CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01155479PARADYSEUpdated Nov 7, 2018Results posted

A Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study of Preladenant in Early Parkinson's Disease (PD) (P05664)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Preladenant 2 mg tablet and Preladenant 5 mg tablet in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Terminated. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-07.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Termininated for business reasons
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,022
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a one year, 2-part study to determine the efficacy and safety of preladenant, an adenosine type 2a (A2a) receptor antagonist. The purpose of Part 1 (first 26 weeks) is to determine if preladenant is effective in the treatment of early Parkinson's Disease. The purpose of Part 2 (second 26 weeks) is to determine if preladenant is safe and well tolerated. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that at least the 10 mg twice daily dose of preladenant is superior to placebo as measured by the change from Baseline to Week 26 in the sum of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts 2 and 3 scores (UPDRS2+3).

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,022 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a diagnosis of idiopathic PD for \< 5 years.
  • If receiving amantadine and/or anticholinergics, must have been on a stable regimen of treatment for at least the 5 weeks immediately before Screening. (Note: Participants who are not taking any medications for PD are permitted to enroll in this trial.)
  • Must have a UPDRS Part 3 score of ≥10, a Hoehn and Yahr Stage ≤3, be ≥30 to ≤85 years of age, and have results of Screening clinical laboratory tests drawn within 5 weeks prior to randomization, clinically acceptable to the investigator, and not within the parameters specified for exclusion.
  • If sexually active or plan to be sexually active, must agree to use a highly effective method of birth control while the participant is in the study and for 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A male participant must also not donate sperm during the trial and within 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must not have a form of drug-induced or atypical Parkinsonism, cognitive impairment (ie, Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score \<22), bipolar disorder, untreated major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder; history of exposure to a known neurotoxin, or any neurological features not consistent with the diagnosis of PD as assessed by the investigator.
  • Must not have had surgery for PD.
  • Must not have a history of repeated strokes with stepwise progression of Parkinsonism or head injuries, or a stroke within 6 months of screening; poorly controlled diabetes; abnormal renal function; or a severe or ongoing unstable medical condition.
  • Must not have failed to show a therapeutic response if a diagnostic levodopa (L dopa) challenge had been done with a large test dose (>500 mg) of L dopa (if malabsorption excluded), or failed to respond to an adequate previous treatment with dopaminergic therapy.
  • Must not have been treated with L dopa or dopamine agonists for 30 days or more. A participant who has been treated with L-dopa or dopamine agonists for \<30 days will be allowed to enter the study. These participants must stop taking dopaminergic medication 30 days prior to Randomization.
  • Must not be at imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others.
  • Must not have elevated blood pressure (BP) (systolic BP ≥150 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥95 mm Hg) that cannot be adequately controlled with antihypertensive medication, as demonstrated by 2 BP measurements meeting acceptable BP criterion at consecutive scheduled or unscheduled visits between Screening and Randomization (a 5-6 week period), one of which must be the Randomization visit.
  • Must not have had any clinically significant cardiovascular event or procedure for 6 months prior to Randomization, including, but not limited to, myocardial infarction, angioplasty, unstable angina, or heart failure; and a participant must not have heart failure staged New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
  • Must not have an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate amino transferase (AST) ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin (T BIL) ≥ 1.5 x ULN.
  • Must not have active serologically-confirmed hepatic dysfunction (defined as viral infection [Hepatitis B, C, or E; Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)]; cytomegalovirus [CMV] or a history of diagnosis of drug- or alcohol-induced hepatic toxicity or frank hepatitis, or a history of diagnosis of drug- or alcohol-induced hepatic toxicity or frank hepatitis.)
  • Must not have a history within the past 5 years of a primary or recurrent malignant disease with the exception of adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or in situ prostate cancer with a normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) post resection.
  • Must not have received certain prespecified medications or ingested high tyramine-containing aged cheeses (eg, Stilton) for a prespecified time window before the trial, during the trial, and for 2 weeks after the trial.
  • Must not have an average daily consumption of more than three 4 ounce glasses (118 mL) of wine or the equivalent.
  • Must not have a severe or ongoing unstable medical condition (eg, any form of clinically significant cardiac disease, symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, seizures, or alcohol/drug dependence.)
  • Must not have allergy/sensitivity to investigational product(s) or its/their excipients.
  • Must not be breast-feeding, considering breast-feeding, pregnant or intending to become pregnant.
  • Must not have used preladenant ever, or any investigational drugs within 90 days immediately before screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,022 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Preladenant 2 mg

    Preladenant 2 mg oral tablet and placebo for rasagiline taken in the morning (AM) followed by preladenant 2 mg oral tablet taken in the evening (PM) for 26 weeks (Part 1) and then for another 26 weeks (Part 2).

    Drug: Preladenant 2 mg tablet · Drug: Placebo for Rasagiline 1 mg capsule

  • Experimental
    Preladenant 5 mg

    Preladenant 5 mg oral tablet and placebo for rasagiline taken in the AM followed by preladenant 5 mg taken in the PM for 26 weeks (Part 1) and then for another 26 weeks (Part 2).

    Drug: Preladenant 5 mg tablet · Drug: Placebo for Rasagiline 1 mg capsule

  • Experimental
    Preladenant 10 mg

    Preladenant 10 mg oral tablet and placebo for rasagiline taken in the AM followed by preladenant 10 mg taken in the PM for 26 weeks (Part 1) and then for another 26 weeks (Part 2).

    Drug: Preladenant 10 mg tablet · Drug: Placebo for Rasagiline 1 mg capsule

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo for preladenant and placebo for rasagiline taken in the AM followed by placebo for preladenant taken in the PM for 26 weeks (Part 1); preladenant 5 mg was taken twice daily for 26 weeks (Part 2).

    Drug: Preladenant 5 mg tablet · Drug: Placebo for Rasagiline 1 mg capsule · Drug: Placebo for Preladenant

  • Active comparator
    Rasagiline

    Rasagiline 1 mg oral capsule and placebo for preladenant taken in the AM followed by placebo for preladenant taken in the PM for 26 weeks (Part 1) and then for another 26 weeks (Part 2).

    Drug: Rasagiline 1 mg capsule · Drug: Placebo for Preladenant

Interventions

  • DrugPreladenant 2 mg tablet

    Preladenant 2 mg oral tablet taken twice daily

    Also known as: SCH 420814

  • DrugPreladenant 5 mg tablet

    Preladenant 5 mg oral tablet taken twice daily

    Also known as: SCH 420814

  • DrugPreladenant 10 mg tablet

    Preladenant 10 mg oral tablet taken twice daily

    Also known as: SCH 420814

  • DrugRasagiline 1 mg capsule

    Rasagiline 1 mg oral capsule taken once daily

    Also known as: Azilect

  • DrugPlacebo for Rasagiline 1 mg capsule

    Placebo for rasagiline 1 mg oral capsule taken once daily

  • DrugPlacebo for Preladenant

    Placebo for preladenant 2 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg oral tablet taken twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Sum of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Scores (UPDRS2+3)

    The UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability. The UPDRS assesses six features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. The UPDRS Part 2 is the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score and can range from 0-52 as determined by the physician. The UPDRS Part 3 is the Motor Examination (Total Motor Score \[TMS\]) and is defined as the total score, ranging from 0-108 as determined by the physician, of the tests given in the motor examination section. The combined scores of Parts 2 and 3 can range from 0-160 with the higher score indicating the worse condition. Change from baseline was analyzed using a constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) model with treatment, time, strata and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 1

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 26

  3. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 1

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 26

  4. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 2

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

    Time frame: Week 27 to Week 52

  5. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 2

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

    Time frame: Week 27 to Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responders (Participants With a ≥20% Improvement in UPDRS2+3)

    UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability; it assesses 6 features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. UPDRS Part 2 is Activities of Daily Living score and ranges from 0-52. UPDRS Part 3 is Motor Examination and ranges from 0-108. The combined scores of Parts 2 and 3 can range from 0-160 with the higher score indicating the worse condition. A Responder is defined as a participant with at least 20% improvement in UPDRS2+3 from Baseline to Week 26 (End of Part 1 Treatment); a participant with at least a 20% decrease from Baseline score in UPDRS2+3 is defined as a responder. The proportion of Responders was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment effect, strata and Baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate, and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and subject as random effect.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

  2. Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Part 2 Score (Activities of Daily Living [ADL])

    The UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability. The UPDRS assesses six features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. The UPDRS Part 2 is the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score and can range from 0-52 as determined by the physician with the higher score indicating the worse condition. Change from baseline was analyzed using a cLDA model with treatment, time, strata and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2016

Participant flow

Participants with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD for less than 5 years were selected to participate in this study.

Part I
Participant flow — Part I
MilestonePreladenant 2 mgPreladenant 5 mgPreladenant 10 mgPlaceboRasagiline
Started204204206204204
Treated200202204198203
Completed166177167177181
Not completed3827392723
Withdrew: Adverse event1381876
Withdrew: Administrative22200
Withdrew: Did not meet protocol eligibility31213
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1113889
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00110
Withdrew: Treatment failure30312
Withdrew: Did not receive treatment42261
Withdrew: Non-compliance with protocol21332
Part II
Participant flow — Part II
MilestonePreladenant 2 mgPreladenant 5 mgPreladenant 10 mgPlaceboRasagiline
Started166177167177181
Completed107116109127126
Not completed5961585055
Withdrew: Adverse event76834
Withdrew: Administrative4349363846
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject841273
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10001
Withdrew: Treatment failure01201
Withdrew: Non-compliance with protocol01020

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Sum of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Scores (UPDRS2+3)

The UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability. The UPDRS assesses six features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. The UPDRS Part 2 is the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score and can range from 0-52 as determined by the physician. The UPDRS Part 3 is the Motor Examination (Total Motor Score \[TMS\]) and is defined as the total score, ranging from 0-108 as determined by the physician, of the tests given in the motor examination section. The combined scores of Parts 2 and 3 can range from 0-160 with the higher score indicating the worse condition. Change from baseline was analyzed using a constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) model with treatment, time, strata and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in the Sum of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Scores (UPDRS2+3)
Score on a ScalePreladenant 2 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Rasagiline (Part 1)
Change From Baseline in the Sum of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Scores (UPDRS2+3)0.3 ± 0.63-1.0 ± 0.60-1.8 ± 0.61-2.2 ± 0.61-1.9 ± 0.61
Statistical analysis
  • Preladenant 2 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.0033 · Difference in estimated means: 2.60 · 95% CI 0.86 to 4.30
  • Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.1382 · Difference in estimated means: 1.30 · 95% CI -0.41 to 2.94
  • Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.6378 · Difference in estimated means: 0.40 · 95% CI -1.29 to 2.11
  • Placebo (Part 1) vs Rasagiline (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.6923 · Difference in estimated means: 0.30 · 95% CI -1.35 to 2.03
SecondaryPercentage of Responders (Participants With a ≥20% Improvement in UPDRS2+3)

UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability; it assesses 6 features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. UPDRS Part 2 is Activities of Daily Living score and ranges from 0-52. UPDRS Part 3 is Motor Examination and ranges from 0-108. The combined scores of Parts 2 and 3 can range from 0-160 with the higher score indicating the worse condition. A Responder is defined as a participant with at least 20% improvement in UPDRS2+3 from Baseline to Week 26 (End of Part 1 Treatment); a participant with at least a 20% decrease from Baseline score in UPDRS2+3 is defined as a responder. The proportion of Responders was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment effect, strata and Baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate, and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and subject as random effect.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Responders
Percentage of Responders (Participants With a ≥20% Improvement in UPDRS2+3)
Percentage of RespondersPreladenant 2 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Rasagiline (Part 1)
Percentage of Responders (Participants With a ≥20% Improvement in UPDRS2+3)25.90 (18.95 to 34.33)29.50 (22.50 to 37.72)31.50 (24.06 to 40.02)35.20 (27.49 to 43.82)33.10 (25.60 to 41.51)
Statistical analysis
  • Preladenant 2 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · generalized linear mixed model · p = 0.0785 (p-value is for the estimated Odds Ratio based on a generalized linear mixed model with baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effect and participant as random effect.) · Difference vs placebo (%): -9.7 · 95% CI -21.0 to 1.82
  • Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · generalized linear mixed model · p = 0.2735 (p-value is for the estimated Odds Ratio based on a generalized linear mixed model with baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effect and participant as random effect.) · Difference vs placebo (%): -6.3 · 95% CI -17.6 to 5.05
  • Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · generalized linear mixed model · p = 0.4823 (p-value is for the estimated Odds Ratio based on a generalized linear mixed model with baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effect and participant as random effect.) · Difference vs placebo (%): -3.7 · 95% CI -15.2 to 7.99
  • Placebo (Part 1) vs Rasagiline (Part 1) · generalized linear mixed model · p = 0.6827 (p-value is for the estimated Odds Ratio based on a generalized linear mixed model with baseline UPDRS2+3 as a covariate and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effect and participant as random effect.) · Difference vs placebo (%): -2.3 · 95% CI -13.9 to 9.24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the UPDRS Part 2 Score (Activities of Daily Living [ADL])

The UPDRS is a clinician based rating scale used to measure motor impairments and disability. The UPDRS assesses six features of PD impairment. These are evaluated using a combination of data collected by interview and examination of the participant. The UPDRS Part 2 is the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score and can range from 0-52 as determined by the physician with the higher score indicating the worse condition. Change from baseline was analyzed using a cLDA model with treatment, time, strata and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects and participant as a random effect.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Part 2 Score (Activities of Daily Living [ADL])
Score on a ScalePreladenant 2 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Rasagiline (Part 1)
Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Part 2 Score (Activities of Daily Living [ADL])0.30 ± 0.220.10 ± 0.21-0.20 ± 0.21-0.40 ± 0.21-0.20 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • Preladenant 2 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.0235 · Difference in estimated means: 0.70 · 95% CI 0.09 to 1.27
  • Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.1093 · Difference in estimated means: 0.50 · 95% CI -0.11 to 1.04
  • Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1) vs Placebo (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.5756 · Difference in estimated means: 0.20 · 95% CI -0.42 to 0.75
  • Placebo (Part 1) vs Rasagiline (Part 1) · constrained longitudinal analysis · p = 0.6657 · Difference in estimated means: 0.10 · 95% CI -0.45 to 0.70
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 1

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 1
ParticipantsPreladenant 2 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Rasagiline (Part 1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 1108110121102105
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 1

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 1
ParticipantsPreladenant 2 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 1)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Rasagiline (Part 1)
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 11382086
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 2

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

Time frame:
Week 27 to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 2
ParticipantsPreladenant 2 mg (Part 2)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 2)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 2)Placebo (Part 2)Rasagiline (Part 2)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Part 2116120113120119
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 2

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.

Time frame:
Week 27 to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 2
ParticipantsPreladenant 2 mg (Part 2)Preladenant 5 mg (Part 2)Preladenant 10 mg (Part 2)Placebo (Part 2)Rasagiline (Part 2)
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Due to an AE in Part 275834

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 54 weeks (including 2 weeks of follow-up). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Preladenant 2 mg - Part 1—4/200 (2%)33/200 (16.5%)
Preladenant 5 mg - Part 1—5/202 (2.5%)39/202 (19.3%)
Preladenant 10 mg - Part 1—8/204 (3.9%)40/204 (19.6%)
Placebo - Part 1—3/198 (1.5%)36/198 (18.2%)
Rasagiline - Part 1—9/203 (4.4%)34/203 (16.7%)
Preladenant 2 mg - Part 2—7/166 (4.2%)18/166 (10.8%)
Preladenant 5 mg - Part 2—1/177 (0.6%)22/177 (12.4%)
Preladenant 10 mg - Part 2—8/167 (4.8%)17/167 (10.2%)
Placebo/Preladenant 5 Mg-Part 2—4/177 (2.3%)16/177 (9%)
Rasagiline - Part 2—8/181 (4.4%)19/181 (10.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent serious events
EventPreladenant 2 mg - Part 1Preladenant 5 mg - Part 1Preladenant 10 mg - Part 1Placebo - Part 1Rasagiline - Part 1Preladenant 2 mg - Part 2Preladenant 5 mg - Part 2Preladenant 10 mg - Part 2Placebo/Preladenant 5 Mg-Part 2Rasagiline - Part 2
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders0/2000/2021/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/2000/2021/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Femur FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Uterine LeiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Suicide AttemptPsychiatric disorders0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Cystitis HaemorrhagicRenal and urinary disorders0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1771/181
PhlebitisVascular disorders0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2031/1660/1770/1670/1770/181
Acute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders0/2000/2020/2040/1980/2030/1660/1771/1670/1770/181
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPreladenant 2 mg - Part 1Preladenant 5 mg - Part 1Preladenant 10 mg - Part 1Placebo - Part 1Rasagiline - Part 1Preladenant 2 mg - Part 2Preladenant 5 mg - Part 2Preladenant 10 mg - Part 2Placebo/Preladenant 5 Mg-Part 2Rasagiline - Part 2
HeadacheNervous system disorders13/20010/20215/2045/19810/20311/1664/1779/1675/1777/181
TremorNervous system disorders8/2007/2023/20411/1986/2037/16611/1775/1678/1776/181
HypertensionVascular disorders4/20011/20211/20411/19811/2031/1665/1776/1674/1775/181
DizzinessNervous system disorders7/20011/2025/2049/19810/2034/1661/1774/1671/1776/181
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/2009/20211/2045/1983/2031/1661/1774/1674/1772/181
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/20010/2028/2046/1986/2033/1669/1773/1677/1777/181

Baseline characteristics

All Participants as Randomized

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Preladenant 2 mgPreladenant 5 mgPreladenant 10 mgPlaceboRasagilineTotal
Mean63.0 ± 10.562.3 ± 10.263.8 ± 11.163.3 ± 10.062.9 ± 10.263.1 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Preladenant 2 mgPreladenant 5 mgPreladenant 10 mgPlaceboRasagilineTotal
Female7890908285425
Male126114116122119597
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Stocchi F, Rascol O, Hauser RA, Huyck S, Tzontcheva A, Capece R, Ho TW, Sklar P, Lines C, Michelson D, Hewitt DJ; Preladenant Early Parkinson Disease Study Group. Randomized trial of preladenant, given as monotherapy, in patients with early Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017 Jun 6;88(23):2198-2206. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004003. Epub 2017 May 10. PubMed 28490648 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01155479
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2010
Start date
Jul 6, 2010
Primary completion
Jul 16, 2013
Completion
Jul 16, 2013
Results posted
Jul 28, 2016
Last update
Nov 7, 2018

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion