CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01344759Updated Aug 8, 2018Results posted

Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Children With History of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-08.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Months to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the effects of two commonly used anesthetic drugs, dexmedetomidine and propofol, have on the shape and muscle tone of the upper airway in children, adolescents, and young adults with a history of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) having an MRI scan.

The results of this study will help in making the best decisions regarding the anesthesia medications that are most appropriate for children, adolescents, and young adults with OSA during MRI studies.

Read the detailed description

Patients with OSA are at risk for airway obstruction (a condition that makes it difficult to breath) during sedation and anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine and propofol are safe and effective drugs regularly used by anesthesiologists. These drugs are used to put patients to sleep for operations and certain studies like MRI scans. However, there have been no studies describing the effects these drugs have on the upper airway of children, adolescents, and young adults with OSA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • MRI
  • Pediatrics
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Propofol
  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Apnea

1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with documented history of OSA by polysomnography who require anesthesia for MRI sleep study or MRI brain imaging study.
  2. Subjects must be 12 months to 25 years of age (inclusive)
  3. Either the subject (if subject's age is 18-25) or the subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject has life-threatening medical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 4, 5 or 6). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scale is a measure of physical status or how healthy the patient is. For our study, we will focus on children which are defined as ASA I, II or III which means a healthy child (ASA I), a child with a systemic disease that is mild and well controlled (ASA II) or a child with systemic disease that is severe and controlled (ASA III).
  2. The subject is allergic to or has a contraindication to propofol or dexmedetomidine.
  3. The subject has a tracheostomy or other mechanical airway device
  4. The subject is not scheduled to receive anesthesia-sedation care for the MRI
  5. The subject has a history or a family (parent or sibling) history of malignant hyperthermia.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Propofol

    Drug: Propofol

  • Active comparator
    Dexmedetomidine

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    Once an IV is in place, atropine 10 mcg/kg will be given. Loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg will be administered over 10 minutes followed by a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at rate of 1 mcg/kg/h using a syringe pump.

    Also known as: Precedex

  • DrugPropofol

    Once an IV is in place, atropine 10 mcg/kg will be given. Loading dose of propofol 2 mg/kg will be administered over 2 minutes followed by a continuous infusion of propofol at rate of 100 mcg/kg/minute using a syringe pump.

    Also known as: Diprivan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cross Sectional Area of the Pharyngeal Airway

    The primary outcome measures will be the cross sectional area of the pharyngeal airway of the patients measured at two levels soft palate (nasopharyngeal) and base of the tongue (retroglossal). Magnetic resonance images of the airway were obtained during low (1 mcg/kg/hr) and high (3 mcg/kg/hr) doses of DEX or low (100 mcg/kg/m) and high (200 mcg/kg/m) doses of Propofol. All were administered through an intravenous (IV) catheter.

    Time frame: during MRI within first 10 minutes of scanning

Secondary outcomes

  1. Obstructive Index Until Recovery Room Discharge

    The Obstructive Index is a count of the obstructive apnea events per hour of sleep

    Time frame: During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes

  2. Respiratory Disturbance Index

    The respiratory disturbance index is a count of respiratory disturbance events per hour of sleep.

    Time frame: During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes

  3. Needed Artificial Airway

    This is the count of the number of patients who needed an artificial airway.

    Time frame: During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes

  4. Room Air SpO2

    The patient's oxygen saturation on room air.

    Time frame: During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Failure to standardize mouth opening, due to stimulation of the subject during manipulation of the mouth No baseline measurements were obtained while awake Many patients had Downs syndrome so the results may not apply across all patients with OSA

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropofolDexmedetomidine
Started3030
Completed3028
Not completed02
Withdrew: Patients failed to reach sedation level02

Outcome measures

PrimaryCross Sectional Area of the Pharyngeal Airway

The primary outcome measures will be the cross sectional area of the pharyngeal airway of the patients measured at two levels soft palate (nasopharyngeal) and base of the tongue (retroglossal). Magnetic resonance images of the airway were obtained during low (1 mcg/kg/hr) and high (3 mcg/kg/hr) doses of DEX or low (100 mcg/kg/m) and high (200 mcg/kg/m) doses of Propofol. All were administered through an intravenous (IV) catheter.

Time frame:
during MRI within first 10 minutes of scanning
Reported as:
Median · mm^2
Cross Sectional Area of the Pharyngeal Airway
mm^2PropofolDexmedetomidine
Low Dose Sedative, Nasopharyngeal measurement239.9 (185.4 to 267.2)178.5 (148.5 to 222.4)
High Dose Sedative, Nasopharyngeal measurement201.6 (148.9 to 291.7)235.4 (145.0 to 258.8)
Low Dose Sedative, Retroglossal measurement115.1 (67.8 to 167.0)120.9 (63.6 to 179.5)
High dose sedative, Retroglossal measurement108.1 (53.6 to 134.4)120.5 (50.1 to 178.4)
SecondaryObstructive Index Until Recovery Room Discharge

The Obstructive Index is a count of the obstructive apnea events per hour of sleep

Time frame:
During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · Apnea events/hour of sleep
Obstructive Index Until Recovery Room Discharge
Apnea events/hour of sleepMild OSA and DexmedetomidineMild OSA and PropofolModerate OSA and DexmedetomidineModerate OSA and PropofolSevere OSA and DexmedetomidineSevere OSA and Propofol
Obstructive Index Until Recovery Room Discharge4.2 (3.4 to 4.9)3.0 (2.3 to 3.5)8.0 (7.4 to 8.6)8.0 (5.9 to 8.9)16.7 (14.1 to 23.3)17.1 (14.6 to 37.0)
SecondaryRespiratory Disturbance Index

The respiratory disturbance index is a count of respiratory disturbance events per hour of sleep.

Time frame:
During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · respir.disturbance events/hr of sleep
Respiratory Disturbance Index
respir.disturbance events/hr of sleepMild OSA and DexmedetomidineMild OSA and PropofolModerate OSA and DexmedetomidineModerate OSA and PropofolSevere OSA and DexmedetomidineSevere OSA and Propofol
Respiratory Disturbance Index5.1 (4.8 to 5.4)3.2 (2.4 to 4.1)8.8 (7.7 to 9.8)7.1 (5.9 to 9.1)16.6 (14.3 to 19.6)25.2 (14.7 to 41.9)
SecondaryNeeded Artificial Airway

This is the count of the number of patients who needed an artificial airway.

Time frame:
During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes
Reported as:
Number · Number of artifical airway events
Needed Artificial Airway
Number of artifical airway eventsMild OSA and DexmedetomidineMild OSA and PropofolModerate OSA and DexmedetomidineModerate OSA and PropofolSevere OSA and DexmedetomidineSevere OSA and Propofol
Needed Artificial Airway011125
SecondaryRoom Air SpO2

The patient's oxygen saturation on room air.

Time frame:
During MRI and until recovery room discharge - approximately 30-250 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of SpO2
Room Air SpO2
percentage of SpO2Mild OSA and DexmedetomidineMild OSA and PropofolModerate OSA and DexmedetomidineModerate OSA and PropofolSevere OSA and DexmedetomidineSevere OSA and Propofol
Room Air SpO287.2 (86.7 to 87.7)88.0 (83.0 to 91.0)86.3 (84.8 to 87.5)89.0 (87.0 to 93.0)84.0 (77.0 to 88.8)88.0 (80.4 to 88.2)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propofol—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Dexmedetomidine—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PropofolDexmedetomidineTotal
<=18 years303060
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PropofolDexmedetomidineTotal
Mean8.8 (5.8 to 14.3)8.3 (4.7 to 16.1)8.6 (5.3 to 15.2)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PropofolDexmedetomidineTotal
Female8816
Male222244
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PropofolDexmedetomidineTotal
United States303060
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mason KP, Zgleszewski SE, Dearden JL, Dumont RS, Pirich MA, Stark CD, D'Angelo P, Macpherson S, Fontaine PJ, Connor L, Zurakowski D. Dexmedetomidine for pediatric sedation for computed tomography imaging studies. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):57-62, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000216293.16613.15. PubMed 16790626 ↗
  • Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):382-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00016. PubMed 10910487 ↗
  • Talke P, Lobo E, Brown R. Systemically administered alpha2-agonist-induced peripheral vasoconstriction in humans. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00014. PubMed 12826844 ↗
  • Talke P, Richardson CA, Scheinin M, Fisher DM. Postoperative pharmacokinetics and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg. 1997 Nov;85(5):1136-42. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00033. PubMed 9356115 ↗
  • Doze VA, Chen BX, Maze M. Dexmedetomidine produces a hypnotic-anesthetic action in rats via activation of central alpha-2 adrenoceptors. Anesthesiology. 1989 Jul;71(1):75-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198907000-00014. PubMed 2568769 ↗
  • Drummond GB. Comparison of sedation with midazolam and ketamine: effects on airway muscle activity. Br J Anaesth. 1996 May;76(5):663-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.5.663. PubMed 8688266 ↗
  • Drummond GB. Influence of thiopentone on upper airway muscles. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jul;63(1):12-21. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.1.12. PubMed 2765337 ↗
  • Hwang JC, St John WM, Bartlett D Jr. Respiratory-related hypoglossal nerve activity: influence of anesthetics. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Sep;55(3):785-92. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.3.785. PubMed 6629915 ↗
  • Hudgel DW, Harasick T, Katz RL, Witt WJ, Abelson TI. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in obstructive apnea. Value of preoperative localization of site of upper airway narrowing during sleep. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 May;143(5 Pt 1):942-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.942. PubMed 2024847 ↗
  • Nandi PR, Charlesworth CH, Taylor SJ, Nunn JF, Dore CJ. Effect of general anaesthesia on the pharynx. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Feb;66(2):157-62. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.2.157. PubMed 1817614 ↗
  • SAFAR P, ESCARRAGA LA, CHANG F. Upper airway obstruction in the unconscious patient. J Appl Physiol. 1959 Sep;14:760-4. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.5.760. No abstract available. PubMed 14440737 ↗
  • Litman RS, Kottra JA, Berkowitz RJ, Ward DS. Upper airway obstruction during midazolam/nitrous oxide sedation in children with enlarged tonsils. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Sep-Oct;20(5):318-20. PubMed 9803430 ↗
  • Donnelly LF, Casper KA, Chen B, Koch BL. Defining normal upper airway motion in asymptomatic children during sleep by means of cine MR techniques. Radiology. 2002 Apr;223(1):176-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2231011023. PubMed 11930064 ↗
  • Donnelly LF, Shott SR, LaRose CR, Chini BA, Amin RS. Causes of persistent obstructive sleep apnea despite previous tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children with down syndrome as depicted on static and dynamic cine MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):175-81. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.1.1830175. PubMed 15208134 ↗
  • Ibacache ME, Munoz HR, Brandes V, Morales AL. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):60-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000094947.20838.8E. PubMed 14693585 ↗
  • Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Ors S, Esmaoglu A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation and provides smooth extubation after pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Sep;15(9):762-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01541.x. PubMed 16101707 ↗
  • Petroz GC, Sikich N, James M, van Dyk H, Shafer SL, Schily M, Lerman J. A phase I, two-center study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine in children. Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1098-110. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00009. PubMed 17122572 ↗
  • Mahmoud M, Tyler T, Sadhasivam S. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine for large anterior mediastinal mass biopsy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Oct;18(10):1011-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02604.x. No abstract available. PubMed 18811855 ↗
  • Eastwood PR, Platt PR, Shepherd K, Maddison K, Hillman DR. Collapsibility of the upper airway at different concentrations of propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):470-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00007. PubMed 16129969 ↗
  • Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Zgleszewski SE, Robson CD, Carrier M, Hickey PR, Dinardo JA. High dose dexmedetomidine as the sole sedative for pediatric MRI. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 May;18(5):403-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02468.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. PubMed 18363626 ↗
  • Mason KP, Zgleszewski SE, Prescilla R, Fontaine PJ, Zurakowski D. Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for CT imaging studies. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 May;18(5):393-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02451.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. PubMed 18363628 ↗
  • Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O, Yucel A, Toprak HI, Ersoy OM. A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):63-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000219592.82598.AA. PubMed 16790627 ↗
  • Usher AG, Kearney RA, Tsui BC. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia for MRI in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Jan;15(1):23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01390.x. PubMed 15649159 ↗
  • Frankville DD, Spear RM, Dyck JB. The dose of propofol required to prevent children from moving during magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 1993 Nov;79(5):953-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199311000-00013. PubMed 8239013 ↗
  • Levati A, Colombo N, Arosio EM, Savoia G, Tommasino C, Scialfa G, Boselli L. Propofol anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 May;40(5):561-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04488.x. PubMed 8792885 ↗
  • Evans RG, Crawford MW, Noseworthy MD, Yoo SJ. Effect of increasing depth of propofol anesthesia on upper airway configuration in children. Anesthesiology. 2003 Sep;99(3):596-602. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200309000-00014. PubMed 12960543 ↗
  • Litman RS, Weissend EE, Shrier DA, Ward DS. Morphologic changes in the upper airway of children during awakening from propofol administration. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):607-11. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00016. PubMed 11873035 ↗
  • Mathru M, Esch O, Lang J, Herbert ME, Chaljub G, Goodacre B, vanSonnenberg E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway. Effects of propofol anesthesia and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in humans. Anesthesiology. 1996 Feb;84(2):273-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199602000-00004. PubMed 8602656 ↗
  • Thompson JR, Schneider S, Ashwal S, Holden BS, Hinshaw DB Jr, Hasso AN. The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation. Radiology. 1982 May;143(2):475-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350. PubMed 7071350 ↗
  • Napoli KL, Ingall CG, Martin GR. Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. J Pediatr. 1996 Aug;129(2):287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70256-1. PubMed 8765629 ↗
  • Greenberg SB, Faerber EN, Aspinall CL, Adams RC. High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Sep;161(3):639-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124. PubMed 8352124 ↗
  • Ronchera-Oms CL, Casillas C, Marti-Bonmati L, Poyatos C, Tomas J, Sobejano A, Jimenez NV. Oral chloral hydrate provides effective and safe sedation in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1994 Aug;19(4):239-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1994.tb00680.x. PubMed 7989402 ↗
  • Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):699-705. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00035. PubMed 10702460 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01344759
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2011
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Nov 2011
Results posted
Feb 23, 2016
Last update
Aug 8, 2018

Study contacts

Mohamed Mahmoud, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion