CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01192516AIMUpdated Apr 7, 2015Results posted

Effectiveness of Tailored Activity Pacing for Symptomatic Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Tailored Activity Pacing and General Activity Pacing in Osteoarthritis and Pain, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-07.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
195
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this project is to examine effectiveness of a tailored pacing intervention on fatigue, pain, and physical function compared to general pacing intervention and usual care groups. A secondary objective is to evaluate the natural history of symptoms and physical disability over time among people with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

In the United States, osteoarthritis is a growing public health issue and a leading cause of disability among older adults. Almost 50% of users of the Veterans Affairs (VA) system present with osteoarthritis. Veterans are a particularly important group to target for symptom management interventions as they are twice as likely as non-veterans to report chronic joint symptoms and activity limitations. There are few evidence-based symptom management interventions offered by health care professionals, such as occupational and physical therapists, at the time when people are seeking treatment for their symptoms. The proposed activity pacing intervention is individually-tailored to a person's symptom and activity patterns. This tailoring provides a personally-relevant and focused intervention that may help people adopt this strategy into their daily lives.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Activity Pacing
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 583 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 195 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of 50 years and older
  • Reported pain for at least 3 months
  • Mild-moderate pain severity according to the WOMAC pain scale
  • Radiographic evidence of knee or hip osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence score of 2 in at least one joint)
  • Community-dwelling (i.e. own home, apartment, senior residence)
  • Ambulatory with or without a cane or walker
  • Adequate cognition to complete study activities (score of 5 on the 6-Item Screener)
  • Ability to use the Actiwatch-S (Phillips-Respironics, Mini-Mitter, Bend OR)accelerometer to record symptoms and activity patterns (ascertained by completion of a learning module specific to the use of the device in this study)
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported medical history of conditions with pain and/or fatigue as a known and marked symptom (e.g multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Medically unstable (e.g. acute conditions or acute presentations of chronic conditions)
  • Anemia (hemoglobin of \<10 for men and \<11 for women)
  • Unmanaged thyroid dysfunction (Thyroid stimulating hormone \<.035>5.5 mg/dl)
  • 2 or more days of complete bed rest within the last month
  • Limb hemiplegia or amputation
  • Arthroscopic procedure within the previous 2 months
  • Joint injection within the previous 3 months
  • Total or partial joint replacement within the previous 6 months
  • Self-reported illness or conditions that impair cooperation with the study team or ability to complete study procedures
  • Current enrollee in physical or occupational therapy for symptoms associated with osteoarthritis
  • Current attendance or attendance within the previous year in a cognitive behavioral therapy program or other self-management program that includes activity pacing instruction
  • Any other unforeseen exclusion criteria that, by the opinion of the study personnel, would make the participant unable to safely or effectively complete the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
195 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Tailored activity pacing

    Behavioral: Tailored Activity Pacing

  • Experimental
    Arm 2

    General activity pacing and symptom management (Occupational therapy)

    Behavioral: General Activity Pacing

  • No intervention
    Arm 3

    Usual care group

Interventions

  • BehavioralTailored Activity Pacing

    Therapeutic intervention will be based on a tailored approach using collected data on symptom and activity patterns of each participant.

  • BehavioralGeneral Activity Pacing

    Therapeutic intervention using generalized pacing instruction to manage symptoms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and fatigue interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Fatigue-BFI

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

    Time frame: 10 weeks post-baseline

  3. Fatigue-BFI

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score indicates worse fatigue.

    Time frame: 6 months post-baseline

  4. Pain- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

    This is a summary of reported pain in specific activities. It is 5 questions with answers ranging from 0 - 4. Total possible score is 20 in which a higher score is worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Pain- WOMAC

    This is a 5-item pain scale in which scores from 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score indicates more pain.

    Time frame: 10 weeks post-baseline

  6. Pain- WOMAC

    This is a 5 item pain scale in which items on a scale of 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score means more pain.

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    Six minute walk is the distance (in feet) that people walk at a usual pace over 6 minutes

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    This is the distance in feet that people walk over 6 minutes.

    Time frame: 10 weeks post-baseline

  3. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    This is the distance people walk in feet over 6 minutes

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

07

Results

Posted Mar 19, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Although overall effects were not found by group over time, additional data analyses will be conducted to determine if there were positive effects for specific subgroups of people.

Participant flow

Potential participants were recruited through fliers and advertisements.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Started666663
Completed464955
Not completed20178
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7107
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject441
Withdrew: Started new treatment510
Withdrew: Unable to follow actiwatch instructions420

Outcome measures

PrimaryFatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and fatigue interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
units on a scaleTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Fatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)3.06 ± 2.343.18 ± 2.452.70 ± 2.31
PrimaryFatigue-BFI

This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

Time frame:
10 weeks post-baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fatigue-BFI
units on a scaleTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Fatigue-BFI3.35 ± 2.133.09 ± 2.142.98 ± 2.28
PrimaryFatigue-BFI

This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score indicates worse fatigue.

Time frame:
6 months post-baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fatigue-BFI
units on a scaleTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Fatigue-BFI3.30 ± 2.362.90 ± 1.982.83 ± 2.26
Statistical analysis
  • Tailored Activity Pacing vs General Activity Pacing vs Usual Care Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .85Adjusted for age, gender, pain level, and body mass index at baseline.
PrimaryPain- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

This is a summary of reported pain in specific activities. It is 5 questions with answers ranging from 0 - 4. Total possible score is 20 in which a higher score is worse pain.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
units on a scaleArm 1Arm 2Arm 3
Pain- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)8.23 ± 2.998.19 ± 3.378.27 ± 3.32
PrimaryPain- WOMAC

This is a 5-item pain scale in which scores from 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score indicates more pain.

Time frame:
10 weeks post-baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain- WOMAC
units on a scaleTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Pain- WOMAC8.10 ± 3.437.16 ± 3.117.83 ± 3.46
PrimaryPain- WOMAC

This is a 5 item pain scale in which items on a scale of 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score means more pain.

Time frame:
6 months post baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain- WOMAC
units on a scaleTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Pain- WOMAC7.63 ± 3.577.33 ± 2.766.68 ± 3.29
Statistical analysis
  • Tailored Activity Pacing vs General Activity Pacing vs Usual Care Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .06Adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index.
SecondaryPhysical Function- Six Minute Walk

Six minute walk is the distance (in feet) that people walk at a usual pace over 6 minutes

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk
feetTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk1185.3 ± 263.31208.6 ± 255.21209.4 ± 260.1
SecondaryPhysical Function- Six Minute Walk

This is the distance in feet that people walk over 6 minutes.

Time frame:
10 weeks post-baseline
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk
feetTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk1200.5 ± 260.11249.4 ± 217.31236.1 ± 246.1
SecondaryPhysical Function- Six Minute Walk

This is the distance people walk in feet over 6 minutes

Time frame:
6 months post baseline
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk
feetTailored Activity PacingGeneral Activity PacingUsual Care Group
Physical Function- Six Minute Walk1225.4 ± 240.11264.3 ± 192.91222.4 ± 265.6
Statistical analysis
  • Tailored Activity Pacing vs General Activity Pacing vs Usual Care Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .36 (Adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, and pain at baseline.)

Adverse events

Collected over Data were collected from baseline through completion of Time 3 outcome measures at 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 4.55% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1—0/66 (0%)3/66 (4.5%)
Arm 2—0/66 (0%)3/66 (4.5%)
Arm 3—0/63 (0%)1/63 (1.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1Arm 2Arm 3
x-ray mistakesMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/663/661/63

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years393636111
>=65 years27302784
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Total
Mean64.5 ± 8.164.1 ± 8.365.8 ± 8.764.8 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Total
Female404139120
Male26252475
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Total
United States666663195
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Murphy SL, Schepens Niemiec S, Lyden AK, Kratz AL. Pain, Fatigue, and Physical Activity in Osteoarthritis: The Moderating Effects of Pain- and Fatigue-Related Activity Interference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9 Suppl):S201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.025. Epub 2016 May 17. PubMed 27207435 ↗
  • Murphy SL, Lyden AK, Clary M, Geisser ME, Yung RL, Clauw DJ, Williams DA. Activity pacing for osteoarthritis symptom management: study design and methodology of a randomized trial testing a tailored clinical approach using accelerometers for veterans and non-veterans. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 2;12:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-177. PubMed 21810253 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01192516
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2010
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Results posted
Mar 19, 2015
Last update
Apr 7, 2015

Study contacts

Susan L Murphy, ScD OTR
principal investigator · VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion