CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01064999Updated Mar 14, 2012

A Trial of High Intensity Versus Low Intensity Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by Fudan University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-03-14.

Sponsored by Fudan University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2012), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the standard therapy for local advanced rectal cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) is an important prognostic factor for local control and survival. A high intensity CRT increases not only the pCR rate, but also toxicity, especially diarrhea. Compared with traditional RT technique, intensity-modified radiation therapy (IMRT) can decrease the toxicity of diarrhea because of low volume of high dose for small bowel. Therefore, IMRT technique provides an opportunity to improve the dose intensity of neoadjuvant CRT. The investigators hypothesize that a higher treatment dose induces a high rate of pCR and design a two-arm trial. in this trial, low intensity CRT includes the whole pelvic irradiation of 50Gy together with Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine weekly. While in high intensity group, additional concomitant 5Gy for primary tumor and a cycle of Xelox are prescribed. All patients will receive a total mesorectal excision (TME) 8 weeks after CRT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • locally advanced rectal cancer
  • intensity-modulated radiation therapy
  • pathological complete response
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,762 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 518 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 65 across 1,298 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 1,270 studies on the registry; 623 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma
  • Clinical staged T3/4 or any node-positive disease
  • Age: 18-75 years
  • Karnofsky Performance Status > 80
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve, renal and hepatic functions
  • Without previous antitumoural chemotherapy
  • No evidence of metastatic disease
  • Written informed consent before randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pelvis radiotherapy.
  • Previous antitumoural chemotherapy
  • Clinically significant internal disease
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High intensity group

    (RT 55Gy + CapOx) + a cycle of Xelox + Surgery

    Drug: Oxaliplatin · Drug: Capecitabine · Radiation: Radiotherapy · Procedure: Surgery

  • Active comparator
    Low instensity group

    (RT 50Gy + CapOx) + Surgery

    Drug: Oxaliplatin · Drug: Capecitabine · Radiation: Radiotherapy · Procedure: Surgery

Interventions

  • DrugOxaliplatin

    CRT:50mg/m2,IV,weekly\*5 cycle CT: 130mg/m2,IV,d1,q 21 day

  • DrugCapecitabine

    CRT:625mg/m2,bid,d1-5,q week RT:1000mg/m2,bid,d1-14,q 3 weeks

  • RadiationRadiotherapy

    High intensity group:55Gy Low intensity group:50Gy

  • ProcedureSurgery

    Lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the rate of pathological complete response (pCR)

    Time frame: within 14days after surgery

  2. toxicity

    Time frame: every week during radiotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. local recurrence

    Time frame: every half year after surgery

  2. disease-free survival

    Time frame: every half year after surgery

  3. overall survival

    Time frame: every half year after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cancer Hospital, Fudan University
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200032, China
    • Zhen Zhang, MD · Principal investigator
    • Ji Zhu, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang J, Guan Y, Gu W, Yan S, Zhou J, Huang D, Tong T, Li C, Cai S, Zhang Z, Zhu J. Long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with versus without a concomitant boost in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial (FDRT-002). Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 29;14(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1420-z. PubMed 31783766 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01064999
Lead sponsor
Fudan University
Collaborators
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, First People Hospital of Zhejiang, RenJi Hospital
Responsible party
Zhen Zhang (Division Head, Division of Radiation Oncology,Cancer Hospital, Fudan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2010
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2012

Study contacts

Ji Zhu, MD
Contact
leo.zhu@126.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion