An observational study in Pregnancy and Fetal and Neonatal Health, sponsored by University of Luebeck. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 12 Weeks to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-03.
Sponsored by University of Luebeck · Observational
Neural tube defects are one of the most prevalent congenital abnormalities, surpassed only by cardiac malformations. Spina bifida accounts for the majority of the neural tube defects and is comprised of a wide spectrum of anomalies ranging from small isolated sacral dysraphisms to large spinal defects. The origin of spina bifida is a failure of neurulation. It usually occurs at 15 days post-conception, resulting in a bony spinal defect with extrusion of the neural placode and/or the meninges outside of the spinal canal. Spina bifida has a prevalence of 1-5 in 1,000 live births and is the most complex congenital abnormality compatible to long-time survival. Concerning psychomotor development as well as urinary bladder and intestinal morbidity the prognosis ranges from normal functional outcome to severe disability.
The diagnosis of serious fetal abnormalities such as spinal dysraphism by ultrasound screening allows patients to prepare for the birth of an impaired child or to consider termination of the pregnancy. In current practice, prenatal counseling and obstetric management depend not only on the detection of a spinal dysraphism but also on an appropriate assessment of the severity of the defect and its possible impact on the postnatal development of the affected child.
Level and type of lesion, presence of associated anomalies (e.g., Chiari II malformation and ventriculomegaly) and mode of surgical closure are factors known to have prognostic impact on the postnatal outcome. Previous studies reported that postnatally determined lesion levels correlated well with functional status and survival. On the contrary, it is still not clear whether similar data obtained antenatally are of value.
In this study, the investigators will review their database of all cases of prenatally diagnosed spina bifida within a 16 year period between 1993 and 2009. By analyzing the prenatal and postnatal characteristics of fetuses with spina bifida in relation to the anatomic level of the lesion, the investigators aim to contribute further information regarding the natural course of affected pregnancies and the correlation of prenatal ultrasound findings with their functional outcome.
152 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Dysraphism; 37 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 103 is above the median of 91 across 54 observational studies indexed under Spinal Dysraphism.
Browse Spinal Dysraphism studies →University of Luebeck is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Fetuses with spina bifida identified at prenatal ultrasound examination between 1993 and 2009
Exclusion Criteria:
spinal lesion at thoracal level detected at prenatal ultrasound exam
spinal lesion at lumbar level detected at prenatal ultrasound exam
spinal lesion at sacral level detected at prenatal ultrasound exam
pregnancy outcome
To investigate the prenatal course and functional outcome of fetuses with spina bifida according to prenatal ultrasound exam.
Time frame: 17 yrs
Infant psychomotor development
Kaufmann ABC Denver Developmental Screening Test walking ability muscle strenght
Time frame: 17 yrs
Infant bladder and bowel function
Degree of continence.
Time frame: 17 yrs
Conception date
Time frame: 17 yrs
spectrum of ultrasound signs
Time frame: 17yrs
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Luebeck