A Phase 3 interventional study of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-12-28.
Sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this trial is to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.
The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.
Breast cancer are heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse behavior, outcome, and sensitivity to therapy.In recent years, the term triple negative (TN) breast cancer has emerged to describe those cancers which do not express oestrogen (ER) , progesterone (PR) receptors, or Her2. Many studies had estimated that TN cases represents between 12%-20% of all breast cancers. Those TN case constitute one of the most challenging breast cancer groups, with only systemic chemotherapy is currently available for their treatment.
BRCA1 protein normally functions as a negative regulator of the cell cycle, also, BRCA1-positive tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors that show distinctive pathological and clinical features. BRCA1-associated cancers are typically high-grade invasive duct carcinoma and are mostly triple negative.The phenotypic and molecular similarity of the TNBCs to BRCA1-associated BCs might be of use in designing their treatment protocol. There is increasing evidence that the DNA repair defects that are characteristic of BRCA-1 related cancers may provide sensitivity to certain systemic agents to treat TNBC patients such as the bifunctional alkylating agents and platinum drugs.
Dose density refers to the administration of drugs with a shortened intertreatment interval. It is based on the observation that in experimental models, a given dose always kills a certain fraction, rather than a certain number, of exponentially growing cancer cells. Because human cancers in general, and breast cancers in particular, usually grow by nonexponential Gompertzian kinetics, this model has been extended to those situations. Regrowth of cancer cells between cycles of cytoreduction is more rapid in volume-reduced Gompertzian cancer models than in exponential models. Hence it has been hypothesized that the more frequent administration of cytotoxic therapy would be a more effective way of minimizing residual tumor burden than dose escalation. In the INT C9741 trial, the dose-dense schedule is accomplished by using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to permit every-2-week recycling of the drugs A, T and C at their optimal dose levels rather than at the conventional 3-week intervals.Sequential therapy refers to the application of treatments one at a time rather than concurrently. It does not challenge the concept that multiple drugs are needed to maximally perturb cancers that are composed of cells heterogeneous in drug sensitivity. Rather, it hypothesizes that for slow-growing cancers like most breast cancers, it is more important to preserve dose density than to force a combination, especially if that combination would be more toxic and requires dose-reductions or delays in drug administration. If dose density is the same in a sequential combination chemotherapy regimen and a concurrent combination regimen, theoretical considerations indicate that the therapeutic result should be the same, even if the sequential pattern happens to be less toxic.
In our trial, we want to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.
12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.
Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
AC-T(dose-dense) EPI(Pharmorubicin) CTX(cyclophosphamide) PTX(Paclitaxel) G-CSF
Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF
PTX(Paclitaxel) CBP(carboplatin)
Drug: epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF
Drug pages: Epirubicin · Cyclophosphamide · Paclitaxel · Carboplatin · Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor · Filgrastim
epirubicin 80mg/m2 iv d1 or divide in two days cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 150mg/m2 iv d1 carboplatin AUC=3 iv d2 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*8cycles
Also known as: pharmorubicin
3 years DFS
the participants will be followed by the telephone for the duration, an expected average of 3 years.
Time frame: 3 years
Toxicity as assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Time frame: 3 years
The record gives a start of May 2011, a primary completion of May 2013 and a completion of Jun 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Epirubicin · Cyclophosphamide · Paclitaxel · Carboplatin · Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor · Filgrastim
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences →