ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01378533Updated Dec 28, 2011

The Trial Comparing Dose-dense AC-T With PC as Adjuvant Therapy for TNBC

A Phase 3 interventional study of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-12-28.

Sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2011), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer are heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse behavior, outcome, and sensitivity to therapy.In recent years, the term triple negative (TN) breast cancer has emerged to describe those cancers which do not express oestrogen (ER) , progesterone (PR) receptors, or Her2. Many studies had estimated that TN cases represents between 12%-20% of all breast cancers. Those TN case constitute one of the most challenging breast cancer groups, with only systemic chemotherapy is currently available for their treatment.

BRCA1 protein normally functions as a negative regulator of the cell cycle, also, BRCA1-positive tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors that show distinctive pathological and clinical features. BRCA1-associated cancers are typically high-grade invasive duct carcinoma and are mostly triple negative.The phenotypic and molecular similarity of the TNBCs to BRCA1-associated BCs might be of use in designing their treatment protocol. There is increasing evidence that the DNA repair defects that are characteristic of BRCA-1 related cancers may provide sensitivity to certain systemic agents to treat TNBC patients such as the bifunctional alkylating agents and platinum drugs.

Dose density refers to the administration of drugs with a shortened intertreatment interval. It is based on the observation that in experimental models, a given dose always kills a certain fraction, rather than a certain number, of exponentially growing cancer cells. Because human cancers in general, and breast cancers in particular, usually grow by nonexponential Gompertzian kinetics, this model has been extended to those situations. Regrowth of cancer cells between cycles of cytoreduction is more rapid in volume-reduced Gompertzian cancer models than in exponential models. Hence it has been hypothesized that the more frequent administration of cytotoxic therapy would be a more effective way of minimizing residual tumor burden than dose escalation. In the INT C9741 trial, the dose-dense schedule is accomplished by using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to permit every-2-week recycling of the drugs A, T and C at their optimal dose levels rather than at the conventional 3-week intervals.Sequential therapy refers to the application of treatments one at a time rather than concurrently. It does not challenge the concept that multiple drugs are needed to maximally perturb cancers that are composed of cells heterogeneous in drug sensitivity. Rather, it hypothesizes that for slow-growing cancers like most breast cancers, it is more important to preserve dose density than to force a combination, especially if that combination would be more toxic and requires dose-reductions or delays in drug administration. If dose density is the same in a sequential combination chemotherapy regimen and a concurrent combination regimen, theoretical considerations indicate that the therapeutic result should be the same, even if the sequential pattern happens to be less toxic.

In our trial, we want to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • triple-negative breast cancer
  • dose-dense
  • epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel(AC-T)
  • paclitaxel plus carboplatin(PC)
  • 3 years DFS
  • the tolerance
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient must accept the modified radical mastectomy
  2. Patients with histologically confirmed ER(-) PR(-) and HER-2(-)
  3. Positive axillary lymph nodes;negative axillary lymph node with age\< 35 years or Ⅲ grade or intravascular cancer embolus.
  4. Age between 18 years to 65 years
  5. Able to give informed consent
  6. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0 or 1.
  7. Not pregnant, and on appropriate birth control if of child-bearing potential.
  8. Adequate bone marrow reserve with ANC > 1000 and platelets > 100,000.
  9. Adequate renal function with serum creatinine \< 2.0.
  10. Adequate hepatic reserve with serum bilirubin \< 2.0, AST/ALT \< 2X the upper limit of normal, and alkaline phosphatase \< 5X the upper limit of normal. Serum bilirubin > 2.0 is acceptable in the setting of known Gilbert's syndrome.
  11. No active major medical or psychosocial problems that could be complicated by study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. received neo-adjuvant therapy
  2. Cardiac dysfunction documented by an ejection fraction less than the lower limit of the facility normal by multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan, or 45% by echocardiogram. -The rate of Disease recurrence
  3. Uncontrolled medical problems.
  4. Evidence of active acute or chronic infection.
  5. Pregnant or breast feeding.
  6. Hepatic, renal, or bone marrow dysfunction as detailed above.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AC-T(dose-dense)

    AC-T(dose-dense) EPI(Pharmorubicin) CTX(cyclophosphamide) PTX(Paclitaxel) G-CSF

    Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

  • Experimental
    chemotherapy:PC

    PTX(Paclitaxel) CBP(carboplatin)

    Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

Interventions

  • Drugepirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

    Drug pages: Epirubicin · Cyclophosphamide · Paclitaxel · Carboplatin · Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor · Filgrastim

    epirubicin 80mg/m2 iv d1 or divide in two days cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 150mg/m2 iv d1 carboplatin AUC=3 iv d2 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*8cycles

    Also known as: pharmorubicin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3 years DFS

    the participants will be followed by the telephone for the duration, an expected average of 3 years.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Toxicity as assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cancer institute and hospital Chinese academy of medical sciences
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100021, China
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2011, a primary completion of May 2013 and a completion of Jun 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2011
First posted
Jun 22, 2011
Start
May 2011
Primary completionEst.
May 2013
CompletionEst.
Jun 2013
Last update
Dec 28, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01378533
Responsible party
li qing (chief physician, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
May 2013 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2013 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 28, 2011

Study contacts

qing li, bachelor
Contact
cheryliqing@yahoo.cn
0086-010-87788120
ying han, master
Contact
huani8023@gmail.com
0086-010-87788120
qing li, bachelor
study chair · Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Epirubicin · Cyclophosphamide · Paclitaxel · Carboplatin · Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor · Filgrastim

Start the discussion