ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06869993Updated Feb 19, 2026

Giving Healthy Meal Kits and Cooking Lessons to Rural Families With Food Insecurity.

An interventional study of Meal Kit plus Mobile Culinary Medicine Education in Food Insecurity, Food Insecurity Among Children and Social Emotional Wellness, sponsored by MaineHealth. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-19.

Sponsored by MaineHealth · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if providing healthy meal kits to food insecure families can help lessen the social and emotional impacts of food insecurity on kids and their caregivers in rural Maine. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Is receiving healthy meal kits delivered to homes feasible and acceptable to rural Maine families?
  2. Does receiving meal kits (along with an app to help learn how to cook the food) improve food insecurity and diet quality in rural Maine families?
  3. Does receiving meal kits (along with an app to help learn how to cook the food) improve family function in rural Maine families? We will look at caregivers' stress, family conflict, household chaos, and child emotional-behavioral symptoms.

Participants will:

  1. Recieve and prepare a dietitian-designed meal kit with 10 meals per week for 4 weeks.
  2. Receive free culinary medicine education via an app that they will continue to have access to after the study ends.
  3. Complete a 1-1.5 hour virtual visit at the beginning of and end of the study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Food Insecurity
  • Food Insecurity Among Children
  • Social Emotional Wellness
  • Caregiver Stress
  • Caregiver Distress
  • Caregiver Mental Health
  • Family Function
  • Family Functioning
  • Nutrition
  • Child Mental Health

Keywords

  • Food is Medicine
  • Family Stress
  • Child stress
  • Food Insecurity
  • Childhood Food Insecurity
  • Child Mental Health
  • Nutrition
  • family
  • Family Functioning
  • Mental Health
  • Caregiver Stress
  • Child Caregiver
  • Healthy Food
  • Nutrition Security
  • Nutrition Insecurity
03

In context

Caregiver Burden

500 studies on the registry are indexed under Caregiver Burden; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 71 across 402 interventional studies indexed under Caregiver Burden.

Browse Caregiver Burden studies →

Lead sponsor

MaineHealth is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Legal caregiver for a child between the ages of 6-12 with whom they live at least 75% of the time.
  • Reside in rural county in Maine as designated by the Health Resources and Services Administration.
  • Endorse food insufficiency within the past month on their screening questionnaire.
  • Able to speak and read in English.
  • Stable address with the ability to receive packages

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inadequate access (\<5 days/week) to a kitchen with refrigeration and heating elements to prepare meals.
  • Food-restrictive diet (i.e., veganism, gluten-free, dialysis-dependent, severe heart failure).
  • A household member with any anaphylactic food allergy.
  • No access to a smartphone with texting capabilities.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants

    Participants will receive 4 weeks of health meal kits delivered to their homes in addition culinary medicine education via an app. They will also participate in weekly as well as pre-and post-intervention assessments.

    Dietary Supplement: Meal Kit plus Mobile Culinary Medicine Education

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementMeal Kit plus Mobile Culinary Medicine Education

    This intervention will involve four phases: (1) a baseline assessment; (2) a 7-day monitoring phase, (3) a 30-day intervention phase in which all households receive weekly meal kits delivered to their home in addition to mobile culinary medicine education; and (4) a follow-up assessment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. USDA Household Food Security Survey

    An 18-item questionnaire designed to assess a household's level of food insecurity during the past year, including questions related to both worry and insufficiency in relation to both adults and children living in the household

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  2. Rapid Prime Diet Quality Screener

    A 13-item diet screener that assesses the frequency with which various categories of food were consumed over the past month (e.g., processed meats, vegetables, soft drinks).

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  3. Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale

    A 15-item, caregiver-report questionnaire that assesses the level of environmental confusion in the home

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  4. 24-Hour Food Recall

    A structured assessment intended to capture detailed information about all foods, beverages, and dietary supplements consumed by the participant in the past 24 hours. The assessment queries about the time of day, portion size, and preparation methods of each food item.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  5. Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale

    A 28-question validated questionnaire assessing food agency in three separate categories (self-efficacy, structure, and attitude).

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  6. Parenting Stress Index - Short Form

    A 36-item caregiver report assesses three domains of stress (parental distress, dysfunctional parent-child interactions, and difficult child).

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  7. Perceived Stress Scale

    A 10-item, self-report measure that assesses the degree to which different situations are appraised as stressful, unpredictable, and uncontrollable.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  8. Alabama Parenting Questionnaire - Short Form

    A 9-item, caregiver-report measure of parenting practices that assesses domains of positive parenting, poor monitoring/supervision, and inconsistent discipline

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  9. Family Environment Scale - Fourth Edition

    A self-report assessment designed to assess different aspects of family functioning via 90 true or false questions. In order to reduce participant burden, only items from the Cohesion, Conflict, Organization and Control subscale will be administered.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  10. Child Behavior Checklist

    The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a caregiver-report measure that consist of 120 problem items rated on a three-point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat or sometimes true, 2 = very true or often true) that yield empirically derived subscales related to different psychological symptoms and competence in several areas of functioning. Subscales are consistent across age, gender, informant, and culture and have test-retest reliabilities between 0.74 and 0.95 and Cronbach alphas between 0.79 and 0.97. The Brief Problem Monitor is a 19-item caregiver-report measure with parallel items and scales to the CBCL designed for assessing change over time.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adult Self-Report

    A self-report inventory on which caregivers rated the extent to which they have experienced 126 psychological problems during the past six months on a three-point scale 1 = somewhat or sometimes true, 2 = very true or often true). Items form empirically validated subscales that are normed by age, gender, and culture.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  2. PROMIS Fatigue Profile

    16-item, self-report measure that assesses fatigue intensity and its effects on social functioning, cognition, and motivation.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

  3. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

    A 20-item self-report measure that assesses the extent to which participants have various moods during a specified timeframe (i.e., 30 days) which yields independent positive and negative affect subscales.

    Time frame: Baseline and 5 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Demographic Survey

    A 14-item questionnaire designed specifically for the current study was used to obtain basic information about the caregiver (e.g., age, gender identity, race, ethnicity, occupation, and level of education) as well as the composition and economic circumstances of the household.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • MaineHealth
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — For patient protection IPD will not be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Jul 2025, 2 months.

Of 282 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Caregiver Burden, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 291 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 2, 2025
First posted
Mar 11, 2025
StartActual
Apr 14, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jul 8, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06869993
Lead sponsor
MaineHealth
Responsible party
Lauren Ciszak (Postdoctoral Fellow, MaineHealth) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2025
Start date
Apr 14, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 8, 2025
Completion
Jul 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026

Study contacts

Merelise Ametti, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · MaineHealth
Lauren Ciszak, MD
principal investigator · MaineHealth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion