CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01286779Updated May 20, 2021Results posted

BAX 326 (rFIX) Continuation Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of BAX 326 (Recombinant factor IX) in Hemophilia B, sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire. Completed at 42 sites in 17 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-20.

Sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
117
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this BAX 326 Continuation Study is to further investigate incremental recovery over time, the hemostatic efficacy, the safety, immunogenicity, and health-related quality of life (HR QoL) of BAX 326 in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B who participated in BAX 326 pivotal study 250901 or BAX 326 pediatric study 251101.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia B
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 117 is above the median of 28 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Baxalta now part of Shire is the lead sponsor of 110 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject and/or legal representative has/have voluntarily provided signed informed consent
  • Subject has completed Baxter clinical study 250901 (pivotal study) or Baxter clinical study 251101 (pediatric study)
  • Subject was 12 to 65 years old at the time of screening for Study 250901 or \< 12 years old at the time of screening for Study 251101
  • Subject has severe (FIX level \< 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B (based on the one stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay), as tested at screening at the central laboratory
  • Subject has not developed an inhibitory FIX antibody during Baxter Pivotal Study 250901 or Pediatric Study 251101

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject received factor IX product(s) other than BAX 326 upon completion of Baxter Pivotal Study 250901 or Pediatric Study 251101
  • Subject has been diagnosed with an acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia B
  • For subjects transferring from Pivotal Study 250901: Subject's weight is \< 35 kg or > 120 kg
  • Subject is planned to take part in any other clinical study, with the exception of BAX 326 Surgery study as described in this protocol, during the course of the Continuation Study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BAX 326

    Biological: BAX 326 (Recombinant factor IX)

Interventions

  • BiologicalBAX 326 (Recombinant factor IX)

    The treatment with BAX 326 will be at the discretion of the investigator and will consist of either twice weekly prophylactic treatment with 50 IU/kg, modified prophylaxis, or on-demand treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events Possibly or Probably Related to the Investigational Product

    Possibly or probably related adverse events that occurred during or after first BAX326 infusion.

    Time frame: Assessed (based on patient diary) every 3 months until study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution

    Number of Infusions of BAX326 that were required until bleed resolution.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  2. Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Resolution of Bleed

    Overall clinical efficacy rating of bleeding episodes was done at resolution of bleed according these rating scale: Excellent=Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion. No additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusion would not affect the scoring. Good=Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. Fair=Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. None=No improvement or condition worsens.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  3. Annualized Bleed Rate During Prophylaxis Treatment

    Annualized bleed rate (ABR) was calculated as (number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days)\*365.25

    Time frame: For prophylactic treatment the period from first to last prophylactic infusion is considered.

  4. Consumption of BAX 326: Number of Infusions Per Month and Per Year

    The number of infusions consumed per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  5. Consumption of BAX 326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Month and Per Year

    The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  6. Consumption of BAX326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Bleeding Episode

    The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per bleeding episode for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens. Only infusions required until the resolution of bleed are considered.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  7. Development of Inhibitory and Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX

    Testing for inhibitory and total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX). Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.

    Time frame: Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.

  8. Development of Antibodies to Chinese Hamster Ovary Proteins (CHO Proteins) and rFurin

    Testing for antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin. Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.

    Time frame: Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.

  9. Occurrence of Severe Allergic Reactions and Thrombotic Events

    The occurrence of severe allergic reactions and thrombotic events was assessed.

    Time frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

  10. Clinical Significant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs

    Hematology panel consists of complete blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, leukocytes) with differential (ie, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils), mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and platelet count. Clinical chemistry panel consists of sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and glucose. Vital signs include body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure. CS=clinically significant, NCS=not clinically significant. Change from Screening to End of Study is reported.

    Time frame: Measurements at screening and at study completion/termination are included in the analysis.

  11. Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR) Over Time

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min \[IU/dL\] - Cpre-infusion \[IU/dL\]) / dose per kg body weight \[IU/kg\] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.

    Time frame: IR over time was measured as Baseline and at Completion/Termination visit within 30 minutes pre-infusion and at 30 (± 5) minutes post-infusion.

  12. Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

    After a wash out period of at least 5 days PK infusion with investigational product was administered. AUC 0-∞ is defined as AUC 0-t + Ct/lambda z, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration.

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours

  13. Pharmacokinetics: Elimination Phase Half-life (T1/2)

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Elimination phase half-life is calculated as T1/2=log e (2) / lambda z where the elimination rate constant (lambda z) will be obtained by log e - linear fitting using least squares deviation to at least the last 3 quantifiable concentrations above pre-infusion level.

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours

  14. Pharmacokinetics: Mean Residence Time (MRT)

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Mean residence time is calculated as total area under the moment curve divided by the total area under the curve. MRT=(AUMC0-∞\[h2\*IU/dL\])/(AUC0-∞\[h\*IU/dL\]) - TI/2 where AUMC0-∞ is determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration in hours.

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours

  15. Pharmacokinetics: Systemic Clearance (CL)

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Systemic clearance is balculated as the dose in IU/kg divided by the total AUC. CL= Dose\[IU/kg\] / AUC0-∞\[h\*IU/dL\]

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours

  16. Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Apparent steady state volume of distribution is calculated as Vss = CL \* MRT CL=Systemic Clearance and MRT=Mean residence time

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours

  17. Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR)

    PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min \[IU/dL\] - Cpre-infusion \[IU/dL\]) / dose per kg body weight \[IU/kg\] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.

    Time frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours.

  18. Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire SF-36

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item validated, generic HR QoL instrument suitable for participants of 17 years of age or older. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, mental health, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning) which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The mental health component summary score ranged from 19.5 to 64.2 with higher scores indicating less disability. The physical health component summary scores ranged from 18.6 to 59.6 with higher scores indicating less disability.

    Time frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.

  19. Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Using the Peds QL

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL) is a generic health related quality of life instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population and captures following domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and school functioning. The Peds-QL total score consist of all 23 items of all domains. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 44.6 to 98.9). The Peds-QL Physical Health Summary score consists of 8 items from the physical functioning domain. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 40.6 to 100.0) The Psychosocial Health Summary score consists of 15 items from the emotional, social and school functioning domains. Score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 46.7 to 100.0).

    Time frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.

  20. Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire Haemo-QoL and Haem-A-QoL

    The Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire (Haemo-QoL) and the Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-Qol) instruments have been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. Haemo-QoL is used for participants aged 8 to 16 years and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 0.0 to 44.3) Haem-A-QoL is used for participants aged 17 years and older and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 4.9 to 76.8).

    Time frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.

  21. Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire EQ-5D and Pain Score.

    The EQ-5D captures overall HR QoL (phyiscal, mental and social functioning). A health utility score can be calculated from this measure, adult and proxy versions available. EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS):Respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two endpoints (scale range from 0 to 100). Score 0 corresponds to the worst health you can imagine and score 100 corresponds to the best health you can imagine (collected scores ranged from 10-100). EQ-5D Total Index is based on general population valuation surveys. Responses to 5 questions are converted to an Index value and score range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Total Index was derived on US population (collected scores ranged from 0.4-1). General pain assessment (Pain score) is done through a visual analog scale (VAS), scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more pain (collected scores ranged 0-87).

    Time frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.

07

Results

Posted Sep 10, 2018

Participant flow

Enrollment was conducted at 40 clinical sites in 18 countries. A total of 117 participants were enrolled. Of these, 65 participants transitioned from BAX326 pivotal study, 20 participants transitioned from BAX326 pediatric study and 32 participants were newly recruited.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBAX 326
Started115
Completed96
Not completed19
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject9
Withdrew: Protocol violation5
Withdrew: Physician decision2
Withdrew: Participant had scheduled surgery1
Withdrew: Participant moved to another country1
Withdrew: Discontinued by sponsor1

Outcome measures

PrimaryAdverse Events Possibly or Probably Related to the Investigational Product

Possibly or probably related adverse events that occurred during or after first BAX326 infusion.

Time frame:
Assessed (based on patient diary) every 3 months until study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Number · Adverse Events
Adverse Events Possibly or Probably Related to the Investigational Product
Adverse EventsBAX 326
Adverse Events Possibly or Probably Related to the Investigational Product2
SecondaryTreatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution

Number of Infusions of BAX326 that were required until bleed resolution.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Mean · Number of infusions
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution
Number of infusionsBAX 326Standard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall ProphylaxisOn-Demand
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution1.8 ± 1.652.1 ± 2.121.9 ± 1.411.3 ± 0.462.0 ± 2.011.5 ± 0.79
SecondaryTreatment of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Resolution of Bleed

Overall clinical efficacy rating of bleeding episodes was done at resolution of bleed according these rating scale: Excellent=Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion. No additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusion would not affect the scoring. Good=Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. Fair=Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. None=No improvement or condition worsens.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Number · Number of infusions
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Resolution of Bleed
Number of infusionsBAX 326Standard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall ProphylaxisOn-Demand
Excellent341168510219122
Good650281400321329
Fair115901761132
None630251
SecondaryAnnualized Bleed Rate During Prophylaxis Treatment

Annualized bleed rate (ABR) was calculated as (number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days)\*365.25

Time frame:
For prophylactic treatment the period from first to last prophylactic infusion is considered.
Reported as:
Median · Bleeds per year
Annualized Bleed Rate During Prophylaxis Treatment
Bleeds per yearStandard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall Prophylaxis
Annualized Bleed Rate During Prophylaxis Treatment1.3 (0.0 to 78.7)1.4 (0.0 to 34.6)1.9 (0.5 to 3.3)1.3 (0.0 to 52.2)
SecondaryConsumption of BAX 326: Number of Infusions Per Month and Per Year

The number of infusions consumed per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Mean · Number of infusions
Consumption of BAX 326: Number of Infusions Per Month and Per Year
Number of infusionsStandard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall ProphylaxisOn-Demand
Number of infusions per month8.5 ± 1.2510.8 ± 4.344.0 ± 0.608.4 ± 1.383.6 ± 2.44
Number of infusions per year101.8 ± 15.03130.2 ± 52.1348.3 ± 7.23101.1 ± 16.5043.1 ± 29.28
SecondaryConsumption of BAX 326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Month and Per Year

The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg
Consumption of BAX 326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Month and Per Year
IU/kgStandard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall ProphylaxisOn-Demand
Weight adjusted BAX 326 consumption per month462.3 ± 102.05684.4 ± 337.70250.9 ± 41.37464.2 ± 111.46199.8 ± 124.18
Weight adjusted BAX 326 consumption per year5547.8 ± 1224.658212.4 ± 4052.363010.3 ± 496.445570.7 ± 1337.532397.4 ± 1490.22
SecondaryConsumption of BAX326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Bleeding Episode

The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per bleeding episode for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens. Only infusions required until the resolution of bleed are considered.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg
Consumption of BAX326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Bleeding Episode
IU/kgStandard ProphylaxisModified ProphylaxisPK Tailored ProphylaxisOverall ProphylaxisOn-Demand
Consumption of BAX326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Bleeding Episode124.2 ± 140.70114.8 ± 99.4167.4 ± 34.39122.0 ± 134.0282.6 ± 48.21
SecondaryDevelopment of Inhibitory and Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX

Testing for inhibitory and total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX). Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.

Time frame:
Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Development of Inhibitory and Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX
ParticipantsBAX 326
Inhibitory antibodies to FIX-develop. during study0
Inhibitory antibodies to FIX-treatment emergent0
Total bind. antibodies to FIX-develop.during study0
Total binding antibodies to FIX-treatment emergent0
SecondaryDevelopment of Antibodies to Chinese Hamster Ovary Proteins (CHO Proteins) and rFurin

Testing for antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin. Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.

Time frame:
Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Development of Antibodies to Chinese Hamster Ovary Proteins (CHO Proteins) and rFurin
ParticipantsBAX 326
Antibodies to CHO - developed during study0
Antibodies to CHO - treatment emergent0
Antibodies to rFurin - developed during study4
Antibodies to rFurin - treatment emergent4
SecondaryOccurrence of Severe Allergic Reactions and Thrombotic Events

The occurrence of severe allergic reactions and thrombotic events was assessed.

Time frame:
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurrence of Severe Allergic Reactions and Thrombotic Events
ParticipantsBAX 326
Severe allergic reactions0
Thrombotic events0
SecondaryClinical Significant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs

Hematology panel consists of complete blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, leukocytes) with differential (ie, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils), mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and platelet count. Clinical chemistry panel consists of sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and glucose. Vital signs include body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure. CS=clinically significant, NCS=not clinically significant. Change from Screening to End of Study is reported.

Time frame:
Measurements at screening and at study completion/termination are included in the analysis.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Significant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs
ParticipantsBAX 326
Hematology: Change from normal to abnormal CS2
Hematology:Change from abnormal NCS to abnormal CS1
Chemistry: Change from normal to abnormal, CS1
Chemistry: Change from abnormal NCS to abnormal CS3
Change in vital signs0
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR) Over Time

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min \[IU/dL\] - Cpre-infusion \[IU/dL\]) / dose per kg body weight \[IU/kg\] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.

Time frame:
IR over time was measured as Baseline and at Completion/Termination visit within 30 minutes pre-infusion and at 30 (± 5) minutes post-infusion.
Reported as:
Mean · (IU/dL):(IU/kg)
Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR) Over Time
(IU/dL):(IU/kg)BAX 326
Baseline0.85 ± 0.207
End of Study0.85 ± 0.286
Change from baseline to end of study-0.005 ± 0.259
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

After a wash out period of at least 5 days PK infusion with investigational product was administered. AUC 0-∞ is defined as AUC 0-t + Ct/lambda z, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration.

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Reported as:
Mean · IU*hr/dL
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
IU*hr/dLBAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)1335.56 ± 299.83
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Elimination Phase Half-life (T1/2)

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Elimination phase half-life is calculated as T1/2=log e (2) / lambda z where the elimination rate constant (lambda z) will be obtained by log e - linear fitting using least squares deviation to at least the last 3 quantifiable concentrations above pre-infusion level.

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetics: Elimination Phase Half-life (T1/2)
hoursBAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Elimination Phase Half-life (T1/2)28.52 ± 4.12
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Mean Residence Time (MRT)

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Mean residence time is calculated as total area under the moment curve divided by the total area under the curve. MRT=(AUMC0-∞\[h2\*IU/dL\])/(AUC0-∞\[h\*IU/dL\]) - TI/2 where AUMC0-∞ is determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration in hours.

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetics: Mean Residence Time (MRT)
hoursBAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Mean Residence Time (MRT)29.97 ± 2.72
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Systemic Clearance (CL)

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Systemic clearance is balculated as the dose in IU/kg divided by the total AUC. CL= Dose\[IU/kg\] / AUC0-∞\[h\*IU/dL\]

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Reported as:
Mean · dL/kg/hours
Pharmacokinetics: Systemic Clearance (CL)
dL/kg/hoursBAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Systemic Clearance (CL)0.06 ± 0.014
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Apparent steady state volume of distribution is calculated as Vss = CL \* MRT CL=Systemic Clearance and MRT=Mean residence time

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Reported as:
Mean · dL/kg
Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
dL/kgBAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)1.78 ± 0.42
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR)

PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min \[IU/dL\] - Cpre-infusion \[IU/dL\]) / dose per kg body weight \[IU/kg\] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.

Time frame:
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours.
Reported as:
Mean · (IU/dL):(IU/kg)
Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR)
(IU/dL):(IU/kg)BAX 326
Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR)0.85 ± 0.196
SecondaryChanges in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire SF-36

The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item validated, generic HR QoL instrument suitable for participants of 17 years of age or older. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, mental health, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning) which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The mental health component summary score ranged from 19.5 to 64.2 with higher scores indicating less disability. The physical health component summary scores ranged from 18.6 to 59.6 with higher scores indicating less disability.

Time frame:
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire SF-36
Score on a scaleBAX 326
SF-36 Bodily Pain6.7 ± 12.66
SF-36 General Health3.2 ± 9.32
SF-36 Mental Health0.7 ± 14.72
SF-36 Mental Health Component Score0.8 ± 12.08
SF-36 Physical Functioning4.2 ± 10.46
SF-36 Physical Health Component Score5.7 ± 8.43
SF-36 Role-Emotional2.3 ± 11.57
SF-36 Role-Physical4.5 ± 10.28
SF-36 Social Functioning4.5 ± 11.67
SF-36 Vitality2.0 ± 8.87
SecondaryChanges in Health Related Quality of Life Using the Peds QL

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL) is a generic health related quality of life instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population and captures following domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and school functioning. The Peds-QL total score consist of all 23 items of all domains. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 44.6 to 98.9). The Peds-QL Physical Health Summary score consists of 8 items from the physical functioning domain. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 40.6 to 100.0) The Psychosocial Health Summary score consists of 15 items from the emotional, social and school functioning domains. Score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 46.7 to 100.0).

Time frame:
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Using the Peds QL
Score on a scaleBAX 326
Peds-QL Physical Health Summary Score-2.3 ± 18.47
Peds-QL Psychosocial Health Summary Score3.8 ± 5.99
Peds-QL Total Score1.6 ± 10.14
SecondaryChanges in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire Haemo-QoL and Haem-A-QoL

The Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire (Haemo-QoL) and the Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-Qol) instruments have been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. Haemo-QoL is used for participants aged 8 to 16 years and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 0.0 to 44.3) Haem-A-QoL is used for participants aged 17 years and older and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 4.9 to 76.8).

Time frame:
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire Haemo-QoL and Haem-A-QoL
Score on a scaleBAX 326
Haem-A-QoL Total Score-3.0 ± 9.45
Haemo-QoL Total Score-0.7 ± NA
SecondaryChanges in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire EQ-5D and Pain Score.

The EQ-5D captures overall HR QoL (phyiscal, mental and social functioning). A health utility score can be calculated from this measure, adult and proxy versions available. EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS):Respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two endpoints (scale range from 0 to 100). Score 0 corresponds to the worst health you can imagine and score 100 corresponds to the best health you can imagine (collected scores ranged from 10-100). EQ-5D Total Index is based on general population valuation surveys. Responses to 5 questions are converted to an Index value and score range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Total Index was derived on US population (collected scores ranged from 0.4-1). General pain assessment (Pain score) is done through a visual analog scale (VAS), scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more pain (collected scores ranged 0-87).

Time frame:
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire EQ-5D and Pain Score.
Score on a scaleBAX 326
EQ-5D Total Index0.0 ± 0.13
EQ-5D VAS5.1 ± 21.75
Pain Score-8.0 ± 36.62

Adverse events

Collected over Throughout the entire study period from screening to completion/termination. Overall 6 years and 2 months. For each participant the duration of study depended on when the participant has accumulated a total of 100 exposure days during the course of the pivotal/pediatric studies and this study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BAX 3260/115 (0%)9/115 (7.8%)63/115 (54.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventBAX 326
Renal colicRenal and urinary disorders2/115
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/115
Duodenal ulcer hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/115
Corneal abscessInfections and infestations1/115
Brain contusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/115
Extradural hematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/115
Head injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/115
Scroctal haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/115
SeizureNervous system disorders1/115
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders1/115
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventBAX 326
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations25/115
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders15/115
PyrexiaGeneral disorders14/115
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations11/115
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/115
InfluenzaInfections and infestations8/115
RhinitisInfections and infestations8/115
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/115
BronchitisInfections and infestations6/115
PharyngitisInfections and infestations6/115

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BAX 326
Mean29.6 ± 16.39
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BAX 326
Female0
Male115
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)BAX 326
Race — White99
Race — Black or African American1
Race — Asian10
Race — Other5
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • Instituto de Hematología y Medicina Clíncia Rubén Dávoli
    Rosario, 2000, Argentina
  • UNIFESP - Universidade Estadual de Sao Paulo
    Sao Paulo, 040024-002, Brazil
  • Specialized Haematological Hospital "Joan Pavel"
    Sofia, 1233, Bulgaria
  • Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio
    Santiago, Chile
  • Hospital de San Jose
    Bogotá, Colombia
  • Centro Medico Imbanaco
    Cali, Colombia
  • Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
    Medellin, 005543, Colombia
  • Klinika detské hematologie a onkologie
    Prague, 150 06, Czechia
  • Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospital
    New Delhi, 110002, India
  • St. James's Hospital, National Center for Hereditary Coagulation Disorders
    Dublin, 8, Ireland
  • University Hospital Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Hospital Ferrarotto Alessi
    Catania, 95124, Italy
  • University Hospital Careggi, Agency of Hemophilia - Regional Reference Center for Inherited Bleeding
    Florence, 50134, Italy
  • University of Foggia Riuniti Hospital, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
    Foggia, 71100, Italy
  • Hospital San Giovanni Bosco, Center for Hemophilia and Thrombosis, Department of Hematology
    Naples, 80144, Italy
  • Padova University Hospital, Medical Clinic II, Center for Hemophilia
    Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Nara Medical University, Department of Pediatrics
    Nara, 634-8251, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University
    Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
  • Ogikubo Hospital
    Tokyo, 167-0035, Japan
  • Hematology and Transplantology Clinic, University Clinic Centre - Medical University Hospital
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • University Pediatric Hospital in Cracow
    Krakow, 30-663, Poland
  • Medical College of the Jagiellonian University, Department of Hematology
    Krakow, 31-501, Poland
  • Copernicus Hospital, Medical University in Lodz, Department of Hematology
    Lodz, 93-510, Poland
  • Professor Tadeusz Sokolowski Independent Public Teaching Hospital No. 1 of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin
    Szczecin, 71-252, Poland
  • Klinika Hematologii
    Warsaw, 00-579, Poland
  • Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine
    Warsaw, 02-776, Poland
  • Prof. Dr. C.T. Nicolau National Institute for Transfusional Hematology
    Bucharest, 11156, Romania
  • Louis Turcanu Emergency Clinical Children´s Hospital
    Timisoara, Romania
  • Regional clinical hospital
    Ekaterinburg, 620149, Russian Federation
  • Federal State Institution Kirov Hematology and Blood Transfusion Research Institute under the Federal Agency for High-Tech Medical Care
    Kirov, 610027, Russian Federation
  • Pediatric Regional Clinical Hospital, Hematology Department
    Krasnodar, 350007, Russian Federation
  • Hematology Research Center RAMS, Department of Reconstructive Orthopedics for Haemophilia Patients
    Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation
  • Republican Center for Hemophilia Treatment Outpatient Clinic No. 37
    St. Petersburg, 195213, Russian Federation
  • Malmö University Hospital, Department of Coagulation Disorders
    Malmö, 205 02, Sweden
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital
    Taipei City, Taipei 110, Taiwan
  • Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
    Taichung, 40705, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
  • Tri-Service General Hospital
    Taipei, 114, Taiwan
  • State Institution "Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
    Lviv, 79044, Ukraine
  • Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia Centre and Haemostasis Unit, Royal Free Hospital
    London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
  • Manchester Children's Hospital
    Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Windyga J, Stasyshyn O, Lissitchkov T, Mamonov V, Serban M, Rusen L, Ploder B, Tangada S. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Hemostatic Efficacy of Nonacog Gamma in Patients With Severe or Moderately Severe Hemophilia B: A Continuation Study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620950836. doi: 10.1177/1076029620950836. PubMed 32866032 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 19, 2015
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 27, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01286779
Lead sponsor
Baxalta now part of Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2011
Start date
Apr 12, 2011
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2017
Completion
Jun 29, 2017
Results posted
Sep 10, 2018
Last update
May 20, 2021

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion