CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01391013MONARCHUpdated Jun 27, 2013Results posted

A Study to Compare Brachial Artery Reactivity and Cardiovascular Risk of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg Versus a Triple Combination Therapy Containing DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of Darunavir(DRV) and Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-27.

Sponsored by Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare change of brachial artery flow mediated vasodilatation using Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily as a monotherapy (use of a single medication) versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and DRV/r in Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infected participants.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase II, randomized (the study medication is assigned by chance), open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), controlled, single centre study. The study consists of 3 phases including, the screening phase (4 weeks before administration of study medication), treatment phase (48 weeks), and the follow-up phase (4 weeks). In the treatment phase, HIV-infected participants who have not changed their first-line treatment of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 8 weeks and have documented evidence of their HIV- ribonucleic acid (RNA) measurements being virologically suppressed (HIV-RNA less than 50 copies/mL) for at least 24 weeks prior to the screening, will be randomly assigned equally in two treatment arms: triple combination therapy arm (DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily plus 2 NRTIs) or monotherapy arm (DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily). Participants in the triple combination arm who are already on 2 NRTIs prior to randomization may remain on these or switch them at baseline, where the participants on the monotherapy arm will discontinue HAART at baseline and will start DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily. Safety evaluations will include assessment of adverse events, significant vital signs, and significant laboratory tests. The total duration of the study will be 56 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1

Keywords

  • Human immunodeficiency virus 1
  • Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Immunologic deficiency syndrome
  • Darunavir/ritonavir
  • Darunavir
  • Ritonavir
  • Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)
  • Prezista
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infected participants on their first-line treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (combination of 2 or 3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] with at least 1 additional antiretroviral [ARV] from the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI] and/or protease inhibitors [PI] class) for at least 24 weeks, provided the same ARV combination for at least 8 weeks before screening

  • Participants' preference for a more convenient regimen and/or any current or history of toxicity on actual regimen
  • Plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than 50 cp/ml for at least 24 weeks before screening, where single viral blips of more than 50 copies/mL are allowed
  • Cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count more than 100/mm3 at the start of HAART and more than 200/mm3 at screening
  • Healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and 12-lead electrocardiogram performed at screening
  • Agrees to protocol-defined use of effective contraception
  • Postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or abstinent female participants

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of coronary heart disease, uncontrolled hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and or cerebrovascular disease
  • History of virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy, plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid more than 500 copies/mL after initial full virological suppression while on ARV therapy and any PI mutations
  • Participants with significantly hepatic and liver insufficiency or diagnosed with acute viral hepatitis or have active clinically significant diseases and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining illness at screening
  • Current significant tobacco use, active drug or alcohol use or dependence
  • Use of lipid-lowering drugs within 4 weeks prior to study entry and use of testosterone, anabolic steroids, oral contraceptives or hormonal replacement within 12 weeks prior to study entry or previous or current use of darunavir
  • Use of systemic glucocorticoids, long-acting inhaled steroids (inhaled via mouth or nose), or other immunomodulators within 30 days prior to study entry
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Monotherapy

    Monotherapy: darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) will be administered for 48 weeks.

    Drug: Darunavir(DRV) · Drug: Ritonavir

  • Experimental
    Combination therapy

    DRV/r along with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) will be administered for 48 weeks and whenever possible, participants should take these medications at the same time. Switch of NRTIs will be allowed in the event of suspected toxicity/intolerance, providing this change can be linked to a documented adverse event (AE)/serious AE.

    Drug: Darunavir(DRV) · Drug: Ritonavir · Drug: 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)

Interventions

  • DrugDarunavir(DRV)

    Oral administration of tablet DRV 800 mg (2 tablets of 400 mg) once daily at the same time, within 30 minutes after food for 48 weeks

    Also known as: Prezista

  • DrugRitonavir

    Oral administration of tablet ritonavir 100 mg once daily at the same time, within 30 minutes after food for 48 weeks

  • Drug2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)

    2 NRTIs will be administered as per the package inserts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Vasodilatation (FMD): Median Change in FMD (%)

    Brachial artery FMD is calculated as the percentage increase in brachial artery diameter with hyperemia (an increase in the quantity of blood flow to a body part) induced relative to the resting brachial artery diameter. Percentage of brachial artery diameter is measured as FMD diameter/basal diameter.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Week 1) to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Brachial Artery FMD: Median Change in FMD (%)

    Brachial artery FMD is calculated as the percentage increase in brachial artery diameter with hyperemia induced relative to the resting brachial artery diameter. Percentage of brachial artery diameter is measured as FMD diameter/basal diameter.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  2. Number of Participants With a Human Immunodeficiency Virus- Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) Greater Than or Equal to 50 Copies/mL

    Time frame: Screening (Week -4), Week 1 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and follow-up (Week 52)

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Circulating Endothelial Cells

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Precursors of Circulating Endothelial Cells

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Mean Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in LDL

    Time frame: Baseline (Day1 of Week 1), Week 24, and Week 48

  6. Change From Baseline in Mean High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in HDL

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Triglycerides

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    The Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA-IR is reflected in the diminished effect of insulin on hepatic glucose production. HOMA-IR is calculated as: (Glucose \[mg/dL\] X Insulin \[pmol/L\]) / (405 X 6.945). Higher scores indicate worse insulin resistance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Mean Framingham Risk Score at Week 24 and Week 48: Medican Change in Framingham Risk Score

    The Framingham Risk Score is used to estimate the 10-year cardiovascular risk of a participant. It is calculated according to age, laboratory values of total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure. The framingham risk score is calculated as: for males: 0 point (1 percentage) up to 17 points (30 percentages); whereas for females: 0 to 9 points (1 percentage) up to 25 points (30 percentage). Higher scores indicate high cardiovascular risk.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Leg Fat Content: Median Change in Leg Fat (Total)

    Leg fat content will be analyzed by Dual Energy X-ray Absortiometry (DEXA scan).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Visceral Fat Content in Abdomen: Median Change in Visceral Abdominal Tissue (VAT)

    Visceral fat content in abdomen will be analyzed with median change in VAT by an abdomen Computerized Tomography.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck T Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck T Score

    T score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as a participant. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. T score has a mean of '50' and a standard deviation of '10'. T score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck Z Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck Z Score

    Z score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. Z score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the participant's age, sex and ethnicity. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. Z score has a mean of '0' and a standard deviation of '1'. Z score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar T Score: Median Change in Lumbar T Score

    T score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as a participant. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. T score has a mean of '50' and a standard deviation of '10'. T score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar Z Score: Median Change in Lumbar Z Score

    Z score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. Z score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the participant's age, sex and ethnicity. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. Z score has a mean of '0' and a standard deviation of '1'. Z score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

  16. Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Count Over Week 48

    Time frame: Screening (Week -4), Week 1 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and follow-up (Week 52)

07

Results

Posted Jun 27, 2013

Participant flow

30 participants were enrolled at a single site in Italy.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Started1515
Completed1515
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Vasodilatation (FMD): Median Change in FMD (%)

Brachial artery FMD is calculated as the percentage increase in brachial artery diameter with hyperemia (an increase in the quantity of blood flow to a body part) induced relative to the resting brachial artery diameter. Percentage of brachial artery diameter is measured as FMD diameter/basal diameter.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1 of Week 1) to Week 24
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of brachial artery diameter
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Vasodilatation (FMD): Median Change in FMD (%)
Percentage of brachial artery diameterMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Vasodilatation (FMD): Median Change in FMD (%)-4.8 (-7.0 to 0.3)-0.6 (-4.7 to 3.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Brachial Artery FMD: Median Change in FMD (%)

Brachial artery FMD is calculated as the percentage increase in brachial artery diameter with hyperemia induced relative to the resting brachial artery diameter. Percentage of brachial artery diameter is measured as FMD diameter/basal diameter.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of brachial artery diameter
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Brachial Artery FMD: Median Change in FMD (%)
Percentage of brachial artery diameterMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Brachial Artery FMD: Median Change in FMD (%)-4.4 (-6.2 to 2.6)-3 (-4.5 to 4.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.88
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Human Immunodeficiency Virus- Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) Greater Than or Equal to 50 Copies/mL
Time frame:
Screening (Week -4), Week 1 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and follow-up (Week 52)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With a Human Immunodeficiency Virus- Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) Greater Than or Equal to 50 Copies/mL
ParticipantsMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Screening (Week -4)0 (-6.2 to 2.6)0 (-4.5 to 4.0)
Week 1 (Day 1)10
Week 400
Week 1201
Week 2401
Week 3620
Week 4810
Follow up (Week 52)20
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.31This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Circulating Endothelial Cells
Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Endothelial cells
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Circulating Endothelial Cells
Endothelial cellsMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Baseline5.09 (0 to 105.6)14.6 (0 to 551.4)
Week 4837 (0 to 5533)64 (0 to 4256)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.37This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Precursors of Circulating Endothelial Cells
Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Endothelial cells
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Precursors of Circulating Endothelial Cells
Endothelial cellsMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Baseline16 (0 to 60)18 (0 to 93)
Week 48120 (0 to 519)108 (0 to 715)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.66This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in LDL
Time frame:
Baseline (Day1 of Week 1), Week 24, and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in LDL
mg/dLMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 2417 (0 to 40)6 (-17 to 20)
Week 4814 (7 to 42)5 (-12 to 19)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.02This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in HDL
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in HDL
mg/dLMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 24-1 (-6 to 3)-6 (-9 to 4)
Week 48-4 (-5 to 0)-6 (-11 to -1)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.12This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Triglycerides
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Triglycerides
mg/dLMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 2415 (-18 to 42)-1 (-28 to 25)
Week 4824 (-15 to 64)6 (-8 to 38)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.71This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

The Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA-IR is reflected in the diminished effect of insulin on hepatic glucose production. HOMA-IR is calculated as: (Glucose \[mg/dL\] X Insulin \[pmol/L\]) / (405 X 6.945). Higher scores indicate worse insulin resistance.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · HOMA score
Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity at Week 24 and Week 48: Median Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 24-0.2 (-1.4 to 0.6)-0.3 (-1.1 to 0.3)
Week 48-0.6 (-1.1 to 0.0)-0.5 (-1.6 to -0.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.83This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Framingham Risk Score at Week 24 and Week 48: Medican Change in Framingham Risk Score

The Framingham Risk Score is used to estimate the 10-year cardiovascular risk of a participant. It is calculated according to age, laboratory values of total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure. The framingham risk score is calculated as: for males: 0 point (1 percentage) up to 17 points (30 percentages); whereas for females: 0 to 9 points (1 percentage) up to 25 points (30 percentage). Higher scores indicate high cardiovascular risk.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Framingham risk score
Change From Baseline in Mean Framingham Risk Score at Week 24 and Week 48: Medican Change in Framingham Risk Score
Framingham risk scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 240 (0 to 1)0 (-1 to 3)
Week 481 (0 to 2)1 (0 to 3)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.66This statistical analysis applies to 'Week 48'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Leg Fat Content: Median Change in Leg Fat (Total)

Leg fat content will be analyzed by Dual Energy X-ray Absortiometry (DEXA scan).

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of fat
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Leg Fat Content: Median Change in Leg Fat (Total)
Percentage of fatMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Leg Fat Content: Median Change in Leg Fat (Total)-57 (-447 to 419)-288 (-794 to 601)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.76
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Visceral Fat Content in Abdomen: Median Change in Visceral Abdominal Tissue (VAT)

Visceral fat content in abdomen will be analyzed with median change in VAT by an abdomen Computerized Tomography.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · cm square
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Visceral Fat Content in Abdomen: Median Change in Visceral Abdominal Tissue (VAT)
cm squareMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Visceral Fat Content in Abdomen: Median Change in Visceral Abdominal Tissue (VAT)-4 (-38 to 4)-4 (-15 to 19)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.56
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck T Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck T Score

T score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as a participant. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. T score has a mean of '50' and a standard deviation of '10'. T score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · T score
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck T Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck T Score
T scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck T Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck T Score0.2 (-0.1 to 0.4)-0.1 (-0.2 to 0.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.11
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck Z Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck Z Score

Z score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. Z score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the participant's age, sex and ethnicity. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. Z score has a mean of '0' and a standard deviation of '1'. Z score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Z score
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck Z Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck Z Score
Z scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Femoral Neck Z Score: Median Change in Femoral Neck Z Score0.2 (-0.1 to 0.4)0.0 (-0.1 to 0.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.18
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar T Score: Median Change in Lumbar T Score

T score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as a participant. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. T score has a mean of '50' and a standard deviation of '10'. T score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · T score
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar T Score: Median Change in Lumbar T Score
T scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar T Score: Median Change in Lumbar T Score0.1 (0.0 to 0.3)0.0 (-0.2 to 0.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.03
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar Z Score: Median Change in Lumbar Z Score

Z score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. Z score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for the participant's age, sex and ethnicity. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. Z score has a mean of '0' and a standard deviation of '1'. Z score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · Z score
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar Z Score: Median Change in Lumbar Z Score
Z scoreMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Lumbar Z Score: Median Change in Lumbar Z Score0.1 (0.0 to 0.3)0.0 (-0.2 to 0.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy · Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test · p = 0.04
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Count Over Week 48
Time frame:
Screening (Week -4), Week 1 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, and follow-up (Week 52)
Reported as:
Median · CD4 cells
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Count Over Week 48
CD4 cellsMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Week 246 (-48 to 58)-12 (-67 to 70)
Week 48100.1 (32 to 135)60 (-69 to 122)

Adverse events

Collected over 52 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Monotherapy—0/15 (0%)10/15 (66.7%)
Combination Therapy—0/15 (0%)11/15 (73.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventMonotherapyCombination Therapy
Blood cholesterol increasedInvestigations4/150/15
Low density lipoprotein increasedInvestigations4/150/15
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/153/15
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/151/15
InfluenzaInfections and infestations2/151/15
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations0/152/15
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders2/150/15
MalaiseGeneral disorders1/151/15
Blood triglycerides increasedInvestigations1/151/15
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/151/15

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)MonotherapyCombination TherapyTotal
Median44.8 (34.5 to 55.1)43.0 (35.0 to 46.8)44.6 (35.0 to 47.4)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MonotherapyCombination TherapyTotal
Female347
Male121123
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)MonotherapyCombination TherapyTotal
White141529
Black101
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01391013
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2011
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2011
Completion
Apr 2011
Results posted
Jun 27, 2013
Last update
Jun 27, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion