CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01347034Updated May 23, 2016Results posted

Radiation Therapy and Intratumoral Autologous Dendritic Cells in Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)

A Phase 2 interventional study of External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT) and Autologous Dendritic Cells in Soft Tissue Sarcoma, sponsored by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-23.

Sponsored by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if injection of the participant's our own immune related white blood cells (called dendritic cells) into their tumor will strengthen their immune system to fight against their cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • radiation
  • neoadjuvant
  • intratumoral
  • autologous
  • dendritic cells
03

In context

Sarcoma

1,667 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 1,283 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma.

Browse Sarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 533 studies on the registry; 74 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 57 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Intermediate or High grade (AJCC 7th edition Grade 3 and 4 or Grade 2 and 3 of a 3 tier system) STS as determined by local pathology diagnostic biopsy specimen review
  • Musculoskeletal tumor in extremities, trunk or chest wall
  • Primary tumor or isolated locally recurrent tumor greater than 5 cm in diameter as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria v1.1
  • Clinical Stage T2N0M0 (AJCC 7th edition)
  • Age ≥18 years at time of consent
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1
  • Patient's written study specific, Institutional Review Board (IRB) stamped informed consent.
  • Adequate organ function (measured within a week prior to beginning treatment for Arm B and within 2 weeks of beginning treatment for Arm A): white blood count (WBC) > 3,000/mm³ and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1500/mm³; Platelets > 100,000/mm³; Hematocrit > 25%; Bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL; Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL, or creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min
  • Radiation Oncologist must confirm that a 2-3 cm strip of skin can be spared from RT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Retroperitoneal or Head and Neck primary locations
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)
  • Demonstrated metastatic disease
  • Contraindication to resection
  • Prior RT if the current tumor is locally recurrent after prior resection
  • Concurrent treatment with any anticancer agent other than RT as dictated by the protocol
  • Prior chemotherapy for the pre-surgical treatment of the primary tumor (neoadjuvant chemotherapy)Bleeding/coagulation disorder
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or other primary immunodeficiency disorder
  • Ongoing systemic therapy with immunosuppressant drugs (e.g. corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporin, methotrexate)
  • Steroid therapy within 4 weeks of first DC administration
  • Any serious ongoing infection
  • Pregnant or lactating women. Patients in reproductive age must agree to use contraceptive methods for the duration of the study (*A pregnancy test will be obtained before treatment).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)

    Arm A - University of Florida - External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT) - As outlined in Intervention Description

    Procedure: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)

  • Experimental
    External Beam RT + DC Injection

    Arm B - Moffitt Cancer Center - External Beam RT + Autologous Dendritic Cells (DC) Injection - As outlined in Intervention Description

    Procedure: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT) · Biological: Autologous Dendritic Cells

Interventions

  • ProcedureExternal Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)

    Day 1: Start external beam RT, 25 fractions from days 1-33 administered Monday through Friday only (no conventional external beam RT on days 6, 7, 13, 14, 20, 21, 27, or 28 Days 57-70: Surgery will occur 3-5 weeks after the final dose of external beam RT. Day 78-91: First post-operative visit Days 91-365: Clinical follow-up Beyond day 365, follow-up will be conducted using the standard of care approach applicable to these patients for the determination of disease recurrence, progression and survival.

  • BiologicalAutologous Dendritic Cells

    Prior to each injection on Arm B, patients may receive prophylactic doses of a first generation cephalosporin antibiotic per physician discretion. Following each DC injection, Arm B patients will assess procedure-associated pain on a scale of 0-10. The next Monday following each DC injection, the patient will be called and questioned about such procedure associated toxicities.

    Also known as: immunotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Enhanced T Lymphocyte Immune Response Specific for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Tumor Associated Antigens(STS-TAAs)

    Investigate the ability of an intensified radiation therapy (RT) regimen (namely, conventional RT with a high-dose hypofractionated boost) and Dendritic Cell (DC) administration to induce an enhanced T lymphocyte immune response specific for STS-TAAs. Criteria for immune response evaluation: Individual patients were considered as responders to TAAs if at any time point the response in IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was found higher than 30 spots per 200,000 cells or in proliferation assay higher than 3000 counts/min (CPM) AND the response in IFN-γ ELISPOT or proliferation assays to tumor cell lysates (TCL) or Ad-Surv was found more than 2SD higher than the response to corresponding control lysate or Ad-c at the same time point AND 2SD higher than the response to the same stimuli at a base line (before start of the treatment).

    Time frame: 11 weeks per participant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

    Evaluate the safety of intratumoral injections of DCs in combination with an intensified RT regimen patients with high-grade large STS. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly to include assessments for: constitutional symptoms, fever, fatigue; common radiation side effects; special attention was paid to DC injection and biopsy related toxicity. Only treatment related SAEs and AEs are reported for this measure.

    Time frame: 11 weeks per participant

07

Results

Posted Aug 8, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Investigators planned to accrue 21 patients in each arm for a total of 42 participants.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection
Started614
Completed614
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Enhanced T Lymphocyte Immune Response Specific for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Tumor Associated Antigens(STS-TAAs)

Investigate the ability of an intensified radiation therapy (RT) regimen (namely, conventional RT with a high-dose hypofractionated boost) and Dendritic Cell (DC) administration to induce an enhanced T lymphocyte immune response specific for STS-TAAs. Criteria for immune response evaluation: Individual patients were considered as responders to TAAs if at any time point the response in IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was found higher than 30 spots per 200,000 cells or in proliferation assay higher than 3000 counts/min (CPM) AND the response in IFN-γ ELISPOT or proliferation assays to tumor cell lysates (TCL) or Ad-Surv was found more than 2SD higher than the response to corresponding control lysate or Ad-c at the same time point AND 2SD higher than the response to the same stimuli at a base line (before start of the treatment).

Time frame:
11 weeks per participant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Enhanced T Lymphocyte Immune Response Specific for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Tumor Associated Antigens(STS-TAAs)
participantsActive Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection
Number of Participants With Enhanced T Lymphocyte Immune Response Specific for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Tumor Associated Antigens(STS-TAAs)25
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

Evaluate the safety of intratumoral injections of DCs in combination with an intensified RT regimen patients with high-grade large STS. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly to include assessments for: constitutional symptoms, fever, fatigue; common radiation side effects; special attention was paid to DC injection and biopsy related toxicity. Only treatment related SAEs and AEs are reported for this measure.

Time frame:
11 weeks per participant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsActive Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection
Treatment Emergent SAEs00
Treatment Emergent Other AEs614

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years, 2 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)—0/6 (0%)6/6 (100%)
Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection—1/14 (7.1%)14/14 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/61/14
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/61/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent other events
EventActive Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC Injection
Dermatitis radiationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/611/14
FatigueGeneral disorders2/68/14
PainGeneral disorders3/65/14
Skin hyperpigmentationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/67/14
Erythema multiformeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/60/14
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/67/14
Infections and infestations - OtherInfections and infestations3/60/14
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations0/66/14
Edema limbsGeneral disorders0/64/14
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/64/14

Baseline characteristics

All participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC InjectionTotal
Mean53.8 (45 to 74)59.5 (42 to 77)57.35 (42 to 77)
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC InjectionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years31013
>=65 years347
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC InjectionTotal
Female347
Male31013
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active Comparator: External Beam Radiation Therapy (RT)Experimental: External Beam RT + DC InjectionTotal
United States61420
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Shands University of Florida Department of Radiation Oncology
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Shands Jacksonville Department of Radiation Oncology
    Jacksonville, Florida 32206, United States
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hong WX, Sagiv-Barfi I, Czerwinski DK, Sallets A, Levy R. Neoadjuvant Intratumoral Immunotherapy with TLR9 Activation and Anti-OX40 Antibody Eradicates Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;82(7):1396-1408. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1382. PubMed 35135810 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01347034
Lead sponsor
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Collaborators
University of Florida
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Apr 2016
Results posted
Aug 8, 2014
Last update
May 23, 2016

Study contacts

Alberto Chiappori, M.D.
principal investigator · H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Daniel Indelicato, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Florida, Shands Jacksonville

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion