ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01112735Updated Jul 6, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of ARTISS for Flap Adherence in Abdominoplasty

A Phase 2 interventional study of FS VH S/D 4 s-apr (= two-component fibrin sealant, double virus inactivated, made from pooled human plasma) and Standard of care in Seroma and Hematoma, sponsored by Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-06.

Sponsored by Baxter Healthcare Corporation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ARTISS versus standard of care in adhering tissue places and reducing seroma/hematoma formation in subjects undergoing abdominoplasty.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seroma
  • Hematoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Abdominoplasty
  • Flap adherence in subjects undergoing abdominoplasty to eliminate dead space and reduce seroma/hematoma formation
03

In context

Seroma

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Seroma; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Seroma.

Browse Seroma studies →

Lead sponsor

Baxter Healthcare Corporation is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is 18 to 75 years of age at the time of screening
  • Subject is planned for primary standard abdominoplasty (status post Cesarean section or liposuction performed more than 6 months prior to enrollment in the study are allowed)
  • If the subject is of ; presents with a negative pregnancy test, and agrees to employ adequate measures for the duration of the study
  • Subject resides within 100 miles of the site and is willing and able to comply with the scheduling requirements of the protocol (notably home visits by study personnel)
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is obese ( [BMI] > 30 before surgery)
  • Subject has experienced massive weight loss (subject has a history of obesity during adult life; subject lost more than 20 BMI unit score, subject has undergone a bariatric surgery)
  • Subject has a history of active smoking within the previous 12 months
  • Subject is elected for a non-standard abdominoplasty (extended, limited or mini-abdominoplasty, endoscopic, fleur-de-lis or circumferential abdominoplasty) or panniculectomy
  • Subject has scars on the abdominal wall above the umbilicus. Vertical midline, laparoscopic punctures, or liposuction punctures are permitted
  • Subject is planned for other "body lifting" procedures (eg to the arms, legs, back etc.)
  • Subject is planned for combined abdominoplasty with other cosmetic procedures including liposuction (restricted liposuction of the waist line and the lower back is allowed, as long as the integrity of the surgical spaces is maintained)
  • Subject has an active or chronic skin disorder, history or evidence of keloid formation, or hypertrophic scarring
  • Subject has a history of gastrointestinal disorders (eg Irritable Bowel Syndrome) requiring prescription medications
  • Subject has a known abdominal hernia that requires mesh fixation
  • Subject has a documented hiatal hernia or acid reflux disease
  • Subjects with congenital or acquired immunodeficiency disorders
  • Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus ( > 7.0)
  • Subject has a history of cardio-vascular disease including uncontrolled hypertension (> 140/90 mm Hg)
  • Subject has a clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorder (including obsessive compulsive disorders)
  • Subject has a known (documented) bleeding or coagulation disorder including history of thromboembolic events
  • Subject is being treated with anti-coagulants or with Aspirin (that was not discontinued 7 days prior to surgery)
  • Subject is receiving active treatment for a
  • Subject has a connective tissue disorder
  • Subject has received chronic treatment with drugs, systemic , or other chronic treatments within 30 days prior to the surgery
  • Subject has participated in another clinical study involving an product (IP) or investigational device within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study
  • Subject has a known sensitivity to fibrin sealants
  • Subject is a friend, employee, or relative of the investigator or other study personnel
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ARTISS

    ARTISS will be used as an adjuvant to standard of care.

    Biological: FS VH S/D 4 s-apr (= two-component fibrin sealant, double virus inactivated, made from pooled human plasma)

  • Other
    Standard of care

    Standard of care

    Procedure: Standard of care

Interventions

  • BiologicalFS VH S/D 4 s-apr (= two-component fibrin sealant, double virus inactivated, made from pooled human plasma)

    Drug page: Fibrin Tissue Adhesive

    Dosage form: spray (aerosolized sealant), Dosage frequency: once (1 layer). ARTISS will be applied onto the fascia or the wound bed.

    Also known as: ARTISS

  • ProcedureStandard of care

    Standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Drainage Volume Collected Until Drain Removal

    Drainage fluids were to be collected through the Blake drain and into the collection bulb. The drainage volume was measured and recorded daily until the removal of the drain. During scheduled visits, measurement was to be performed at the study site, and on non-visit day recording of the drainage volume was to be done by a visiting home care nurse (or other study personnel). The drain was ready to be removed when the drainage volume in a given 24 hour period was \<=30 cc.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Seroma

    The investigator inspected each subject post surgery (Day 0) an each scheduled visit (Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90) to determine whether there were any areas on the abdominal wall that meet the definition of seroma. A seroma is a pocket of clear serous fluid that sometimes develops in the body after surgery. This fluid is composed of blood plasma that has seeped out of ruptured small blood vessels and inflammatory fluid produced by the injured and dying cells.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90

  2. Occurrence of Hematoma

    The investigator inspected each subject post surgery (Day 0) an each scheduled visit (Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90) to determine whether there were any areas on the abdominal wall that meet the definition of hematoma. A hematoma is a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90

  3. Time to Drain Removal

    The drain was ready to be removed when the drainage volume in a given 24 hour period was \<=30cc.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) up to Day 90

  4. Number of Fluid Aspiration for Seromas

    Number of interventions recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90

  5. Total Volume of Fluid Aspirations for Seromas

    Volume of fluid recovered was recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90

  6. Change From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 2 Inches Above Umbilicus

    Test administered on abdomen midline using a set of different size Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. These instruments are used to measure the cutaneous sensory perception threshold of patients. Each monofilament represents a unique amount of force. The force applied by each monofilament increases with each ascending size. Testing begins with small to large monofilaments. A higher score indicates a greater loss of sensation. Evaluator Size=ES, Hand \& Dorsal Foot Thresholds=HDFT, Normal=N, Diminished Light Touch=DLT,Diminished Protective Sensation=DPS, Loss of Protective Sensation=LOPS, Deep Pressure Sensation Only=DPSO: ES=1.65 (minimum),HDFT=N;ES=2.36,HDFT=N;ES=2.44,HDFT=N;ES=2.83,HDFT=N;ES=3.22,HDFT=DLT;ES=3.61,HDFT=DLT;ES=3.84,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.08,HDFT=DPS;ES-4.17,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.31,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.56,HDFT=LOPS;ES=4.74,HDFT=LOPS;ES=4.93,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.07,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.18,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.46,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.88,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.10,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.45,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.65 (maximum),HDFT=DPSO.

    Time frame: Days 0 (Baseline), 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90

  7. Change From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 1 Inch Below Umbilicus

    Test administered on abdomen midline using a set of different size Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. These instruments are used to measure the cutaneous sensory perception threshold of patients. Each monofilament represents a unique amount of force. The force applied by each monofilament increases with each ascending size. Testing begins with small to large monofilaments, pressing at a 90 degree angle for approximately 1.5 seconds against the skin until it bows then it is removed. The patient is instructed to respond when a stimuli is felt, and a score is applied based on the monofilament in use. A higher score indiactes a greater loss of sensation.

    Time frame: Days 0 (Baseline), 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90

  8. Summary of Pain Assessment by Visit

    Subjects were to be presented with a non-verbal visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure the level of pain (rating 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\]) the patient experienced at the site of surgery at the time of the visit.

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90

  9. Summary of Numbness Assessment by Visit

    Subjects were to be presented with a non-verbal VAS to measure the level of numbness (rating 0 \[no numbness\] to 10 \[complete numbness\]) that the patient experienced at the time of the visit.

    Time frame: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90

07

Results

Posted Jul 6, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneARTISSStandard of Care
Started2020
Completed2020
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Drainage Volume Collected Until Drain Removal

Drainage fluids were to be collected through the Blake drain and into the collection bulb. The drainage volume was measured and recorded daily until the removal of the drain. During scheduled visits, measurement was to be performed at the study site, and on non-visit day recording of the drainage volume was to be done by a visiting home care nurse (or other study personnel). The drain was ready to be removed when the drainage volume in a given 24 hour period was \<=30 cc.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Total Drainage Volume Collected Until Drain Removal
mLARTISSStandard of Care
Total Drainage Volume Collected Until Drain Removal407.45 ± 470.36595.90 ± 519.46
SecondaryOccurrence of Seroma

The investigator inspected each subject post surgery (Day 0) an each scheduled visit (Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90) to determine whether there were any areas on the abdominal wall that meet the definition of seroma. A seroma is a pocket of clear serous fluid that sometimes develops in the body after surgery. This fluid is composed of blood plasma that has seeped out of ruptured small blood vessels and inflammatory fluid produced by the injured and dying cells.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90
Reported as:
Number · Events
Occurrence of Seroma
EventsARTISSStandard of Care
Occurrence of Seroma85
SecondaryOccurrence of Hematoma

The investigator inspected each subject post surgery (Day 0) an each scheduled visit (Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90) to determine whether there were any areas on the abdominal wall that meet the definition of hematoma. A hematoma is a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90
Reported as:
Number · Events
Occurrence of Hematoma
EventsARTISSStandard of Care
Occurrence of Hematoma00
SecondaryTime to Drain Removal

The drain was ready to be removed when the drainage volume in a given 24 hour period was \<=30cc.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) up to Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to Drain Removal
DaysARTISSStandard of Care
Time to Drain Removal6.8 ± 7.119.55 ± 5.82
SecondaryNumber of Fluid Aspiration for Seromas

Number of interventions recorded.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · Interventions
Number of Fluid Aspiration for Seromas
InterventionsARTISSStandard of Care
Number of Fluid Aspiration for Seromas5 ± 4.343.2 ± 1.64
Statistical analysis
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.5621
SecondaryTotal Volume of Fluid Aspirations for Seromas

Volume of fluid recovered was recorded.

Time frame:
Day 0 (Surgery Day) to Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Total Volume of Fluid Aspirations for Seromas
mLARTISSStandard of Care
Total Volume of Fluid Aspirations for Seromas226.13 ± 157.78152.2 ± 150.34
Statistical analysis
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3595
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 2 Inches Above Umbilicus

Test administered on abdomen midline using a set of different size Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. These instruments are used to measure the cutaneous sensory perception threshold of patients. Each monofilament represents a unique amount of force. The force applied by each monofilament increases with each ascending size. Testing begins with small to large monofilaments. A higher score indicates a greater loss of sensation. Evaluator Size=ES, Hand \& Dorsal Foot Thresholds=HDFT, Normal=N, Diminished Light Touch=DLT,Diminished Protective Sensation=DPS, Loss of Protective Sensation=LOPS, Deep Pressure Sensation Only=DPSO: ES=1.65 (minimum),HDFT=N;ES=2.36,HDFT=N;ES=2.44,HDFT=N;ES=2.83,HDFT=N;ES=3.22,HDFT=DLT;ES=3.61,HDFT=DLT;ES=3.84,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.08,HDFT=DPS;ES-4.17,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.31,HDFT=DPS;ES=4.56,HDFT=LOPS;ES=4.74,HDFT=LOPS;ES=4.93,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.07,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.18,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.46,HDFT=LOPS;ES=5.88,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.10,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.45,HDFT=LOPS;ES=6.65 (maximum),HDFT=DPSO.

Time frame:
Days 0 (Baseline), 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 2 Inches Above Umbilicus
Units on a ScaleARTISSStandard of Care
Day 30.92 ± 1.790.89 ± 1.69
Day 70.55 ± 1.370.73 ± 1.34
Day 140.78 ± 1.420.54 ± 1.08
Day 280.63 ± 1.410.53 ± 1.28
Day 600.5 ± 1.260.3 ± 1.46
Day 900.38 ± 0.950.19 ± 1.17
Statistical analysis
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9417
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.5488
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.7107
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8809
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4598
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3837
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 1 Inch Below Umbilicus

Test administered on abdomen midline using a set of different size Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. These instruments are used to measure the cutaneous sensory perception threshold of patients. Each monofilament represents a unique amount of force. The force applied by each monofilament increases with each ascending size. Testing begins with small to large monofilaments, pressing at a 90 degree angle for approximately 1.5 seconds against the skin until it bows then it is removed. The patient is instructed to respond when a stimuli is felt, and a score is applied based on the monofilament in use. A higher score indiactes a greater loss of sensation.

Time frame:
Days 0 (Baseline), 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Postoperative Skin Sensitivity 1 Inch Below Umbilicus
Score on a ScaleARTISSStandard of Care
Day 31.81 ± 1.831.78 ± 1.67
Day 71.47 ± 1.321.02 ± 1.52
Day 141.28 ± 1.470.49 ± 1.25
Day 281.21 ± 1.430.81 ± 1.45
Day 600.97 ± 1.670.50 ± 1.55
Day 901.00 ± 1.680.84 ± 1.42
Statistical analysis
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9699
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4709
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.1406
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4291
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.2704
  • ARTISS vs Standard of Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.7564
SecondarySummary of Pain Assessment by Visit

Subjects were to be presented with a non-verbal visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure the level of pain (rating 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\]) the patient experienced at the site of surgery at the time of the visit.

Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Summary of Pain Assessment by Visit
Score on a ScaleARTISSStandard of Care
Day 33.68 ± 2.404 ± 2.03
Day 72.7 ± 2.112.8 ± 1.79
Day 141.7 ± 1.531.7 ± 1.34
Day 281.05 ± 1.730.37 ± 0.50
Day 600.37 ± 0.760.3 ± 0.57
Day 900.3 ± 0.920.15 ± 0.37
SecondarySummary of Numbness Assessment by Visit

Subjects were to be presented with a non-verbal VAS to measure the level of numbness (rating 0 \[no numbness\] to 10 \[complete numbness\]) that the patient experienced at the time of the visit.

Time frame:
Day 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Summary of Numbness Assessment by Visit
Score on a ScaleARTISSStandard of Care
Day 35.16 ± 3.246.30 ± 2.39
Day 75.50 ± 2.544.95 ± 2.21
Day 144.45 ± 2.524.35 ± 2.32
Day 283.25 ± 1.923.42 ± 2.61
Day 603.37 ± 1.743.16 ± 2.29
Day 902.85 ± 1.692.11 ± 1.91

Adverse events

Collected over 90 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ARTISS0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)10/20 (50%)
Standard of Care0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)7/20 (35%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventARTISSStandard of Care
HypertensionVascular disorders1/200/20
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventARTISSStandard of Care
SeromaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications8/205/20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/200/20
Skin NecrosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/202/20
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/200/20
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/200/20
Incision Site InfectionInfections and infestations1/201/20
Abdominal AbscessInfections and infestations0/201/20
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/201/20
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/200/20
Wound DehiscenceInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/200/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)ARTISSStandard of CareTotal
Mean40.90 ± 7.8945.60 ± 10.3243.25 ± 9.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ARTISSStandard of CareTotal
Female201939
Male011
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ARTISSStandard of CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino6713
Not Hispanic or Latino141327
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ARTISSStandard of CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White182038
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Mei Li Surgery Center
    Beverly Hills, California 90210, United States
  • Center for Plastic Surgery and Skin Care
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Miami Plastic Surgery
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • Places Plastic Surgery
    Atlanta, Georgia 30327, United States
  • The Practice of Gary Wiesman, M.D. and Irvin Wiesman, M.D. and Associates
    Chicago, Illinois 60654, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery
    Dallas, Texas 75390-9132, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2010, a primary completion of Dec 2010 and a completion of Feb 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2018, 7 years 7 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Feb 2012.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2010
First posted
Apr 28, 2010
Start
May 2010
Primary completionActual
Dec 2010
CompletionActual
Feb 2011
Results delay requested
Feb 2, 2012
Results first posted
Jul 6, 2018
Last update
Jul 6, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01112735
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2010
Start date
May 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Feb 2011
Results posted
Jul 6, 2018
Last update
Jul 6, 2018

Study contacts

Steve Z Abrams, MD, MBA
study director · Baxter Healthcare Corporation
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fibrin Tissue Adhesive

Start the discussion