CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01287416Updated May 13, 2014Results posted

Circle of Life. Improving Capacity of Swampy Cree Community Members to Recognize People at Risk for Suicide

An interventional study of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training and Resilience Retreat in Suicide, sponsored by University of Manitoba. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-13.

Sponsored by University of Manitoba · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Hypothesis: Participants in the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) gatekeeper training will be significantly more likely to have increased knowledge and preparedness to help people with suicidal ideation than participants who receive the resilience retreat.

Secondary Hypotheses:

  1. Participants in ASIST gatekeeper training will not have higher levels of post-intervention distress or suicidal ideation compared to the resilience retreat.
  2. High levels of distress, grief, and alcohol abuse will significantly impact on the learning and retention of suicide intervention skills.
Read the detailed description

Inclusion criterion: All members of the Swampy Cree Tribal communities who are currently residing on the reserves will be eligible to participate in the study.

Exclusion criterion: Exclusion criteria for the study include being less than 16 years of age, prior training in SafeTALK or ASIST, being an elected official in a First Nations community, and inability to read or write.

Primary outcome: Skills in Suicide Intervention: Suicide Intervention Response Inventory.The Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI) will be used to detect enhancement of intervention skills in participants. The SIRI is a self-administered test that was designed to measure competence in choosing appropriate response to a series of clinical scenarios with suicidal individuals. Research on the SIRI has shown its good psychometric properties, freedom from social desirability effects, and responsiveness to training in suicide prevention. It contains 25 items, each of which consists of a "client" remark and two "helper" responses. Responses are judged based on response options made by highly expert suicidologists. The SIRI has shown good internal consistency with alpha of 0.834, and good test-retest reliability.

Secondary Outcomes:

  • Knowledge about suicide, attitudes toward suicide, and self-reported preparedness to intervene with suicidal behavior will be measured by a series of questions that were developed by LivingWorks Inc.
  • Gatekeeper behaviors will be measured similar to questions utilized by Wyman in the school-based study that assess how many people had the person asked others about suicide.
02

Conditions studied

  • Suicide

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Suicide Intervention
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)
  • Resilience Retreat
  • First Nations
  • Suicide Intervention and Response Inventory (SIRI)
03

In context

Suicide

701 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicide; 183 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 104 across 560 interventional studies indexed under Suicide.

Browse Suicide studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manitoba is the lead sponsor of 542 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All members of the Swampy Cree Tribal communities who are currently residing on the reserves will be eligible to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being less than 16 years of age
  • prior training in SafeTALK or ASIST
  • being an elected official in a First Nations community
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)

    ASIST is a 2-day intensive, interactive and practice-dominated course aimed at enabling people to recognize risk and learn how to intervene immediately to prevent suicide. The training is designed for anyone (especially those in a position of trust), from professionals and volunteers to members of the community. Participants range from those in caring roles to people concerned about family members or friends. The theory is that suicide can be pre¬vented with the help of prepared caregivers. ASIST is designed to help all caregivers become more willing, ready and able to help persons at risk. Just as "CPR" skills make physical first aid possible, training in suicide intervention develops the skills used in suicide first aid.

    Behavioral: Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training

  • Active comparator
    Resilience Retreat

    The two days will be divided into cultural activities, sharing circles, small group discussions, story telling and dance. Two First Nations community leaders will be identified to lead each of the two retreats.

    Behavioral: Resilience Retreat

Interventions

  • BehavioralApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training

    Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) is a 2-day, 14 hour suicide intervention skills training workshop.

    Also known as: ASIST

  • BehavioralResilience Retreat

    The Resilience Retreat is a 2-day, 14 hour session

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SIRI Questionnaire Score

    The Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2) will be used to detect enhancement of intervention skills in participants. The 25-item SIRI-2 is a self-administered test that was designed to measure competnce in choosing appropriate response to a series of clinical scenarios with suicidal individuals. Research on the SIRI-2 has shown its good psychometric properties, freedom from social desirabiity effects and responsiveness to training in suicide prevention.

    Time frame: pre-training, post-training and 6 mo follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-perceived Confidence in Helping a Suicidal Individual

    Meaures the level of confidence that the individual believes they have in helping a suicidal person based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident).

    Time frame: pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up

  2. Self-perceived Skill in Helping a Suicidal Individual

    Measures the level of ability that the individual believes they have in helping a suicidal person based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all skilled) to 4 (very skilled).

    Time frame: pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up

  3. Self-perceived Knowledge About Suicide

    Measures the level of knowledge about suicide that the individual believes they have based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all knowledgeable) to 4 (very knowledgeable).

    Time frame: pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up

  4. Self-perceived Preparedness

    Measures the level of preparedness of the individual to help someone who is suicidal based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all prepared) to 4 (very prepared).

    Time frame: pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up

  5. Self-reported Distress

    Measures the level of distress in the participant using the K6 distress scale. The scale is comprised of six questions which are scored from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). The sum of the scores from all six questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (not at all distressed) to 24 (very distressed).

    Time frame: pre-training and 6 month follow-up

  6. Self-reported Alcohol Use

    Details participants' level of alcohol consumption and if it may be harmful according to the AUDIT. The AUDIT scale is comprised of ten questions with most questions being scored from 0 (never) to 4 (4 or more times per week). The sum of the scores from all ten questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (no risk related to alcohol) to 40 (high risk related to alcohol). Total scores of 8 or more are recommended as indicators of hazardous and harmful alcohol use, as well as possible alcohol dependence.

    Time frame: pre-training and 6 month follow-up

  7. Self-reported Resiliency Score

    Assesses resiliency in the participant according to the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, 10-item. The CD-RISC 10 is comprised of ten questions scored from 0 (Not at all true) to 4 (True nearly all of the time). The sum of the scores from all ten questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (low resiliency) to 40 (highly resilient).

    Time frame: pre-training and 6 month follow-up

  8. Lifetime Suicidal Ideation at Baseline

    Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in their lifetime as measured at baseline

    Time frame: July 19-20, 2010

  9. Lifetime Suicide Attempt at Baseline

    Number of people who endorsed having made a suicide attempt in their lifetime as measured at baseline

    Time frame: July 19-20, 2010

  10. Suicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days at Baseline

    Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in the past 2 days as measured at baseline (not at all vs a little to a lot)

    Time frame: July 19-20, 2010

  11. Number of People With Suicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days Immediately Post Training

    Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in the past 2 days as measured immediately post training (not at all vs a little to a lot)

    Time frame: July 22-23, 2010

  12. Suicidal Ideation Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up

    Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide since the training as measured at 6 month follow-up (not at all vs a little to a lot)

    Time frame: January 28-31, 2011

  13. Attempted Suicide Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up

    Number of people who endorsed having made a suicide attempt since the training as measured at 6 month follow-up

    Time frame: January 28-31, 2011

  14. Gatekeeper Behaviors - Asked Person at Risk About Suicidal Thoughts

    Number of participants who have asked someone that they thought was at risk about suicidal thoughts since the training, measured at 6 month follow-up assessment.

    Time frame: January 28-31, 2011

  15. Gatekeeper Behaviours - Did Not Ask Person at Risk

    Number of participants who did not ask someone about their suicidal thoughts even though they thought they were at risk, measured at 6 month follow-up assessment based on time since training.

    Time frame: January 28-31, 2011

07

Results

Posted May 13, 2014

Participant flow

Various methods of advertising for volunteers was used (i.e., radio advertisements, newsletters, posters). Community activities were organized by community representatives in an effort to recruit individuals to participate in the study (i.e., through a bingo night, barbecue, etc.) between May 2010 and May 2011.

Pre-post Training
Participant flow — Pre-post Training
MilestoneApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Started4848
Training workshop3124
Post training questionnaire2623
Completed2623
Not completed2225
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1724
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up51
6 Month Follow-up
Participant flow — 6 Month Follow-up
MilestoneApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Started3124
Completed2822
Not completed32
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up32

Outcome measures

PrimarySIRI Questionnaire Score

The Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2) will be used to detect enhancement of intervention skills in participants. The 25-item SIRI-2 is a self-administered test that was designed to measure competnce in choosing appropriate response to a series of clinical scenarios with suicidal individuals. Research on the SIRI-2 has shown its good psychometric properties, freedom from social desirabiity effects and responsiveness to training in suicide prevention.

Time frame:
pre-training, post-training and 6 mo follow up
Reported as:
Mean · number of items correct
SIRI Questionnaire Score
number of items correctApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training12.90 ± 2.7814.17 ± 4.10
Post-training14.83 ± 3.9214.30 ± 3.42
6 month follow-up13.52 ± 3.7215.05 ± 3.58
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.61 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05. Effect size determined by partial eta-squared to be 0.01.)Model was adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-perceived Confidence in Helping a Suicidal Individual

Meaures the level of confidence that the individual believes they have in helping a suicidal person based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident).

Time frame:
pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Self-perceived Confidence in Helping a Suicidal Individual
scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training2.68 ± 0.912.87 ± 0.80
Post-training2.73 ± 0.782.57 ± 0.99
6 month follow-up2.63 ± 0.932.68 ± 0.84
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.95 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05. Effect size determined by partial eta-squared to be 0.02.)Model was adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-perceived Skill in Helping a Suicidal Individual

Measures the level of ability that the individual believes they have in helping a suicidal person based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all skilled) to 4 (very skilled).

Time frame:
pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Self-perceived Skill in Helping a Suicidal Individual
scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training1.94 ± 0.772.00 ± 0.74
Post-training2.50 ± 0.762.23 ± 0.97
6 month follow-up2.43 ± 0.922.27 ± 0.97
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.33 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05. Effect size determined by partial eta-squared to be 0.02.)Model was adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-perceived Knowledge About Suicide

Measures the level of knowledge about suicide that the individual believes they have based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all knowledgeable) to 4 (very knowledgeable).

Time frame:
pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Self-perceived Knowledge About Suicide
Scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training2.16 ± 0.972.09 ± 0.79
Post-training2.65 ± 0.752.23 ± 0.92
6 month follow-up2.50 ± 0.882.23 ± 0.81
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05. Effect size determined by partial eta-squared to be 0.05.)Model adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-perceived Preparedness

Measures the level of preparedness of the individual to help someone who is suicidal based on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all prepared) to 4 (very prepared).

Time frame:
pre-training, post-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Self-perceived Preparedness
Scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training2.19 ± 0.872.33 ± 0.76
Post-training2.77 ± 0.912.39 ± 0.84
6 month follow-up2.43 ± 0.962.45 ± 0.86
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.63 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05. Effect size determined by partial eta-squared to be 0.01.)Model was adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-reported Distress

Measures the level of distress in the participant using the K6 distress scale. The scale is comprised of six questions which are scored from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). The sum of the scores from all six questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (not at all distressed) to 24 (very distressed).

Time frame:
pre-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Self-reported Distress
Scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training7.62 ± 0.986.30 ± 1.13
6 month follow-up6.40 ± 0.806.77 ± 0.92
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · ANCOVA · p = 0.21 (A priori threshold for significance set to p\<.05.)Model adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-reported Alcohol Use

Details participants' level of alcohol consumption and if it may be harmful according to the AUDIT. The AUDIT scale is comprised of ten questions with most questions being scored from 0 (never) to 4 (4 or more times per week). The sum of the scores from all ten questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (no risk related to alcohol) to 40 (high risk related to alcohol). Total scores of 8 or more are recommended as indicators of hazardous and harmful alcohol use, as well as possible alcohol dependence.

Time frame:
pre-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Self-reported Alcohol Use
Scores on a scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training12.14 ± 2.769.70 ± 2.35
6 month follow-up8.38 ± 1.868.76 ± 1.58
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · ANCOVA · p = 0.46 (A priori threshold for significance set at p\<.05.)Model was adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondarySelf-reported Resiliency Score

Assesses resiliency in the participant according to the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, 10-item. The CD-RISC 10 is comprised of ten questions scored from 0 (Not at all true) to 4 (True nearly all of the time). The sum of the scores from all ten questions was used to determine a total scale score which ranges from 0 (low resiliency) to 40 (highly resilient).

Time frame:
pre-training and 6 month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on scale
Self-reported Resiliency Score
Scores on scaleApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Pre-training21.78 ± 1.3828.71 ± 1.49
6 month follow-up23.68 ± 1.2127.82 ± 1.31
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · ANCOVA · p = 0.28 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance was set at p\<.05.)Model is adjusted for differences in educational attainment at baseline.
SecondaryLifetime Suicidal Ideation at Baseline

Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in their lifetime as measured at baseline

Time frame:
July 19-20, 2010
Reported as:
Number · participants
Lifetime Suicidal Ideation at Baseline
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Lifetime Suicidal Ideation at Baseline1414
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Chi-squared · p = 0.33 (A priori threshold for significance set at p\<.05.)
SecondaryLifetime Suicide Attempt at Baseline

Number of people who endorsed having made a suicide attempt in their lifetime as measured at baseline

Time frame:
July 19-20, 2010
Reported as:
Number · participants
Lifetime Suicide Attempt at Baseline
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Lifetime Suicide Attempt at Baseline66
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Chi-squared · p = 0.62 (A priori threshold for significance set at p\<.05.)
SecondarySuicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days at Baseline

Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in the past 2 days as measured at baseline (not at all vs a little to a lot)

Time frame:
July 19-20, 2010
Reported as:
Number · participants
Suicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days at Baseline
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Not at all2922
A little to a lot22
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 (A priori threshold for significance set to p\<.05.)
SecondaryNumber of People With Suicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days Immediately Post Training

Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide in the past 2 days as measured immediately post training (not at all vs a little to a lot)

Time frame:
July 22-23, 2010
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of People With Suicidal Ideation in Past 2 Days Immediately Post Training
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Not at all2321
A little to a lot22
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 (A priori threshold for significance set to p\<.05.)
SecondarySuicidal Ideation Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up

Number of people who endorsed having thought about suicide since the training as measured at 6 month follow-up (not at all vs a little to a lot)

Time frame:
January 28-31, 2011
Reported as:
Number · participants
Suicidal Ideation Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Not at all2121
A little to a lot71
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Fisher Exact · p = 0.064 (A priori threshold for significance set to p\<.05.)
SecondaryAttempted Suicide Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up

Number of people who endorsed having made a suicide attempt since the training as measured at 6 month follow-up

Time frame:
January 28-31, 2011
Reported as:
Number · participants
Attempted Suicide Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Attempted Suicide Since Training at 6 mo Follow-up00
SecondaryGatekeeper Behaviors - Asked Person at Risk About Suicidal Thoughts

Number of participants who have asked someone that they thought was at risk about suicidal thoughts since the training, measured at 6 month follow-up assessment.

Time frame:
January 28-31, 2011
Reported as:
Number · participants
Gatekeeper Behaviors - Asked Person at Risk About Suicidal Thoughts
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Gatekeeper Behaviors - Asked Person at Risk About Suicidal Thoughts36
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Fisher Exact · p = 0.14 (a priori threshold for significance set a p\<.05.)unadjusted model
SecondaryGatekeeper Behaviours - Did Not Ask Person at Risk

Number of participants who did not ask someone about their suicidal thoughts even though they thought they were at risk, measured at 6 month follow-up assessment based on time since training.

Time frame:
January 28-31, 2011
Reported as:
Number · participants
Gatekeeper Behaviours - Did Not Ask Person at Risk
participantsApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience Retreat
Gatekeeper Behaviours - Did Not Ask Person at Risk99
Statistical analysis
  • Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) vs Resilience Retreat · Chi-squared · p = 0.41 (A priori threshold for significance set at p\<.05.)Unadjusted model

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline time point to 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)—0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)
Resilience Retreat—0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The number of baseline participants reflects the number of participants that showed up on the day of training, as that was our first point of contact and the time point at which the baseline questionnaire was given. This is different than the number of people that we invited to participate in the study.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
16-2115924
22-4481018
45+8412
Missing011
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
Female211233
Male101222
Marital status
Marital status(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
Never married121426
Widowed/separated/divorced437
Married/common-law11718
Missing404
Educational attainment
Educational attainment(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
Grade 9 or lower19322
Grade 10 or higher122133
Language spoken most often
Language spoken most often(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
English202040
Cree9413
Missing202
Current work status
Current work status(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
Working full- or part-time6814
Unemployed/social assistance141125
Retired/at home full-time/student11516
Know someone who died by suicide
Know someone who died by suicide(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
Yes282149
No336
When most recent suicide death
When most recent suicide death(participants)Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Resilience RetreatTotal
More than 1 year ago181028
Within the last year3811
Within the last 6 months538
Within the last 1 month000
Missing202
Did not know someone who died by suicide336
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Manitoba Department of Psychiatry
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3N4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sareen J, Isaak C, Bolton SL, Enns MW, Elias B, Deane F, Munro G, Stein MB, Chateau D, Gould M, Katz LY. Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in First Nations community members: a randomized controlled trial. Depress Anxiety. 2013 Oct;30(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1002/da.22141. Epub 2013 Jun 12. PubMed 23761133 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01287416
Lead sponsor
University of Manitoba
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Dr. Jitinder Sareen (Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 1, 2011
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
Results posted
May 13, 2014
Last update
May 13, 2014

Study contacts

Jitender Sareen, MD
principal investigator · Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion