CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01341080Chantix-PDUpdated Dec 30, 2022Results posted

Varenicline for Gait and Balance Impairment in Parkinson Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of Varenicline and Sugar pill in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-30.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2010, registered Apr 2011).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if varenicline is effective in improving gait and balance impairment in patients with Parkinson disease.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson disease (PD) is a clinical entity characterized by bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability. Current treatments primarily focus on replacement of dopamine to compensate for the degeneration of the substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neuronal population. Though dopamine treats many of the motor symptoms of PD, postural instability (which often leads to falls) typically is least responsive to therapy. More recently, the degeneration of the cholinergic system arising from the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) in the brainstem has been implicated in gait dysfunction in PD. Striatal cholinergic inputs are supplied from the PPN both via the intralaminar complex of the thalamus and through direct inputs. The primary subtypes of cholinergic receptors present in the striatum are nicotinic and include α4β2, α6β2, and α7 receptors. Varenicline (Chantix) is a novel partial α4β2 agonist and full α7 agonist developed as an aid for smoking cessation and has been shown in initial studies to improve imbalance in patients with inherited spinocerebellar ataxia. The unique method of action of varenicline may make it an ideal drug for the treatment of balance impairment in PD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Postural impairment
  • Falls
  • Parkinson Disease
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects will be diagnosed with Parkinson Disease (PD) by the United Kingdom (UK) Brain Bank criteria.
  • Subjects will have to be at least stage 2 on the Hoehn and Yahr staging system of PD and have a history of at least 1 fall or near fall in the last 6 months
  • Subjects must have a stable medication regimen.
  • All subjects will be over the age of 40 in an attempt to exclude inherited forms of parkinsonism.
  • Serum creatine kinase, complete metabolic panel, complete blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, platelets and EKG are within normal limits (results obtained from primary care physician and dated within the past 6 months or obtained at screening visit).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hoehn and Yahr stage V subjects.
  • Subjects with a history of major psychiatric disorder, deep brain stimulation surgery, recent cerebral trauma, cardiac arrhythmia, or renal insufficiency.
  • A cardiovascular procedure in the last 5 years (eg, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) or have cardiovascular instability (including myocardial infarction or unstable angina). Other cardiovascular exclusions include uncontrolled hypertension, significant neurological sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease with prior amputation, or severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV).
  • Concurrent treatment with any monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), bupropion (Wellbutrin), or nicotine patches.
  • Dementia or other psychiatric illness that prevents the patient from giving informed consent (Folstein Mini Mental Status Exam score less than 25).
  • Concurrent treatment with trihexyphenidyl (Artane) or benztropine mesylate (Cogentin).
  • Significant degree of dysphagia, by history.
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
  • Presence of severe renal disease (BUN 50% greater than normal or creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min) or hepatic disease.
  • Abnormal creatine kinase and/or platelet count in the past 6 months (as determined by lab reports obtained from primary care physicians or conducted at baseline).
  • Use of varenicline within the previous 30 days.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant at the time of screening or who will not use adequate protection during participation of the study.
  • Allergy/sensitivity to the drug or its formulations.
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical study.
  • Active substance or tobacco use or dependence.
  • Moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Serious illness (requiring systemic treatment/or hospitalization) until the subject either completes therapy or is clinically stable on therapy, in the opinion of the site investigator, for at least 60 days prior to study entry.
  • Inability or unwillingness of the subject or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Varenicline

    Drug: Varenicline

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar pill

    Drug: Sugar pill

Interventions

  • DrugVarenicline

    Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.

    Also known as: Chantix

  • DrugSugar pill

    1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale

    Efficacy was measured as a change on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the study after 8 weeks on drug. The BBS is a 14-item measure consisting of basic balance tasks, with a final score indicative of overall balance ability. The maximum score is 56 and minimum is 0. Higher scores reflect better balance.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frontal Assessment Battery

    The change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB, score range 0-18) and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, score range 0-30) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. High scores on both scales indicate better performance. The FAB measures executive functioning and consists of the following 6 sections: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  2. Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)

    The change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. The maximum score on the MMSE is 30 and lowest score 0, with higher score indicating better cognitive function.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 30, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The sensitivity of the BBS is poor to moderate, with frequent uncertainty in its scoring; The study also faced challenges in recruitment, which was slow and spanned 8 years, potentially biasing the sample; High attrition resulted in a smaller sample size than estimated by power analysis; Although the authors intended to recruit tremor predominant and PIGD patients in equal numbers, the PIGD subtype was overrepresented. Thus, the PIGD subtype was unintentionally favored.

Participant flow

Subjects were recruitment from the Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder clinic at Rush University Medical Center over the course of the study (2011-2018).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVareniclineSugar Pill
Started1818
Completed1517
Not completed31

Outcome measures

PrimaryBerg Balance Scale

Efficacy was measured as a change on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the study after 8 weeks on drug. The BBS is a 14-item measure consisting of basic balance tasks, with a final score indicative of overall balance ability. The maximum score is 56 and minimum is 0. Higher scores reflect better balance.

Time frame:
9 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Berg Balance Scale
score on a scaleVareniclineSugar Pill
Baseline43.93 ± 1.9741.14 ± 2.55
End Point43.25 ± 1.8445.13 ± 2.34
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Sugar Pill · Repeated measures analysis or variance · p = 0.05 · Cohen's d: 0.15 · 95% CI -4.01 to 4.61
SecondaryFrontal Assessment Battery

The change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB, score range 0-18) and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, score range 0-30) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. High scores on both scales indicate better performance. The FAB measures executive functioning and consists of the following 6 sections: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.

Time frame:
9 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Frontal Assessment Battery
score on a scaleVareniclineSugar Pill
Baseline17.40 ± 0.9715.25 ± 2.77
End point17.70 ± 2.1615.19 ± 2.74
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Sugar Pill · Repeated measures analysis or variance · p = 0.05 · Cohen's d: 0.16 · 95% CI -1.39 to 1.53
SecondaryMini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)

The change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. The maximum score on the MMSE is 30 and lowest score 0, with higher score indicating better cognitive function.

Time frame:
9 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
score on a scaleVareniclineSugar Pill
Baseline29.08 ± 1.1728.19 ± 1.72
End point28.00 ± 2.0028.13 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Sugar Pill · Repeated measures analysis or variance · p = 0.05 · Cohen's d: 0.81 · 95% CI -0.40 to 1.40

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected throughout subject participation (e.g. 9 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Varenicline0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Sugar Pill0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

36 participants were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward. 32 were used in the analysis and demographics are reported here.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years336
>=65 years121426
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
Mean71.93 ± 8.570.24 ± 7.971.03 ± 8.134
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
Female336
Male121426
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
White151732
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
United States151732
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(units on a scale)VareniclineSugar PillTotal
Mean33.1 ± 9.735.7 ± 12.734.74 ± 11.558
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bohnen NI, Muller ML, Koeppe RA, Studenski SA, Kilbourn MA, Frey KA, Albin RL. History of falls in Parkinson disease is associated with reduced cholinergic activity. Neurology. 2009 Nov 17;73(20):1670-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c1ded6. PubMed 19917989 ↗
  • Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, Brown R, McNamee S, Carne W. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson's disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):789-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.005. PubMed 15827933 ↗
  • Zesiewicz TA, Sullivan KL. Treatment of ataxia and imbalance with varenicline (chantix): report of 2 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (types 3 and 14). Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(6):363-5. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31818736a9. PubMed 19050414 ↗
  • Perez XA, Quik M. Focus on alpha4beta2* and alpha6beta2* nAChRs for Parkinson's Disease Therapeutics. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 2011;3(1):1-6. PubMed 21499569 ↗
  • Bohnen NI, Albin RL. The cholinergic system and Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. 2011 Aug 10;221(2):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.048. Epub 2010 Jan 7. PubMed 20060022 ↗
  • Karachi C, Grabli D, Bernard FA, Tande D, Wattiez N, Belaid H, Bardinet E, Prigent A, Nothacker HP, Hunot S, Hartmann A, Lehericy S, Hirsch EC, Francois C. Cholinergic mesencephalic neurons are involved in gait and postural disorders in Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest. 2010 Aug;120(8):2745-54. doi: 10.1172/JCI42642. Epub 2010 Jul 12. PubMed 20628197 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 23, 2011
  • Informed consent form · Dec 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01341080
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Responsible party
Deborah Hall, MD (MD, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2011
Start date
Dec 28, 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2, 2018
Completion
Nov 2, 2018
Results posted
Dec 30, 2022
Last update
Dec 30, 2022

Study contacts

Deborah A Hall, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Rush University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion