CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01326988Updated Feb 6, 2012

Real-time Ultrasound-guided Spinal Anesthesia:A Feasibility Study

An observational study in Ultrasound Spinal Anesthesia, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-06.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The traditional landmarks to locate the injection site and orientation of the spinal needle for spinal anesthesia are based on palpation of surface bony landmarks. However the actual injection target into the CSF is located at an unknown depth inside the patients 3 dimensional spinal anatomy which can itself vary in its orientation relative to these surface markers.Also bony surface markers may not be palpable in some patients or the patient may have altered spinal alignment. Thus an already blind procedure can become even more misguided involving multiple trial and error needle insertions. On the other hand ultrasound allows visualisation of deep target structures which are impalpable, it allows assessment of spinal alignment and thus directs the orientation of the seeking needle more accurately. Performing US in real-time during needle insertion gives continuous feedback about the correct needle approach path which should reduce the number of blind needle passes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ultrasound Spinal Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Spinal anesthesia
  • ultrasound
  • real-time
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 566 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients presenting for elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery to a specialist orthopaedic hospital.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consenting patients of at least 18 years of age undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective lower limb surgery

Exclusion Criteria (are as for Spinal anesthesia generally)

  • Patient refusal
  • Sepsis or local infection at the site of injection
  • Hypovolemia
  • Coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5, Platelets \< 75X 109 /L, anticoagulant therapy)
  • Indeterminate neurologic disease
  • Increased intracranial pressure
  • Local anesthetic allergy
  • Infection distinct from the site of injection
  • Unknown duration of surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients requiring spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgery

    Patients of at least 18 years of age undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective lower limb surgery will be recruited. Therefore inclusion and exclusion criteria are the same as for traditionally administered spinal anesthesia as below. Additionally we will exclude those patients who are incapable of providing fully informed consent, patients who are currently enrolled in other studies and patients with communication difficulties

    Procedure: Real-time ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureReal-time ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia

    The neuraxial US scan will be performed with the patient in the sitting or lateral position with the hip and knees slightly flexed using full aseptic technique. The spinal needle will be inserted in real-time under direct ultrasound guidance to administer the spinal anesthetic.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of ventral passes of the spinal needle into the patient

    Time frame: Assessed at time of spinal anesthetic injection (baseline)

  2. Rate of successful performance of real-time ultrasound guided spinal needle insertion

    Time frame: Assessed at time of spinal anesthetic injection (baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time for the procedure from first needle contact to the skin to injection of the medication into the spinal canal

    Time frame: Assessed at time of spinal anesthetic injection (baseline)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Holland Orthopaedic & Arthritic Center
    Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1G4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002 Mar;57(3):277-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2403_4.x. PubMed 11892638 ↗
  • Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19633. No abstract available. PubMed 11172514 ↗
  • Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):845-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep079. Epub 2009 Apr 27. PubMed 19398454 ↗
  • Tran D, Kamani AA, Al-Attas E, Lessoway VA, Massey S, Rohling RN. Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;57(4):313-21. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9252-1. PubMed 20196236 ↗
  • Chin KJ, Chan VW, Ramlogan R, Perlas A. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with a challenging spinal anatomy: two case reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Feb;54(2):252-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02112.x. Epub 2009 Oct 15. PubMed 19839951 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01326988
Lead sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2011
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Last update
Feb 6, 2012

Study contacts

Paul McHardy, MD FRCPC BA
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
Patrick H Conroy, MB FFARCSI
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
Luyet Cedric, MD
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
colin McCartney, FRCPC
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion