ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01197352PARTUpdated May 21, 2012

Pilot Study of a Text Message Platform to Reduce Risky Drinking in Young Adults

An interventional study of Motivational and Normative Feedback and Self-Awareness in Alcohol Abuse, Alcohol Consumption and Drinking Behavior, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-05-21.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Young adults are in a critical period where they can be influenced to avoid a trajectory of high-risk drinking and harmful outcomes in the later adult years. The Emergency Department might offer a unique opportunity to reach young adults, if an easy to implement screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment was available. The investigators are investigating the feasibility and accuracy of ED-initiated and outpatient-continued assessment of drinking behavior in young adults using a computer-driven text messaging platform. Based on the subject's response to weekly assessments, the computer platform will send personalized motivational messages in real-time.

Read the detailed description

Greater than 45% of young adults have heavy episodic drinking (HED; 5/4 drinks per occasion form men/women), resulting in significant health risks, including injury and death. Early identification and secondary prevention of HED using screening, brief interventions and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is advocated by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) as a way to reduce injury and health consequences. Each day in the United States, there are over 2700 emergency department (ED) visits associated with alcohol, unfortunately, SBIRT is rarely performed in the ED due to time and training requirements. Our application seeks to solve this problem by integrating SBIRT into ED care through the use of ecological assessments with interventions. We will incorporate components of the NIAAA 2005 Clinicians Guide into automated weekly assessments (EA) and branching algorithms for personalized interventions (EA\&I) delivered in real-time through mobile phone text messaging to young adults with a history of at-risk drinking behavior. We will assess the feasibility of EA\&I to study young adults with a history of at-risk drinking and assess the variability in outcomes in patients undergoing EA\&I, EA or standard care. We expect to find that this ED-initiated and outpatientcontinued platform will improve collection of drinking behavior, delivery of real-world motivational feedback and follow-up in young adults with at-risk drinking histories. We anticipate that short-term HED will be reduced in those subjects randomized to EA\&I. We will use this information to support further studies with adequate power to show ED-initiated EA\&I reduce long-term HED and its adverse consequences in young adults.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Abuse
  • Alcohol Consumption
  • Drinking Behavior

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Abuse
  • Drinking
  • Behavior
  • Text
  • Computer
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,674 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 331 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 88 across 1,428 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-24 years
  • English speaking
  • Owns a personal phone with text messaging

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Prisoner
  • Treated for alcohol dependence or abuse
  • Treated for psychiatric disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Text message queries with feedback

    Weekly prompted queries about drinking behavior with personalized feedback.

    Behavioral: Motivational and Normative Feedback

  • Active comparator
    Text message queries

    Weekly prompted queries about drinking behavior

    Behavioral: Self-Awareness

  • No intervention
    Control

    Weekly text reminders to complete final (12 week) instruments

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational and Normative Feedback

    Weekly feedback based on their frequency and degree of at-risk drinking behavior using normative, educational and motivational feedback

  • BehavioralSelf-Awareness

    Weekly queries to raise awareness and allow self-reflection about drinking habits

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ability of system to collect drinking information from young adults

    We will report the proportion of weeks with completed drinking assessments in the EA and EA\&I groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of binge drinking episodes in subjects as a measure of safety and efficacy

    We will compare the number of binge drinking episodes between subjects in the three groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Emergency Department
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2010, a primary completion of Feb 2011 and a completion of Feb 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2010
First posted
Sep 9, 2010
Start
Aug 2010
Primary completionActual
Feb 2011
CompletionActual
Feb 2011
Last update
May 21, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01197352
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
Last update
May 21, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion