CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01154517Updated Jul 1, 2010

Utility of the History and Physical Exam in the Emergency Department

An observational study in Abdominal Pain, Back Pain and Dyspnea, sponsored by Henry Ford Health System. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-07-01.

Sponsored by Henry Ford Health System · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is trying to prove that the history and physical exam (H\&P) in the emergency department is the most important tool in exam of patients. The investigator is attempting to correlate the time of the H\&P of residents and attendings to the accuracy of diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the study is to examine the utility of the history and physical exam in the emergency room towards obtaining a diagnosis. The goal of this observational study is to correlate physician level of experience and time spent on history and physical exam, to the correct diagnosis.

The aim of this study is:

  1. To draw a connection between time and accuracy of the history and physical exam.
  2. To draw a connection between time and level of experience as a physician based on post-graduate level.
  3. To assess the number of laboratory and radiographic studies and the post-graduate level.
  4. To assess the relevance of the labs and radiographs ordered. (Relevance is defined as something that changes plan of care.)

Time is a critical component of the ED physician. Our study will analyse if modern medicine has created a more laboratory/image based need to ascertain a diagnosis or if history and physical examination alone can predict the ultimate diagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Pain
  • Back Pain
  • Dyspnea
  • Headache
  • Weakness
03

In context

Dyspnea

656 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspnea; 153 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 128 is close to the median of 122 across 204 observational studies indexed under Dyspnea.

Browse Dyspnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Henry Ford Health System is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Emergency Department Patients

Inclusion criteria

  • Anyone over the age of 18 with a generalized complaints able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone under 18 yrs and anyone with a very specific, system based complaint.
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Henry Ford Macomb Hospital
    Clinton Township, Michigan 48038, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01154517
Lead sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
First posted
Jul 1, 2010
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Last update
Jul 1, 2010

Study contacts

Jennifer Stevenson, DO
study director · Henry Ford Macomb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion