ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01342848REMNANTUpdated Jun 8, 2015

Effectiveness of Thrombus Aspiration in Plaque Reduction for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

An observational study in Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by Raffaele De Caterina. Completed at 3 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-08.

Sponsored by Raffaele De Caterina · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Enrollment
76
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although successful, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with stent implantation may be hampered by periprocedural myocardial necrosis. In acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the reduction of thrombus burden through manual thrombus aspiration (TA) of an occluded coronary artery has been documented to produce an improved myocardial perfusion rate and significant survival advantage. To date, beyond feasibility and safety studies no clinical benefit has been yet documented with the use of TA before stent deployment in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) outside acute STEMI. The investigators hypothesize that TA before stent deployment reduces the thrombus/plaque burden - as assessed by intravascular imaging systems - in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) outside acute STEMI.

Read the detailed description

Periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) has an independent adverse prognostic relevance. Several trials have documented a reduction in the occurrence of periprocedural MI through various pharmacological strategies, with enhanced inhibition of platelet aggregation or high dose statins. However, real-world registries still document an incidence of periprocedural MI in 30-40% of patients. Currently available intravascular imaging techniques, Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and more recently available Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) allow a precise evaluation of the coronary plaque and can be extremely useful for monitoring plaque modifications obtained with thrombus aspiration (TA). Plaque burden will be assessed as plaque + media (P+M), commonly measured with IVUS by subtracting lumen (L) to external elastic membrane (EEM) cross sectional area (P+M= EEM-L).

Expecting a mean plaque volume of 160±50 mm3 in a population of patients with ACS undergoing PCI, a sample size of at least 45 patients (52 lesions) with a recent (\<15 days, but after 24 hours) STEMI or a non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS within 72 hours of symptoms would provide a 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the plaque volume after TA with an alpha (probability value) of 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

  • NSTE-ACS
  • PCI
  • Thrombus Aspiration
  • IVUS
  • Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 500 across 590 observational studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Raffaele De Caterina is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

45 patients with at least one "culprit" lesion, identified as a high-grade (>90%) lesion in the territory of jeopardized myocardium, at coronary angiography performed for a recent (\<15 days, but after 24 hours) STEMI or a non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS within 72 hours of symptoms.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18-75 years old.
  • Recent(\<15 days, >24 hrs)STEMI or NSTE-ACS within 72 hrs of symptoms.
  • Presence at least one "culprit" high-grade (>90%)lesion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • STEMI within 24 hours.
  • Cardiogenic shock, decompensated heart failure, \<30%.
  • Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dl.
  • to aspirin, heparin, thienopyridines.
  • Total occlusion of target vessel.
  • Diseased vein graft or a restenosis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in plaque volume as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

    The reduction of plaque volume after TA, assessed as (Baseline P+M)- (Post-TA P+M);

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 minutes after thromboaspiration (TA)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Histopathology assessment of aspirated material.

    Quantitative analysis: size and weight. Qualitative evaluation: a) thrombus containing only platelets, b) a thrombus with an erythrocyte component c) any fragment of vessel wall, cholesterol crystals, inflammatory cells or collagen tissue.

    Time frame: One week after PCI

  2. Myocardial infarct size by markers of myocardial injury/necrosis

    Myocardial infarct size will be determined as the area under the curve of serial CK-MB and cardiac Troponin I assessment

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after PCI

  3. The change in thrombus burden as assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Thrombus burden will be assessed with a semiquantitative scale (0-4) by OCT at baseline and after TA

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 minutes after thromboaspiration (TA)

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Center of Predictive Molecular Medicine - University "G. d'Annunzio"
    Chieti, 66013, Italy
  • Institute of Cardiology, G. d'Annunzio University
    Chieti, 66100, Italy
  • San Giovanni Hospital and Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto, Fondazione Onlus
    Rome, 00184, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, Jorgensen E, Marco J, Nordrehaug JE, Ruzyllo W, Urban P, Stone GW, Wijns W; Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005 Apr;26(8):804-47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi138. Epub 2005 Mar 15. PubMed 15769784 ↗
  • Iakovou I, Mintz GS, Dangas G, Abizaid A, Mehran R, Kobayashi Y, Lansky AJ, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB. Increased CK-MB release is a "trade-off" for optimal stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Dec 3;42(11):1900-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.012. PubMed 14662249 ↗
  • Prati F, Pawlowski T, Gil R, Labellarte A, Gziut A, Caradonna E, Manzoli A, Pappalardo A, Burzotta F, Boccanelli A. Stenting of culprit lesions in unstable angina leads to a marked reduction in plaque burden: a major role of plaque embolization? A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2003 May 13;107(18):2320-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000066695.24697.07. Epub 2003 Apr 21. PubMed 12707236 ↗
  • Nienhuis MB, Ottervanger JP, Bilo HJ, Dikkeschei BD, Zijlstra F. Prognostic value of troponin after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):318-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21345. PubMed 18288753 ↗
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2525-38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm355. No abstract available. PubMed 17951287 ↗
  • Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, Dotzer F, ten Berg J, Bollwein H, Graf I, Ibrahim M, Pache J, Seyfarth M, Schuhlen H, Dirschinger J, Berger PB, Schomig A; Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic: Regimen Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 (ISAR-REACT 2) Trial Investigators. Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1531-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.joc60034. Epub 2006 Mar 13. PubMed 16533938 ↗
  • Patti G, Colonna G, Pasceri V, Pepe LL, Montinaro A, Di Sciascio G. Randomized trial of high loading dose of clopidogrel for reduction of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study. Circulation. 2005 Apr 26;111(16):2099-106. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000161383.06692.D4. Epub 2005 Mar 6. PubMed 15750189 ↗
  • Pasceri V, Patti G, Nusca A, Pristipino C, Richichi G, Di Sciascio G; ARMYDA Investigators. Randomized trial of atorvastatin for reduction of myocardial damage during coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):674-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137828.06205.87. Epub 2004 Jul 26. PubMed 15277322 ↗
  • Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, Diercks GF, de Smet BJ, van den Heuvel AF, Anthonio RL, Jessurun GA, Tan ES, Suurmeijer AJ, Zijlstra F. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):557-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706416. PubMed 18256391 ↗
  • Vlaar PJ, Diercks GF, Svilaas T, Vogelzang M, de Smet BJ, van den Heuvel AF, Anthonio RL, Jessurun GA, Tan ES, Suurmeijer AJ, Zijlstra F. The feasibility and safety of routine thrombus aspiration in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):937-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21717. PubMed 19021272 ↗
  • Zimarino M, Prati F, Stabile E, Pizzicannella J, Fouad T, Filippini A, Rabozzi R, Trubiani O, Pizzicannella G, De Caterina R. Optical coherence tomography accurately identifies intermediate atherosclerotic lesions--an in vivo evaluation in the rabbit carotid artery. Atherosclerosis. 2007 Jul;193(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.08.047. Epub 2006 Sep 27. PubMed 17007862 ↗
  • Prati F, Regar E, Mintz GS, Arbustini E, Di Mario C, Jang IK, Akasaka T, Costa M, Guagliumi G, Grube E, Ozaki Y, Pinto F, Serruys PW; Expert's OCT Review Document. Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2010 Feb;31(4):401-15. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp433. Epub 2009 Nov 4. PubMed 19892716 ↗
  • Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003 Oct 7;108(14):1664-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. PubMed 14530185 ↗
  • Zimarino M, Calafiore AM, De Caterina R. Complete myocardial revascularization: between myth and reality. Eur Heart J. 2005 Sep;26(18):1824-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi249. Epub 2005 Apr 11. PubMed 15824076 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Sep 2011 and a completion of Oct 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 12, 2011
First posted
Apr 27, 2011
Start
Mar 2011
Primary completionActual
Sep 2011
CompletionActual
Oct 2011
Last update
Jun 8, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01342848
Lead sponsor
Raffaele De Caterina
Collaborators
San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
Responsible party
Raffaele De Caterina (Director - Institute of Cardiology, G. d'Annunzio University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2011
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Sep 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Last update
Jun 8, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion