CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01042899RRTC--TOPSUpdated Mar 8, 2016

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Interventions--Teen Online Problem Solving Study

An interventional study of Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) and Teen Online Problem Solving--Teen Only (TOPS-TO) in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-08.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
153
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of an Internet-based psychosocial treatment in improving problem-solving, communication skills, stress management strategies, and coping among teens who have had a traumatic brain injury and their families.

Read the detailed description

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adolescents is a significant stressor for both the teen and his or her family. Existing interventions are rare and access to treatment can be restricted by distance and finances. Based on previous findings and participant feedback, we propose to expand the previously developed TOPS intervention by conducting a multi-site study comparing the efficacy of TOPS to that of TOPS-Teen Only (TOPS-TO) in improving child behavior and functioning, parental depression and distress and family functioning. The efficacy of both active treatments would be examined in relation to an internet resource comparison group (IRC). During years 1-3, we will recruit 165 children between the ages of 11 and 18 with moderate to severe TBI and randomly assign them to receive TOPS, TOPS-TO, or IRC. We anticipate that TOPS will result in improvements in child, caregiver, and family functioning relative to IRC; but that TOPS-TO will only result in improvements in child behavior and adjustment. Based on prior research, we anticipate that the family-level treatment model of TOPS may be more effective than TOPS-TO in improving child behavior for children/adolescents with fewer social resources. Given these expectations, we will test the following hypotheses: 1) Children with TBI receiving either TOPS or TOPS-TO will have fewer behavior problems, greater social competence, and better functioning than those receiving IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 2) Caregivers of children receiving TOPS will report less depression and psychological distress, less parent-child conflict, and better family functioning than those receiving TOPS-TO or IRC at both post-treatment and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. 3) Social resources will moderate treatment efficacy, such that children with limited social and economic resources will show greater improvements in the more comprehensive TOPS intervention. We hypothesize better teen problem solving and communication skills, fewer teen emotional/behavioral problems, less parental burden and distress, and less parent-teen conflict at follow-up among the TOPS group compared to the IRC group. TOPS makes use of emerging technology to address the multifaceted needs of teens following TBI with the goal of improving the teen's social and emotional functioning, thereby enabling him or her to better negotiate the complex transition to adulthood and independent functioning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • TBI
  • intracranial edema
  • brain edema
  • craniocerebral trauma
  • head injury
  • brain hemorrhage, traumatic
  • subdural hematoma
  • brain concussion
  • head injuries, closed
  • epidural hematoma
  • extra-axial hemorrhage
  • cortical contusion
  • wounds and injuries
  • disorders of environmental origin
  • trauma, nervous system
  • brain injuries
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 153 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe TBI that occurred within the last 18 months
  • Overnight hospital stay
  • English-speaking
  • Parent must be willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child does not live with parents or guardian
  • Child or parent has history of hospitalization for psychiatric problem
  • TBI is a result of child abuse
  • Child suffered a non-blunt injury (e.g., projectile wound, stroke, drowning, or other form of asphyxiation)
  • Diagnosed with moderate or severe mental retardation, autism, or a significant developmental disability
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
153 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS)

    Web intervention

    Behavioral: Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) · Behavioral: Teen Online Problem Solving--Teen Only (TOPS-TO) · Behavioral: Internet Resources Comparison (IRC)

  • Experimental
    Teen Online Problem Solving---Teen Only

    Web Intervention

    Behavioral: Teen Online Problem Solving--Teen Only (TOPS-TO)

  • Active comparator
    Internet Resources Comparison

    Web Intervention

    Behavioral: Internet Resources Comparison (IRC)

Interventions

  • BehavioralTeen Online Problem Solving (TOPS)

    The TOPS program has 10 sessions that provide training in stress management, problem solving, communication, and social skills to all enrolled families, while the remaining 6 sessions address content related to the stressors and burdens of individual families. Each self-guided online session includes real adolescents talking about how TBI affected them, content regarding the skill, video clips showing adolescents and/or families modeling the skill, and exercises giving the family an opportunity to practice the skill. After the completion of the self-guided web pages, the family will meet with the therapist via videoconference; the therapist will review the exercises and help the family implement the problem-solving process with a problem or goal identified by the family.

    Also known as: TOPS

  • BehavioralTeen Online Problem Solving--Teen Only (TOPS-TO)

    TOPS-TO targets the same skills as TOPS and includes largely the same website and intervention content. However, it differs with respect to the extent of family involvement in the sessions. In TOPS-TO, sessions will be conducted with the child or adolescent alone, rather than with the family as whole. Parents will be given access to the TOPS-TO website content via their own password protected site so they will understand the skills that their child is learning. However, only the adolescent, and not the parents, will participate in the synchronous videoconferences with the therapist.

    Also known as: TOPS-TO

  • BehavioralInternet Resources Comparison (IRC)

    Families in the IRC group will also receive a computer, printer, and high-speed internet access if they do not currently have these. Additionally, IRC families receive access to a home page of brain injury resources and links (identical to those given on the TOPS and TOPS-TO homepage) but will not be able to access specific session content. This will enable us to equate the groups with respect to access to the information and resources available on the Web.

    Also known as: IRC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent Report Measures

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Teen Self-Report Measures

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Neuropsychological Testing

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • The Children's Hospital
    Denver, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45224, United States
  • Rainbow Babies' and Children's Hospital
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Narad ME, Kaizar EE, Zhang N, Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Kurowski BG, Wade SL. The Impact of Preinjury and Secondary Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder on Outcomes After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2022 Aug 1;43(6):e361-e369. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001067. Epub 2022 Feb 15. PubMed 35170571 ↗
  • Wade SL, Fisher AP, Kaizar EE, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Zhang N. Recovery Trajectories of Child and Family Outcomes Following Online Family Problem-Solving Therapy for Children and Adolescents after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Oct;25(9):941-949. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000778. Epub 2019 Aug 13. PubMed 31405391 ↗
  • Narad ME, Raj S, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Kirkwood MW, Stancin T, Wade SL. Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Problem-Solving Intervention Following Adolescent Traumatic Brain Injury: Family Outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):811-820. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30738021 ↗
  • Wade SL, Kaizar EE, Narad M, Zang H, Kurowski BG, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Zhang N. Online Family Problem-solving Treatment for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6):e20180422. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0422. Epub 2018 Nov 9. PubMed 30413559 ↗
  • Lantagne A, Peterson RL, Kirkwood MW, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Yeates KO, Wade SL. Featured Article: Interpersonal Stressors and Resources as Predictors of Adolescent Adjustment Following Traumatic Brain Injury. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Aug 1;43(7):703-712. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy020. PubMed 29617953 ↗
  • Wade SL, Narad ME, Kingery KM, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Kirkwood MW, Yeates KO. Teen online problem solving for teens with traumatic brain injury: Rationale, methods, and preliminary feasibility of a teen only intervention. Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Aug;62(3):290-299. doi: 10.1037/rep0000160. PubMed 28836809 ↗
  • Wade SL, Cassedy AE, Fulks LE, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Kirkwood MW, Yeates KO, Kurowski BG. Problem-Solving After Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescence: Associations With Functional Outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1614-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 4. PubMed 28389109 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01042899
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Collaborators
MetroHealth Medical Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2010
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Mar 8, 2016

Study contacts

Sharil L Wade, PhD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion