ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01350245Updated May 16, 2025Results posted

Bone Marrow Transplantation of Patients in Remission Using Partially Matched Relative Donor

A Phase 2 interventional study of Total Body Irradiation (TBI) and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Biphenotypic Leukemia, sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-16.

Sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary hypothesis of this research study is that patients in remission undergoing myeloablative haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on the Thomas Jefferson University (TJU) 2 Step treatment regimen will have a disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 1 year that is the same or better than the historical DFS of patients with similar diagnoses and ages undergoing matched sibling HSCT. Based on a review of the literature a DFS rate of 50% or better at 1 year would meet the criterion for an effective alternative therapy. A DFS rate of 75% or better would imply superior efficacy of the TJU 2 Step approach over T-replete matched sibling HSCT.

Read the detailed description

The primary rationale for the development of this research study is to find out if the Thomas Jefferson University (TJU) 2 Step approach to stem cell transplant is an effective treatment for patients with blood cancers who require transplant for long-term survival but are without an available matched-sibling donor. Historically, survival rates for patients undergoing half-matched stem cell transplant have been much lower than those observed after matched sibling stem cell transplant. This may be due to the poor-risk disease features of the patients by the time they are referred for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Survival post half-matched stem cell transplant has also been affected by the requirement to remove or soothe donor T cells resulting in higher rates of infection and relapse. Newer approaches to haploidentical HSCT, such as the TJU 2 Step approach, utilize cyclophosphamide (CY) to tolerize donor lymphocytes instead of removing them completely from the donor product. This has resulted in less infection without concomitant increase in severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and has increased overall survival as compared to older haploidentical treatment approaches due to decreases in regimen-related morbidity.

Because of the historically low overall survival (OS) after haploidentical HSCT, it has become a procedure of last resort with most centers unwilling to consider it unless all other options are exhausted. With the recent development of regimens such as the TJU 2 Step approach which provide safe, alternative platforms for HSCT, it is now feasible, and ethically more acceptable, for patients without matched sibling donors to undergo HSCT prior to being heavily pretreated or developing resistant disease. In this setting, i.e. equivalent regimen safety profiles and more homogenous patient comparison groups, it is possible to more accurately compare antitumor effects between matched sibling donors and haploidentical donors. There is ample evidence in the literature that HLA mismatching causes GVHD. There is not a large body of evidence supporting the notion that HLA mismatching provides superior tumor control translating into greater relapse free survival. As compared to more common types of transplants where donor T cells are given to the recipient, the investigators would surmise that the T cell tolerization associated with the TJU 2 Step approach may decrease the anti-tumor effects of the donor immune system. Conversely, the greater degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch with exploitation of NK effects may mitigate some of the attenuated T cell alloreactivity.

Thus, in the context of comparable regimen-related toxicity, our major aim in this research study is to compare graft versus tumor effects as measured by disease-free survival (DFS) between matched sibling HSCT and the TJU 2 Step haploidentical HSCT. If DFS is similar despite T cell tolerization, than the TJU 2 Step haploidentical approach should be considered an effective alternative therapy for those patients in remission without a matched sibling donor. The widespread benefit of this outcome would be the enfranchisement of segments of the population who are without available matched donors resulting in a delay or a failure to receive this potentially life-saving therapy. If DFS survival after treatment on the TJU 2 Step haploidentical approach is superior to what would be expected after matched sibling HSCT, then one could conclude that haploidentical HSCT confers greater tumor control forming the basis for future studies regarding the potential benefits of utilizing haploidentical donors over matched sibling donors when both types of donors are available.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Biphenotypic Leukemia
  • Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Plasma Cell Neoplasms
  • Lymphoma
  • Hodgkin's Disease
  • Aplastic Anemia

Keywords

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Biphenotypic Leukemia
  • Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Plasma Cell Neoplasms
  • Lymphoma
  • Hodgkin's Disease
  • Aplastic Anemia
  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)
  • myeloablative haploidentical HSCT
  • graft versus host disease (GVHD)
03

In context

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

3,667 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 816 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 40 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.

Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →

Lead sponsor

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 120 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Any patient with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis without morphological evidence of disease in which HSCT is thought to be beneficial.

    • Diagnoses include:

    Acute Myeloid Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndromes Biphenotypic Leukemia Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Plasma Cell Neoplasms Lymphoma Hodgkin Disease Aplastic Anemia

  2. Patients must have a related donor who is a two or more allele mismatch at the HLA-A; B; C; DR loci.
  3. Patients must adequate organ function:

    • of > or = 50%
    • DLCO > or = 50% of predicted corrected for
    • Adequate liver function as defined by a serum \< or = 1.8, or ALT \< or = 2.5X
    • of > or = 60 ml/min
  4. Performance status > or = 70% (TJU )
  5. HCT-CI Score \< 5 Points
  6. Patients must be willing to use if they have
  7. Able to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Performance status \< or = 70% (TJU )
  2. HCT-CI Score > 5 Points
  3. Combination of Performance status of \< 80% (TJU Karnofsky) and an HCT-CI of 4 points or more.
  4. positive
  5. Active involvement of the central nervous system with
  6. Psychiatric disorder that would preclude patients from signing an
  7. Pregnancy
  8. Patients with of \< or = 6 months for reasons other than their underlying hematologic/oncologic disorder
  9. Patients who have received alemtuzumab within 8 weeks of the transplant admission, or who have recently received horse or rabbit ant-thymocyte globulin and have an ATG level of > or = 2 ugm/ml
  10. Patients who cannot receive cyclophosphamide
  11. Patients with evidence of another malignancy, exclusive of a skin cancer that requires only local treatment, should not be enrolled on this protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TJU 2 Step Regimen

    All patients treated on this trial will have hematological malignancies that are in remission at the time of the transplant. Their diseases would be expected to relapse with standard therapy alone.

    Radiation: Total Body Irradiation (TBI) · Biological: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) · Drug: Tacrolimus · Device: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

Interventions

  • RadiationTotal Body Irradiation (TBI)

    Total body irradiation is given in 8 fractions over 4 days (total dose of 12 Gy).

  • BiologicalDonor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI)

    After TBI, the patients will receive a dose of 2 x 10e8 of their donor's T cells. After this infusion, the patients will have 2 rest days.

  • Cyclophosphamide is administered 2 days after the DLI to help tolerize the donor T cells. It is given at a dose of 60 mg/kg/d for 2 days

    Also known as: Endoxan, Cytoxan, Neosar, Procytox, Revimmune, cytophosphane

  • Started the day before the transplant to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD)

    Also known as: CellCept

  • Started the day before the transplant to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)

    Also known as: FK-506, Fujimycin

  • DeviceHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

    One day after the cyclophosphamide is finished, the patients will receive a CD34 selected-donor stem cell product. This is the day of transplant. The CliniMACS® Plus Instrument will be used for the selection of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in human allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

    Also known as: CliniMACS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

    1-year post-transplant disease free survival (DFS), defined as success if a patient is alive and disease free at 1-year post-transplant.

    Time frame: 1 year post-transplant

  2. Probability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment

    Probability of overall survival at 15 months post-treatment, defined as success if a patient is alive 1-year post-transplant.

    Time frame: 15 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 13, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTJU 2 Step Regimen
Started28
Completed28
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryDisease-Free Survival (DFS)

1-year post-transplant disease free survival (DFS), defined as success if a patient is alive and disease free at 1-year post-transplant.

Time frame:
1 year post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
percentage of patientsTJU 2 Step Regimen
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)78.6
PrimaryProbability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment

Probability of overall survival at 15 months post-treatment, defined as success if a patient is alive 1-year post-transplant.

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of probability
Probability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment
percentage of probabilityTJU 2 Step Regimen
Probability of Overall Survival at 15 Months Post-treatment85

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TJU 2 Step Regimen—19/28 (67.9%)28/28 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventTJU 2 Step Regimen
FeverGeneral disorders8/28
CMV reactivationImmune system disorders4/28
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders3/28
InfectionGeneral disorders2/28
HHV-6 infectionBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/28
HypoxiaGeneral disorders2/28
Bone marrow cellularityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/28
HeadacheGeneral disorders1/28
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders1/28
BK cystitisGeneral disorders1/28
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 199
Most frequent other events
EventTJU 2 Step Regimen
FatigueGeneral disorders26/28
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders25/28
MucositisGastrointestinal disorders24/28
FeverGeneral disorders24/28
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders23/28
TachycardiaCardiac disorders20/28
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders19/28
HypotensionBlood and lymphatic system disorders19/28
HeadacheGeneral disorders18/28
InsomniaGeneral disorders18/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TJU 2 Step Regimen
Mean45.2 ± 14.3
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)TJU 2 Step Regimen
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years27
>=65 years1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TJU 2 Step Regimen
Female8
Male20
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TJU 2 Step Regimen
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White22
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TJU 2 Step Regimen
Hispanic or Latino3
Not Hispanic or Latino24
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TJU 2 Step Regimen
United States28
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
09

References and documents

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2010, a primary completion of May 2013 and a completion of May 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2014, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 4, 2011
First posted
May 9, 2011
Start
Jul 2010
Primary completionActual
May 2013
CompletionActual
May 2014
Results first posted
Oct 13, 2014
Last update
May 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01350245
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2011
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Oct 13, 2014
Last update
May 16, 2025

Study contacts

Dolores Grosso, DNP, CRNP
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University
Neal Flomenberg, MD
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclophosphamide · Mycophenolic Acid · Tacrolimus

Start the discussion