CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01358734Updated Jun 25, 2019Results posted

A Study Being Conducted at Multiple Locations to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Regimens; (1) High-Dose Lenalidomide; (2) Lenalidomide + Azacitidine; or (3) Azacitidine in Subjects ≥ 65 Years With Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Azacitidine and Lenalidomide in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, sponsored by Celgene. Completed at 30 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-25.

Sponsored by Celgene · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Read the detailed description

On September 11, 2013, randomization into the continuous 50 mg lenalidomide only arm was temporarily suspended based on review of the data from the first 13 participants and a high rate of discontinuation (11/13 participants). The Data Monitoring Committee assessed the study data on September 20, 2013 and reported no safety concerns. The high rate of early discontinuation is inconsistent with the treatment duration required for testing the study primary endpoint of survival at one year. Consequently, Celgene has decided not to reopen the lenalidomide only arm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Keywords

  • AML
  • elderly
  • acute myelogenous leukemia
  • vidaza
  • azacitidine
  • elderly AML
  • revlimid
  • lenalidomide
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Celgene is the lead sponsor of 419 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), AML with antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML
  • Male or female subjects aged ≥ 65
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10⁹/L at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine or lenalidomide
  • Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment of any kind for AML or prior use of targeted therapy agents.
  • Suspected or proven acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • Candidate for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • AML antecedent hematologic disorder such as chronic myelogenous leukemia or myeloproliferative neoplasms
  • Presence of malignant disease within the previous 12 months with exceptions
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine

    Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous (SC) on Days 1-7 and lenalidomide 50 mg/day by mouth (PO) on Days 8-28 followed by a 14-day break plus best supportive care

    Drug: Azacitidine · Drug: Lenalidomide · Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

  • Experimental
    Lenalidomide - single agent

    Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily for 28 days for the first 2 cycles and lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO plus best supportive care

    Drug: Lenalidomide · Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

  • Experimental
    Azacitidine-single agent

    Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 followed by a 21-day break plus best supportive care

    Drug: Azacitidine · Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Interventions

  • DrugAzacitidine

    Azacitidine at 75 mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7

    Also known as: Vidaza

  • DrugLenalidomide

    Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily x 28 days for the first 2 cycles then 25 mg PO daily x 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily

    Also known as: Revlimid®, CC-5013

  • OtherBest Supportive Care (BSC)

    The use of BSC was considered as concomitant treatment and must be documented as concomitant medication. BSC includes, but is not limited to, treatment with Red Blood Celll (RBC) or whole blood transfusions, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, platelet transfusions, antibiotic or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival

    One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.

    Based on IWG response criteria for AML. Complete remission (CR), morphologic complete remission (CR) was defined as \< 5% bone marrow blasts, an absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1 x 10\^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC count may be \<1 x 10\^9/L and/or the platelet count may be \<100 x 10\^9/L. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.

  2. Duration of Remission (DoR)

    Duration of remission was defined as the time from the date of CR or CRi until relapse. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.

  3. Cytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)

    The CRc response category is comprised of the subset of participants who had abnormal cytogenetics at baseline and subsequently achieved CR during treatment in conjunction with a reversion to a normal karyotype. For the primary definition of CRc, a normal karyotype is defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) 1) CR criteria met AND 2) Abnormal karyotype present at baseline AND 3) Reversion to normal karyotype at time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.

  4. Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)

    Morphologic complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a one marrow aspirate with spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with auer rods) and ANC of ≥ 1 x 10\^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L, no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment. No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC may be \< 1 x 10\^9/L and/or the platelet count may be \< 100 x 10\^9/L. Partial remission was defined as an ANC \> 1 x 10\^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L with a \> 50% decrease in the percentage of bone marrow blasts to 5% to 25% (a blast count value of ≤ 5% may also be considered a partial remission if auer rods are present). Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.

  5. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of documented disease progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.

  6. Event-Free Survival (EFS)

    EFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after CR or CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Event-Free survival time was not analyzed.

  7. Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

    RFS is defined only for subjects that achieve CR and CRi and is measured as the interval from that date to the date of disease relapse, death from any cause, whichever occurs first, censoring at the last visit date for subjects alive in continuous CR/CRi. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Time frame: Relapse-Free survival time frame was not analyzed.

  8. Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality

    30-day mortality rate was defined as death from any cause within 30 days after first dose.

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    TEAEs were defined as those events that started on or after the first day of study drug up until 28 days after the last dose of study drug; Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. Severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); and according to the scale: Grade (Gr) 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018

  10. Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy

    Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events regardless of the treatment arm the participant was enrolled in.

    Time frame: From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year

    Defined as the percentage of participants who survived at one year

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 4, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Accrual to the lenalidomide arm was stopped before ending accrual to the 2 other arms because of poor tolerability and no comparison of outcomes was planned.

Participant flow

Participants were randomized at 25 sites in North America (Canada and the United States).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Started153934
Safety population143832
Completed000
Not completed153934
Withdrew: Adverse event473
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy013
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject163
Withdrew: Death372
Withdrew: Progressive disease51316
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study drug001
Withdrew: Other254
Withdrew: Protocol violation002

Outcome measures

PrimaryKaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival

One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation

Time frame:
Up to 24 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival
monthsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival3.00 (1.18 to 11.93)9.61 (3.18 to 19.31)13.67 (6.75 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Lenalidomide vs Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide · Log Rank · p = 0.119 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.789 · 95% CI 0.861 to 3.718
  • Lenalidomide vs Azacitidine · Log Rank · p = 0.014 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.659 · 95% CI 1.214 to 5.822
  • Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide vs Azacitidine · Log Rank · p = 0.356 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.367 · 95% CI 0.704 to 2.653
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.

Based on IWG response criteria for AML. Complete remission (CR), morphologic complete remission (CR) was defined as \< 5% bone marrow blasts, an absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1 x 10\^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC count may be \<1 x 10\^9/L and/or the platelet count may be \<100 x 10\^9/L. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of Remission (DoR)

Duration of remission was defined as the time from the date of CR or CRi until relapse. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryCytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)

The CRc response category is comprised of the subset of participants who had abnormal cytogenetics at baseline and subsequently achieved CR during treatment in conjunction with a reversion to a normal karyotype. For the primary definition of CRc, a normal karyotype is defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) 1) CR criteria met AND 2) Abnormal karyotype present at baseline AND 3) Reversion to normal karyotype at time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)

Morphologic complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a one marrow aspirate with spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with auer rods) and ANC of ≥ 1 x 10\^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L, no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment. No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC may be \< 1 x 10\^9/L and/or the platelet count may be \< 100 x 10\^9/L. Partial remission was defined as an ANC \> 1 x 10\^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L with a \> 50% decrease in the percentage of bone marrow blasts to 5% to 25% (a blast count value of ≤ 5% may also be considered a partial remission if auer rods are present). Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of documented disease progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryEvent-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after CR or CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Event-Free survival time was not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRelapse-Free Survival (RFS)

RFS is defined only for subjects that achieve CR and CRi and is measured as the interval from that date to the date of disease relapse, death from any cause, whichever occurs first, censoring at the last visit date for subjects alive in continuous CR/CRi. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

Time frame:
Relapse-Free survival time frame was not analyzed.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality

30-day mortality rate was defined as death from any cause within 30 days after first dose.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality
percentage of participantsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality13.317.95.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

TEAEs were defined as those events that started on or after the first day of study drug up until 28 days after the last dose of study drug; Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. Severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); and according to the scale: Grade (Gr) 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Time frame:
From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
participantsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Any TEAE143832
≥1 TEAE related to study drug133530
≥1 TEAE CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAE143429
≥1 TEAE CTCAE Gr 3 or 4 TEAE related to study drug112518
≥1 TEAE CTCAE Grade 55105
≥1 Serious TEAE132925
≥1 Serious TEAE related to study drug10167
≥1TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug6124
≥1TEAE leading to dose reduction of study drug082
≥1TEAE leading to dose interruption of study drug82110
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants Alive at One Year

Defined as the percentage of participants who survived at one year

Time frame:
Up to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year
Percentage of participantsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year21.4 (0.0 to 42.9)43.9 (27.9 to 59.9)52.3 (34.7 to 69.8)
PrimaryOverall Survival

Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Overall Survival0.2 (0.2 to 0.2)7.1 (1.4 to 53.3)4.1 (0.2 to 54.8)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy

Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events regardless of the treatment arm the participant was enrolled in.

Time frame:
From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy
ParticipantsLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy003

Adverse events

Collected over From the date of randomization to 28 days after the last dose of study drug. Up to 15 May 2018.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lenalidomide7/14 (50%)13/14 (92.9%)14/14 (100%)
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide34/38 (89.5%)29/38 (76.3%)38/38 (100%)
Azacitidine29/32 (90.6%)25/32 (78.1%)32/32 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 110
Most frequent serious events
EventLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/1416/388/32
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/144/387/32
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/142/382/32
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/142/381/32
SepsisInfections and infestations2/141/382/32
Septic shockInfections and infestations2/141/380/32
Pulmonary haemorrhageRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/141/380/32
Pulmonary infarctionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/140/380/32
FatigueGeneral disorders2/140/381/32
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/143/381/32
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 243
Most frequent other events
EventLenalidomideAzacitidine Plus LenalidomideAzacitidine
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/1419/3822/32
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders7/1424/3817/32
FatigueGeneral disorders8/1415/3814/32
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/1419/388/32
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/1412/388/32
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/1418/3810/32
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders6/147/387/32
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/1411/3810/32
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1416/384/32
Weight decreasedInvestigations5/1415/3810/32

Baseline characteristics

Intent To Treat (ITT) includes all randomized participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LenalidomideAzacitidine + LenalidomideAzacitidineTotal
Mean77.6 ± 5.4775.5 ± 5.8874.8 ± 4.9675.97 ± 5.44
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LenalidomideAzacitidine + LenalidomideAzacitidineTotal
Female3171535
Male12221953
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status(Participants)LenalidomideAzacitidine + LenalidomideAzacitidineTotal
0 = (Fully Active)441018
1 = (Restrictive but ambulatory)9281754
(Ambulatory but unable to work)27615
3 = (Limited self care)0000
4 = (Completely Disabled)0000
Missing0011
Peripheral Blast Blood Count
Peripheral Blast Blood Count(Participants)LenalidomideAzacitidine + LenalidomideAzacitidineTotal
<1 X 10^9L11312769
≥1 X 10^9L48719
08

Study locations

30 sites
  • (210) University of Arizona Cancer Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • (180) University of California, San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92093-0960, United States
  • (240) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • (215) Hematology Oncology Medical Group
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • (130) UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95857, United States
  • (200) Coastal Integrative Cancer Care
    San Luis Obispo, California 93401, United States
  • (125) University of Stanford
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • (115) University of Colorado Anschultz Cancer Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • (145) Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • (140) Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • (185) The University of Kansas Cancer Center
    Westwood, Kansas 66205, United States
  • (175) University Lousiville
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • (195) Tulane University Hospital Tulane Cancer Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70072, United States
  • (235) University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • (100) Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, United States
  • (150) Billings Clinic
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • (165) Mount Sinai Medical Center New York
    New York, New York 10029-65749, United States
  • (160) The Western Pennsylvania Hospital- Cancer Institute
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224-1791, United States
  • (205) Greenville Hospital System
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • (120) Avera Cancer Institute
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105, United States
  • (230) Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • (105) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390-9179, United States
  • (155) Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • (135) University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • (402) Tom Baker Cancer Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • (405) University of Alberta Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z1, Canada
  • (401) Cancer Care Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9, Canada
  • (403) Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - VG Site
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada
  • (404) The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • (400) Princess Margaret Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Medeiros BC, McCaul K, Kambhampati S, Pollyea DA, Kumar R, Silverman LR, Kew A, Saini L, Beach CL, Vij R, Wang X, Zhong J, Gale RP. Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):101-106. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172353. Epub 2017 Nov 2. PubMed 29097499 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01358734
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2011
Start date
Apr 27, 2012
Primary completion
May 19, 2015
Completion
May 15, 2018
Results posted
Jul 4, 2016
Last update
Jun 25, 2019

Study contacts

Robert Gale, MD
study director · Celgene

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion