An interventional study of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18) F-fluorothymidine in Esophageal Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-17.
Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The purpose of this pilot study is to develop a more advanced software program that will collect, compare and analyze tumor images for evaluation. Another purpose of this study is to learn if a new radio-tracer for tumor imaging called 3'-deoxy-3'(18) F-fluorothymidine (FLT) can improve the evaluation of tumors during a PET/CT scan. This new type of image tracking is meant to improve the visualization of tumor active and size.
1,593 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms; 461 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 58 across 1,171 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms.
Browse Esophageal Neoplasms studies →Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 813 studies on the registry; 123 are open to participants now.
Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
This is a single arm trial, in which all patients receive three FDG-PET scans and three FLT-PET scans, before, during and after pre-operative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.
Drug: 3'-deoxy-3'-(18) F-fluorothymidine
Radio-tracer for tumor imaging
Also known as: FLT
Feasibility: Determined by the Number of Participants Who Had All Three Sets of Completed Serial PET Scans That Were Imported for Analysis
Determine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis.
Time frame: 1 year
Analyze Correlation Between FDG and FLT PET Scans, and the Correlation Between Both Types of PET Scan and the Response to Treatment.
We will compare the findings of FDG and FLT PET scans at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment time points to determine how closely they correlate with each other, and if there is a specific time point at which any observed differences between FDG and FLT PET scans are most pronounced. We will also determine which of the six PET scans may correlate most closely with the response to treatment as determined by pathologic findings at esophagectomy.
Time frame: 1 year
Single arm open label pilot study. Study was expected to enroll five patients at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital. The study was initiated in August 2010 and the primary completion date was March 2013.
| Milestone | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Started | 5 |
| Completed | 5 |
| Not completed | 0 |
Determine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis.
| participants | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Feasibility: Determined by the Number of Participants Who Had All Three Sets of Completed Serial PET Scans That Were Imported for Analysis | 5 |
We will compare the findings of FDG and FLT PET scans at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment time points to determine how closely they correlate with each other, and if there is a specific time point at which any observed differences between FDG and FLT PET scans are most pronounced. We will also determine which of the six PET scans may correlate most closely with the response to treatment as determined by pathologic findings at esophagectomy.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | — | 0/5 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Mean | 63.4 ± 9.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Female | 0 |
| Male | 5 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute