CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01053741Updated May 25, 2017Results posted

Effect of Seminal Fluid on the Colon Wall; Implications for HIV Transmission

An interventional study of Radiolabeled autologous seminal fluid and Radiolabeled Normosol-R in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-25.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This research is being done to learn how seminal fluid affects the lining of the colon, and whether this might make it easier for HIV to get into the body and cause infection.

Read the detailed description

Design of effective rectal microbicides to prevent HIV infection requires an understanding of rectal HIV transmission and the location within the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract (luminal and mucosal) of HIV (cell-free and cell-associated) following exposure to infected seminal fluid. These basic details of HIV transmission have yet to be determined in human subjects, yet they are essential to select microbicide candidates if they are to be rationally designed to achieve effective concentrations at sites of HIV transmission. Rational development of a rectal microbicide also requires an understanding of those factors that may contribute to colonic mucosal injury - potential confounders of microbicidal effect. Such factors include exposure to seminal fluid which has been shown in animal and in vitro studies to cause histologic and permeability changes that might facilitate HIV transmission.

02

Conditions studied

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to provide signed informed consent
  • Men of 21 years or older.
  • Prior history of receptive anal intercourse.
  • Laboratory values within the last 28 days:
  • Negative for HIV antibodies
  • Lymphocyte count within normal limits
  • Neutrophil count > 1,000 cells/ml
  • Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count > 500 cells/ml
  • Platelet count ≥ 150,000 cells/mm3
  • Prothrombin Time (PT) within normal limits
  • Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits.
  • No childbearing intentions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active anorectal disease or recent (3 months) anorectal surgery;
  • Diarrhea, defined as three or more loose stools per day, for at least three days prior to admission.
  • History of sleep apnea, or airway problems with previous sedation procedures.
  • History of significant adverse reaction to sedation medications.
  • Other history, including significant occupational radiation exposure, history of inflammatory bowel disease or any other diseases and lab results, such that, in the judgment of the investigator, study procedures are not considered safe for the subject's participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Seminal Fluid then Normosol

    2.5 mL radiolabeled autologous seminal fluid administered rectally x1. Two week pause between interventions. Then 2.5 mL radiolabeled Normosol-R administered rectally X1.

    Biological: Radiolabeled autologous seminal fluid · Biological: Radiolabeled Normosol-R

  • Experimental
    Normosol then Seminal Fluid

    2.5 mL radiolabeled Normosol-R administered rectally x1. Two week pause between interventions. Then 2.5 mL radiolabeled autologous seminal fluid administered rectally X1.

    Biological: Radiolabeled autologous seminal fluid · Biological: Radiolabeled Normosol-R

Interventions

  • BiologicalRadiolabeled autologous seminal fluid

    Autologous lymphocytes labeled with 250 microcuries In-111 and 500 microcuries Tc-99m in seminal fluid vehicle.

  • BiologicalRadiolabeled Normosol-R

    Autologous lymphocytes labeled with 250 microcuries In-111 and 500 microcuries Tc-99m in Normosol-R fluid vehicle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Epithelial Disruption Graded by a Pathologist Blinded to Study Intervention.

    Endoscopy will be performed to obtain biopsy specimens at baseline and following each inpatient enema exposure. Samples will be obtained at each flexible sigmoidoscopy and set aside for batch sectioning and H\&E staining. Slides will be reviewed and scored by a qualified pathologist blinded to treatment assignment using a qualitative scoring system. This scoring system uses semi-quantitative scoring that focuses on acute toxicity to epithelial cell layer similar to that seen in animal studies. This is a categorical grading scale, where 0 = Epithelial surface intact;1 = \<1/3 of surface denuded; 2 = 1/3 - 2/3rds of surface denuded;3 = More than 2/3rds of surface denuded. Six separate biopsies for each subject and each treatment intervention were analyzed in a multi-level analysis. In comparison with the baseline condition (no intervention), the odds and 95% confidence interval (CI) of having a higher epithelial denudation score were calculated for each intervention.

    Time frame: One hour

07

Results

Posted May 25, 2017

Participant flow

Recruitment initiated September 2008, completed October 2009. Study participants recruited from previous trial participation and advertisements posted in the medical institutions.

1st Intervention
Participant flow — 1st Intervention
MilestoneSeminal Fluid, Then Normosol-RNormosol-R Then Seminal Fluid
Started56
Completed56
Not completed00
14 Day Washout
Participant flow — 14 Day Washout
MilestoneSeminal Fluid, Then Normosol-RNormosol-R Then Seminal Fluid
Started56
Completed56
Not completed00
2nd Study Intervention
Participant flow — 2nd Study Intervention
MilestoneSeminal Fluid, Then Normosol-RNormosol-R Then Seminal Fluid
Started56
Completed55
Not completed01
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryEpithelial Disruption Graded by a Pathologist Blinded to Study Intervention.

Endoscopy will be performed to obtain biopsy specimens at baseline and following each inpatient enema exposure. Samples will be obtained at each flexible sigmoidoscopy and set aside for batch sectioning and H\&E staining. Slides will be reviewed and scored by a qualified pathologist blinded to treatment assignment using a qualitative scoring system. This scoring system uses semi-quantitative scoring that focuses on acute toxicity to epithelial cell layer similar to that seen in animal studies. This is a categorical grading scale, where 0 = Epithelial surface intact;1 = \<1/3 of surface denuded; 2 = 1/3 - 2/3rds of surface denuded;3 = More than 2/3rds of surface denuded. Six separate biopsies for each subject and each treatment intervention were analyzed in a multi-level analysis. In comparison with the baseline condition (no intervention), the odds and 95% confidence interval (CI) of having a higher epithelial denudation score were calculated for each intervention.

Time frame:
One hour
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Epithelial Disruption Graded by a Pathologist Blinded to Study Intervention.
units on a scaleSeminal FluidNormosol-R
Epithelial Disruption Graded by a Pathologist Blinded to Study Intervention.1.0 (0.92 to 1.17)1.17 (1.04 to 1.46)
Statistical analysis
  • Seminal Fluid vs Normosol-R · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Seminal Fluid—0/10 (0%)4/10 (40%)
Normosol-R—0/10 (0%)3/10 (30%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSeminal FluidNormosol-R
Gas/bloatingGastrointestinal disorders4/103/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Seminal Fluid Then NormosolNormosol-R Then Seminal FluidTotal
Median44 (34 to 50)40 (21 to 48)41.5 (21 to 50)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Seminal Fluid Then NormosolNormosol-R Then Seminal FluidTotal
Male gender5510
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Seminal Fluid Then NormosolNormosol-R Then Seminal FluidTotal
United States5510
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University Drug Development Unit
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is an exploratory physiologic study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01053741
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2010
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Results posted
May 25, 2017
Last update
May 25, 2017

Study contacts

Edward Fuchs, PA-C, MBA
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion