ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01110187Updated Apr 28, 2014Results posted

A Pilot Study of NSICU Assessment of Seizure Prophylaxis With Lacosamide

An interventional study of lacosamide and Fosphenytoin in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Terminated at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-28.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Lack of enrollement
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trial to determine if seizure prophylaxis with IV LCM in NSICU patients experiencing mental status changes due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) will result in improved short- and long-term outcomes and better immediate adverse effects when compared to the current standard of care anticonvulsant (IV fPHT) and will be at least as effective as IV fPHT in preventing clinical and sub-clinical seizure activity.

Read the detailed description

The goals are to compare IV LCM and IV fPHT for seizure prophylaxis in the neuro-critical care setting in terms of the following outcome measures:

  1. The short- and long-term incidence of adverse events related to the anticonvulsant medication
  2. The frequency of clinically-evident and sub-clinical seizures, as demonstrated by continuous EEG monitoring for the first three days and by clinical assessment for up to 6 months after initial admission.
  3. Intermediate and long-term outcomes as measured by standard outcome measures including Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, Disability Rating Scale, and Resource Utilization Questionnaire
02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Lacosamide
  • Fosphenytoin
  • traumatic brain injury
  • Glasgow coma scale
  • Disability Rating Scale
  • Resource Utilization Questionnaire
  • Continuous EEG
  • seizures
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 460 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 55 across 1,158 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,415 studies on the registry; 277 are open to participants now.

Of its 160 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject with traumatic brain injury admitted to the hospital less than 24 hours prior to randomization
  • GCS score 3-8 (inclusive) or GCS motor score of 5 or less and abnormal admission CT scan showing intracranial pathology
  • Hemodynamically stable with a systolic BP > 90 mmHg
  • At least one reactive pupil
  • Age at least 18 years
  • Signed informed consent and HIPAA authorization for research form
  • Patients will not be excluded because of race, gender, educational status or occupation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No venous access
  • Spinal cord injury
  • History of or CT confirmation of previous brain injury such as brain tumor, cerebral infarct, or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Hemodynamically unstable
  • Suspected anoxic events
  • Other peripheral trauma likely to result in liver failure
  • Age less than 18 years of age
  • Known hypersensitivity to any anticonvulsant
  • Any treatment, condition, or injury that contraindicates treatment with Lacosamide (LCM) or fos-phenytoin (fPHT)
  • Inability to obtain signed informed consent or HIPAA authorization for research
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IV LCM (lacosamide)

    Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachanoid hemorrhage (SAH) randomized to seizure prophylaxis with either lacosamide.

    Drug: lacosamide

  • Active comparator
    IV fPHT (fos-phenytoin)

    Patients with TBI or SAH randomized to seizure prophylaxis with fos-phenytoin

    Drug: Fosphenytoin

Interventions

  • 200 mg IV over 60 minutes; these patients will then be started on a maintenance dose 100 mg, IV BID as prophylaxis administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days. The Lacosamide dose can be adjusted as needed if seizures occur for therapeutic effect up to 200 mg bid (400 mg/d) as a maximum dose.

    Also known as: Vimpat

  • 20 mgPE/kg IV over 60 minutes and then will be started on a maintenance dose (5 mgPE/kg/day, rounded to nearest dose of 150 mgPE IV, BID administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days

    Also known as: Dilantin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Adverse Events

    The primary outcome measure is the incidence of clinical adverse events. These will be followed by daily clinical observations during the hospital stay. Subjects will be evaluated for e.g., seizures, fever, neurological changes, cardiovascular, hematologic and dermatologic abnormalities, liver failure, renal failure, and death; EKGs will be requested as per ICU routines through day 7.

    Time frame: baseline to 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Seizures

    Number of seizures in the first 72 hours based on EEG recording

    Time frame: baseline to 72 hours

07

Results

Posted Apr 28, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Early termination due to lack of enrollment. Statistical comparisons between groups are not possible and were not performed.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIV LCMIV fPHT
Started74
Completed74
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Adverse Events

The primary outcome measure is the incidence of clinical adverse events. These will be followed by daily clinical observations during the hospital stay. Subjects will be evaluated for e.g., seizures, fever, neurological changes, cardiovascular, hematologic and dermatologic abnormalities, liver failure, renal failure, and death; EKGs will be requested as per ICU routines through day 7.

Time frame:
baseline to 7 days
Reported as:
Number · number of events experienced
Number of Adverse Events
number of events experiencedIV LCMIV fPHT
Number of Adverse Events1221
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Seizures

Number of seizures in the first 72 hours based on EEG recording

Time frame:
baseline to 72 hours
Reported as:
Number · number of participants with seizures
Number of Participants With Seizures
number of participants with seizuresIV LCMIV fPHT
Number of Participants With Seizures00

Adverse events

Collected over baseline to 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IV LCM—2/7 (28.6%)7/7 (100%)
IV fPHT—0/4 (0%)4/4 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIV LCMIV fPHT
deathNervous system disorders2/70/4
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIV LCMIV fPHT
feverInvestigations3/73/4
increased ICPNervous system disorders0/73/4
LFTHepatobiliary disorders1/73/4
strokeNervous system disorders1/73/4
arrythmiaCardiac disorders1/73/4
anemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/72/4
low plateletsBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/72/4
HypotensionInvestigations0/71/4
skin reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/71/4

Baseline characteristics

Traumatic Brain Injury

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IV LCMIV fPHTTotal
Median57 (38 to 66)55.5 (23 to 61)56 (23 to 66)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IV LCMIV fPHTTotal
Female303
Male448
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • UC Health University Pointe
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45069, United States
  • UC Health Medical Arts Building
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • University Hospital
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Szaflarski JP, Sangha KS, Lindsell CJ, Shutter LA. Prospective, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9304-y. PubMed 19898966 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01110187
Collaborators
UCB Pharma
Responsible party
Jerzy P Szaflarski (Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 26, 2010
Start date
May 2010
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Apr 28, 2014
Last update
Apr 28, 2014

Study contacts

Jerzy P Szaflarski, M.D., PhD
principal investigator · Univeristy of Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lacosamide

Start the discussion