ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01091415Updated Mar 24, 2010

Comparison of Volar Locking Plate Fixation Alone and Volar Locking Plate Fixation Plus Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement Augmentation for Distal Radius Fractures Patients Aged More Than 65

An interventional study of calcium phosphate bone cement injection in Distal Radius Fracture, sponsored by Ewha Womans University. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-03-24.

Sponsored by Ewha Womans University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The incidence of distal radius fracture (DRF) increases with age, and thus, because of improving life expectancies, these fractures are set to become more common. Fractures of the distal radial metaphysis are known to be strongly related to osteoporosis, and as a result, the management of distal radius fractures in elderly patients is beset with difficulties.

Recently, more aggressive fracture fixation in the elderly has become a topic of interest, in the hope of increasing the rate of recovery to preserve the ability to live independently. Many elderly patients remain active well into their eighth and ninth decades, for example, some pursue activities, such as, golf and tennis, on a daily basis. The introduction of volar locking plating system has increased this interest. This system, which uses a fixed angle principle, has been proposed to be effective at maintaining good anatomic reduction, even in the elderly. However, there is a still concern about remaining metaphyseal defect after reduction of the osteoporotic DRF.

Injectable calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC) has been used to augment the remaining metaphyseal defect after fracture reduction including DRF, specially in osteoporotic old patients. The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to investigate that additional CPC augmentation has any benefit over volar locking plate fixation in unstable DRF patient who is older than 65. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference of wrist functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications between treatment of volar locking plate alone and calcium phosphate bone cement as well as volar locking plate in unstable DRF patient who is older than 65.

02

Conditions studied

  • Distal Radius Fracture

Browse trials for

03

In context

Wrist Fractures

331 studies on the registry are indexed under Wrist Fractures; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 64 across 269 interventional studies indexed under Wrist Fractures.

Browse Wrist Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Ewha Womans University is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients older than 65 years old with an acute DRF were considered for inclusion for this study. Inclusion criterion of this study was an unacceptable closed reduction after one attempt of closed reduction. The criteria of unacceptable closed reduction included dorsal angulation of > 100, volar angulation of > 200, an articular gap or step off of >2 mm, radial inclination of \<100, or radial shortening of > 5mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A preexisting severe illness
  • An ipsilateral upper extremity injury
  • A previous wrist injury
  • Surgical delay of more than 2 weeks
  • A concomitant ulnar neck fracture.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    calcium phosphate bone cement

    one arm; volar locking plate alone the other arm; calcium phosphate bone cement as well as volar locking plate

    Procedure: calcium phosphate bone cement injection

Interventions

  • Procedurecalcium phosphate bone cement injection

    volar locking plate alone versus calcium phosphate bone cement as well as volar locking plate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcomes

    grip strength, wrist range of motion, subjective wrist pain, modified Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score

    Time frame: 12 months postoepratively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiographic outcomes

    radial inclination and volar angulation and ulnar variance

    Time frame: postoperatively 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ewha Womans University Hospital
    Seoul, 158-710, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Orbay JL, Fernandez DL. Volar fixed-angle plate fixation for unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly patient. J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jan;29(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.015. PubMed 14751111 ↗
  • Larsson S, Bauer TW. Use of injectable calcium phosphate cement for fracture fixation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Feb;(395):23-32. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00004. PubMed 11937863 ↗
  • Ring D, Jupiter JB. Treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S80-4. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1808-x. Epub 2004 Dec 22. PubMed 15614440 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01091415
Lead sponsor
Ewha Womans University
First posted
Mar 24, 2010
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Mar 24, 2010

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion