CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01432730EPICCUpdated Nov 24, 2020Results posted

A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Gefapixant (MK-7264/AF-219), in Participants With Chronic Cough (MK-7264-006)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Gefapixant and Placebo in Chronic Cough, sponsored by Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA). Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-24.

Sponsored by Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, single centre study of gefapixant (AF-219/MK-7264) in participants with idiopathic or treatment resistant chronic cough designed to evaluate the effectiveness of gefapixant in reducing daytime objective cough frequency.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Cough
03

In context

Cough

346 studies on the registry are indexed under Cough; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 70 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Cough.

Browse Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • History of cough for more than 8 weeks
  • Normal chest radiograph
  • Idiopathic or treatment resistant cough (idiopathic defined as a cough for which no objective evidence of an underlying trigger can be determined after investigation or a cough that is unresponsive to 8 weeks of targeted treatment for identified underlying triggers including reflux disease, asthma and post-nasal drip [treatment-resistant]).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smoker
  • Individuals who have given up smoking within the past 6 months, or those with >20 pack-year smoking history
  • Treatment with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACE-inhibitor) as the potential cause of a participant's cough, or requiring treatment with an ACE-inhibitor during the study or within 4 weeks prior to Day 0
  • Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \<60%
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gefapixant 600 mg>Placebo

    Gefapixant, 600 mg, twice daily (BID), taken orally for 2 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period and then placebo to gefapixant, BID, taken orally for 2 weeks.

    Drug: Gefapixant · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Placebo>Gefapixant 600 mg

    Placebo to gefapixant BID, taken orally for 2 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period and then gefapixant, 600 mg, BID, taken orally for 2 weeks.

    Drug: Gefapixant · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGefapixant

    Oral tablets, BID

    Also known as: AF-219, MK-7264

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral tablets, BID

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Daytime Objective Cough Frequency

    Daytime Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) the participant is awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participants is awake. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device. Change from baseline in awake cough frequency = (post-treatment awake cough frequency - baseline awake cough frequency). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Cough Severity VAS: scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough. Change from baseline in daytime cough severity = (post-treatment daytime cough severity - baseline daytime cough severity). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough severity, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period

  2. Change From Baseline in Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency

    Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period the participant is asleep divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participant is asleep. 24 hour sound recording were collected with a digital recording device. Change from baseline in nighttime cough frequency = (post-treatment nighttime cough frequency - baseline nighttime cough frequency). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period

  3. Change From Baseline of Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Cough Severity VAS: scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough. Change from baseline in nighttime cough severity = (post-treatment nighttime cough severity - baseline nighttime cough severity). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough severity, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period

  4. Change From Baseline of 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency

    Total (0-24 hours) Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration (in hours, i.e., 24 hours mostly) for the monitoring period. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device. A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

    Time frame: 24 hours at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period

  5. Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Frequency

    At the end of each study period, participants were asked to complete the global rating of change scale questionnaire. The participants were asked to record whether their cough frequency was "worse", "about the same", or "better". If better or worse, the participants were then asked "by how much" with a 7-category rating scale. Therefore, a 15-point ordered scale was used (1=minimum, a very great deal better to 15=maximum, a very great deal worse with a score of 8=indicating no change).

    Time frame: Day 15 of each study period

  6. Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Severity

    At the end of each study period, participants were asked to complete the global rating of change scale questionnaire. The participants were asked to record whether their cough severity was "worse", "about the same", or "better". If better or worse, the participants were then asked "by how much" with a 7-category rating scale. Therefore, a 15-point ordered scale was used (1=minimum, a very great deal better to 15=maximum, a very great deal worse with a score of 8=indicating no change).

    Time frame: Day 15 of each study period

  7. Change From Baseline in Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)

    The CQLQ Questionnaire included 28 items that described negative aspects of quality of life specific to chronic cough. Subscales include: Physical complaints, Psychosocial issues, Functional abilities, Emotional wellbeing, Extreme physical complaints, and Personal safety fears. Participants indicated their degree of agreement with each statement on a 4 point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree). CQLQ scores (28 for least impact, 112 for highest impact) used a mixed effect model with terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period. Change from baseline in CQLQ scores = (posttreatment CQLQ scores - baseline CQLQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in CQLQ scores (lowest cough impact on health-related quality of life), while a positive result indicates an increase in CQLQ scores (highest cough impact on health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period

  8. Change From Baseline in Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale

    UtCQ is determined through the use of a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging between 0 for "no urge to cough" and 100 for "severe urge to cough"). Change from baseline in UtCQ scores = (post-treatment UtCQ scores - baseline UtCQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in UtCQ scores (lowest impact), while a positive result indicates an increase in UtCQ scores (highest impact).

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period

Other outcomes

  1. Baseline Daytime Cough Frequency

    Daytime Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) the participant is awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participants is awake. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  2. Baseline Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Cough Severity VAS is scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  3. Baseline Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency

    Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period the participant is asleep divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participant is asleep. 24 hour sound recording were collected with a digital recording device.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  4. Baseline Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Nighttime cough severity was scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  5. Baseline 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency

    Total (0-24 hours) Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration (in hours, i.e., 24 hours mostly) for the monitoring period. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  6. Baseline Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)

    The CQLQ Questionnaire included 28 items that described negative aspects of quality of life specific to chronic cough. Subscales include: Physical complaints, Psychosocial issues, Functional abilities, Emotional wellbeing, Extreme physical complaints, and Personal safety fears. Participants indicated their degree of agreement with each statement on a 4 point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree). CQLQ scores (28 for least impact, 112 for highest impact) used a mixed effect model with terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period. Change from baseline in CQLQ scores = (posttreatment CQLQ scores - baseline CQLQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in CQLQ scores (lowest cough impact on health-related quality of life), while a positive result indicates an increase in CQLQ scores (highest cough impact on health-related quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

  7. Baseline Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale

    UtCQ is determined through the use of a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging between 0 for "no urge to cough" and 100 for "severe urge to cough").

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) of each study period

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2020

Participant flow

24 participants were enrolled and randomized from a single center.

Period 1
Participant flow — Period 1
MilestoneGefapixant 600 mg>PlaceboPlacebo>Gefapixant 600mg
Started1212
Completed1012
Not completed20
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Period 2
Participant flow — Period 2
MilestoneGefapixant 600 mg>PlaceboPlacebo>Gefapixant 600mg
Started1012
Completed108
Not completed04
Withdrew: Adverse event04

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Daytime Objective Cough Frequency

Daytime Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) the participant is awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participants is awake. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device. Change from baseline in awake cough frequency = (post-treatment awake cough frequency - baseline awake cough frequency). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period
Reported as:
Log mean · Coughs/hour
Change From Baseline in Daytime Objective Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Daytime Objective Cough Frequency-0.5365 ± 0.17180.0523 ± 0.0462
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0003 · Log mean difference (active - placebo): -0.6027 · 95% CI -0.9049 to -0.3005Mixed model included terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment \& period. Average \& period baseline covariates included.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Cough Severity VAS: scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough. Change from baseline in daytime cough severity = (post-treatment daytime cough severity - baseline daytime cough severity). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough severity, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough severity.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-21.5 ± 35.65-0.7 ± 19.01
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.003 · Mean difference (final values): -25.57 · 95% CI -41.53 to -9.62Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency

Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period the participant is asleep divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participant is asleep. 24 hour sound recording were collected with a digital recording device. Change from baseline in nighttime cough frequency = (post-treatment nighttime cough frequency - baseline nighttime cough frequency). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period
Reported as:
Log mean · Coughs/hour
Change From Baseline in Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency-0.3452 ± 0.23140.0690 ± 0.1767
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.057 · Log mean difference (active - placebo): -0.4212 · 95% CI -0.8568 to 0.01438Mixed model included terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment \& period. Average \& period baseline covariates included.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Cough Severity VAS: scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough. Change from baseline in nighttime cough severity = (post-treatment nighttime cough severity - baseline nighttime cough severity). A negative result indicates a decrease in cough severity, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough severity.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-16.1 ± 27.71-3.7 ± 22.05
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.172 · Mean difference (final values): -8.53 · 95% CI -20.93 to 3.87Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency

Total (0-24 hours) Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration (in hours, i.e., 24 hours mostly) for the monitoring period. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device. A negative result indicates a decrease in cough frequency, while a positive result indicates an increase in cough frequency.

Time frame:
24 hours at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 14 of each study period
Reported as:
Log mean · Coughs/hour
Change From Baseline of 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency-0.5562 ± 0.17950.0298 ± 0.0459
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Log mean difference (active - placebo): -0.582 · 95% CI -0.8934 to -0.2707Mixed model included terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment \& period. Average \& period baseline covariates included.
SecondaryGlobal Rating of Change Score for Cough Frequency

At the end of each study period, participants were asked to complete the global rating of change scale questionnaire. The participants were asked to record whether their cough frequency was "worse", "about the same", or "better". If better or worse, the participants were then asked "by how much" with a 7-category rating scale. Therefore, a 15-point ordered scale was used (1=minimum, a very great deal better to 15=maximum, a very great deal worse with a score of 8=indicating no change).

Time frame:
Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Frequency
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Frequency5.83 ± 4.968.32 ± 2.28
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.033 · Mean difference (final values): -2.538 · 95% CI -4.849 to -0.227Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
SecondaryGlobal Rating of Change Score for Cough Severity

At the end of each study period, participants were asked to complete the global rating of change scale questionnaire. The participants were asked to record whether their cough severity was "worse", "about the same", or "better". If better or worse, the participants were then asked "by how much" with a 7-category rating scale. Therefore, a 15-point ordered scale was used (1=minimum, a very great deal better to 15=maximum, a very great deal worse with a score of 8=indicating no change).

Time frame:
Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Severity
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Global Rating of Change Score for Cough Severity6.00 ± 4.948.23 ± 2.25
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.049 · Median difference (final values): -2.267 · 95% CI -4.523 to -0.010Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)

The CQLQ Questionnaire included 28 items that described negative aspects of quality of life specific to chronic cough. Subscales include: Physical complaints, Psychosocial issues, Functional abilities, Emotional wellbeing, Extreme physical complaints, and Personal safety fears. Participants indicated their degree of agreement with each statement on a 4 point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree). CQLQ scores (28 for least impact, 112 for highest impact) used a mixed effect model with terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period. Change from baseline in CQLQ scores = (posttreatment CQLQ scores - baseline CQLQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in CQLQ scores (lowest cough impact on health-related quality of life), while a positive result indicates an increase in CQLQ scores (highest cough impact on health-related quality of life).

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)-10.8 ± 14.23-1.4 ± 6.48
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.018 · Mean difference (final values): -9.237 · 95% CI -16.759 to -1.716Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale

UtCQ is determined through the use of a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging between 0 for "no urge to cough" and 100 for "severe urge to cough"). Change from baseline in UtCQ scores = (post-treatment UtCQ scores - baseline UtCQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in UtCQ scores (lowest impact), while a positive result indicates an increase in UtCQ scores (highest impact).

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 15 of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale-27.2 ± 42.07-6.5 ± 28.59
Statistical analysis
  • Gefapixant 600 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.035 · Mean difference (final values): -21.25 · 95% CI -40.96 to -1.54Mixed effect model fitting terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period.
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Daytime Cough Frequency

Daytime Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) the participant is awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participants is awake. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Coughs/hour
Baseline Daytime Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Daytime Cough Frequency37.09 ± 32.2365.45 ± 163.36
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Cough Severity VAS is scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Baseline Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Daytime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)48.8 ± 20.7352.7 ± 16.10
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency

Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency is the total number of cough events during the monitoring period the participant is asleep divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the participant is asleep. 24 hour sound recording were collected with a digital recording device.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Coughs/hour
Baseline Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Nighttime Objective Cough Frequency4.34 ± 7.797.78 ± 23.80
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Nighttime cough severity was scored from 0 to 100 using a 10 mm visual analogue scale with 0 at 0mm and 100 at 100mm with 0 representing no cough and 100 the most severe cough.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Baseline Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Nighttime Cough Severity Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)31.5 ± 23.8628.8 ± 24.88
Other pre-specifiedBaseline 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency

Total (0-24 hours) Objective Cough Frequency = Total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration (in hours, i.e., 24 hours mostly) for the monitoring period. 24-hour sound recordings were collected using a digital recording device.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Coughs/hour
Baseline 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency
Coughs/hourGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency26.63 ± 22.6344.70 ± 105.16
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)

The CQLQ Questionnaire included 28 items that described negative aspects of quality of life specific to chronic cough. Subscales include: Physical complaints, Psychosocial issues, Functional abilities, Emotional wellbeing, Extreme physical complaints, and Personal safety fears. Participants indicated their degree of agreement with each statement on a 4 point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree). CQLQ scores (28 for least impact, 112 for highest impact) used a mixed effect model with terms for treatment sequence, participant within sequence, treatment, and period. Change from baseline in CQLQ scores = (posttreatment CQLQ scores - baseline CQLQ scores). A negative result indicates a decrease in CQLQ scores (lowest cough impact on health-related quality of life), while a positive result indicates an increase in CQLQ scores (highest cough impact on health-related quality of life).

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Baseline Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Cough-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)56.3 ± 10.4056.2 ± 10.28
Other pre-specifiedBaseline Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale

UtCQ is determined through the use of a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging between 0 for "no urge to cough" and 100 for "severe urge to cough").

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) of each study period
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Baseline Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale
Score on a scaleGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
Baseline Urge to Cough Questionnaire (UtCQ) 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale63.1 ± 23.1062.5 ± 19.99

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 59 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gefapixant 600 mg—0/24 (0%)24/24 (100%)
Placebo—0/22 (0%)5/22 (22.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventGefapixant 600 mgPlacebo
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders21/240/22
HypogeusiaNervous system disorders13/240/22
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/241/22
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/241/22
Salivary hypersecretionGastrointestinal disorders3/241/22
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/241/22
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/241/22
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/242/22
Vision blurredEye disorders2/240/22
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/240/22

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)All Participants
Mean54.5 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female18
Male6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino24
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White24
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdulqawi R, Dockry R, Holt K, Layton G, McCarthy BG, Ford AP, Smith JA. P2X3 receptor antagonist (AF-219) in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1198-205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61255-1. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PubMed 25467586 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01432730
Lead sponsor
Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2011
Start date
Sep 22, 2011
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2013
Completion
Feb 21, 2013
Results posted
Nov 2, 2020
Last update
Nov 24, 2020

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion