CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01314859Updated Jul 29, 2014

Nifedipine Treatment in Preterm Labor

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nifedipine and Atosiban in Threatened Preterm Labor, sponsored by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago. Withdrawn. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-29.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a study for pregnant women who have been diagnosed with Threatened Preterm Labor. The principal aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Nifedipine treatment versus Atosiban treatment over these patients' newborn babies.

Read the detailed description

Preterm labor is defined as the presence of uterine contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix prior to term gestation (between 20 and 37 weeks).

It is a major health problem of increased incidence, affecting approximately between 7-10% of pregnant women in developed countries with a high socioeconomic costs and high rates of fetal mortality, although perinatal progress.

This study may allow to establish the existence of differences in perinatal outcomes and to define the first choice drug for tocolysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Threatened Preterm Labor

Keywords

  • Nifedipine
  • Obstetric Labor
  • Premature
  • Tocolysis
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The study population and the inclusion criteria is established by patients between the 24th and 33+6th weeks of pregnancy, fixed by an ecography during the first three-month period, and with a threat of preterm labor (TLP), by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG's) criteria:

  • Four contractions or more with a duration of at least 30 seconds during 30 minutes
  • Documented cervix changes:

    • The cervix changes in a nulliparous woman are: both cervix tact with 0 to 4 cm of dilatation and cervical effacement of at least a 50% (vaginal ultrasound alternative with cervix length two standard curvatures under the average for the gestational age)
    • The cervix changes in a multiparous woman are: 1 to 4 cm of dilatation and cervical effacement of at least a 50% (same ecographic alternative as the nulliparous).
  • Patient who had signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria of the pregnant mother and intrauterine fetal:

  • Prior treatment with a different tocolytic from the ones in the protocol.
  • Chorioamnionitis.
  • Premature rupture of membranes.
  • Vaginal Bleeding.
  • Major fetal malformations.
  • Intrauterine growth retardation (IGR): IGR\<percentile 5.
  • Cardiopathies (aortic stenosis, congestive heart failure).
  • Blood Pressure lower than 100/60 mmHg.
  • High transaminase levels.
  • Uterine malformations.
  • Use of magnesium sulphate.
  • Severe hypertensive disorder, defined as blood pressure equal to or greater than 160/100 mmHg or any figure associated with severe preeclampsia.
  • Non-reassuring cardiac frequency tracing defined as category II and III of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
  • Asthmatic patients treated with betamimetics.
  • Hypertensive patients treated with vasodilators.
  • Patient in treatment or treated with another product/s in investigation during the four weeks prior to randomization.
  • Hypersensitivity to any drug of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nifedipine

    * Oral Treatment with Nifedipine capsules (10 mg) * Initial dose: 20 mg of nifedipine (2 capsules of 10 mg). * Maintenance Dose: 20 mg of nifedipine (2 capsules of 10 mg) every 6 hours. * Maximum Duration of the treatment: 48 hours.

    Drug: Nifedipine

  • Active comparator
    Atosiban

    * Intravenously Treatment with Atosiban (7.5mg/ml) * Initial Dose: IV bolus injection during 1 minute + Intravenous infusion 7.5 mg/ml during 3 hours. * Maintenance: Maintenance intravenous infusion 7.5 mg/ml at least 18 hours to a maximum of 45 hours. * Maximum Duration of the treatment: 48 hours.

    Drug: Atosiban

Interventions

  • DrugNifedipine

    * Oral Treatment with Nifedipine capsules (10mg) * Initial dose: 20 mg of nifedipine (2 capsules of 10 mg). * Maintenance Dose: 20 mg of nifedipine (2 capsules of 10 mg) every 6 hours. * Maximum Duration of the treatment: 48 hours.

  • DrugAtosiban

    * Intravenously Treatment with Atosiban (7.5mg/ml) * Initial Dose: IV bolus injection during 1 minute + Intravenous infusion 7.5 mg/ml during 3 hours. * Maintenance: Maintenance intravenous infusion 7.5 mg/ml at least 18 hours to a maximum of 45 hours. * Maximum Duration of the treatment: 48 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) at birth

    * Clinical assessment: results of the Silverman test. Existence of tachypnea, chest wall retractions, auricular flutter, expiratory grunting and chest-abdominal asynchrony. * Need of 02 at birth (maximum Fi02 in the first 24 hours to estimate the immediate distress). Measurement of pCO2 at birth. * Need of mechanic ventilation: invasive/not invasive and duration of it. * Radiologic estimation of the level of hyaline membrane disease * Need of a surfactant and number of used dosages.

    Time frame: Measured in the newborn at birth and at 30 days after labor

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prolongation of the pregnancy in women with Threatened Preterm Labor

    It will be evaluated as a delay in the labor: hours after starting the treatment: more than 48 hours/more than 7 days of prolongation.

    Time frame: more than 48 hours/7 days

  2. Obstetric results

    Number of days and type of labor.

    Time frame: at labor and 24 hours after delivery

  3. Presence of the neonatal intracranial hemorrhage

    Determination of the appearance and periventricular hemorrhage degree (I-IV) by transfontelar ultrasound scans.

    Time frame: First assessment: in the first week.

  4. Presence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis

    Monitor the need of canalizing the umbilical vein or artery, the days of parenteral nutrition, days to the start of enteral nutrition, type of enteral nutrition (from the mother, artificial or mixed), start of the elimination of meconium, clinical data from the neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(abdominal strain, vomiting, blood in the feces, septic appearance) and radiologic/ecographic (dilated bowel loops, intestinal pneumatosis, air in portal, pneumoperitoneum).

    Time frame: at birth and at 30 days after labor

  5. Presence of Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

    Monitor the iGF1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1) levels on the 3rd week of life as well as an assessing the development of retinopathy.

    Time frame: Between the 4th and 6th week of baby life.

  6. Presence of ductus

    Clinical assessment (heart murmur, jumpy pulse, worsening of the clinical basal situation), echocardiography (confirmation of the ductus, Al/Ao relation, ductal size), medical or surgical treatment necessity.

    Time frame: At birth and 30 days after labor

  7. Mother Tolerance Results

    Survey to assess the tolerance to the symptomatology induced by the medicines (flush, tachycardia, digestive upsets).

    Time frame: at labor and 24 hours after delivery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wilson A, Hodgetts-Morton VA, Marson EJ, Markland AD, Larkai E, Papadopoulou A, Coomarasamy A, Tobias A, Chou D, Oladapo OT, Price MJ, Morris K, Gallos ID. Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 10;8(8):CD014978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014978.pub2. PubMed 35947046 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01314859
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Collaborators
Fundación Ramón Domínguez
First posted
Mar 15, 2011
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Jul 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2013 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2014

Study contacts

Manuel Macía Cortiñas, MD
study chair · Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Lourdes González González, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Son Dureta, Mallorca, Spain
Javier Martínez Pérez-Mendaña, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Complexo Hospitalario Arquitecto Marcide- Profesor Novoa Santos, Ferrol, Spain
José Eloy Moral Santamarina, MD
principal investigator · Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
Susana Blanco Pérez, MD
principal investigator · Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense; Ourense, Spain
Luis Miguel González Seijas, MD
principal investigator · Hospital del Barbanza; Ribeira, A Coruna, Spain
Emilio Cabo Silva, MD
principal investigator · Hospital del Salnes; Vilagarcía de Arousa, Pontevedra, Spain
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion