ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01265030Updated Jun 26, 2023Results posted

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Use of mTor Inhibitor Sirolimus in Children and Young Adults With Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Sirolimus in Desmoid Tumor, sponsored by MaineHealth. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 29 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-26.

Sponsored by MaineHealth · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 29 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 33 studies in Desmoid Tumors with a site in United States — 7 open to participants now, 10 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Desmoid Tumors · United States.

Enrollment
21st of 24
9 · median 43
Started
2014
with 2 others
Phase 1/2
4 of 33
2 open now
Registered
8th of 33
by date

Among the 33 studies in Desmoid Tumors with a site in United States, this one is the 21st largest by enrollment of the 24 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2014, is one of 4 in phase 1/2, and was the 8th registered.

By phase

33 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 28 · 1 open
Observational7 · 3 open
Phase 16 · 0 open
Phase 1/2this study4 · 2 open
Phase 33 · 0 open
No phase2 · 0 open
Other kind2 · 1 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1991; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 43 across the 24 interventional studies, 150 across the 7 observational. Of the 20 that completed or were terminated, 9 (45%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 33 studies in Desmoid Tumors with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Desmoid-type fibromatosis (or desmoid tumor) represents an intermediate grade neoplasm with a striking predilection for locally invasive growth and recurrence following resection. It occurs in children as well as young adults. As a typically localized disease, the historical standard of care for treatment has been surgical resection, with or without ionizing radiation. In some cases where surgical resection or radiation is not feasible, chemotherapy has been used. Two clinical trials conducted in the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and the Children's Oncology Group (COG) evaluated the role for either low intensity or non-cytotoxic chemotherapy for children with desmoid tumor that is not amenable to standard therapy. These were largely empirical treatment strategies or based on somewhat anecdotal observations. By better understanding desmoid tumor biology, even more effective therapy targeting a particular protein that is central to the disease can be developed.

Desmoid tumor is well-known to be associated with deregulation of the Adenomatous Polyposis Cell/beta-catenin (APC/β-catenin pathway). This is true of familial cases associated with Gardner's Syndrome and also in sporadic desmoid tumor, nearly all of which display histological or molecular evidence of Adenomatous Polyposis Cell/beta-catenin (APC β-catenin) pathway activation (Alman et al., 1997; Lips et al., 2009). Several new pieces of evidence support the concept that deregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cell proliferation/survival pathway may play an important role in tumor biology when the APC/β-catenin pathway is disrupted. Sirolimus, a drug that inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is currently being evaluated as an anti-cancer agent in a variety of tumor types, but it has not been previously studied in desmoid tumor.

The investigators are conducting this pilot study to begin to explore whether mTOR inhibition may be beneficial for children and young adults with desmoid tumor.

Read the detailed description

We propose a translational research project that will directly test the hypothesis that mTOR is active in desmoid tumor in children and young adults. Activity will be assessed by clinical and histological studies following a course of pre-operative chemotherapy using sirolimus. Clinical response will be measured using validated pain assessment scales because desmoid tumor size is unlikely to change during the course of pre-operative chemotherapy in this study. Histological response will be based on quantifying the phosphorylation of following mTOR targets: thr389p-p70S6K, p-4E-BP1, and ser473p-AKT.

03

Conditions studied

  • Desmoid Tumor

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Desmoid Tumor
  • Sirolimus
  • Surgically-Resectable Desmoid Tumor
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 29 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be less than 30 years of age at time of original diagnosis
  • Must have -proven desmoid tumor (or aggressive fibromatosis). For patients with recurrent disease, a biopsy is not required at the time of recurrence
  • Patients known to have germ-line adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations or clinical manifestations of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis(FAP)/Gardner's syndrome can be included
  • Patients must have surgery planned to remove the desmoid tumor and either:

    • the desmoid tumor has already recurred after a prior surgery or
    • the newly diagnosed and/or previously unresected disease is judged to be at high risk for recurrence due to its size (>5 centimeters) or location at an anatomic site making it unlikely to be resected with negative margins (eg. adjacent to neurovascular structures)
  • There must be a commitment by the surgical team to resect the primary tumor within 3 days following the 4 weeks of sirolimus unless the clinical situation at the time of resection suggests that these interventions are not in the patient's best interest
  • Concomitant medication restrictions:

    • Patients may have received prior chemotherapy (excluding prior mTOR inhibitors)
    • Use of for non-tumor indications (for example: asthma or severe allergic reaction) is permitted
  • Patients must have a performance status of greater than or equal to 50 for patients older than 16 years of age or Lansky performance status of greater than or equal to 50 for patients less than or equal to 16 years of age.
  • Patients must have a of greater than or equal to 8 weeks.
  • Patients must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering this study

    • Myelosuppressive chemotherapy: Must not have received within 2 weeks of entry onto this study (4 weeks if prior nitrosourea)
    • Biologic (anti-neoplastic agent): at least 7 days since the completion of therapy with a biological agent
    • Stem Cell Transplant (SCT): No evidence of active . For SCT, greater than or equal to 6 months must have elapsed.
  • Patients must be able to consume oral medication in the form of tablets or solution
  • Patients must have normal laboratory values as defined below:

    • or radioisotope ≥ 70millileters/minute/1.73 meters2 or a normal serum creatinine based on age/gender
  • Hepatic: Adequate liver function is defined as:

    • Total less than or equal to 1.5 x (ULN)for age, and
    • Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase () less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit normal (ULN) for age
  • Hematologic function: Adequate bone marrow function is defined as:

    • (ANC) greater than or equal to 1 x 10 to the ninth/Liter
    • greater than or equal to 10 gram/deciliter
    • count greater than or equal to 100 x 10 to the ninth/Liter
  • Female patients must have a negative pregnancy test
  • Female patients who are lactating must agree to stop breast-feeding
  • Sexually active patients of must agree to use effective
  • Patients must be able to cooperate fully with all planned protocol therapy
  • Signed MUST be obtained from patient or parent/legal guardian (if patient is less than 18 years of age). Consent must be signed prior to any study procedures and study entry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other fibroblastic lesions or other fibromatoses are NOT eligible.
  • Concomitant medication restrictions

    • Patients may NOT have received prior mTor inhibitors
    • Growth factor(s): Must not have received within 1 week of entry onto this study.
  • Patients must not be known to be positive. Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus is not mandatory.
  • Patients must not be taking medicines known to influence sirolimus metabolism
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(18)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sirolimus

    Preoperative sirolimus: * loading dose of 12 milligrams/meter2; Per Os (PO), by mouth day 1 (Max dose 12 milligram) * starting 24 hours after the initial loading dose, subjects will receive a dose of 4 milligram/meters2 daily; Per Os (PO), by mouth days 2 through 28

    Drug: Sirolimus

Interventions

  • * Loading dose of 12 milligrams/meter2; Per Os (PO), by mouth day 1 (Max dose 12 milligrams) * Starting 24 hours after the initial loading dose, patients will receive a dose of 4 milligrams/meter2 daily; Per Os (PO), by mouth days 2 through 28 (Max dose 4 milligram/day)

    Also known as: Rapamune®, Rapamycin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Immunohistochemical Immunoreactive Score Results After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus Compared to Control Specimens

    Changes to the mTOR pathway were determined using an immunohistochemical immunoreactive score (IRS). The components of the IRS for each phosphoprotein (p4EPB and pS706K) are as follows: the percentage of positive cells were scored as: 0 (0%); 1 (\<10%); 2 (11-50%); 3 (51-80%); 4(\>80%). The staining intensity were scored as: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). To derive the IRS, the percentage of positive cells and staining intensity were multiplied together, resulting in a value from 0 to 12. The score for patients after 4 weeks of sirolimus was compared to a group of control desmoid tumor samples from the UCLA tumor bank (n=68). Lower scores for patients following 4 weeks of sirolimus compared to control sample scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Levels After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus

    Pain assessments were performed using the validated numeric (age ≥ 10 years) and Wong-Baker FACES (≥3 and \< 10 years) pain rating scales at specified study time points including baseline, at week 1 and after 4 weeks of treatment (just prior to surgery). Both pain scales range from a value of 0 to 10 with 0 being equal to no pain and 10 being equal to the worst pain. The median pain score and pain score range for study participants at Week 1 and Prior to Surgery (Week 4) timepoints are provided. Lower pain scale values (median and upper limit of the range) at the Prior to Surrgery timepoint are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Number of Participants Without Tumor Recurrence

    We evaluated the number of study participants whose tumor did not recur by 3 years from the date of surgery.

    Time frame: 3 years from the end of therapy, a total duration of 3 years and 4 weeks

  3. Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Per CTCAE Definitions

    The safety and tolerability of patients receiving sirolimus was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading criteria. All reported grades of toxicity (1-5) were collected.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 26, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSirolimus
Started9
Completed9
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryImmunohistochemical Immunoreactive Score Results After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus Compared to Control Specimens

Changes to the mTOR pathway were determined using an immunohistochemical immunoreactive score (IRS). The components of the IRS for each phosphoprotein (p4EPB and pS706K) are as follows: the percentage of positive cells were scored as: 0 (0%); 1 (\<10%); 2 (11-50%); 3 (51-80%); 4(\>80%). The staining intensity were scored as: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). To derive the IRS, the percentage of positive cells and staining intensity were multiplied together, resulting in a value from 0 to 12. The score for patients after 4 weeks of sirolimus was compared to a group of control desmoid tumor samples from the UCLA tumor bank (n=68). Lower scores for patients following 4 weeks of sirolimus compared to control sample scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Immunohistochemical Immunoreactive Score Results After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus Compared to Control Specimens
score on a scaleImmunoreactive Score Results of p4EPB After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus for the Study PatientsImmunoreactive Score Results of pS706K After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus for the Study PatientsImmunoreactive Score Results of p4EPB for the Control TumorsImmunoreactive Score Results of pS706K for the Control Tumors
Immunohistochemical Immunoreactive Score Results After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus Compared to Control Specimens5.22 (1 to 12)7.44 (0 to 12)4.47 (0 to 12)9.39 (0 to 12)
Statistical analysis
  • Immunoreactive Score Results of p4EPB After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus for the Study Patients · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.63 · Mean difference (net): 0.75 · 95% CI -2.54 to 4.04
  • Immunoreactive Score Results of pS706K After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus for the Study Patients · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.31 · Mean difference (net): -1.95 · 95% CI -6.08 to 2.19
SecondaryPain Levels After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus

Pain assessments were performed using the validated numeric (age ≥ 10 years) and Wong-Baker FACES (≥3 and \< 10 years) pain rating scales at specified study time points including baseline, at week 1 and after 4 weeks of treatment (just prior to surgery). Both pain scales range from a value of 0 to 10 with 0 being equal to no pain and 10 being equal to the worst pain. The median pain score and pain score range for study participants at Week 1 and Prior to Surgery (Week 4) timepoints are provided. Lower pain scale values (median and upper limit of the range) at the Prior to Surrgery timepoint are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pain Levels After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus
score on a scaleWeek 1Prior to Surgery
Pain Levels After 4 Weeks of Sirolimus1 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 3)
Statistical analysis
  • Week 1 vs Prior to Surgery · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.68 · Mean difference (net): 0.063 · 95% CI -.286 to 0.411
SecondaryNumber of Participants Without Tumor Recurrence

We evaluated the number of study participants whose tumor did not recur by 3 years from the date of surgery.

Time frame:
3 years from the end of therapy, a total duration of 3 years and 4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Without Tumor Recurrence
ParticipantsStudy Patients
Number of Participants Without Tumor Recurrence5
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Per CTCAE Definitions

The safety and tolerability of patients receiving sirolimus was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading criteria. All reported grades of toxicity (1-5) were collected.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Per CTCAE Definitions
ParticipantsSafety
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Toxicity Per CTCAE Definitions0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected for the duration of treatment (4 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sirolimus0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 35
Most frequent other events
EventSirolimus
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders5/9
HypotensionVascular disorders4/9
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations3/9
Creatinine increasedInvestigations3/9
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/9
FatigueGeneral disorders2/9
Oral painGastrointestinal disorders2/9
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations2/9
HypertriglyceridemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/9
Sinus bradycardiaCardiac disorders2/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sirolimus
Median15 (5 to 28)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sirolimus
Female3
Male6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Sirolimus
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Rady Children's Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
    Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
  • Maine Medical Center
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 94 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2023, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 6, 2010
First posted
Dec 22, 2010
StartActual
Feb 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 22, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 22, 2021
Results first posted
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Jun 26, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01265030
Lead sponsor
MaineHealth
Collaborators
Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation, Pfizer
Responsible party
Aaron Weiss (Principal Investigator, MaineHealth) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2010
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Dec 22, 2021
Completion
Dec 22, 2021
Results posted
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Jun 26, 2023

Study contacts

Aaron R Weiss, DO
principal investigator · MaineHealth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sirolimus

Start the discussion