ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01031537TBEVUpdated Jul 5, 2018Results posted

Vaccine Study for Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV)

A Phase 2 interventional study of FSME-IMMUN 0.5ml Baxter in Tick-Borne Encephalitis, Encephalitis, Tick-Borne and Tick-Borne Disease, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-05.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Manufacturer discontinued support of the study
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was an open label trial of a non-US licensed vaccine for tick-borne encephalitis. The vaccine was licensed by Baxter, and now following an acquisition by Pfizer Inc in Vienna, Austria since 2001, and has an extensive safety record in multiple European countries. Field effectiveness studies suggest > 99 percent protection against disease transmitted by the natural routes of either tick bite or ingestion of contaminated, unpasteurized milk. The vaccine is also considered to be effective against laboratory exposures and is used routinely for this purpose in European laboratories. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health acknowledge the effectiveness of the vaccine by allowing those who have received it to study tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in isolation facilities rated at BSL-3 rather than the more stringent BSL-4, with the exception of the Russian Spring-Summer Encephalitis strain. Subjects were recruited from personnel at 2 intramural campuses of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who may be exposed accidentally to any strain or serotype of viable TBEV. Approximately 160 individuals were eligible to participate. The rapid immunization schedule (injections on Days 0, 14, and 161) was used and subjects had labs drawn 21 days after the 2nd, 3rd and 4th vaccine injections to determine seroconversion. Subjects that seroconverted to TBEV were offered a booster dose of the vaccine 3 years from the date of receipt of the third dose of the vaccine. Subjects that were seropositive at entry into the study were offered a booster dose of the vaccine every 3 years from Day 0.

Read the detailed description

Infection by tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a significant health concern for humans in Europe and Asia. A vaccine is available in these regions and in Canada, but not in the United States. Research studies in Europe have shown the vaccine to be effective in preventing infection among the general population, where disease is transmitted either by the bite of an infected tick (most common) or by ingestion of contaminated unpasteurized milk or milk products. Persons who work with the virus in a research setting, however, have the potential of being exposed in unnatural ways, and may come into contact with concentrations of virus higher than those found naturally in ticks. The Food and Drug Administration is investigating the effectiveness of the existing vaccine. It is a killed vaccine, which means that it has been treated to ensure that it does not contain live agents (bacteria or virus). The manufacturer has tested the product for other possible contaminating agents and none have been detected. However, there is an unknown but small risk of exposure to undetected contaminating agents in the vaccine. This was an open label trial of a non-US licensed vaccine for tick-borne encephalitis. The vaccine has been licensed by Baxter, and now following an acquisition by Pfizer Inc in Vienna, Austria since 2001, and has an extensive safety record in multiple European countries. Field effectiveness studies suggest > 99 percent protection against disease transmitted by the natural routes of either tick bite or ingestion of contaminated, unpasteurized milk. The vaccine is also considered to be effective against laboratory exposures and is used routinely for this purpose in European laboratories. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health acknowledge the effectiveness of the vaccine by allowing those who have received it to study tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in isolation facilities rated at BSL-3 rather than the more stringent BSL-4, with the exception of the Russian Spring-Summer Encephalitis strain.

Subjects were recruited from personnel at 2 intramural campuses of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who may be exposed accidentally to any strain or serotype of viable TBEV. Approximately 160 individuals were eligible to participate.

Objectives: To test the safety and immune response to a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). To add a level of protection to persons who may have occupational exposure to TBEV to reduce their chances of developing infection from that exposure.

Eligibility: Individuals 18 years of age or older who are in generally good health and have the potential for occupational exposure to TBEV at one of the two National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases campuses.

Design: The full series of the vaccine included at least three doses by injection in the upper arm. The first and third dose of study vaccine were given in the muscle of the nondominant arm. The second dose was given in the dominant arm. Participation included at least 12 scheduled visits to the study center over approximately 3.5 years. An initial visit took place 7 to 21 days prior to the first injection. Blood samples were taken to test liver and kidney function, baseline antibody levels, and for possible pregnancy in female participants. Vaccine doses were given on days 0, 14, and 161. Participants were asked to complete a diary card on each day for one week following the vaccination to assess any reactions or side effects. At each visit after receipt of a vaccine, participants were asked about any side effects. Blood was drawn 14 days after the second injection and 21 days after the third injection in order to measure the level of antibodies and overall response to the vaccine. Subjects that developed a sufficiently high level of antibodies may (at the discretion of the laboratory chief) be allowed to work with strains of TBEV at Biosafety Level (BSL) 3 rather than BSL-4. Blood was drawn annually for 3 years to determine antibody level and response to the vaccine. Booster doses were provided if required.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tick-Borne Encephalitis
  • Encephalitis, Tick-Borne
  • Tick-Borne Disease
  • Glycoprotein E, Flavivirus
  • NSI Protein, Flavivirus

Keywords

  • FSME-Immun
  • TBEV
  • TBE Researcher
  • Plavivirus
  • Anti-TBEV Levels
  • Tic-Borne Encephalitis
03

In context

Encephalitis, Tick-Borne

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 69 is below the median of 192 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne.

Browse Encephalitis, Tick-Borne studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All subjects must meet the following criteria at study entry:

  • Be engaged in activities that place them at potential risk of occupational exposure to TBEV in its viable form at one of the participating intramural laboratories of NIAID
  • Be 18 years of age or older at the time of the first immunization.
  • Comprehend the study requirements.
  • Provide written to participate in this study.
  • Be in good health as determined by the Investigator, based upon medical history and a targeted physical examination.
  • Have a stable health status as determined by the Investigator.
  • Have access to a consistent means of telephone contact, which may be either in the home or at the workplace, land line or mobile, but NOT a pay phone or other multiple-user device (i.e., a common use phone serving multiple rooms or apartments).
  • Express availability for the required study period, and ability to attend scheduled visits.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

The following criteria should be checked at the time of the study entry. If any apply, the subject will not be included in the study:

  • The subject must not be participating in any other trial of an drug or vaccine for 1 month prior to the first injection through until 21 days after the third injection. (Given the nature of the work these study subjects engage in, exemptions to this proscription may be granted on a case by case basis after discussion between the Investigator and the IRB.)
  • The presence on the day of immunization of an oral temperature of >101.2 degrees F or acute symptoms other than mild severity.
  • Active systemic infectious process as determined by review of systems and physical examination. The subject may be enrolled at a later date once the illness has resolved.
  • Known immune suppression, such as that associated with infection, or other condition, to the extent that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is likely to have a poor response to the vaccine. This information will be obtained by history only. Serologic screening for these diseases will not be performed.
  • Presence of evidence of substance abuse or of neurological or psychiatric diagnoses which, even if clinically stable, are deemed by the Investigator to render the potential subject unable/unlikely to report promptly any adverse reactions to the vaccine.
  • Current diagnosis of leukemia, Hodgkin s disease, non-Hodgkin s lymphoma, or any other cancer, disease such as lupus, which is in and of itself a cause of to the point that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is likely to have a poor response to the vaccine.
  • Currently receiving systemic immunosuppressive chemotherapy or immunotherapy (including ) resulting in immune suppression to the point that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is likely to have a poor response to the vaccine.
  • Any neurological condition in which (in the opinion of the Investigator) the integrity of the blood brain barrier may have been compromised.
  • Licensed vaccines are not exclusionary but should be given at least 14 days before or after immunization (applies to each of the 3 scheduled TBEV injections) for inactivated vaccines and 30 days before or after immunization with any . This is in order to avoid potential confusion of adverse reactions. (Given the nature of the work these study subjects engage in, exemptions to this proscription may be granted on a case-by-case basis after discussion between the Investigator and the IRB.).
  • Previous anaphylactic reaction to any TBE vaccine.

Known or suspected anaphylactic reaction to any constituent of FSME IMMUN, to include formaldehyde, protamine sulfate, gentamicin and neomycin, or current egg allergy.

  • Known pregnancy, or anticipating becoming pregnant in the first 8 months of the study or a positive urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta hCG) test result prior to immunization. If subjects become pregnant at some point in time after the 1st injection, no further injections will be given until after the pregnancy is completed, they are no longer nursing or have a negative beta-hCG result.
  • Lactating or nursing.
  • Women of child bearing potential (defined as pre-menopausal who have not undergone either hysterectomy or tubal ligation) who lack a history of reliable practices. Reliable contraceptive practices (for the first 8 months of the study and within 21 days prior to or 42 days after booster immunizations) include:

    • Consistent abstinence from heterosexual activity
    • Consistent use of combined or progestogen oral contraceptives
    • Injectable progestogen
    • Implants of levonorgestrel
    • Estrogen or estrogen/progestogen vaginal ring
    • Percutaneous contraceptive patches
    • Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS)
    • Successful vasectomy of the sole male partner, or
    • Double barrier method (condom or occlusive cap plus spermicidal agent)
  • A history of a prior infection with TBEV or previously receiving a TBE vaccine will not be considered as an exclusionary criterion for immunization through this protocol. However, these subjects antibody titer data will not be included in the statistical analysis.
  • Any other conditions, which in the Investigator s judgment, might result in an increased risk to the subject, or would affect their participation in the study. Additionally the Investigator has the ability to exclude a subject if for any reason he/she feels the subject is not a good candidate for the study or will not be able to follow study procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter

    FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter is non-US licensed vaccine for tick-borne encephalitis virus. The FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter is available as 0.5mL in a pre-loaded vaccine syringe. All participants received active vaccine using a rapid immunization schedule, with vaccine administration on Days 0, 14, 161 and 245. Participants that tested seropositive for tick-borne encephalitis virus or subjects that developed positive viral neutralizer titers after the 3rd or 4th vaccine were given a booster of FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter vaccine at 3, 6 and 9 years after enrollment.

    Biological: FSME-IMMUN 0.5ml Baxter

Interventions

  • BiologicalFSME-IMMUN 0.5ml Baxter

    Vaccine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10

    Tick borne encephalitis antibody viral neutralization titer levels (\>1:10)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10

    The number of participants that develop anti-tick borne encephalitis antibody viral neutralization titer levels (\>1:10) following receipt of 3 doses of intramuscular FSME-IMMUN (vaccine series)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 5, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Started66
Completed34
Not completed32
Withdrew: Medical reasons not related to study3
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Retired from nih, met exclusion criteria1
Withdrew: Moved, met exclusion criteria10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5
Withdrew: Pi removal, no longer met eligibility12

Outcome measures

PrimaryTBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10

Tick borne encephalitis antibody viral neutralization titer levels (\>1:10)

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10
ParticipantsFSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:106
PrimaryTBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10

The number of participants that develop anti-tick borne encephalitis antibody viral neutralization titer levels (\>1:10) following receipt of 3 doses of intramuscular FSME-IMMUN (vaccine series)

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:10
ParticipantsFSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
TBEV Viral Neutralization Titer >1:1058

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from baseline (day 0), and on days 7, 14, 21, 35, 161, 168, 182, 245, 252, and 266, 3 years, and up to 6 years after vaccination. Note study was prematurely closed on July 5, 2016 as the manufacturer elected to stop providing the vaccine support for this study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter0/66 (0%)10/66 (15.2%)64/66 (97%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Urinary tract infection, relapsing feverInfections and infestations2/66
Pulmonary granulomaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/66
Bladder lacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/66
Ovarian cystReproductive system and breast disorders1/66
B-cell lymphomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/66
Stage IV lung cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/66
SchwannomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/66
Uterine fibroidNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/66
Breast carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/66
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventFSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Pain at the injection siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders64/66
HeadacheNervous system disorders25/66
FatigueGeneral disorders19/66
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders18/66
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/66
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/66
SwellingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/66
ItchingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/66
BruisingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/66
MalaiseGeneral disorders1/66

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years66
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Female27
Male39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino62
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian8
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White53
More than one race4
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
United States66
Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibody Neutralization Titer
Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibody Neutralization Titer(Participants)FSME-IMMUN 0.5mL Baxter
Count of participants6
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
  • Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML)
    Hamilton, Montana 59840, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Adner N, Leibl H, Enzersberger O, Kirgios M, Wahlberg T. Pharmacokinetics of human tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody levels after injection with human tick-borne encephalitis immunoglobulin, solvent/detergent treated, FSME-BULIN S/D in healthy volunteers. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33(11):843-7. doi: 10.1080/00365540110027358. PubMed 11760166 ↗
  • Baumhackl U, Franta C, Retzl J, Salomonowitz E, Eder G. A controlled trial of tick-borne encephalitis vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis. Vaccine. 2003 Apr 1;21 Suppl 1:S56-61. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00815-0. PubMed 12628815 ↗
  • Charrel RN, Attoui H, Butenko AM, Clegg JC, Deubel V, Frolova TV, Gould EA, Gritsun TS, Heinz FX, Labuda M, Lashkevich VA, Loktev V, Lundkvist A, Lvov DV, Mandl CW, Niedrig M, Papa A, Petrov VS, Plyusnin A, Randolph S, Suss J, Zlobin VI, de Lamballerie X. Tick-borne virus diseases of human interest in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Dec;10(12):1040-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01022.x. PubMed 15606630 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2009, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2018, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 11, 2009
First posted
Dec 14, 2009
Start
Sep 25, 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 23, 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 23, 2016
Results first posted
Jul 5, 2018
Last update
Jul 5, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01031537
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2009
Start date
Sep 25, 2009
Primary completion
Dec 23, 2016
Completion
Dec 23, 2016
Results posted
Jul 5, 2018
Last update
Jul 5, 2018

Study contacts

James M Schmitt, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion