CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01349101Updated Dec 15, 2025Results posted

A Research Study of Bone Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated or Partially Matched Related Donors

A Phase 2 interventional study of Total Body Irradiation and Cyclophosphamide in Hematological Malignancies, sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-15.

Sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is hypothesized that engraftment when administering cyclophosphamide post the stem cell infusion will increase, the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and day 100 mortality will decrease, and the use of cyclophosphamide post stem cell infusion with alternative donors will be as safe and as effective as traditional matched transplants.

Read the detailed description

The primary rationale for the development of this research study is to find out if the use of cyclophosphamide after a "blood" stem cell transplant is an effective treatment for patients with blood cancers who require transplant for long-term survival but are without an available matched-sibling donor. Historically, survival rates for patients undergoing partially matched related or unrelated donor transplants (henceforth to be called alternative donor transplants) have been much lower than those observed after matched sibling stem cell transplants. Survival post alternative donor stem cell transplant has also been affected by the requirement to remove or reduce the numbers of donor T cells resulting in higher rates of infection, graft rejection, and relapse. One significant limitation to conventional donor transplants with HLA matched siblings has been that over 50% of patients do not have HLA matched siblings so that increasing the safety of alternative donor transplants could have a significant influence on the number of patients who could safely receive transplants. Because of the historically low overall survival (OS) after alternative donor transplants, it has become a procedure of "last resort" in many centers unwilling to consider it unless all other options are exhausted. There fore several centers including ours have sought to overcome problems using various strategies. The strategy the investigators have proposed for this study (which has been used similarly by other centers) has been to administer cyclophosphamide post the stem cell infusion (traditionally it is given before the stem cell infusion) thereby hopefully destroying the activated T-cells causing graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and allow T cell tolerization and engraftment; but, not the inactivated T cells thereby hopefully preserving the anti-tumor effects of the donor immune system. Thus, the major aim of this study will be to measure the engraftment with this regimen and secondarily to measure incidence of GVHD and day 100 mortality. The goal is to see if in the first 3 months the use of cyclophosphamide post stem cell infusion with alternative donors is as safe and as effective as traditional matched transplants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematological Malignancies

Keywords

  • hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • HSCT
  • allogeneic marrow transplantation
  • cyclophosphamide
  • graft-versus-host disease
  • GVHD
03

In context

Hematologic Neoplasms

1,464 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms; 433 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 78 is above the median of 45 across 1,068 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms.

Browse Hematologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Any patient with a hematological or oncological diagnosis in which allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is thought to be beneficial.

    1. Patients without morphological or molecular evidence of disease
    2. For patients with "indolent diseases," if the patient has evidence of disease the disease burden must be minimal (at least PR) and the disease must be chemoresponsive. Thus for example patients with acute leukemia (not an indolent disease) must be in a morphological CR or CRp.
  2. For patients with MDS the inclusion criteria is specifically as follows:

    • For patients with RA or RARS or isolated 5q- they can proceed to transplant without any treatment.
    • For patients with RAEB-1, RCMD+/-RS, or MDS NOS must have stable disease for 6 months (as documented by serial bone marrow examinations) in the absence of any therapy but growth factors or transfusion support. Patients who require treatment to "control their disease" must show chemo-responsiveness
    • For patients with CMML or RAEB-2 they must demonstrate chemo-responsiveness
    • Chemo-responsiveness is defined as a blast percentage decrease by at least 5 percentage points and there must be less than 10% blasts after treatment and at the time of transplant, if there are more than 10% blasts at any point during the disease course
    • Chemo-responsiveness must also include at least one of the following if applicable:

      • A cytogenetic response
      • A well-documented decrease in transfusion requirements.
  3. Patients must have a related donor who is zero, one, two, three, or four antigen mismatched at the HLA-A; B; C; DR loci or an unrelated donor up to a two antigen mismatch. DNA will be retained by the tissue typing laboratory for possible typing for DQ and DP. When multiple related donor options are available donor selection will be determined the same as in the TJU two-step protocols. When multiple unrelated donors are available care will be made to avoid HLA-A and HLA-B mismatches if possible based on data from the Japanese Marrow Donor Registry studies. An HLA antibody screen will be performed on each patient.
  4. All patients must have adequate organ function:

    1. Patients with related donors must have an LVEF of >35%. Patients with unrelated donors must have an LVEF >45%. Patients with LVEF ≤50% and all patients with symptoms or history of heart failure or coronary artery disease must have a stress echo or equivalent test and a cardiological evaluation.
    2. Patients with related donors must have a DLCO >35% of predicted corrected for hemoglobin. Patients with unrelated donors must have a DLCO >45% of predicted corrected for hemoglobin. For related donors if the DLCO is less than 45% the EF must be greater than 45% and vice versa.
    3. Patients with related donors must have an adequate liver function as defined by a serum bilirubin \<3.0, AST and ALT \<3.0X upper limit of normal. Patients with unrelated donors must have an adequate liver function as defined by a serum bilirubin \<1.8, AST and ALT \< 2.5X upper limit of normal. Exceptions may be granted for patients with "benign" liver disorders such as Gilbert's disease.
    4. Patients with related donors or with unrelated donors must have a creatinine clearance of > 60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2.
    5. Patients with related donors must have a performance status > 60% (TJU Karnofsky14) (Appendix A). Patients with unrelated donors must have a Performance status > 70% (TJU Karnofsky).
    6. Patients with related donors must have a HCT-CI Score \< 6 Points (Appendix B). Patients with unrelated donors must have a HCT-CI Score \< 5 Points.
    7. Patients must be willing to use contraception if they are of childbearing potential.
    8. Patients must be able to give informed consent or have a care giver who can give consent.
    9. Patients that are HIV positive will be eligible for the study if they have an undetectable viral load and meet the above criteria for patients with unrelated donors.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with related donors who have a combination of Performance status of \< 70% (TJU Karnofsky) and an HCT-CI of 4 points or more. Patients with unrelated donors with a combination of Performance status of \< 80% (TJU Karnofsky) and an HCT-CI of 4 points or more.
  2. Patients with active involvement of the central nervous system with malignancy. Patients with a disease with potential for CNS involvement should have documentation of the lack of CNS involvement via lumbar puncture or similar procedure performed within two months of admission or as per TJU standard practice guidelines.
  3. Patients with a psychiatric disorder that would preclude patients from complying with the protocol even with a caregiver. Patients with a lack of social support that would interfere with the ability to receive appropriate medical care will also be excluded.
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Patients with life expectancy of \< 6 months for reasons other than their underlying hematological/oncological disorder.
  6. Patients who have received alemtuzumab within 8 weeks of the transplant admission, or who have recently received horse or rabbit ant-thymocyte globulin and have an ATG level of > 2 μg/ml. Patients on systemic corticosteroids at a dose equivalent of prednisone 7.5mg/day or higher.
  7. Patients who cannot receive cyclophosphamide.
  8. Patients with evidence of another malignancy, exclusive of a skin cancer that requires only local treatment, should not be enrolled on this protocol.
  9. Patients with refractory disease.
  10. Patients with clinically significant preformed antibodies to their donors.
  11. Patients who require supplemental oxygen other than for sleep apnea will be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Myeloablative HSCT

    Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): Patients will receive myeloablative transplants or nonmyeloablative transplants depending on their disease type.

    Radiation: Total Body Irradiation · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Genetic: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Experimental
    Reduced Intensity HSCT

    Reduced Intensity Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): Patients who have received a previous transplant, patients who have received dose limiting radiation, and patients with a DLCO \<45% will receive the reduced intensity conditioning regimen.

    Radiation: Total Body Irradiation · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Busulfan · Genetic: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Interventions

  • RadiationTotal Body Irradiation

    Myeloablative HSCT Arm: Total body irradiation (TBI) is given in 8 fractions over 4 days (total dose of 12 Gy) Reduced Intensity HSCT Arm: TBI is given in one fraction (total dose of 2 Gy)

    Also known as: TBI, radiotherapy

  • DrugCyclophosphamide

    Cyclophosphamide is administered on the third day after the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to help reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It is given at a dose of 60 mg/kg/d for 2 days on days +3 and +4.

    Also known as: Endoxan, Cytoxan, Neosar, Procytox, Revimmune, Cytophosphane, Cy

  • DrugTacrolimus

    Started the fifth day after the transplant to help prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

    Also known as: FK-506, Fujimycin

  • DrugMycophenolate mofetil

    Started the fifth day after the transplant to help prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

    Also known as: CellCept, MMF

  • DrugFludarabine

    Started the fifth day before the transplant. Given for four days at 30 mg/m2/d.

    Also known as: fludarabine phosphate, Fludara

  • DrugBusulfan

    Started the fourth day before the transplant. Given for two days at 3.2 mg/kg.

    Also known as: Myleran, Busulfex IV

  • GeneticHematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Allogeneic marrow transplantation given after the last dose of total body irradiation (TBI)

    Also known as: HSCT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful Engraftment Using Cyclophosphamide Post-Transplant

    Successful Hematopoietic engraftment will be assessed by determining the incidence of participants who achieve both of the following criteria within the 100 days post-transplant: ANC \>/= 0.5x10e9/L for at least 3 days. Platelet engraftment \>20,000 with no transfusions X 7 days. The incidence will be calculated as the number of participants who meet both engraftment criteria. Results will be presented as a proportion/percentage/probability not as an incidence rate.

    Time frame: Through 100 days post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV GVHD

    The cumulative incidence of Grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) within 100 days post-transplant will be estimated; goal is less than 10%. The cumulative incidence represents the probability that a participant experiences Grade III-IV GVHD by day 100. Results will be reported as proportion/percentage/probability.

    Time frame: Through 100 days post-transplant

  2. Incidence of GVHD Unresponsive to Corticosteroids and Photopheresis

    This outcome will estimate the cumulative incidence (probability) of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that is considered unresponsive to corticosteroids and photopheresis within 100 days after treatment; goal is less than 15%. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as the number of participants meeting these criteria. Results will be reported as a proportion/percentage.

    Time frame: Through 100 days post-treatment

  3. Transplant-Related Mortality

    The cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) by day 100 post-transplant will be estimated. Assess day 100 transplant-related mortality; goal is less than 15%. TRM is defined as death that results from medical treatment rather than from the underlying disease itself. The cumulative incidence reflects the probability of TRM by day 100. The result will be reported as a proportion/percentage/probability, not an incidence rate.

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

07

Results

Posted Dec 15, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Started3345
Completed2936
Not completed49
Withdrew: Disease progression11
Withdrew: Death38

Outcome measures

PrimarySuccessful Engraftment Using Cyclophosphamide Post-Transplant

Successful Hematopoietic engraftment will be assessed by determining the incidence of participants who achieve both of the following criteria within the 100 days post-transplant: ANC \>/= 0.5x10e9/L for at least 3 days. Platelet engraftment \>20,000 with no transfusions X 7 days. The incidence will be calculated as the number of participants who meet both engraftment criteria. Results will be presented as a proportion/percentage/probability not as an incidence rate.

Time frame:
Through 100 days post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · Cumulative Probability of Engraftment
Successful Engraftment Using Cyclophosphamide Post-Transplant
Cumulative Probability of EngraftmentMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Successful Engraftment Using Cyclophosphamide Post-Transplant1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)0.93 (0.86 to 1.00)
SecondaryCumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV GVHD

The cumulative incidence of Grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) within 100 days post-transplant will be estimated; goal is less than 10%. The cumulative incidence represents the probability that a participant experiences Grade III-IV GVHD by day 100. Results will be reported as proportion/percentage/probability.

Time frame:
Through 100 days post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · Cumulative Probability of Grade III-IV G
Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV GVHD
Cumulative Probability of Grade III-IV GMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV GVHD0.5152 (0.3312 to 0.6716)0.3111 (0.1820 to 0.4493)
SecondaryIncidence of GVHD Unresponsive to Corticosteroids and Photopheresis

This outcome will estimate the cumulative incidence (probability) of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that is considered unresponsive to corticosteroids and photopheresis within 100 days after treatment; goal is less than 15%. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as the number of participants meeting these criteria. Results will be reported as a proportion/percentage.

Time frame:
Through 100 days post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · Cumulative Probability of GVHD
Incidence of GVHD Unresponsive to Corticosteroids and Photopheresis
Cumulative Probability of GVHDMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Incidence of GVHD Unresponsive to Corticosteroids and Photopheresis0.0625 (0.0107 to 0.1838)0.0233 (0.00177 to 0.1072)
SecondaryTransplant-Related Mortality

The cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) by day 100 post-transplant will be estimated. Assess day 100 transplant-related mortality; goal is less than 15%. TRM is defined as death that results from medical treatment rather than from the underlying disease itself. The cumulative incidence reflects the probability of TRM by day 100. The result will be reported as a proportion/percentage/probability, not an incidence rate.

Time frame:
100 days post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · Cumulative Probability of Mortality
Transplant-Related Mortality
Cumulative Probability of MortalityMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Transplant-Related Mortality0.0909 (0.0226 to 0.2192)0.1951 (0.0904 to 0.3292)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded for 100 days following transplant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Myeloablative HSCT3/33 (9.1%)5/33 (15.2%)33/33 (100%)
Reduced Intensity HSCT8/45 (17.8%)5/45 (11.1%)45/45 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 98
Most frequent serious events
EventMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Hypoxia - Grade 3Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/333/45
Acute Kidney Injury - Grade 4Renal and urinary disorders1/335/45
Pneumonitis - Grade 3Infections and infestations3/334/45
Hypotension - Grade 4Cardiac disorders1/334/45
Syncope - Grade 3Nervous system disorders1/334/45
Hyperbilirubinemia - Grade 4Hepatobiliary disorders1/333/45
Hypoxia - Grade 4Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/333/45
increased creatinine - Grade 4Renal and urinary disorders0/333/45
Respiratory Failure - Grade 4Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/333/45
Diarrhea - Grade 3Gastrointestinal disorders2/331/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 661
Most frequent other events
EventMyeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCT
Fever - Grade 1Immune system disorders23/3340/45
Mucositis - Grade 3Gastrointestinal disorders23/3314/45
Rash - Grade 1Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/3329/45
Insomnia - Grade 1Psychiatric disorders20/3317/45
Fatigue - Grade 2General disorders18/3327/45
Fever - Grade 2Immune system disorders17/339/45
Rash - Grade 2Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders17/3317/45
Constipation - Grade 1Gastrointestinal disorders13/3323/45
Edema - Extremities - Grade 1Vascular disorders6/3323/45
Hypertension - Grade 2Vascular disorders13/3322/45

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Myeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCTTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years331750
>=65 years02828
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Myeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCTTotal
Female172138
Male162440
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Myeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCTTotal
Hispanic or Latino516
Not Hispanic or Latino284472
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Myeloablative HSCTReduced Intensity HSCTTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American5510
White213859
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported707
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 22, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01349101
Lead sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2011
Start date
Feb 10, 2011
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2022
Completion
Dec 7, 2022
Results posted
Dec 15, 2025
Last update
Dec 15, 2025

Study contacts

John L Wagner, MD
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion