliteal artery are exposed to unique long term stress in the form of repeated compression, flexion and torsion and it is probably the reason why recent studies have revealed stent fractures in up to 50% of nitinol stents 1 year after placement (Schneinert et al 2005) and in 19% of Wallstents a mean of 43 months after placement (Sclager et al 2005). The fractures seem to be associated with poorer patency and they are more common in longer stents.

Drug eluting stents have shown great promise in coronary artery interventions. One of these drugs, sirolimus, that is a natural macrocyclic lactone with potent immunosuppressive and antimitotic action, has been tried also at femoral arteries. Sirolimus-eluting self-expanding nitinol SMART stent was compared in a small (57 patients) randomized, double-blind multi-center study with the bare metal stent (SIROCCO II trial) in treating femoral artery lesions with average length of 8 cm (Duda et al 2005). Exceptionally low angiographically verified binary restenosis rate of 7.7% was registered at the bare metal stent group. Although the restenosis rate was zero and there was less mean late loss in diameter in the drug stent group the difference did not reach statistical difference.

Paclitaxel is a mitotic inhibitor and another antiproliferative agent and widely used, effective agent in drug eluting stents to reduce restenosis in coronary circulation. Paclitaxel binds specifically to the beta-tubulin subunit of microtubules and appears to antagonize the disassembly of this key cytoskeletal protein; this action results in accumulation of microtubule bundles and aberrant microtubular derived structures in the mitotic phase of the cell cycle. Zilver PTX (Cook Medical) paclitaxel-eluting stent is designed for the SFA. It is a nitinol stent coated with paclitaxel only, with no polymer or binder. A recent prospective, randomized trial reported significantly better 24-month event-free survival among patient receiving PTX stent than among those treated with PTA (86,6% vs. 77.6%, p\<0.01). Primary patency at 24 months of the PTX stent group was 74.8% vs 32.4% for the PTA group. (Dake , LINC 2011).

PURPOSE AND STUDY RATIONALE

To compare Paclitaxel eluting Zilver PTX stent (Cook INC) with bypass surgery using PTFE graft to proximal popliteal artery in the treatment of long SFA obstructions in a prospective, randomized, Finnish multi center trial with consecutive claudicant and chronic critical ischemia patients. Bypass with a synthetic graft instead of autogeneous vein is used as a reference standard because of the difficulty to standardize the quality of available vein and because the bypass done to the proximal popliteal artery with the graft types gives very similar results. The aim is to randomize altogether 400 patients during about two years in five university and in 2-3 central hospitals.

The power analysis of study is based on non-inferiority hypothesis, i.e. to show that paclitaxel eluting stent is not inferior to bypass surgery in 24 month patency. With accepted marginal for equality 5%, assuming surgical group patency 75% and non-inferiority margin 10% and using 1:1 randomization the sample size for a power of 80% to detect non-inferiority of the test treatment is 590 (295/295).

PATIENT RECRUITMENT

Consecutive patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be asked to the study by vascular surgeon or interventional radiologist after the diagnostic imaging study. A consensus of a vascular surgeon and interventional radiologist is required: for an elective patient this is acquired in a weekly vascular meeting and for an urgent patient by consultation. The patient will be provided no additional compensation for participation but normal travel expenses for clinical visits will be paid. The patient's identity and personal study data will be available only for the researchers of the trial. Normal clinical patient insurance is applied.

PREOPERATIVE IMAGING AND VASCULAR LAB

MR-angio, CT angio, or catheter angio (DSA) is performed for planning of the therapy.

Ankle brachial index is measured..

INTERVENTIONS

Balloon angioplasty is performed before and after stent placement. Stenting is done from healthy-to-healthy segment.

Surgery is performed by using PTFE graft with distal distal anastomosis at above knee popliteal artery.

POSTOPERATIVE MEDICATION

Stent group: ASA 100 mgx1, Simvastatin , Clopidogrel 300 mgx1, 75 mgx1 for 6 months

Surgery: ASA 100 mgx1, Simvastatin

POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW- UP

AB-index and duplex ultrasound study will be performed at patient discharge. Clinical visit to a vascular surgeon is scheduled at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months with Ankle-brachial index measurement and duplex US study.

STUDY COORDINATION AND MONITORING

The main investigator of the trial is professor Hannu Manninen, Kuopio University Hospital. The other investigators in KUH are M.Ds. Kimmo Mäkinen, Petri Saari, and Jussi Kärkkäinen. The main investigator in Helsinki, Oulu, Tampere, and Turku University Hospitals are Jukka Perälä, Kimmo Lappalainen, Janne Korhonen, and Riitta Rautio, correspondingly. Randomization is performed centralized by a study coordinator (Marja-Liisa Sutinen, Kuopio) Analysis of imaging studies is performed in a core lab. The trial will possibly be monitored, which will be performed by an authorized person and coordinated by the research unit of Kuopio University Hospital.

STUDY ENDPOINTS

Study end points are determined according to CIRSE/SVS standards. Primary endpoint: Patency at 24 month follow-up by objective means with the aid of AB-index measurement and duplex US measurement.

Secondary endpoints:

Primary success and assisted primary success is registered at patient discharge.

Complications classified as minor and major. 30-day mortality. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), which was defined as any revascularization procedure, percutaneous or surgical, involving the target lesion.

AFS (amputation free survival) Economical analysis of direct and indirect costs. Life quality analysis.

DATA ANALYSIS

Randomization will be performed and coordinated by a common research coordinator for all participating centers. Imaging data will be archieved to a secured science PACS of Kuopio University Hospital and the image analysis will be performed by an independent researcher without knowledge of the patient data.

Primary procedural success and complications are defined according to established EVS/CIRSE guidelines. Cumulative patency rate will be calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and the statistical difference between the survival curves will be determined by the means of log-rank test. Quality of life analysis will be done using RAND-36 questionnaire.

BUDGET

Study coordinator will be recruited for 12 months. EVO funding will be applied.

TIME SCHEDULE

Approval of ethical committee in Kuopio: May 2011, in other centers August 2011.

Patient interventions start June 2011, cathering until December 2013. End of Follow up December 2015.

PUBLICATION PLAN

The sresults will be published in 2 - 3 original publications international peer reviewed journals and they will be a main portion of one Thesis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia
  • Peripheral Athero Obstructive Disease
  • Critical Ischemia
  • Claudication

Keywords

  • Chronic lower limb ischemia
  • claudication
  • chronic critical ischemia
03

In context

Intermittent Claudication

309 studies on the registry are indexed under Intermittent Claudication; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 74 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Intermittent Claudication.

Browse Intermittent Claudication studies →

Lead sponsor

Kuopio University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suffering from severe life-style limiting claudication indicating revascularization as well as patients suffering from chronic critical ischemia and having de-novo SFA obstruction with total length of 7-20 cm will be recruited.
  • For claudicant patients an attempt of conservative treatment should be attempted before revacularization therapy. Both surgical bypass operation and endovascular treatment should be able to be safely performed;
  • the patient has not extensive additional cardio-pulmonary and/or cerebro-vascular diseases increasing remarkably operative risk.
  • At least one patent artery is to the ankle level.
  • The patient has given his/her .
  • Previous or simultaneus endovascular therapy of coexisting iliac disease is not a but study groups should be balanced.
  • Unplanned common femoral artery endarterectomy is not a contraindication when it is done at the same intervention to facilitate anastomosis creation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have not given their written .
  • Patient has allergy for iodine contrast agent.
  • Patient is undergoing hemodialysis.
  • Patient has undergone previous endovascular treatment for the target lesion (restenotic lesions).
  • Patient has also infrapopliteal disease indicating revascularization.
  • Patient is pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    drug eluting stent

    Paclitaxel eluting stent for long superficial femoral artery obstruction

    Procedure: bypass surgery, stent placement · Procedure: stent placement

  • Active comparator
    bypass operation

    femoropopliteal artery bypass operation by using synthetic PTFE graft

    Procedure: bypass surgery, stent placement

Interventions

  • Procedurebypass surgery, stent placement

    bypass surgery, stent placement

    Also known as: PTX stent

  • Procedurestent placement

    placement of paclitaxel eluting stent in long superficial femoral artery obstruction

    Also known as: PTX Cook

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary patency of the stent or graft at two year follow up

    Time frame: Ultrasound study at 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Amputation free survival

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bjorkman P, Auvinen T, Hakovirta H, Romsi P, Turtiainen J, Manninen H, Venermo M. Drug-Eluting Stent Shows Similar Patency Results as Prosthetic Bypass in Patients with Femoropopliteal Occlusion in a Randomized Trial. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;53:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jun 7. PubMed 29886215 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01450722
Collaborators
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Turku University Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Finnish Society of Interventional radiology, North Karelia Central Hospital, Paijat-Hame Hospital District
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2024

Study contacts

Hannu Manninen, professor
Contact
hannu.manninen@kuh.fi
358-447113318
Marja-Liisa Sutinen, nurse
Contact
marja-liisa.sutinen@kuh.fi
358 44717 3941
Hannu I Manninen, Professor
principal investigator · Kuopio University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion