CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01280942Updated Feb 14, 2018Results posted

Early Warning System for Clinical Deterioration on General Hospital Wards

An interventional study of EWS Nursing Alerts and Wireless Remote Sensor in Escalation of Care, Cardiopulmonary Arrest and Respiratory Arrest, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-14.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20,031
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal is to develop a two-tiered monitoring system to improve the care of patients at risk for clinical deterioration on general hospital wards (GHWs) at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (BJH). The investigators hypothesize that the use of an automated early warning system (EWS) that identifies patients at risk of clinical deterioration, with notification of nurses on the GHWs when patients are identified, will reduce the risk of ICU transfer or death within 24 hrs of an alert. As a substudy, the investigators will pilot the use of a wireless pulse oximeter to establish feasibility and to develop algorithms for a real-time event detection system (RDS) in these high-risk patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Escalation of Care
  • Cardiopulmonary Arrest
  • Respiratory Arrest
  • Severe Sepsis
  • Septic Shock

Keywords

  • clinical deterioration
  • detection algorithms
  • automated warning systems
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20,031 is above the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients age 18 and above, hospitalized in GHWs at Barnes Jewish Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors, patients younger than 18 years old.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20,031 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients admitted to 4 GHWs designated as controls. Nurses will not be notified when patients on these GHWs satisfy the EWS algorithm. They will also not wear the wireless sensor devices.

  • Experimental
    Nurse notification of EWS alert

    Patients admitted to 4 GHWs designated as intervention wards at BJH. Nurses will be notified when patients on these wards satisfy the EWS algorithm. Some patients will be asked to wear the wireless remote sensors.

    Behavioral: EWS Nursing Alerts · Device: Wireless Remote Sensor

Interventions

  • BehavioralEWS Nursing Alerts

    An automated algorithm (EWS) will identify patients at potential risk of clinical deterioration. When a patient satisfies the algorithm, a nurse on the patient's ward will be notified. S/he will assess the patient and institute any interventions that are clinically required.

  • DeviceWireless Remote Sensor

    A subset of patients will be consented to wear a wireless sensor device which will monitor heart rate and level of oxygen in the blood.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Transfer to ICU or Unexpected Death Within 24 Hrs of Identification by the EWS Algorithm

    The proportion of patients transferred to ICU or death within 24 hrs of identification by the EWS algorithm for intervention and control wards.

    Time frame: Within 24 hrs of an EWS alert

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Outcomes and Process Measures

    length of stay

    Time frame: Hospital discharge

07

Results

Posted Feb 14, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlNurse Notification of EWS Alert
Started101209911
Completed101209911
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTransfer to ICU or Unexpected Death Within 24 Hrs of Identification by the EWS Algorithm

The proportion of patients transferred to ICU or death within 24 hrs of identification by the EWS algorithm for intervention and control wards.

Time frame:
Within 24 hrs of an EWS alert
Reported as:
Number · participants
Transfer to ICU or Unexpected Death Within 24 Hrs of Identification by the EWS Algorithm
participantsControlNurse Notification of EWS Alert
Transfer to ICU or Unexpected Death Within 24 Hrs of Identification by the EWS Algorithm426444
SecondaryClinical Outcomes and Process Measures

length of stay

Time frame:
Hospital discharge
Reported as:
Median · days
Clinical Outcomes and Process Measures
daysControlNurse Notification of EWS Alert
Clinical Outcomes and Process Measures6.92 (3.82 to 12.67)7.07 (3.99 to 12.15)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control—0/10,120 (0%)0/10,120 (0%)
Nurse Notification of EWS Alert—0/9,911 (0%)0/9,911 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlNurse Notification of EWS AlertTotal
Median57 (44 to 69)57 (44 to 70)57 (44 to 70)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlNurse Notification of EWS AlertTotal
Female5355530810663
Male476546039368
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlNurse Notification of EWS AlertTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American486447909654
White506249349996
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported194187381
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlNurse Notification of EWS AlertTotal
United States10120991120031
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Barnes Jewish Hospital
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63108, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bailey TC, Chen Y, Mao Y, Lu C, Hackmann G, Micek ST, Heard KM, Faulkner KM, Kollef MH. A trial of a real-time alert for clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized on general medical wards. J Hosp Med. 2013 May;8(5):236-42. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2009. Epub 2013 Feb 25. PubMed 23440923 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01280942
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Feb 14, 2018
Last update
Feb 14, 2018

Study contacts

Thomas C Bailey, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion