CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01413438Updated Jul 2, 2017

Bevacizumab With or Without Surgery for Adult Glioblastomas

A Phase 2 interventional study of Craniotomy in Glioblastoma and Brain Neoplasm, sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Patients with GBM are usually treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Despite this treatment, most GBMs start growing again. Bevacizumab, a chemotherapy drug, has shown promise in slowing the growth of GBMs. More research is needed to find out whether having surgery before starting bevacizumab is more effective than bevacizumab alone.

Objectives:

  • To compare surgery plus bevacizumab to bevacizumab alone in adults with glioblastoma.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals at least 18 years old whose glioblastoma has come back after treatment.

Design:

  • All participants will be screened with a physical exam, medical history, blood tests, and imaging studies.
  • Participants will be divided into two groups. One group will have surgery followed by bevacizumab. The other group will have the drug without surgery.
  • The first group will have surgery as soon as possible and will begin bevacizumab 4 weeks after surgery. The second group will start the drug as soon as possible.
  • Both groups will receive the drug as an infusion every 2 weeks. They will be monitored with frequent blood tests and imaging studies. The infusions will continue for as long as the drug is effective at preventing tumor regrowth.
  • Participants will be contacted every 4 weeks after they stop taking bevacizumab. They will answer followup questions either in person or by telephone.
Read the detailed description

Objective

The objective of this prospective randomized controlled study is to determine the overall survival benefit of tumor resection in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

Study Population

This study will recruit 42 adults with a diagnosis of recurrent grade 4 astrocytoma into each of two arms, for a total of 84 patients. All participants will be good candidates for elective surgical resection of their tumors according to the previously established NIH Recurrent Glioma Scale (NRGS), which uses performance status, tumor volume, and tumor involvement of critical/eloquent brain areas as prognostic criteria. Patients who require biopsy only or have previously been treated with bevacizumab will be excluded.

Design

Participants will be stratified by NRGS score (NRGS 0 or NRGS 1-2) and randomized to surgery followed by bevacizumab or to bevacizumab alone. Patients assigned to the surgical arm will undergo their procedure within 28 days of randomization. Treatment with bevacizumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks will begin at least 28 days later to allow adequate craniotomy wound healing. Patients assigned to the non-surgical arm will start bevacizumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks immediately. MRI evaluations will take place within 72 hours of surgery to assess extent of resection, 28 days postoperatively, 96 hours after starting bevacizumab, and then every 28 days until tumor progression is documented. Follow-up assessments will take place every 28 days while on bevacizumab until tumor progression. Once progression is established, patients will be free to pursue further surgical and/or medical salvage therapy as they wish. Patients will be followed until their time of death.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure is median overall survival from the date bevacizumab is started. Secondary outcome measures include the rate of progression-free survival 6 months after starting bevacizumab, median progression-free survival, overall survival rates at 6 and 12 months after starting bevacizumab, objective response rate, health-related quality of life, change in KPS of 20 points or more, time to need for additional tumor therapy, and use of corticosteroids.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glioblastoma
  • Brain Neoplasm

Keywords

  • Bevacizumab
  • Quality of Life
  • Glioblastoma Multiforme
  • Neurosurgery
  • Glioblastoma
  • GBM
  • Brain Tumor
03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,920 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 450 are open to participants now.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) is the lead sponsor of 592 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Previous diagnosis of supratentorial GBM established by WHO histological criteria

Age 18 or older

NRGS score of 0 to 2 established by the following criteria:

  • KPS 80 or less (1 point)
  • Tumor volume 50 cc or greater (1 point)
  • Tumor involvement of at least 2 of the following brain areas (1 point):

    • Motor cortex
    • Language cortex
    • Areas directly adjacent to the proximal (M1 and/or M2) middle cerebral artery

Received initial treatment for GBM with:

  • External beam radiation therapy
  • Nitrosourea or temozolomide chemotherapy
  • Biopsy, subtotal or gross total resection

Evidence of recurrence, defined as the appearance or enlargement since previous imaging of a contrast-enhancing mass on T1-weighted MRI

Have a non-deep (involving basal ganglia, thalamus, or periventricular region), non-diffuse recurrence judged to be resectable by a neurosurgeon

Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

NRGS score of 3

Patients requiring biopsy only or other procedures where the goal is not tumor cytoreduction

Patients who require urgent or emergency surgery due to symptoms of raised intracranial pressure or herniation

Patients who have already received bevacizumab therapy

Contraindication to surgery as determined by a neurosurgeon, including bleeding diathesis, unacceptable pulmonary or cardiovascular risk, significant wound healing concerns, or tumor recurrence judged to be inoperable, inaccessible, or diffuse

Contraindication to bevacizumab as determined by a neuro-oncologist, including unacceptable end organ function, evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage, or recent or active use of anticoagulants

Contraindication to MRI scanning as determined by a radiologist, including pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices, brain stimulators, some types of dental implants, aneurysm clips (metal clips on the wall of a large artery), metallic prostheses (including metal pins and rods, heart valves, and cochlear implants), permanent eyeliner, implanted delivery pump, or shrapnel fragments

Pregnancy

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • ProcedureCraniotomy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Overall Survival

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months & median PFS in each arm, objective response rate by the RANO criteria (OR), and overall survival rate at 6 and 12 months in each arm, compare rate of change in health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arko L, Katsyv I, Park GE, Luan WP, Park JK. Experimental approaches for the treatment of malignant gliomas. Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Oct;128(1):1-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 Jun 8. PubMed 20546782 ↗
  • Clarke J, Butowski N, Chang S. Recent advances in therapy for glioblastoma. Arch Neurol. 2010 Mar;67(3):279-83. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.5. PubMed 20212224 ↗
  • Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. PubMed 15758009 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01413438
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
First posted
Aug 10, 2011
Start date
Jul 15, 2011
Primary completion
Sep 26, 2013
Completion
Sep 26, 2013
Last update
Jul 2, 2017

Study contacts

John K Park, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion