ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05138380HOOTUpdated Oct 11, 2023

Hip Osteoarthritis and Foot Orthoses Trial (HOOT)

An interventional study of Foot orthoses and Flat shoe insert in Hip Osteoarthritis, sponsored by La Trobe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-11.

Sponsored by La Trobe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2022; still recruiting 4 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is a randomized feasibility trial to determine the feasibility of comparing two different shoe inserts and on pain, quality of life and physical activity associated with hip osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be randomized to one of two groups - contoured prefabricated foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts (the comparator). Participants will be asked to use the inserts daily for a six week period. Adherence to the intervention will be monitored using a daily diary, as well as adverse events and co-interventions. The primary outcome is feasibility domains (Demand, Implementation, Acceptability, Practicality) with secondary outcomes of change in hip-related pain and quality of life and physical activity levels. The primary time-point will be 6-weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 90 across 457 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

La Trobe University is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Primary symptomatic and radiographic hip OA, in accordance with the American College of Rheumatology

(i) aged > 45 years;

(ii) pain in the hip or groin for more than 3 months;

(iii) average pain intensity over the past week of > 3 out of 10 (Numerical Rating Scale) during functional tasks like walking, climbing stairs or climbing in/out of a car;

(iv) radiographic confirmation of hip osteoarthritis with a Kellgren-Lawrence score ≥ 2 within the last 12 months;

(v) mild to moderate disability indicated by;

  1. able to reciprocally ascend and descend 10 stairs unaided,
  2. able to safely walk one city block, and
  3. able to jog five meters if required

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) other musculoskeletal lower limb or back conditions requiring assessment or treatment by a health professional (Doctor, Physiotherapist, Podiatrist etc) in the last 6 months;

(ii) have received active treatment for their hip pain by a health professional (eg physiotherapist) in the last 3 months;

(iii) history of hip trauma or surgery on the affected side;

(iv) use (oral or intra-articular injection) in the past 3 months

(v) neurological impairment or condition affecting lower limb function

(vi) conditions or factors affecting ability to take part in the intervention, e.g., unavailable for a 6 week intervention period, routine use of gait aids, uncontrolled hypertension, or morbid obesity ( > 40);

(vii) Use of foot orthoses in the previous 12 months

(viii) systemic inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis);

(ix) unable to write, read or comprehend English.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Foot orthoses

    Device: Foot orthoses

  • Sham comparator
    Flat shoe insert

    Device: Flat shoe insert

Interventions

  • DeviceFoot orthoses

    Manufacturer: Foot Science International. Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density) Arch support: inbuilt. Covering: fabric Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist \> 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm. Where: Administered via telehealth When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required Tailoring: Orthoses are fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional. Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)

    Also known as: Foot Science International Ltd; Formthotic

  • DeviceFlat shoe insert

    Manufacturer: Foot Science International. Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density) Arch support: no. Covering: fabric Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist \> 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm. Where: Administered via telehealth When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required Tailoring: Fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional. Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility: adherence

    Recruitment rate (average 1 participant per week); 50% log-book completion rate (daily); drop-out \<20%; 35 hours per week adherence to intervention (log book)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hip-related pain

    Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: pain sub-scale (HOOS-12). Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Hip-related physical function

    Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: function and daily living subscale. Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  3. Hip-related quality of life

    hip osteoarthritis outcome score: quality of life subscale: Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  4. Fear of movement

    Brief Fear of Movement Scale for osteoarthritis (BFOM); 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating lower fear of movement (better score)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  5. Depressive symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire -9: Scored from 0 to 27, participants can be classified as having mild (≥ 5), moderate (≥ 10), moderately severe (≥ 15) and severe (≥ 20) depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  6. Physical activity- Self-reported

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Participants will be asked to recall their physical activity over the last 7 days with regard to vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, walking and sitting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  7. Physical activity- Walking based physical activity

    Will be measured with a tri-axial accelerometer-based activity monitor that is attached on the thigh (activPAL model 4 micro; PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK) and will be expressed as a) daily minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity using the established 100 steps/minute threshold and b) total daily steps (which captures both inside and outside the home walking activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  8. Global rating of change- Physical activity

    Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse

    Time frame: Week 6

  9. Global rating of change- Symptoms

    Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse

    Time frame: Week 6

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2024, 30 months after the start.

Of 200 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Hip, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 226 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2021
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
StartActual
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Oct 26, 2025
Last update
Oct 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05138380
Lead sponsor
La Trobe University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 26, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 11, 2023

Study contacts

Adam Semciw, PhD
Contact
a.semciw@latrobe.edu.au
+61394796452
Matthew King, PhD
Contact
m.king@latrobe.edu.au
+61394793531
Adam Semciw, PhD
principal investigator · La Trobe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion