CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01291160Updated May 13, 2014Results posted

Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Epiflo and Moist Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers, sponsored by Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-13.

Sponsored by Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, validation study of up to 12 weeks duration to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EPIFLO for the treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. The primary objectives of this study are: 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of EPIFLO in combination with standard wound therapy on wound healing as compared to standard wound therapy alone; and 2) Screening for potential safety issues.

Diabetic subjects with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer present for a minimum of 30 days will be enrolled. All subjects enrolled in the study will receive a standard wound therapy regimen consisting of, wound cleansing, moist wound care, off-loading and as appropriate, aggressive debridement. Subjects will be randomized to either the Treatment arm or the Control arm. Subjects will be assessed weekly for signs of wound healing during the 12-week Treatment Period, once two weeks after wound closure and once at the end of 12-week durability Period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 130 is above the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients 20-90 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus with non-healing, full-thickness, University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Class IA diabetic foot ulcers of at least 4 weeks duration, but not greater than 52 weeks, measuring 1 -10 cm2 in area (Area = length x width) 50% at least from 65+ age group
  • Any diabetic foot ulcer at or below the malleoli
  • Patients with partial amputation up to \& including a TMA
  • Subjects; between 20-90 years of age with a diabetic foot ulcer; 50% at least from 65+ age group
  • Subjects must have had the wound open for at least 4 weeks from day one on screening visit.
  • Subjects wound must be ≥1 cm2 in size at screening visit, but not greater than 10 cm2.
  • Subject's ABI should be ≥ 0.7 on the study limb or transcutaneous partial pressure oxygen (TcpO2) >40mmHg; or a toe pressure ≥40mmHg; or a Doppler waveform consistent with adequate flow in the foot(biphasic or triphasic waveforms) at screening
  • No active malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Subject and/or caregiver must be willing and able to learn and perform the duties of dressing changes, and demonstrate the ability to do so.
  • If patient has had a history of alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months prior to base line period, should provide proof of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wounds of duration >52 weeks
  • Evidence of gangrene on any part of affected limb;
  • Subjects with active Charcot's foot on the study limb;
  • Subjects scheduled to undergo vascular surgery, angioplasty or thrombolysis;
  • Subjects with infected target ulcers, accompanied by cellulitis, known or suspected osteomyelitis, or other clinical evidence of infection;
  • Index ulcer has exposed tendons, ligaments, muscle, or bone.
  • ulcers present in between toes
  • Target limb is infected at beginning of study
  • Must never have had malignancy on study limb
  • Oral, or IV antibiotic/antimicrobial agents or medications have been used within 2 days (48 hours) of baseline.
  • Patients with steroids >7mg dosage are excluded
  • Subject has received growth factor therapy (e.g., autologous platelet-rich plasma gel, becaplermin, bilayered cell therapy, dermal substitute, extracellular matrix) within two weeks of screening date.
  • Subject may not be pregnant at the time of treatment.
  • Subjects with ulcer that has a total Surface Area of greater than 10 cm2 at Screening Visit as measured by a member of the study staff;
  • Subject is undergoing renal dialysis, has known immune insufficiency, other than Diabetes Mellitus
  • Ulcers which decrease in area by >30% during the screening 1-week run-in period
  • History of peripheral vascular repair within the 30 days of baseline.
  • Subject is currently receiving or has received radiation or chemotherapy within 3 months of randomization.
  • No known "patient-reported" alcohol or substance abuse within three months prior to baseline.
  • Subject currently enrolled or participated within 30 days of baseline in another investigational device, drug or biological trial.
  • Subject allergic to a broad spectrum of primary \& secondary dressing materials,including occlusive dressings and the adhesives on such dressings.
  • Subject with Chopart amputation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epiflo Treatment

    The cohort will comprise of 2 populations: the Treatment Arm of up to 90 subjects; and the Control Arm of up to 90 subjects, in order to collect 120 invaluable subjects. The Treatment Arm includes subjects with DFU who will receive EPIFLO in addition to standard wound care therapy during the Treatment Period.

    Device: Epiflo

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Device

    The cohort will comprise of 2 populations: the Treatment Arm of up to 90 subjects; and the Control Arm of up to 90 subjects, in order to collect 120 invaluable subjects. Control Arm includes subjects with Diabetic Foot Ulcers who will receive sham units of EPIFLO along with standard wound care therapy during the treatment Period.

    Other: Moist Wound Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceEpiflo

    During the Treatment Period, subjects will be administered EPIFLO (either working units or sham units per randomization schedule) in conjunction with standard wound therapy regimen consisting of aggressive debridement, wound cleansing, wound dressing, for a period of 12 weeks, or until the wound completely closes, whichever event occurs first.

    Also known as: Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy

  • OtherMoist Wound Therapy

    During the Treatment Period, subjects will be administered EPIFLO (either working units or sham units per randomization schedule) in conjunction with standard wound therapy regimen consisting of aggressive debridement, wound cleansing, wound dressing, for a period of 12 weeks, or until the wound completely closes, whichever event occurs first.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of 100% Wound Closure

    Time frame: before or at week 12

07

Results

Posted May 13, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEpiflo TreatmentSham Device
Started6664
Completed4848
Not completed1816

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of 100% Wound Closure
Time frame:
before or at week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Number of 100% Wound Closure
percentage of patientsEpiflo TreatmentSham Device
Number of 100% Wound Closure55.7450.82

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Epiflo Treatment—10/66 (15.2%)37/66 (56.1%)
Sham Device—9/64 (14.1%)37/64 (57.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventEpiflo TreatmentSham Device
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/663/64
Wound InfectionInfections and infestations1/662/64
Gas gangreneInfections and infestations0/661/64
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/661/64
amputationSurgical and medical procedures0/661/64
Localised infectionInfections and infestations1/661/64
Necrotising fasciitisInfections and infestations0/661/64
Wound infection staphylococcalInfections and infestations0/661/64
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/660/64
Abscess limbInfections and infestations1/660/64
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventEpiflo TreatmentSham Device
Wound complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications30/6632/64
AbrasionsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/665/64
Wound infectionInfections and infestations3/665/64
Diabetic ulcerVascular disorders5/663/64
EdemaGeneral disorders1/664/64
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/663/64
Wound InfectionInfections and infestations2/663/64

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Epiflo TreatmentSham DeviceTotal
Mean59.25 ± 13.0658.46 ± 9.5359.25 ± 13.06
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Epiflo TreatmentSham DeviceTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years474794
>=65 years191736
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Epiflo TreatmentSham DeviceTotal
Female211536
Male454994
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85012, United States
  • Southern AZ VA Health Care System
    Tucson, Arizona 85723, United States
  • Dean Vayser, DPM
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • California School of Podiatric Medicine
    Fresno, California 93719, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90010, United States
  • San Jose, California 95116, United States
  • The Diabetic Foot
    San Marcos,, California 92078-2427, United States
  • UF College of Medicine-Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Bruce W. Carter Dept. of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami VA Health Care System
    Miami, Florida 33125, United States
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • Ocean County Foot & Ankle Surgical Associates
    Toms River,, New Jersey 08753, United States
  • Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine
    Independence, Ohio 44131, United States
  • San Antonio, Texas 78212, United States
  • Tacoma Diabetic Foot Center
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01291160
Lead sponsor
Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2011
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
Feb 2013
Results posted
May 13, 2014
Last update
May 13, 2014

Study contacts

Vickie R Driver, MSDPM FACFAS
principal investigator · Lead Principal Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion