CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01043432Updated May 12, 2015Results posted

Executive Dysfunction and Suicide in Psychiatric Outpatients and Inpatients

An observational study in Traumatic Brain Injury and Suicidality, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-12.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
133
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Those with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk for suicidal behavior, and suicidality is associated with executive dysfunction. In the aim of highlighting an important risk factor, this study will assess decision making in the context of an interaction between suicide and TBI. Findings will also allow for exploratory analyses aimed at identifying associations between performance on measures of executive functioning and psychological distress. The long-term objective of this study is to increase understanding regarding executive dysfunction, as a multidimensional construct, with the ultimate goal of conceptualizing assessment tools and interventions aimed at decreasing suicidality in the at-risk population of veterans with a history of TBI.

Read the detailed description

Recent studies indicate that veterans who engage in suicidal behavior have a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and veterans with a history of TBI engage in suicidal behavior. Existing research also suggests an association between suicidality and executive dysfunction (e.g., impaired decision making). To date a clearly defined study has not been conducted to explore the relationship between executive dysfunction as a multidimensional construct (i.e., decision making, impulsivity, concept formation, and aggression) and suicidal behavior in the vulnerable population of those with a history of moderate to severe TBI. Increased understanding regarding this at-risk population is necessary to facilitate the creation of appropriate assessment strategies and interventions. This study will assess decision making in the context of an interaction between suicide and TBI. Findings will also allow for exploratory analyses aimed at identifying associations between performance on measures of executive functioning and psychological distress. Toward this end, the present study seeks to compare test performance among four well-defined groups of veterans: (1) those with moderate to severe TBI and a history of suicidal behavior; (2) those with moderate to severe TBI and no history of suicidal behavior; (3) those with no TBI and a history of suicidal behavior; (4) and those with no TBI and no history of suicidal behavior. This grant proposal is in direct support of the Rehabilitation Research and Development goal of maximizing functional recovery in those with TBI by potentially: 1) increasing clinicians' ability to identify neuropsychological correlates of suicidal behavior for those with moderate to severe TBI; 2) identifying psychometrically sound measures of executive functioning that correspond to real-life behaviors that impact treatment response and recovery; 3) facilitating the creation of innovative assessment techniques and psychosocial interventions (e.g., safety planning) to minimize complications in the management of suicidal behavior due to TBI-related impairments; and 4) creating a basis for further and much-needed research in this area. Ultimately, findings from this study would both contribute to clinicians' ability to identify veterans with TBI who are at risk for suicidal behavior, and create a foundation on which to base further research regarding the relationships between cognition, emotional distress, and suicidality in TBI survivors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Suicidality

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Suicide
  • Executive Function
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 133 is above the median of 100 across 690 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The participants in this observational study will be all individuals willing and eligible from the following populations: 1) those admitted to the locked inpatient psychiatric unit at the Eastern Colorado Health Care System (ECHCS) Denver VA Medical Center (VAMC); 2) those seeking outpatient mental health, rehabilitative, or psychological or other services at the Denver VAMC or Colorado Springs Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) or other CBOC's; 3) those in an ECHCS domiciliary (e.g., Valor Point); 4) those on existing clinical and research databases; and 5) veterans in the community not seeking care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65
  • Ability to provide adequate effort (CARB score of Type 1 or 2)
  • Determination of positive or negative history of moderate or severe TBI
  • Determination of positive or negative history of suicidal behavior
  • Ability to adequately respond to questions regarding the informed consent procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of neurological conditions other than moderate or severe TBI
  • Inability to adequately respond to questions regarding the informed consent procedure
  • Inability to provide adequate effort (CARB score of Type 3 or 4)
  • History of a psychotic or bipolar I mood disorder
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse in the past 7 days
  • Participating in another study in which the results of this study may be impacted
  • History of non-alcohol substance abuse within the last 30 days as identified on the SCID substance use module
  • History of same-day drug or alcohol abuse as identified on the UWRAP pre-administration questionnaire Veterans who report using substances the day of the study visit will be placed on hold and will be rescreened in 30 and 60 days
  • History of mild TBI only
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
133 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Moderate/severe TBI and history of suicidal behavior Group 1

    Moderate/severe TBI and history of suicidal behavior

  • Moderate/Severe TBI and no history of suicidal behaviorGroup

    Moderate/Severe TBI and no history of suicidal behavior

  • No TBI and a history of suicidal behavior Group 3

    No TBI and a history of suicidal behavior

  • No TBI and no history of suicidal behavior Group 4

    No TBI and no history of suicidal behavior

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Iowa Gambling Test

    Iowa Gambling Test - Total Raw Score The Iowa Gambling task requires examinees to sit in front of a computer screen displaying four decks of cards (Decks A, B, C, and D) and select a card from any of the four decks. Decks A and B are the disadvantageous decks because they produce high immediate gains however over time examinees will experience a higher loss. Decks C and D are the advantageous decks because they produce lower gains but over time examinees will experience smaller losses. Examinees will make 100 choices (trials). To measure performance, the 100 trials are divided, in order, into 5 'blocks' of 20. A net score is calculated for each block as the number of cards selected from the advantageous decks minus the disadvantageous decks and the total raw score is the sum of the scores for blocks 1-5. The overall total score can range from -100 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome)and the score for each block can range from -20 to 20

    Time frame: One time - for the vast majority of participants the research protocol was initiated directly after informed consent procedures were completed (within hours). Negative values are possible with this measure, see Outcome Description.

07

Results

Posted May 12, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Majority of control group had lifetime history of psychiatric disorders Significant challenges with recruiting

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
Started22511248
Completed22511248
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryIowa Gambling Test

Iowa Gambling Test - Total Raw Score The Iowa Gambling task requires examinees to sit in front of a computer screen displaying four decks of cards (Decks A, B, C, and D) and select a card from any of the four decks. Decks A and B are the disadvantageous decks because they produce high immediate gains however over time examinees will experience a higher loss. Decks C and D are the advantageous decks because they produce lower gains but over time examinees will experience smaller losses. Examinees will make 100 choices (trials). To measure performance, the 100 trials are divided, in order, into 5 'blocks' of 20. A net score is calculated for each block as the number of cards selected from the advantageous decks minus the disadvantageous decks and the total raw score is the sum of the scores for blocks 1-5. The overall total score can range from -100 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome)and the score for each block can range from -20 to 20

Time frame:
One time - for the vast majority of participants the research protocol was initiated directly after informed consent procedures were completed (within hours). Negative values are possible with this measure, see Outcome Description.
Reported as:
Mean · Total Raw on a scale from -100 to 100
Iowa Gambling Test
Total Raw on a scale from -100 to 100Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
Iowa Gambling Test-4.2 ± 27.71.7 ± 26.63.5 ± 24.55.3 ± 25.5
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1 vs Group 2 vs Group 3 vs Group 4 · Regression, Linear · p = >.05

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Groups—0/133 (0%)0/133 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Moderate/Severe TBI and History of Suicidal Behavior Group 1Moderate/Severe TBI and no History of Suicidal behaviorGroup 2No TBI and a History of Suicidal Behavior Group 3No TBI and no History of Suicidal Behavior Group 4Total
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years22511248133
>=65 years00000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Moderate/Severe TBI and History of Suicidal Behavior Group 1Moderate/Severe TBI and no History of Suicidal behaviorGroup 2No TBI and a History of Suicidal Behavior Group 3No TBI and no History of Suicidal Behavior Group 4Total
Mean49.5 ± 10.353 ± 8.551.7 ± 1254.2 ± 7.652.7 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Moderate/Severe TBI and History of Suicidal Behavior Group 1Moderate/Severe TBI and no History of Suicidal behaviorGroup 2No TBI and a History of Suicidal Behavior Group 3No TBI and no History of Suicidal Behavior Group 4Total
Female304815
Male1951840118
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Moderate/Severe TBI and History of Suicidal Behavior Group 1Moderate/Severe TBI and no History of Suicidal behaviorGroup 2No TBI and a History of Suicidal Behavior Group 3No TBI and no History of Suicidal Behavior Group 4Total
United States22511248133
History of TBI (Present or Absent) - Lifetime OSU TBI-ID
History of TBI (Present or Absent) - Lifetime OSU TBI-ID(participants)Moderate/Severe TBI and History of Suicidal Behavior Group 1Moderate/Severe TBI and no History of Suicidal behaviorGroup 2No TBI and a History of Suicidal Behavior Group 3No TBI and no History of Suicidal Behavior Group 4Total
Number22510073
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01043432
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2010
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
May 12, 2015
Last update
May 12, 2015

Study contacts

Lisa Anne Brenner, PhD
principal investigator · VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion