ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01423227HomeBaseUpdated Aug 14, 2019

Benefits and Costs of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and Hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by La Trobe University. Completed at 2 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-14.

Sponsored by La Trobe University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective treatment for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which improves symptoms, reduces hospitalisation and lowers healthcare costs. However less than 1% of Australians with COPD receive pulmonary rehabilitation each year, due to poor access to programs and high levels of disability. This randomised controlled trial will examine the benefits and costs of a novel, entirely home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program for COPD. We hypothesise that home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can deliver equivalent clinical outcomes at lower cost than the centre-based program.

We will randomly allocate 144 people with COPD to undertake either standard pulmonary rehabilitation in a hospital setting, or a low-cost home-based program. Those who undertake pulmonary rehabilitation in the hospital setting will attend the hospital twice each week for eight weeks for supervised exercise training and education. People in the home pulmonary rehabilitation group will receive one home visit and weekly telephone calls for eight weeks, for supervision and mentoring of exercise and provision of education. We will compare the number of people who complete the program in each setting. We will also test whether the groups have similar results for the standard pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes of breathlessness, quality of life and exercise capacity, at the end of the program and 12 months later. We will compare health care costs and personal costs between groups after 12 months.

If home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can improve uptake of this important treatment, deliver good clinical outcomes and reduce costs this will have significant and long-lasting benefits for patients, the community and the health system

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • COPD
  • exercise
  • rehabilitation
  • dyspnea
  • quality of life
  • economic evaluation
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 144 is above the median of 62 across 3,839 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

La Trobe University is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • current or former smokers of at least 10 packet years
  • aged 40 years or over
  • diagnosis of confirmed on spirometry.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous diagnosis of asthma
  • have attended a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the last two years
  • exacerbation of within the last four weeks
  • have comorbidities which prevent participation in an exercise training program
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation

    Home visit plus 8 weeks of once-weekly telephone calls

    Behavioral: Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation

    Standard twice-weekly 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program

    Behavioral: Hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralHome-based pulmonary rehabilitation

    One home visit plus weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks

  • BehavioralHospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation

    Standard twice-weekly 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 6-minute walk test

    Testing equivalence between groups

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months

  2. Change in Modified Medical Research Council Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months

  3. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. SF-36 v2

    Contributes to cost effectiveness analysis

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months

  5. Program completion rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Austin Health
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Alfred Health
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cox NS, Dal Corso S, Hansen H, McDonald CF, Hill CJ, Zanaboni P, Alison JA, O'Halloran P, Macdonald H, Holland AE. Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 29;1(1):CD013040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013040.pub2. PubMed 33511633 ↗
  • Grimwood CL, Holland AE, McDonald CF, Mahal A, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Cox NS, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Lahham A, Gillies R, Burge AT. Comparison of self-report and administrative data sources to capture health care resource use in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following pulmonary rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1061. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05920-0. PubMed 33228654 ↗
  • Burge AT, Holland AE, McDonald CF, Abramson MJ, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Cox NS, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Lahham A, Gillies R, Mahal A. Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: An economic analysis. Respirology. 2020 Feb;25(2):183-190. doi: 10.1111/resp.13667. Epub 2019 Aug 16. PubMed 31418515 ↗
  • Hoaas H, Zanaboni P, Hjalmarsen A, Morseth B, Dinesen B, Burge AT, Cox NS, Holland AE. Seasonal variations in objectively assessed physical activity among people with COPD in two Nordic countries and Australia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 5;14:1219-1228. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S194622. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31239657 ↗
  • Lahham A, McDonald CF, Mahal A, Lee AL, Hill CJ, Burge AT, Cox NS, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Gillies R, Holland AE. Participation in Physical Activity During Center and Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation for People With COPD: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Mar;39(2):E1-E4. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000373. PubMed 30688793 ↗
  • Liacos A, McDonald CF, Mahal A, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Burge AT, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Cox NS, Lahham A, Gillies R, Holland AE. The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Physiotherapy. 2019 Mar;105(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PubMed 30316548 ↗
  • Holland AE, Mahal A, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Burge AT, Cox NS, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Lahham A, Gillies R, McDonald CF. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):57-65. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208514. Epub 2016 Sep 26. PubMed 27672116 ↗
  • Holland AE, Mahal A, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Burge AT, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Cox NS, Lahham A, Ndongo R, Bell E, McDonald CF. Benefits and costs of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a multi-centre randomised controlled equivalence trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Sep 8;13:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-57. PubMed 24011178 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01423227
Lead sponsor
La Trobe University
Collaborators
The Alfred, Austin Health, Monash University
Responsible party
Anne Holland (Associate Professor, La Trobe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Last update
Aug 14, 2019

Study contacts

Anne E Holland, PhD
principal investigator · La Trobe University, Alfred Health, Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Christine F McDonald, PhD
principal investigator · Austin Health, Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Ajay Mahal, PhD
principal investigator · Monash University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion