ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01124448PROBIOLACUpdated Aug 20, 2014Results posted

Global Effects of a Probiotic Strain on Lactating Women

An interventional study of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 and Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 in Mastitis, sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-08-20.

Sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In this study, the investigators will try to confirm if application of probiotic strains isolated from breast milk actually have a beneficial effect on women suffering lactational mastitis. This project has been design to offer an integrated vision of the effects of probiotherapy (Lactobacillus salivarius PS2) on the human host. Therefore, the investigators propose a multidisciplinary approach involving the application of microbiological, immunological, genomic, metagenomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic techniques. The hypothesis is that probiotherapy will cause different effects on the host, and the objective is the finding of markers that may support the beneficial effect of the strain in such condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mastitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Mastitis

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Mastitis; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 114 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Mastitis.

Browse Mastitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Complutense de Madrid is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Normal term pregnancy
  • Lactating women
  • Healthy breastfed infant

Women with mastitis:

  • Clinical symptoms of mastitis
  • Painful breastfeeding
  • Count of staphylococci, streptococci and/or corynebacteria in milk higher than 3,000 colony-forming units/mL
  • Leukocyte count in milk higher 6 log10/mL

Women without mastitis:

  • No clinical symptoms of mastitis
  • No painful breastfeeding
  • Count of staphylococci, streptococci and/or corynebacteria in milk lower than 500 colony-forming units/mL
  • Leukocyte count in milk lower 5 log10/mL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to cow's milk protein
  • Intolerance to lactose
  • Antibiotic treatment
  • Breast abscess
  • Raynaud syndrome
  • Any parallel disease
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lactobacillus salivarius PS2

    Women with mastitis (n=25) receiving Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 (9.5 log per day, 21 days)

    Biological: Lactobacillus salivarius PS2

  • Active comparator
    Lactobacillus salivarius PS2B

    Lactating women without mastitis (n=15)

    Biological: Lactobacillus salivarius PS2

Interventions

  • BiologicalLactobacillus salivarius PS2

    9.5 log10 (colony-forming units), freeze-dried powder, daily for 21 days

  • BiologicalLactobacillus salivarius PS2

    9.5 log10 colony-forming units, oral route, freeze-dried powder, daily for 21 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evidence of Clinically Definite Mastitis Confirmed by Microbiological Cultures and Somatic Cell Counts

    Total milk bacterial count at the end of the study (after probiotic administration for 21 days), measured as log10 of the number of colony-forming units per mL of milk

    Time frame: one week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evidence of Changes in Gene Expression of Somatic Cells Obtained From Milk Samples

    Time frame: one year

  2. Evidence of Changes in the Metabolic Profile of Urine

    Time frame: One year

  3. Evidence of Changes in the Macronutrient and Electrolyte Profiles of Milk

    Time frame: One year

  4. Evidence of Changes in the Immunological Profile of Milk

    Time frame: one year

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2B
Started2515
Completed2312
Not completed23
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up03
Withdrew: Protocol violation20

Outcome measures

PrimaryEvidence of Clinically Definite Mastitis Confirmed by Microbiological Cultures and Somatic Cell Counts

Total milk bacterial count at the end of the study (after probiotic administration for 21 days), measured as log10 of the number of colony-forming units per mL of milk

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · log10 CFU/mL
Evidence of Clinically Definite Mastitis Confirmed by Microbiological Cultures and Somatic Cell Counts
log10 CFU/mLLactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2B
Evidence of Clinically Definite Mastitis Confirmed by Microbiological Cultures and Somatic Cell Counts3.09 (2.90 to 3.28)2.90 (2.12 to 3.70)
SecondaryEvidence of Changes in Gene Expression of Somatic Cells Obtained From Milk Samples
Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryEvidence of Changes in the Metabolic Profile of Urine
Time frame:
One year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryEvidence of Changes in the Macronutrient and Electrolyte Profiles of Milk
Time frame:
One year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryEvidence of Changes in the Immunological Profile of Milk
Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2—0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2B—0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This study was designed to evaluate a high number of microbiological, biochemical or immunological parameters before and after the administration of a probiotic to women with mastitis and to elucidate which of them can be useful as biomarkers in future studies. The number of participants was considered suitable for such purpose.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2BTotal
Mean28.2 ± 7.729.0 ± 7.828.6 ± 7.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2BTotal
Female251540
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2BTotal
Spain251540
Total milk bacterial count (initial)
Total milk bacterial count (initial)(log10 CFU/mL)Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2Lactobacillus Salivarius PS2BTotal
Mean4.08 ± 0.203.19 ± 0.593.63 ± 0.39
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Dpt. Nutricion, Bromatologia y Tecnologia de los Alimentos
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Arroyo R, Martin V, Maldonado A, Jimenez E, Fernandez L, Rodriguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1551-8. doi: 10.1086/652763. PubMed 20455694 ↗
  • Jimenez E, Fernandez L, Maldonado A, Martin R, Olivares M, Xaus J, Rodriguez JM. Oral administration of Lactobacillus strains isolated from breast milk as an alternative for the treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(15):4650-5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02599-07. Epub 2008 Jun 6. PubMed 18539795 ↗
  • Vazquez-Fresno R, Llorach R, Marinic J, Tulipani S, Garcia-Aloy M, Espinosa-Martos I, Jimenez E, Rodriguez JM, Andres-Lacueva C. Urinary metabolomic fingerprinting after consumption of a probiotic strain in women with mastitis. Pharmacol Res. 2014 Sep;87:160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 29. PubMed 24880136 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Sep 2013 and a completion of Dec 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2014, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 14, 2010
First posted
May 17, 2010
Start
Mar 2011
Primary completionActual
Sep 2013
CompletionActual
Dec 2013
Results first posted
Aug 20, 2014
Last update
Aug 20, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01124448
Collaborators
National Research Council, Spain, University of Valencia, Danone Global Research & Innovation Center
Responsible party
Juan M. Rodríguez (Professor, PhD, Universidad Complutense de Madrid) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 17, 2010
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Aug 20, 2014
Last update
Aug 20, 2014

Study contacts

Juan M Rodríguez, PhD
study director · Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion