CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01167166Updated Jun 26, 2017

Safety and Efficacy of 72-hour and 120-hour Infusion of Rigosertib in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Acute Lymphoid Leukemia (ALL)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of rigosertib in Acute Myelocytic Leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia and Myeloproliferative Disease, sponsored by Traws Pharma, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-26.

Sponsored by Traws Pharma, Inc. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients with leukemia who have not responded to or have progressed after an initial response to standard therapy, therapeutic options are limited. Although responses to standard regimens do occur, durable remissions are achieved infrequently and current regimens are not curative in the majority of patients. Identification of active agents in patients with relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) ultimately affords the potential for use upfront as a component of induction regimens that may translate to improved outcome. Therefore, development of new agents is of critical importance. This study will look at a new, investigational agent, ON 01910.Na, to determine if it has the potential to help Patients with AML and Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) and transformed Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Read the detailed description

This is a single center, open-label, phase 1/2 study in which 2 to 34 patients with refractory acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia or transformed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)who meet all other inclusion/exclusion criteria will be administered a daily dose of 2400 mg ON 01910.Na dose as a intravenous continuous infusion (IVCI) over 24 hours for 72 to 120 consecutive hours every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks then will receive oral rigosertib at a 560 mg twice-daily dose as capsules taken continuously.

In the phase 1 component of the trial, a standard dose escalation scheme will be followed with the enrolment of at least three patients treated with a daily dose of 2400 mg ON 01910.Na IVCI over 24 hours for 72 hours. The dose escalation scheme will follow a traditional dose escalation rule, also known as the "3+3" rule:

If none of the initial three patients treated in the 72-hour cohort experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), during the first two 2-week cycles, then a new cohort of three patients will be treated at the same 2400 mg/24h daily dose but for an increased 120 hours duration.

DLT is defined as an adverse event possibly related to ON 01910.Na that is:

  • Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity other than nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, esophagitis/dysphagia
  • Grade ≥ 3 nausea and vomiting uncontrolled by antiemetics; grade ≥ 3 diarrhea uncontrolled by antidiarrheal agents; grade ≥ 3 drug-induced fever uncontrolled by antipyretics; grade ≥3 metabolic abnormalities that are not controlled by optimal supportive care measures
  • Grade ≥ 3 stomatitis and/or esophagitis/dysphagia lasting > 3 days
  • Marrow cellularity \<5% on day 42 or later (6 weeks) from start of therapy without evidence of leukemia

If one of the three patients in the 72-hour cohort experiences a DLT during the first two cycles, then three additional patients will be treated for the same 72 hours duration. Escalation to the 120-hour cohort will proceed only if no more than one of the six patients treated in the 72-hour cohort experiences a DLT.

If two or more patients in the 72-hour cohort experience DLT during the first two cycles, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will have been exceeded, no further dosing extension will occur, and a full safety review will determine if further enrollment of patients will proceed.

If none of the initial three patients in the 120-hour cohort experiences DLT during the first two cycles, this regimen will be confirmed as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and no further dose escalation will occur.

If one of the three patients in the 120-hour cohort experiences DLT during the first two cycles, then three additional patients will be treated for the same duration. If no more than one patient experiences a DLT, the 120-hour regimen will be confirmed as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and no further dose escalation will occur.

If two or more patients in the 120 hours cohort experience DLT during the first two cycles, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined to be 2400 mg/24h administered for 72 hours every other week.

Once the phase 1 portion of the study is completed, accrual to the phase 2 portion will begin. Patients treated at the MTD during the phase 1 portion will be included in the phase 2 component and will be evaluated for response and secondary end points.

The total study duration is 30 weeks, which includes a 2-week screening phase, a 24-week dosing phase (4-week rigosertib CIV administration, followed by 20 weeks of oral rigosertib administration), and a 4-week follow-up phase that begins after the last dose of rigosertib. Beginning at week 5, patients will be assessed for response every time a complete blood count (CBC) is performed and followed up.

Patients who achieve by week 24 a response or stabilization of their disease are eligible to receive an additional 24 weeks of rigosertib at the same dose and will be followed up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myelocytic Leukemia
  • Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Myeloproliferative Disease
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

  • Acute Myelocytic Leukemia
  • Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Myeloproliferative Disease
  • Myelofibrosis
  • Essential thrombocythemia
  • Polycythemia vera
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
03

In context

Leukemia

5,442 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 637 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 38 across 4,248 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Traws Pharma, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Histologically documented or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of one of the following hematological malignancies:

    • Acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) refractory to standard induction treatment, or relapsed after standard therapy (including transformed myeloproliferative diseases with at least 10% blasts in bone marrow and chronic myeloid leukemia in a blast phase)
    • Transformed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs; i.e., myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV)) with at least 10% blasts in bone marrow and chronic myeloid leukemia in a blast phase refractory or relapsing after standard therapy
    • Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) refractory to induction treatment, or relapsed after standard therapy
  2. Patients should not have received any prior chemotherapy for their leukemia or transformed MPN within 14 days and should have recovered from any toxicity related to prior chemotherapy to at least grade 1. In the presence of rapidly proliferating disease, patients can be included after a washout period of 7 days. Hydroxyurea can be administered as clinically indicated, and no washout is required.
  3. Patients may not be candidates for, or must have declined, bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical donor in the immediate future (ie, within 4 weeks) or other chemotherapeutic regimens known to produce consistent remissions.
  4. Patients with known meningeal infiltration may be enrolled only if radiation has been completed, and a clearing of peripheral blood blasts has been noted. Intrathecal therapy can be continued if judged to be in the best interest of the patient to prevent recurrence, provided there is no toxicity associated with it and there has been clearance of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid.
  5. ECOG Performance Status 0, 1 or 2.
  6. Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
  7. Patient must have signed an informed consent document indicating that he/she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any active malignancy within the past year except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast.
  2. Known HIV-1 seropositivity.
  3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris or cardiac arrhythmia.
  4. Uncontrolled active systemic infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
  5. Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
  6. ALT or AST ≥ 2.5 X ULN.
  7. Serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dL.
  8. Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<130 Meq/L).
  9. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating; Male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements (condom use). Patients of reproductive potential who do not agree to use adequate contraceptive before entry and throughout the study; Female patients with reproductive potential who do not have a negative serum or urine beta-HCG pregnancy test at screening.
  10. Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of rigosertib treatment start.
  11. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as a systolic pressure equal to or greater than 160 and/or a diastolic pressure equal to or greater than 100).
  12. New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to the first dose of rigosertib) or poorly controlled seizures
  13. Any concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy.
  14. Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rigosertib

    Patients will receive 2400 mg dose of rigosertib as a intravenous continuous infusion over 24 hours for 72 to 120 consecutive hours every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks then will receive oral rigosertib at a 560 mg twice-daily dose as capsules taken continuously.

    Drug: rigosertib

Interventions

  • Drugrigosertib

    The dose of rigosertib will be 2400 mg/24h as an intravenous continuous infusion over 72 or 120 hours every 2 weeks for 2 cycles then as oral capsules administered at a dose of 560 mg twice daily on a continuous basis.

    Also known as: rigosertib sodium

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

    DLT: adverse event possibly related that is: * Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity other than nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, esophagitis/dysphagia * Grade ≥ 3 nausea and vomiting uncontrolled by antiemetics; grade ≥ 3 diarrhea uncontrolled by antidiarrheal agents; grade ≥ 3 drug-induced fever uncontrolled by antipyretics; grade ≥3 metabolic abnormalities that are not controlled by optimal supportive care measures * Grade ≥ 3 stomatitis and/or esophagitis/dysphagia lasting \> 3 days * Marrow cellularity \<5% on day 42 or later (6 weeks) from start of therapy without evidence of leukemia

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  2. Change in bone marrow blast cell and peripheral blood counts at 5, 13 and 25 weeks

    Determine the clinical response rate (complete or partial remission) according to response criteria in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia (1 Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization or Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. JCO 21:4642, 2003).

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concentration of ON 01910.Na in plasma

    Blood samples to determine concentration of rigosertib in plasma will be collected at 6 hours after the start of the second 24-hour infusion (Day 2) at Weeks 1 and 3.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 3

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01167166
Lead sponsor
Traws Pharma, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 22, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Last update
Jun 26, 2017

Study contacts

Jorge Cortes, MD
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion